Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiology ; 271(2): 345-55, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24495234

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess screening performance of a direct radiography (DR) photon-counting system versus statewide screening units with different digital technologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local ethics board approved retrospective study of prospectively acquired data from the North Rhine-Westphalian mammography screening program (2009-2010). Informed consent was waived. Examinations in 13 312 women with a DR photon-counting system and statewide digital screening examinations in 993 822 women were included (37 computed radiography mammography systems and 55 DR systems). Diagnostic performance was assessed with cancer detection rate, recall rate, and proportion of small invasive cancers and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Mean glandular dose was calculated for DR photon counting and for a conventional DR subgroup. Differences were tested with χ(2) and t tests (P < .05). RESULTS: The cancer detection rate for subsequent screenings was higher for DR photon counting than statewide rates (0.76% [67 of 8842] vs 0.59% [3108 of 527 194], P = .05) at a higher recall rate (5.4% [475 of 8842] vs 3.3% [17 656 of 527 194], P = .001). Detection of invasive cancers up to 10 mm for DR photon counting was high for initial (40% [14 of 35]) and subsequent (42% [19 of 45]) screenings but not significantly different from statewide rates (initial, 31.6% [942 of 2979], P = .50; subsequent, 32.5% [765 of 2353], P = .25). The DCIS subsequent screening rate was higher for DR photon counting than statewide screening (0.23% [20 of 8842] vs 0.12% [616 of 527 194], P = .01) and the conventional DR subgroup (0.23% [20 of 8842] vs 0.12% [65 of 52 813], P = .025). Mean glandular dose for DR photon counting was significantly lower than that for conventional DR (0.60 mGy ± 0.20 vs 1.67 mGy ± 0.47 [craniocaudal views], 0.64 mGy ± 0.23 vs 1.79 mGy ± 0.53 [mediolateral oblique views], both P = .0001). CONCLUSION: Digital mammography screening with dose-efficient photon counting enables desirable detection rates of small invasive cancers and DCIS. Higher detection rates compared with statewide performance occurred with subsequent screening but had higher recall rates.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography/instrumentation , Aged , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Photons , Radiation Dosage , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Retrospective Studies
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 188(2): 399-407, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17242248

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the detection and distinguishability of microcalcifications on mammograms obtained with a digital direct flat-panel detector versus an analog system using an anthropomorphic breast phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies were performed with a digital mammography system (Selenia) and an analog mammography system (Mammomat 3). Sixty-five transparent films were used as test specimens. Randomly distributed round and heterogeneous silicate particles (diameter, 100-1,400 microm) and an anthropomorphic scatter body were applied to the films. All radiographs were taken at identical settings and exposures. Six radiologists rated the films and monitor-displayed images independently of each other in random order on a standardized electronic questionnaire. RESULTS: Interpretations based on monitor reading produced superior results over those based on digital image reading and analog film reading. In 41.1% (95% CI, 38.7-43.5%) of all the monitor readings, 20.2% (18.2-22.2%) of all digital images, and 19.6% (17.6-21.6%) of all analog films, the number of detectable microcalcifications agreed with the gold standard method. The diameter of visible microcalcifications was interpreted correctly in 35.6% (33.2-38.0%) of monitor readings, 19.0% (17.1-21.0%) of digital images, and 21.0% (18.9-23.0%) of analog films; and microcalcification shape was interpreted correctly in 53.8% (51.4-56.3%) of monitor readings, 28.2% (26.0-30.4%) of digital images, and 28.3% (26.0-30.5%) of analog films. Microcalcification number and size were underestimated more frequently than overestimated. Regardless of display medium, accuracy increased proportionately with the diameter of the simulated microcalcifications for all evaluation variables. CONCLUSION: Digital flat-panel mammography is superior to the analog screen-film method for the detection and morphologic characterization of microcalcifications larger than 200 microm in diameter when the display medium is a monitor.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Data Display , Mammography/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , X-Ray Intensifying Screens , Female , Humans , Mammography/instrumentation , Observer Variation , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiographic Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 20(2): 321-6, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15269960

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of single shot echo planar imaging (SSEPI) with three-dimensional-multishot echo-planar imaging (EPI) based on principles-of-echo-shifting-with-a-train-of-observations (PRESTO) in combination with a standard quadrature head coil and, as an alternative, a multiple receiver coil in intraoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six healthy subjects underwent fMRI with visual stimulation using a SSEPI and a PRESTO-sequence with both coil systems. Statistical evaluation was done with a scanner-based post-processing software and SPM 99. The number of activated voxels in the visual cortex, the percent signal change between rest and activation, and finally the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) during time course were measured and compared for both coil systems and both sequences, used in four different combinations. RESULTS: Blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal changes were the lowest with PRESTO and standard head coil and the highest for SSEPI and phased array coil. For the latter combination, a significantly higher signal change and larger activation size was observed together with a better SNR. SSEPI yielded similar performance using both coils. CONCLUSION: SSEPI was superior due to its better SNR and a higher BOLD signal change in the defined settings, irrespective of the coil used. In a stereotactical setup the phased array coil can be used to generate fMRI data without loss of image quality.


Subject(s)
Brain/anatomy & histology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Oxygen/blood , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Adult , Brain/physiology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male
4.
Eur Radiol ; 14(4): 686-90, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14513267

ABSTRACT

This article deals with technical aspects of intraoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for monitoring the effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in a patient with Parkinson's disease. Under motor activation, therapeutic high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus was accompanied by an activation decrease in the contralateral primary sensorimotor cortex and the ipsilateral cerebellum. Furthermore, an activation increase in the contralateral basal ganglia and insula region were detected. These findings demonstrate that fMRI constitutes a promising clinical application for investigating brain activity changes induced by DBS.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiopathology , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Parkinson Disease/surgery , Aged , Brain/pathology , Electrodes, Implanted , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Stereotaxic Techniques , Subthalamic Nucleus/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL