Fourth-line rescue therapy with rifabutin in patients with three Helicobacter pylori eradication failures.

BACKGROUND: In some cases, Helicobacter pylori infection persists even after three eradication treatments. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of an empirical fourth-line rescue regimen with rifabutin in patients with three eradication failures. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective study. PATIENTS: In whom the following three treatments had consecutively failed: first (PPI + clarithromycin + amoxicillin); second (PPI + bismuth + tetracycline + metronidazole); third (PPI + amoxicillin + levofloxacin). INTERVENTION: A fourth regimen with rifabutin (150 mg b.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.d.) and a PPI (standard dose b.d.) was prescribed for 10 days. OUTCOME: Eradication was confirmed by (13) C-urea breath test 4-8 weeks after therapy. Compliance and tolerance: Compliance was determined through questioning and recovery of empty medication envelopes. Adverse effects were evaluated using a questionnaire. RESULTS: One-hundred patients (mean age 50 years, 39% men, 31% peptic ulcer/69% functional dyspepsia) were included. Eight patients did not take the medication correctly (in six cases due to adverse effects). Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 52% (95% CI = 41-63%) and 50% (40-60%). Adverse effects were reported in 30 (30%) patients: nausea/vomiting (13 patients), asthenia/anorexia (8), abdominal pain (7), diarrhoea (5), fever (4), metallic taste (4), myalgia (4), hypertransaminasemia (2), leucopenia (<1,500 neutrophils) (2), thrombopenia (<150,000 platelets) (2), headache (1) and aphthous stomatitis (1). Myelotoxicity resolved spontaneously in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Even after three previous H. pylori eradication failures, an empirical fourth-line rescue treatment with rifabutin may be effective in approximately 50% of the cases. Therefore, rifabutin-based rescue therapy constitutes a valid strategy after multiple previous eradication failures with key antibiotics, such as clarithromycin, metronidazole, tetracycline and levofloxacin.

Helicobacter pylori first-line treatment and rescue option containing levofloxacin in patients allergic to penicillin.

AIM: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of Helicobacter pylori first-line treatment (omeprazole-clarithromycin-metronidazole) and second-line rescue option (omeprazole-clarithromycin-levofloxacin) in patients allergic to penicillin. PATIENTS: Prospective multicenter study including consecutive patients allergic to penicillin. Therapy regimens: First-line treatment (50 patients): Omeprazole (20mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) and metronidazole (500 mg b.i.d.) for 7 days. Second-line treatment (15 therapy failures out of the aforementioned 50 patients): Omeprazole (20mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) and levofloxacin (500 mg b.i.d.) for 10 days. OUTCOME VARIABLE: Negative (13)C-urea breath test 8 weeks after completion of treatment. RESULTS: (1) First-line treatment (omeprazole-clarithromycin-metronidazole): Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were 55% (27/49; 95%CI=40-70%) and 54% (27/50; 95%CI=39-69%). Compliance with treatment and follow-up was complete in 98% of cases (one patient was not compliant due to nausea). Adverse events were reported in 5 patients (10%): 4 nausea, 1 diarrhoea. (2) Second-line treatment (omeprazole-clarithromycin-levofloxacin): Per-protocol and intention-to-treat eradication rates were both 73% (11/15; 95%CI=45-92%). Compliance with treatment and follow-up was complete in all the cases. Adverse events were reported in 4 patients (20%), which did not prevent the completion of treatment: Mild nausea (2 patients), and vomiting and myalgias/arthralgias (1 patient). CONCLUSION: In H. pylori infected patients allergic to penicillin, the generally recommended first-line treatment with omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole has low efficacy for curing the infection. On the other hand, a levofloxacin-containing regimen (together with omeprazole and clarithromycin) represents an encouraging second-line alternative in the presence of penicillin allergy.

Empirical rescue therapy after Helicobacter pylori treatment failure: a 10-year single-centre study of 500 patients.

