Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Proc Biol Sci ; 281(1795)2014 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25274359

ABSTRACT

The common backswimmer, Notonecta glauca, uses vision by day and night for functions such as underwater prey animal capture and flight in search of new habitats. Although previous studies have identified some of the physiological mechanisms facilitating such flexibility in the animal's vision, neither the biophysics of Notonecta photoreceptors nor possible cellular adaptations are known. Here, we studied Notonecta photoreceptors using patch-clamp and intracellular recording methods. Photoreceptor size (approximated by capacitance) was positively correlated with absolute sensitivity and acceptance angles. Information rate measurements indicated that large and more sensitive photoreceptors performed better than small ones. Our results suggest that backswimmers are adapted for vision in both dim and well-illuminated environments by having open-rhabdom eyes with large intrinsic variation in absolute sensitivity among photoreceptors, exceeding those found in purely diurnal or nocturnal species. Both electrophysiology and microscopic analysis of retinal structure suggest two retinal subsystems: the largest peripheral photoreceptors provide vision in dim light and the smaller peripheral and central photoreceptors function primarily in sunlight, with light-dependent pigment screening further contributing to adaptation in this system by dynamically recruiting photoreceptors with varying sensitivity into the operational pool.


Subject(s)
Heteroptera/physiology , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/physiology , Vision, Ocular , Adaptation, Physiological , Animals , Light
2.
Vision Res ; 48(8): 989-93, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18316106

ABSTRACT

Accommodative pupil constrictions were compared between 27 children (9-10 years) and 13 young adults (22-26 years) in order to clarify the issue whether or not children have such a response. Accommodative stimuli of 4 and 7 diopters were used to elicit the response and experiments were performed at 5 and 100 lux in order to investigate whether the level of ambient light has different effects on developing and mature visual systems. The accommodative pupil response is present in children, but weaker than in adults. Different levels of ambient light lead to only minor additional differences between children and adults. The weaker accommodative pupil response of children may be a consequence of their superior accommodative ranges, which make it unnecessary to close the pupil to increase depth of field. Adults, in contrast, may do better with smaller pupils that reduce accommodative demand because of increased depth of field. A mature human visual system may furthermore be better tuned to handle dimmer and thus noisier images in the photopic range than the developing visual system of a child.


Subject(s)
Accommodation, Ocular/physiology , Lighting , Reflex, Pupillary/physiology , Adult , Aging/physiology , Child , Humans , Photic Stimulation/methods , Pupil/physiology , Refraction, Ocular/physiology
3.
Vision Res ; 46(20): 3443-50, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16806388

ABSTRACT

Children in a tribe of sea-gypsies from South-East Asia have been found to have superior underwater vision compared to European children. In this study, we show that the improved underwater vision of these Moken children is not due to better contrast sensitivity in general. We also show that European children can achieve the same underwater acuity as the Moken children. After 1 month of underwater training (11 sessions) followed by 4 months with no underwater activities, European children showed improved underwater vision and distinct bursts of pupil constriction. When tested 8 months after the last training session in an outdoor pool in bright sunlight-comparable to light environments in South-East Asia-the children had attained the same underwater acuity as the sea-gypsy children. The achieved performance can be explained by the combined effect of pupil constriction and strong accommodation.


Subject(s)
Diving/physiology , Learning/physiology , Pupil/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Accommodation, Ocular/physiology , Adolescent , Child , Contrast Sensitivity/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Roma , Thailand , Water
4.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis ; 21(11): 2061-4, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15535363

ABSTRACT

Defocus changes the visual contrast sensitivity function, thereby creating a complex curve with local dips and peaks. Since underwater vision in humans is severely defocused, we used optical theory and the phenomenon of spurious resolution to predict how well humans can see in this environment. The values obtained correspond well with experimental measurements of underwater human acuity from earlier studies and even point to an opportunity for humans with exceptional contrast sensitivity to see better underwater than the children in those studies. The same theory could be useful when discussing the visual acuity of amphibious animals, as they may use pupil constriction as a means of improving underwater vision.


