Assessment of the Smoke Free Families Tobacco Screening, Counseling, and Referral Program in Pediatric Primary Care Practices.

OBJECTIVE: The Smoke Free Families (SFF) program trained pediatric providers to use an SFF tool during well-child visits (WCVs) of infants ≤12 months to "Ask" caregivers about tobacco use, "Advise" smokers to quit, and "Refer" smokers to cessation services (AAR). The primary objectives were to assess the prevalence and changes in caregiver tobacco use after being screened and counseled by providers using the SFF tool. A secondary objective was to examine providers' AAR behavior facilitated by using the SFF tool. METHODS: Pediatric practices participated in 1 of 3 6-9-month SFF program waves. Over the 3 waves, all initial SFF tools completed on caregivers during their infant's WCV were evaluated for the caregiver and household tobacco use and providers' AAR rates. An infant's first and next WCV was matched to determine changes in caregiver tobacco product use. RESULTS: In total, the SFF tool was completed at 19,976 WCVs; 2081 (18.8%) infants were exposed to tobacco smoke. A total of 834 (74.1%) caregivers who smoked received counseling: 786 (69.9%) were advised to quit, 700 (62.2%) were given cessation resources, and 198 (17.6%) were referred to the Quitline. In total, 230 (27.6%) of caregivers who smoked had a second visit; 58 (25.2%) self-reported that they quit using tobacco. Among cigarette users (n = 183), 89 (48.6%) reported that they used fewer cigarettes or quit at their infants' second WCV. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic use of the SFF AAR tool during infants' WCVs could improve the health of caregivers and children, resulting in decreases in tobacco-related morbidity.

Impact of standardization on racial and socioeconomic disparities in non-accidental trauma evaluations in infants in a pediatric emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Studies have illustrated racial and socioeconomic disparities in evaluation of non-accidental trauma (NAT). We aimed to investigate how implementation of a standardized NAT guideline in a pediatric emergency department (PED) impacted racial and socioeconomic disparities in NAT evaluation. RESULTS: 1199 patients (541 pre- and 658 post-guideline) were included for analysis. Pre-guideline, patients with governmental insurance were more likely than those with commercial insurance to have a social work (SW) consult completed (57.4% vs. 34.7%, p < 0.001) and a Child Protective Services (CPS) report filed (33.4% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.001). Post-guideline, these disparities were still present. There were no differences in race, ethnicity, insurance type, or social deprivation index (SDI) in rates of complete NAT evaluations pre- or post-guideline implementation. Overall adherence to all guideline elements increased from 19.0% before guideline implementation to 53.2% after (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a standardized NAT guideline led to significant increase in complete NAT evaluations. Guideline implementation was not associated with elimination of pre-existing disparities in SW consults or CPS reporting between insurance groups.

Pediatric outdoor recreational injuries: another hidden concern during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Recreational equipment sales rose significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study investigated changes in the incidence of pediatric emergency department (PED) visits related to outdoor recreational activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a large children's hospital with a level 1 trauma center. Data were obtained from PED electronic medical records of children 5-14 years with a visit from March 23-September 1 in years 2015-2020. Patients with an ICD-10 code for injury associated with recreation and use of common outdoor recreational equipment were included. Initial pandemic year, 2020, was compared with pre-pandemic years (2015-2019). Data collected included patient demographics, injury characteristics, deprivation index, and disposition. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the population and Chi-squared analysis was used determine relationships between groups. RESULTS: There were 29,044 total injury visits during the study months with 4715 visits (16.2%) due to recreational mechanisms. A higher proportion of visits due to recreational injury visits occurred during the COVID pandemic (8.2%) compared to before (4.9%). Comparing patients included within the two times, were no differences in sex, ethnicity, or ED disposition. During the COVID pandemic, there was a higher percentage of White patients (80% vs 76%) and patients with commercial insurance (64% vs 55%). There was a significantly lower deprivation index for patients injured during the COVID pandemic. There were more injuries due to bicycles, ATV/motorbike, and non-motorized wheeled vehicles during the COVID pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an increase in bicycle, ATV/motorbike, and non-motorized wheeled vehicle injuries. White patients with commercial insurance were more likely to be injured compared to years prior. A targeted approach to injury prevention initiatives should be considered.

Identifying Health-Related Social and Unintentional Injury Risks Among Patients Presenting to a Pediatric Urgent Care.

