Prognostic role of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with diabetes and acute decompensated heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported the prognostic value of natriuretic peptides, but their predictive value in patients with diabetes mellitus is unknown. The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that measurement of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in ambulatory patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and diabetes can predict the occurrence of cardiovascular events at 6-month follow-up. METHODS: We enrolled 145 consecutive patient with diabetes [age 72 +/- 9 years, hypertension (21%), ischaemic heart disease (52%), atrial fibrillation (22%), preserved left ventricular function (29%)] seen in the outpatient heart failure clinic after an acute episode of cardiac failure. RESULTS: The median (25th/75th interquartile range) BNP concentrations at discharge were 186 (75-348) pg/ml. At 6-month clinical follow-up 10/145 (7%) subjects had died and 31/145 (21%) had been readmitted because of cardiac decompensation. BNP values of 200 and 500 pg/ml were found to have the best compromise between sensitivity (88 and 46%, respectively) and specificity (71 and 89%, respectively) for predicting events at 6 months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified only two parameters as predictors of events: serum creatinine [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.3; P = 0.02], and BNP plasma level BNP cut-off values (HR = 3.8; P = 0.03 for 201-499 pg/ml and HR = 7.7; P = 0.001 for > or = 500 pg/ml). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that BNP and serum creatinine are strong predictors of clinical events in patients with diabetes and CHF. In these patients, clinical outcome might be stratified by plasma BNP levels.

The BNP assay does not identify mild left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic diabetic patients.

AIMS: We examined the usefulness of BNP for screening for left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction in a sample of type 2 diabetic patients, without structural heart disorder, who have never presented symptoms or signs of heart failure (HF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-six consecutive patients admitted to the Outpatient Diabetes Clinic were studied. Blood samples were analyzed using the Triage BNP fluorescence immunoassay (Biosite Diagnostics, La Jolla, CA, USA). Echocardiography examinations were performed, with no knowledge of the BNP value. A total of 39 patients out of 76 (51%) were diagnosed with LV diastolic dysfunction and 23 (30%) with LV hypertrophy. Of the patients with LV diastolic dysfunction, impaired relaxation and pseudonormal pattern accounted for 97 and 3% of the cases, respectively. BNP levels among subjects with LV diastolic dysfunction (26+/-22 pg/ml, n=39) were not significantly different from patients with normal LV function (24+/-23 pg/ml, n=37 pg/ml; Mann-Whitney U-test, Z=-0.4, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm alarmingly high prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction in asymptomatic individuals with diabetes. Identification of patients with preclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy should be a research and clinical priority. BNP levels cannot be used to detect mild LV diastolic dysfunction in this subset of patients, which requires Doppler echocardiography to be detected.

White-coat hypertension: a selection bias? Harvest Study Investigators. Hypertension and Ambulatory Recording Venetia Study.

BACKGROUND: Results of several studies have shown that subjects with white-coat hypertension (WCH) have more target-organ damage than do normotensive controls with similar ambulatory blood pressures. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether this is due to a selection bias. SETTING: Seventeen hypertension clinics in northeast Italy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Echocardiographic data in relation to WCH status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Mild hypertensive subjects from the HARVEST (n = 565) who underwent two ambulatory blood pressure monitorings 3 months apart and M-mode echocardiography, and 95 normotensive control subjects. RESULTS: From first ambulatory monitoring, 90 hypertensive subjects were classified as having WCH (mean daytime blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg). Their 24 h blood pressure was similar to that of the normotensive subjects, but their left ventricular mass index was greater. From second ambulatory monitoring, only 38 of the 90 subjects still had WCH, whereas 24 h blood pressure in the other 52 had risen beyond the limit of WCH. Left ventricular mass index (89.2 +/- 2.4 g/m2), wall thickness (18.1 +/- 0.3 mm), and relative wall thickness (0.359 +/- 0.006%) of the 38 subjects with WCH at both recordings were still greater than those of the normotensive subjects (82.4 +/- 1.5 g/m2, P = 0.02; 17.2 +/- 0.2 mm, P = 0.002; and 0.337 +/- 0.004%, P = 0.025) and similar to those of the 52 subjects who no longer had WCH (88.5 +/- 2.0 g/m2, 18.7 +/- 0.2 mm, and 0.375 +/- 0.005%, all NS). CONCLUSIONS: Owing to regression toward the mean, over 50% of the subjects with WCH could no longer be classified as such from repeated ambulatory monitoring, indicating that the current diagnosis of WCH is subject to selection bias. Cardiac remodeling was present also in the subjects confirmed to have WCH by repeated blood pressure recording, suggesting that the effect of WCH has an actual impact on target organs.

Target organ damage and ambulatory blood pressure in stage I hypertension. The Hypertension and Ambulatory Recording Venetia Study.

According to recent international guidelines the decision on whether to treat young subjects during the early phase of hypertension should be based not only on their office blood pressure but also on their ambulatory blood pressure and whether target organ damage has occurred. Few data on the prevalence of hypertensive complications in young subjects with mild hypertension are available. In the Hypertension and Ambulatory Recording Venetia Study (HARVEST), a multicenter trial conducted in northeast Italy, the percentage of young borderline-to-mild hypertensive subjects with echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy was 4.5% and the percentage with concentric remodeling was 4%. Clear differences in cardiac size and geometric adjustment to ambulatory systolic pressure between the two sexes were found. The impact of blood pressure on the walls of the left ventricle and on the left ventricular mass was remarkable in women but weak in men. The assessment of left ventricular systolic function confirmed that many young mild hypertensive subjects have an increased ejective performance. The left ventricular contractility evaluated by midwall measurement was, however, found to be depressed in 9.2% of the HARVEST participants. Their left ventricular diastolic function was similar to that of 50 normotensive controls. The prevalence of microalbuminuria [albumin excretion rate (AER) > 30 mg/24 h) was 6.1%, only slightly higher than that found by other authors among normotensive subjects and much lower than that observed among patients with more severe hypertension. For our stage I hypertensives, however, the AER was correlated to the 24 h blood pressure with high statistical significance, whereas we found no relationship between the AER and left ventricular mass index either for all of the subjects taken together or for the men and women considered separately. The results suggest that renal and cardiac involvement do not occur in parallel during the initial phase of hypertension.

Relation of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and short-term blood pressure variability to seasonal changes in environmental temperature in stage I hypertensive subjects. Results of the Harvest Trial.

We investigated the seasonal changes in blood pressure (BP) and in short-term BP variability determined using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). 1000 white subjects, who took part in the multicenter HARVEST study, underwent ABPM with the A&D TM-2420 or the Spacelabs 90207. Standard deviation of the mean daytime and nighttime BP was taken as an index of short-term BP variability (v). Maximal outdoor temperature (Tmax) during each ABPM was obtained from local Meteorological Centers. Subjects were divided according to season and to quartiles of Tmax. A subgroup of 46 persons who repeated ABPM in Winter and Summer was also studied. We observed evident seasonal differences in office and ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) with a peak during Winter. Diastolic BP (DBP) and heart rate did not vary throughout the four seasons. Office SBP (p < 0.01), 24-hour (p < 0.002), daytime SBP (p < 0.0001), both daytime SBPv (p < 0.0001), DBPv (p < 0.02), and nighttime SBPv (p < 0.05), DBPv (p < 0.02) as well as norepinephrine (p < 0.005) were significantly higher during Winter than Summer. Similar differences were observed in subjects grouped in quartiles of Tmax. In the subgroup daytime but not nighttime SBP was higher in the cold season. Average 24-hour SBP (p < 0.05), daytime SBP (p < 0.02), daytime SBPv (p < 0.001) and DBPv (p < 0.05) and norepinephrine (p < 0.0001) were significantly negatively correlated with Tmax in the whole population. BP is higher and subjected to wider oscillations during the cold season in patients with mild hypertension probably due to sympathetic activation. The assessment of a hypertensive subject may give different results according to the season.