Rapid, simple multi-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis: a reliable tool for Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak screening.

BACKGROUND: Klebsiella pneumoniae causing nosocomial infections is increasingly multi-drug-resistant. Rapid and efficient typing tools are required for monitoring. AIM: To assess a simple, rapid (<5 h) multiplex polymerase chain reaction method based on multi-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) as a screening tool to determine whether or not K. pneumoniae strains are related. METHODS: The global discriminatory power of the method was assessed on 72 unrelated K. pneumoniae isolates, including community carriage isolates, highly virulent strains causing liver abscess, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- and carbapenemase-producing strains. Suspected related strains from a suspected outbreak and a relapsed meningitis case were also studied. MLVA results were compared with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analysis and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST). FINDINGS: MLVA and MLST had similar discriminatory power, each distinguishing 54 profiles among the 72 unrelated isolates (Hunter-Gaston index 0.989). Each strain belonging to one sequence type (ST) or ST complex had its own MLVA type, with few exceptions. Two strains of ST268 and ST1119 shared the same MLVA profile, and two unrelated strains of ST307, ST86, ST45 and ST37 exhibited two different MLVA types each. Moreover, investigation of seven grouped cases of K. pneumoniae neonatal sepsis pointed to strong suspicion of a common source for five isolates, while two isolates with a different MLVA profile were excluded from this cluster. CONCLUSION: The MLVA approach is a useful, rapid and reliable tool for epidemiological investigation requiring only basic molecular biology equipment, and permits identification of sporadic isolates that are not part of an outbreak. However, analysis of strains sharing the same MLVA type by a highly discriminatory technique, such as WGS, remains necessary.

Epidemiological investigation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates including multidrug-resistant serogroup O12 isolates, by use of a rapid and simplified multiple-locus variable-number of tandem repeats analysis and whole genome sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Clustered cases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in immunocompromised patients' wards require rapid characterization of a potential epidemic to guide investigations and identify the potential source of contamination. AIM: To design and evaluate a rapid and simple typing method for P. aeruginosa in comparison to whole genome sequencing (WGS). METHODS: A simplified polymerase chain reaction based on multiple-locus variable-number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVA) was designed and used to investigate cases of P. aeruginosa infection and colonization in a paediatric haematology department. The method was compared to WGS by using the Illumina method. FINDINGS: On the 17 isolates recovered from 15 children (eight from blood cultures, three from urinary tract infections, one from sputum and five stool isolates), MLVA distinguished 10 different profiles, and seven isolates from six children shared the same profile. Analysis by WGS revealed that these seven isolates belonged to sequence type ST111 and serotype O12, allowing at least three different genotypes to be distinguished among them. Five environmental strains had three MLVA profiles; one was shared with a clinical isolate but WGS excluded any relationship. CONCLUSION: The simplified and inexpensive MLVA method enabled the exclusion, in less than 5 h, of most of the unrelated isolates and thus to focus investigations on a small number of cases, whereas WGS, taking several days of work, drew definitive conclusions concerning the outbreak and the genetic relationships of the ST111 isolates circulating in the department. We conclude that sequential use of both methods is the optimal strategy to investigate clustered cases of P. aeruginosa infections.

Interlaboratory evaluation of Mucorales PCR assays for testing serum specimens: A study by the fungal PCR Initiative and the Modimucor study group.

Interlaboratory evaluations of Mucorales qPCR assays were developed to assess the reproducibility and performance of methods currently used. The participants comprised 12 laboratories from French university hospitals (nine of them participating in the Modimucor study) and 11 laboratories participating in the Fungal PCR Initiative. For panel 1, three sera were each spiked with DNA from three different species (Rhizomucor pusillus, Lichtheimia corymbifera, Rhizopus oryzae). For panel 2, six sera with three concentrations of R. pusillus and L. corymbifera (1, 10, and 100 genomes/ml) were prepared. Each panel included a blind negative-control serum. A form was distributed with each panel to collect results and required technical information, including DNA extraction method, sample volume used, DNA elution volume, qPCR method, qPCR template input volume, qPCR total reaction volume, qPCR platform, and qPCR reagents used. For panel 1, assessing 18 different protocols, qualitative results (positive or negative) were correct in 97% of cases (70/72). A very low interlaboratory variability in Cq values (SD = 1.89 cycles) were observed. For panel 2 assessing 26 different protocols, the detection rates were high (77-100%) for 5/6 of spiked serum. There was a significant association between the qPCR platform and performance. However, certain technical steps and optimal combinations of factors may also impact performance. The good reproducibility and performance demonstrated in this study support the use of Mucorales qPCR as part of the diagnostic strategy for mucormycosis.

Molecular identification of Mucorales in human tissues: contribution of PCR electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry.

Molecular methods are crucial for mucormycosis diagnosis because cultures are frequently negative, even if microscopy suggests the presence of hyphae in tissues. We assessed PCR/electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry (PCR/ESI-MS) for Mucorales identification in 19 unfixed tissue samples from 13 patients with proven or probable mucormycosis and compared the results with culture, quantitative real-time PCR, 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer region (ITS PCR) and 18S PCR sequencing. Concordance with culture identification to both genus and species levels was higher for PCR/ESI-MS than for the other techniques. Thus, PCR/ESI-MS is suitable for Mucorales identification, within 6 hours, for tissue samples for which microscopy results suggest the presence of hyphae.