OBJECTIVE: Many families seek medical care at pediatric urgent care centers. The objective of this study was to determine social and unintentional injury risks reported by these families. METHODS: This cross-sectional study surveyed a convenience sample of guardians of patients 1 to 5 years of age presenting to our pediatric urgent care, 9/10/21 to 2/25/22. Outcomes were the number of reported social and unintentional injury risks. Predictors and covariates included child and parent demographic characteristics and a neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation index. Chi-square, Student's t test, Pearson's correlation tests, and multinominal regression were used. RESULTS: A total of 273 guardians (and children) were included; 245 of guardians (89.7%) were female; 137 (50.2%) of included children identified as Black. Approximately 60% reported ≥1 social risk; 31.5% reported ≥3. Approximately 90% reported ≥1 unintentional injury risk; 57.9% reported ≥3. There were significant associations between social risk presence and Black race, public/no insurance, and neighborhood deprivation (all P < .05). There were no significant associations between unintentional injury risks and assessed predictors. Black guardians were more likely than those of other races to report a greater number of social risks (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50, 5.58 for ≥3 vs 0 risk). Children with public/no insurance compared to private insurance were more likely to experience a greater number of social risks (AOR 3.34, 95% CI 1.42, 7.84 for ≥3 vs 0 risks). CONCLUSIONS: Many presenting to pediatric urgent cares experience social and unintentional injury risks. Risk identification may guide equitable responses.

Attitudes and perceived barriers to firearm safety anticipatory guidance by pediatricians: a statewide perspective.

BACKGROUND: Firearms are the second leading cause of injury-related death in American children. Safe storage of firearms is associated with a significantly decreased odds of firearm-related death, however more than half of US firearm owners store at least one firearm unlocked or accessible to a minor. While guidance by primary care providers has been shown to improve storage practices, firearm safety counseling occurs infrequently in the primary care setting. The primary objective of this study was to describe pediatricians' perceived barriers to providing firearm safety education to families in the pediatric primary care setting. Secondary objectives included identifying pediatric provider attitudes and current practices around firearm counseling. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of pediatric primary care providers in Ohio. Participants were recruited from the Ohio AAP email list over a 3-month period. Only pediatric primary care providers in Ohio were included; subspecialists, residents and non-practicing physicians were excluded. Participants completed an anonymous online survey detailing practice patterns around and barriers to providing firearm safety counseling. Three follow-up emails were sent to pediatricians that failed to initially respond. Response frequencies were calculated using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-nine pediatricians completed the survey and 149 met inclusion criteria for analysis. One hundred seven (72%) respondents agreed that it is the responsibility of the pediatric primary care provider to discuss safe storage. Counseling, however, occurred infrequently with 119 (80%) of respondents performing firearm safety education at fewer than half of well child visits. The most commonly cited barriers to providing counseling were lack of time during office visits, lack of education and few resources to provide to families. A majority, 82 of pediatric providers (55%), agreed they would counsel more if given additional training, with 110 (74%) conveying they would distribute firearm safety devices to families if these were available in their practice. CONCLUSION: Ohio pediatricians agree that it is the responsibility of the primary care provider to discuss firearm safety. However, counseling occurs infrequently in the primary care setting due to a lack of time, provider education and available resources. Improving access to resources for primary care pediatricians will be critical in helping educate families in order to protect their children through improved storage practices.

A pilot QI primary care practice program to help reduce infant mortality risks.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) and inappropriate sleep position/environments contribute to preventable infant deaths. The objective of our quality improvement (QI) program was to increase primary care provider (PCP) screening and counseling for TSE and safe sleep risks at well-child visits (WCVs) and to assess caregiver behavior changes at subsequent visits. METHODS: Pediatric practices, recruited from the Ohio Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics' database, self-selected to participate in this TSE and safe sleep PCP QI program. At every WCV over a 10-month period, caregivers with children < 1 year old were to be screened and counseled by providers. Caregiver demographics, TSE, and safe sleep practices were assessed. Individual PCP results were paired with subsequent family screening tools at follow up visits to determine changes in TSE and safe sleep practices. Differences in frequencies were determined and paired t-tests were used to compare means. RESULTS: Fourteen practices (60 providers) participated; 7289 screens were completed: 3972 (54.5%) initial screens and 1769 (24.3%) subsequent WCV screens. Caregivers on the initial screen were primarily white (61.7%), mothers (86.0%) with public insurance (41.7%). Within the first month after QI program initiation, PCPs TSE screening was during 80% of WCVs, which increased to > 90% by end of the QI program. A total of 637 /3953 (16.1%) screened positive for home TSE on the initial visit: 320/3953 (8.1%) exposed by at least the primary caregivers, and 317/3953 (8.0%) exposed by a home adult smoker (not the identified caregiver). Of caregivers receiving smoking counseling with subsequent follow-up WCV (n = 100), the mean number of cigarettes smoked daily decreased significantly from 10.6 to 4.6 (p = 0.03). Thirty-four percent of caregivers (34/100) reported they quit smoking at their second visit. A total of 1072 (27%) infants screened at risk for inappropriate sleep position or environment at their initial visit. Of these at-risk infants whose caregivers received safe sleep counseling, 49.1% practiced safer sleep behaviors at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs participating in a QI program increased screening at WCVs for infant mortality risks. After counseling and providing resources about TSE and safe sleep, many caregivers reported practicing safer behaviors at their next WCV.