BACKGROUND: Several 'rescue' therapies have been recommended to eradicate Helicobacter pylori, but they still fail in >20% of the cases, and these patients constitute a therapeutic dilemma. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of different 'rescue' therapies empirically prescribed during 10 years to 500 patients in whom at least one eradication regimen had failed to cure H. pylori infection. DESIGN: Prospective single-centre study. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients in whom at least one eradication regimen had failed. INTERVENTION: Rescue regimens included: (i) quadruple therapy with omeprazole-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole; (ii) ranitidine bismuth citrate-tetracycline-metronidazole; (iii) omeprazole-amoxicillin-levofloxacin; and (iv) omeprazole-amoxicillin-rifabutin. Antibiotic susceptibility was unknown (rescue regimens were chosen empirically). OUTCOME: Eradication was defined as a negative (13)C-urea breath test 4-8 weeks after completing therapy. RESULTS: Five hundred patients were included (76% functional dyspepsia, 24% peptic ulcer). Compliance rates with first-, second- and third-line regimens were 92%, 92%, and 95%, respectively. Adverse effects were reported by 30%, 37%, and 55% of the patients receiving second-, third-, and fourth-line regimens. Overall, H. pylori cure rates with the second-, third-, and fourth-line rescue regimens were 70%, 74%, and 76%, respectively. Cumulative H. pylori eradication rate with four successive treatments was 99.5%. CONCLUSION: It is possible to construct an overall treatment strategy to maximize H. pylori eradication, on the basis of administration of four consecutive empirical regimens; thus, performing bacterial culture even after a second or third eradication failure may not be necessary.

Third-line rescue therapy with levofloxacin is more effective than rifabutin rescue regimen after two Helicobacter pylori treatment failures.

BACKGROUND: In patients with a first eradication failure, a second (rescue) therapy still fails in > 20% of cases. AIM: To compare rifabutin and levofloxacin rescue regimens in patients with two consecutive Helicobacter pylori eradication failures. METHODS: Patients, in whom first treatment with omeprazole-clarithromycin-amoxicillin and a second trial with omeprazole-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole (or ranitidine bismuth citrate with these antibiotics) had failed, received 10 days of treatment with either rifabutin (150 mg b.d.) or levofloxacin (500 mg b.d.), plus amoxicillin (1 g b.d.) and omeprazole (20 mg b.d.). Cure rates were evaluated by the (13)C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Twenty patients received rifabutin, and 20 levofloxacin. All the patients returned for follow-up. Compliance in the rifabutin group was 100%. Four patients in the levofloxacin group did not take the medication correctly (in two cases due to adverse effects: myalgia and rash). Side effects in the rifabutin and levofloxacin groups were reported in 60% and 50% of the cases, respectively. Five patients (25%) treated with rifabutin presented with leucopenia, and six (30%) treated with levofloxacin presented with myalgias. Per-protocol cure rates were 45% (95% confidence interval, 26-66%) in the rifabutin group, and 81% (57-93%) in the levofloxacin group (P < 0.05). Intention-to-treat cure rates were, 45% (26-66%) and 85% (64-95%), respectively (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: After two previous H. pylori eradication failures, a 10-day triple levofloxacin-based rescue regimen is more effective than the same regimen with rifabutin.

Helicobacter pylori first-line treatment and rescue options in patients allergic to penicillin.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication is a challenge in patients allergic to penicillin, especially those who have failed a first-eradication trial. AIM: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of H. pylori first-line treatment and rescue options in patients allergic to penicillin. METHODS: Prospective single centre study including 40 consecutive treatments administered to patients allergic to penicillin. Therapy regimens: First-line (12 patients) omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole for 7 days; second-line (17 patients) ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline and metronidazole for 7 days; third-line (nine patients) rifabutin, clarithromycin and omeprazole for 10 days; and fourth-line (two patients) levofloxacin, clarithromycin and omeprazole for 10 days. OUTCOME VARIABLE: a negative (13)C-urea breath test 8 weeks after completion of treatment. RESULTS: Per-protocol/intention-to-treat eradication rates were: first-line (64/58%); second-line (ranitidine bismuth citrate; 53/47%); third-line (rifabutin; 17/11%) and fourth-line regimen (levofloxacin; 100/100%). Compliance with treatment was generally good, except with the rifabutin-based regimen, which presented adverse effects in 89% of the patients, including four cases of myelotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori-infected patients who are allergic to penicillin may be treated with a first-line treatment combining a proton-pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and metronidazole. Rescue options may include a regimen with ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline and metronidazole. A levofloxacin-based rescue regimen (with proton-pump inhibitor and clarithromycin) may also represent an alternative, even when two or more consecutive eradication treatments have previously failed. However, rifabutin + clarithromycin + proton-pump inhibitor regimen is ineffective and poorly tolerated.

Empirical Helicobacter pylori "rescue" therapy after failure of two eradication treatments.

AIM: Even with the current most effective Helicobacter pylori treatment regimens, approximately 20% of patients do not eradicate the infection. Several "rescue" therapies have been recommended, but they still fail to eradicate H. pylori in approximately 20-30% of the cases. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of different rescue therapies prescribed to patients in whom two consecutive H. pylori eradication regimens had failed. METHODS: Design. Prospective single-centre study. Patients. Consecutive patients in whom two eradication regimens had failed to eradicate H. pylori. Intervention. Third eradication regimens included: (1) omeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin for 7 days; (2) quadruple therapy with omeprazole-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole for 7 days; (3) omeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin-bismuth for 14 days; and (4) omeprazole-amoxicillin-rifabutin for 14 days. H. pylori antibiotic susceptibility was unknown and, therefore, rescue regimens were chosen empirically. In no case, was the same regimen repeated. Outcome. H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative in 13C-urea breath test 8 weeks after completing the therapy. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included (mean age 45 years, 44% males, 82% with peptic ulcer and 18% with functional dyspepsia). No patient was lost from follow-up. Adverse effects were described in 21% of the patients. One patient receiving omeprazole, amoxicillin and rifabutin was removed from medication due to adverse effects (vomiting). Overall, mean H. pylori eradication with third therapy after failure of two eradication treatments was 34/48 (71%; 95% confidence interval 57-82%) by intention-to-treat and 34/47 (72%; 95% confidence interval 58-83%) by per-protocol. CONCLUSION: It seems that performing culture even after a second eradication failure may not be necessary, as it is possible to construct an overall strategy to maximise H. pylori eradication, based on the different possibilities of empirical treatment.

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy is more effective in peptic ulcer than in non-ulcer dyspepsia.

AIM: To evaluate whether eradication therapy is more effective in peptic ulcer disease (PUD) than in non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD). METHODS: We retrospectively studied 481 patients with NUD (183 patients) or PUD (298 patients) infected with Helicobacter pylori included in several prospective clinical trials. Three eradication regimens were given: (1) proton pump inhibitor (PPI) plus clarithromycin, plus either amoxycillin or metronidazole for 7 days (297 patients); (2) ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus clarithromycin plus amoxycillin for 7 days (79 patients); and (3) RBC plus clarithromycin plus amoxycillin plus metronidazole for 5 days (105 patients). H. pylori eradication was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test 4 weeks after completing treatment. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication rates were 82% (95% CI 78-87%) with PPI plus two antibiotics for 7 days, 85% (95% CI 75-91%) with RBC plus two antibiotics for 7 days, and 91% (95% CI 86-97%) with RBC plus three antibiotics for 5 days (P < 0.05 compared with the first regimen). Overall, the H. pylori eradication rate in patients with NUD was 78% (95% CI 71-84%), while in patients with PUD it was 89% (95% CI 86-93%) (P < 0.001). Both the combination of PPI plus two antibiotics for 7 days and the combination of RBC plus three antibiotics for 5 days were more effective in PUD than in NUD patients. However, RBC plus clarithromycin plus amoxycillin for 7 days was equally effective in both diseases. RBC plus two antibiotics for 7 days achieved better results than the same therapy with PPI only in NUD patients (84% v. 59%, P < 0.01), but both regimens were similar when prescribed in PUD patients (86% v. 88%). In the multivariate analysis, the type of therapy, the diagnosis (NUD v. PUD), and the product variable of therapy (with RBC plus 2 antibiotics for 7 days) and diagnosis (interaction variable) were the only variables that influenced H. pylori eradication. The odds ratio (OR) for the effect of RBC versus PPI plus two antibiotics for 7 days in patients with NUD was 4 (95% CI 1.7-9.7; P < 0.01), whereas in patients with PUD no statistical significance was achieved (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.2-3.9). CONCLUSION: Overall, H. pylori eradication therapy is more effective in PUD than in NUD patients. This advantage of eradication therapies in PUD patients seems to be observed with 7-day PPI-based triple regimens, and with 5-day RBC-based quadruple therapy, while the 7-day RBC-based triple regimen seems to be equally effective in both diseases.

High efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole twice daily for only five days in Helicobacter pylori Eradication.

AIM: The combination of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or ranitidine-bismuth-citrate (Rbc) and two antibiotics for 7-10 days are, at present, the preferred treatments in Helicobacter pylori eradication. However, therapies for fewer than 7 days have been scarcely evaluated and it is unknown whether the length of treatment can be shortened, without a lost of efficacy, if three instead of two antibiotics are used. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of Rbc plus three antibiotics for only 5 days in H. pylori eradication. METHODS: We prospectively studied 80 patients (34% duodenal ulcer, 66% functional dyspepsia) infected by H. pylori. At endoscopy, biopsies were obtained for histological study and rapid urease test, and a 13C-urea breath test was carried out. Urea breath test was repeated 4 weeks after completing eradication treatment with Rbc [400 mg twice a day (bid)], amoxicillin (1 g bid), clarithromycin (500 mg bid) and metronidazole (500 mg bid). All drugs were administered together after breakfast and dinner for 5 days only, and no treatment was administered thereafter. Compliance with therapy was determined from the interrogatory and the recovery of empty envelopes of medications. RESULTS: In 79 out of the 80 patients, H. pylori eradication success or failure was assessed after therapy (one patient was lost from follow-up). All but one of these 79 patients took all the medications (one patient stopped treatment on the day 3 due to nausea/vomiting). Per protocol eradication was achieved in 72/78 (92%; 95% CI, 84-96%) and in 72/80 (90%; 81-95%) by intention-to-treat. Therapy was more effective in patients with duodenal ulcer than in those with functional dyspepsia [100% (87-100%) vs. 85% (73-92%) by intention-to-treat; p <.05]. Adverse effects were described in ten patients (12%), and included the perception of a metallic taste (eight patients), nausea/vomiting (two patients, one of them abandoned the treatment due to this), and diarrhea (two patients). CONCLUSION: The combination of Rbc, amoxicillin, clarithromycin and metronidazole for only 5 days represents a promising therapy for H. pylori infection, due to its high efficacy, simple posology, low cost and excellent tolerance.

One-week therapy with pantoprazole versus ranitidine bismuth citrate plus two antibiotics for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

AIM: A combination of omeprazole plus amoxycillin (Amo) and clarithromycin (CIa) for 7 days has been studied extensively. However, the role of other proton pump inhibitors, such as pantoprazole (Pan), in this therapy is not well known. On the other hand, ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) also seems to be effective when combined with Amo and CIa. Our aim was to evaluate and to compare these two novel short-term triple therapies (Pan+Amo+Cla and RBC+Amo+Cla) for treatment of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: In a randomized clinical trial 150 consecutive patients (38 with duodenal ulcer, 112 with non-ulcer dyspepsia) infected by H. pylori were studied prospectively. Exclusion criteria were: previous H. pylori eradication therapy, gastroerosive drug use, gastric surgery, and associated diseases. One of two regimens was given for 7 days: Pan (40 mg b.i.d.), Amo (1 g b.i.d.), Cla (500 mg b.i.d.) (group Pan+Amo+Cla, n = 75); or RBC (400 mg b.i.d.), Amo (1 g b.i.d.), Cla (500 mg b.i.d.) (group RBC+Amo+Cla, n = 75). All drugs were administered together after meals. Compliance was evaluated by return tablet count. Data were analysed by univariate (chi2) and multivariate (multiple logistic regression) analysis. Eradication was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test 1 month after completing therapy. RESULTS: The distribution of studied variables (age, gender, smoking, duodenal ulcer/non-ulcer dyspepsia) was similar in both therapy groups. Per-protocol eradication was achieved in 48/71 (68%) in group Pan+Amo+Cla, and in 61/70 (87%) in group RBC+Amo+Cla (P= 0.01). Intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication was achieved in, respectively, 48/ 75 (64%) and in 61/75 (81%) (P= 0.03). The RBC+ Amo+Cla regimen was more effective than Pan+Amo+Cla in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients (ITT, 84% vs 58%; P = 0.005), but statistically significant differences were not demonstrated in duodenal ulcer patients (72% vs 80%). In the multivariate analysis the odds ratio for the effect of the type of therapy on H. pylori eradication in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia was 3.8 (95% Cl, 1.6-9.3; P = 0.003). No relevant adverse effects were reported with any regimen. CONCLUSION: A RBC+Amo+Cla regimen for only 1 week is a promising therapy for H. pylori infection, due to its high efficacy, simple posology, and excellent tolerability. Combination of Pan with Amo and Cla, although effective in duodenal ulcer patients, but in non-ulcer dyspepsia has not achieved the favourable results previously reported with other proton pump inhibitors.

Seven-day 'rescue' therapy after Helicobacter pylori treatment failure: omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole vs. ranitidine bismuth citrate, tetracycline and metronidazole.

BACKGROUND: Eradication therapy with omeprazole (O), amoxycillin (A) and clarithromycin (C) is used extensively, although it often fails. A 'rescue' therapy with a quadruple combination of O, bismuth (B), tetracycline (T) and metronidazole (M) has been recommended. AIM: : To assess ranitidine bismuth citrate (Rbc) instead of O and B for treatment failure. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients (13 duodenal ulcer, 47 non-ulcer dyspepsia) in whom a previous eradication trial with O, A and C had failed were randomized to receive one of two regimens for 7 days: O (20 mg b.d.), B (120 mg q. d.s.), T (500 mg q.d.s.) and M (250 mg q.d.s.) (group OBTM, n=30); or Rbc (400 mg b.d.), T (500 mg q.d.s.) and M (250 mg q.d.s.) (group RbcTM, n=30). Eradication was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test 1 month after completing therapy. RESULTS: Mean age +/- s.d. was 45 +/- 12 years, 47% were males. Distribution of studied variables (age, sex, smoking, duodenal ulcer/non-ulcer dyspepsia) was similar in both therapeutic groups. Per protocol eradication was achieved in 17 out of 29 patients (59%) in group OBTM and in 25 out of 29 patients (86%) in group RbcTM (P < 0.05). Intention-to-treat eradication was achieved, respectively, in 17 out of 30 (57%) and in 25 out of 30 (83%) (P < 0.05). In the multivariate analysis the variables which influenced on H. pylori eradication were the type of therapy (odds ratio, OR=3.9; 95%CI: 1.02-15; P < 0.05) and diagnosis (duodenal ulcer/non-ulcer dyspepsia) (OR=0.1; CI: 0.02-0.4). Adverse effects were infrequent and mild with both regimens. CONCLUSION: Therapy with RbcTM is a promising option after H. pylori eradication failure with OCA, achieving a higher efficacy than quadruple therapy with OBTM.