Subject(s)
Immersion , Models, Biological , Optics and Photonics , Vision, Ocular , Water , Humans
5.
Curr Biol ; 14(15): 1309-18, 2004 Aug 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15296747

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Some bees and wasps have evolved nocturnal behavior, presumably to exploit night-flowering plants or avoid predators. Like their day-active relatives, they have apposition compound eyes, a design usually found in diurnal insects. The insensitive optics of apposition eyes are not well suited for nocturnal vision. How well then do nocturnal bees and wasps see? What optical and neural adaptations have they evolved for nocturnal vision? RESULTS: We studied female tropical nocturnal sweat bees (Megalopta genalis) and discovered that they are able to learn landmarks around their nest entrance prior to nocturnal foraging trips and to use them to locate the nest upon return. The morphology and optics of the eye, and the physiological properties of the photoreceptors, have evolved to give Megalopta's eyes almost 30 times greater sensitivity to light than the eyes of diurnal worker honeybees, but this alone does not explain their nocturnal visual behavior. This implies that sensitivity is improved by a strategy of photon summation in time and in space, the latter of which requires the presence of specialized cells that laterally connect ommatidia into groups. First-order interneurons, with significantly wider lateral branching than those found in diurnal bees, have been identified in the first optic ganglion (the lamina ganglionaris) of Megalopta's optic lobe. We believe that these cells have the potential to mediate spatial summation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the scarcity of photons, Megalopta is able to visually orient to landmarks at night in a dark forest understory, an ability permitted by unusually sensitive apposition eyes and neural photon summation.


Subject(s)
Bees/physiology , Darkness , Orientation/physiology , Photons , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/physiology , Vision, Ocular/physiology , Animals , Bees/anatomy & histology , Contrast Sensitivity , Dark Adaptation/physiology , Electrophysiology , Eye/ultrastructure , Feeding Behavior/physiology , Female , Homing Behavior/physiology , Light , Microscopy, Electron , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/anatomy & histology , Optic Lobe, Nonmammalian/physiology , Optics and Photonics , Panama , Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate/anatomy & histology
6.
Vision Res ; 44(18): 2129-34, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15183679

ABSTRACT

The camera eyes of fishes and cephalopods have come forth by convergent evolution. In a variety of vertebrates capable of color vision, longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) of the optical system is corrected for by the exactly tuned longitudinal spherical aberration (LSA) of the crystalline lens. The LSA leads to multiple focal lengths, such that several wavelengths can be focused on the retina. We investigated whether that is also the case in the firefly squid (Watasenia scintillans), a cephalopod species that is likely to have color vision. It was found that the lens of W. scintillans is virtually free of LSA and uncorrected for LCA. However, the eye does not suffer from LCA because of a banked retina. Photoreceptors sensitive to short and long wavelengths are located at appropriate distances from the lens, such that they receive well-focused images. Such a design is an excellent solution for the firefly squid because a large area of the retina is monochromatically organized and it allows for double use of the surface area in the dichromatically organized part of the retina. However, it is not a universal solution since compensation for LCA by a banked retina requires that eye size and/or spectral separation between photopigments is small.


Subject(s)
Color Perception/physiology , Decapodiformes/physiology , Lens, Crystalline/physiology , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Animals , Biological Evolution , Biometry , Decapodiformes/anatomy & histology , Lens, Crystalline/anatomy & histology , Optics and Photonics , Retina/physiology
7.
Curr Biol ; 13(10): 833-6, 2003 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12747831

ABSTRACT

Humans are poorly adapted for underwater vision. In air, the curved corneal surface accounts for two-thirds of the eye's refractive power, and this is lost when air is replaced by water. Despite this, some tribes of sea gypsies in Southeast Asia live off the sea, and the children collect food from the sea floor without the use of visual aids. This is a remarkable feat when one considers that the human eye is not focused underwater and small objects should remain unresolved. We have measured the visual acuity of children in a sea gypsy population, the Moken, and found that the children see much better underwater than one might expect. Their underwater acuity (6.06 cycles/degree) is more than twice as good as that of European children (2.95 cycles/degree). Our investigations show that the Moken children achieve their superior underwater vision by maximally constricting the pupil (1.96 mm compared to 2.50 mm in European children) and by accommodating to the known limit of human performance (15-16 D). This extreme reaction-which is routine in Moken children-is completely absent in European children. Because they are completely dependent on the sea, the Moken are very likely to derive great benefit from this strategy.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Adolescent , Child , Corneal Topography , Europe , Female , Humans , Infrared Rays , Life Style , Male , Pupil/physiology , Refraction, Ocular/physiology , Thailand , Video Recording/methods , Water
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...