Personalising Safe Sleep Messaging for Infant Caregivers in the United States.

The purpose of our study was to better understand why parents/caregivers might not practice safe sleep behaviours. In autumn 2016, we conducted 'pulse' interviews with 124 parents/caregivers of children under the age of one year at a variety of local community events, festivals and meetings in cities with high infant mortality rates around the Midwestern US state of Ohio. Through an inductive approach, pulse interviews were analysed using thematic coding and an iterative process which followed for further clarification of themes (Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2006, 3, 77; BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2013, 13, 117). The six major themes of underlying reasons why parents/caregivers might not practice safe sleep behaviours that were identified in our coding process included the following: (a) culture and family tradition, (b) knowledge about safe sleep practices, (c) resource access, (d) stressed out parents, (f) lack of support and (g) fear for safety of baby. Using the descriptive findings from the pulse interviews, qualitative themes and key informant validation feedback, we developed four diverse fictional characters or personas of parents/caregivers who are most likely to practice unsafe sleep behaviours. These personas are characteristic scenarios which imitate parent and caregiver experiences with unsafe sleep behaviours. The personas are currently being used to influence development of health promotion and education programs personalised for parents/caregivers of infants less than one year to encourage safe sleep practices.

An Intervention to Increase Knowledge and Utilization of the Low Risk Ankle Rule Among Pediatric Emergency Department Providers.

OBJECTIVES: The Low Risk Ankle Rule (LRAR) can assist pediatric emergency department providers in reducing radiographs without missing significant fractures. Most providers are unaware of this tool. This study sought to educate providers about the LRAR then determine their self-reported use immediately and 2 months after education. METHODS: A web-based survey was e-mailed to providers at one large pediatric emergency department. The survey assessed knowledge and use of the rule. Clinical scenarios, in which radiographs were not indicated, helped determine radiograph ordering practices. After a brief LRAR tutorial, respondents were requeried about radiograph ordering practices along with likelihood of future LRAR use. At 2 months, radiograph ordering was again assessed using the same scenarios; interim LRAR use was also determined. RESULTS: Response rates on the initial and follow-up surveys were 61.4% and 96.2%, respectively. A minority (20%) had heard of the LRAR. Providers initially reported ordering radiographs on 84% of ankle injuries and 82.5% ordered radiographs in the scenario. Immediately after education, only 32% ordered a radiograph in the scenario; 85% reported that they would use the tool consistently. At 2 months, there was no significant change in radiograph ordering practices (79.5% vs 84%). In the interim, 30% reported using the rule at least once. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric emergency department providers were unfamiliar with the LRAR. After a brief tutorial, most providers reported that planning to use the tool and self-reported radiograph ordering was significantly reduced; however, at 2 months, clinical practice was unaffected. Further work to implement the tool into practice is necessary.

Trends of ED visits, admissions, and deaths for pediatric traumatic brain injury comparing sport and non-sport mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) in children result in significant morbidity and mortality. There are many mechanisms, both sport and non-sport related, which cause these injuries. Studies have reported that Emergency Department (ED) visits for pediatric TBI caused by sports are increasing; however, no subsequent study has evaluated the trend in non-sport TBI. The objective of this study was to evaluate ED visits, admissions, and deaths for non-sport TBI compared to those caused by sports. METHODS: A retrospective study of children 5-19 years of age was performed at a pediatric, level 1 trauma center from 2002 to 2012. Subjects with a primary or secondary diagnosis of TBI were identified from the hospital's trauma registry, and mechanism of injury, disposition, injury severity score, and length of stay were recorded. Frequencies were used to characterize the population, Chi-square analysis was performed to determine differences between groups, and linear trend lines were calculated for sport-related and non-sport TBI by year. RESULTS: Thirteen thousand two hundred ninty one subjects were seen in the ED between 2002 and 2012 for a TBI; 9527 (72%) were from a non-sport mechanism, and 3764 (28%) were from a sport mechanism. Subjects with a non-sport TBI were more likely to be younger (p < 0.001), African American (p < 0.001), and have Medicare/Medicaid (p < 0.001). Subjects with a non-sport TBI were admitted to the hospital 15% of the time, and subjects with a sport-related TBI were admitted 10% of the time (p < 0.001). When evaluating all TBI by mechanism of injury, sport had the lowest injury severity score (mean 4.4) and the shortest length of stay (mean 1.6 days) of any mechanism. There were six deaths reported from non-sport TBI and none from sport-related TBI. ED visits for sport-related TBI increased 92%, and non-sport TBI increased 22% over 10 years. There was a peak in TBI, in both groups, seen in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: ED visits for both sport and non-sport TBI have increased over the past 10 years. TBI from a non-sport mechanism was more likely to result in hospitalization or death. Prevention efforts should be expanded to include all high-risk TBI mechanisms, not just sports.

The EASE Project Revisited: Improving Safe Sleep Practices in Ohio Birthing and Children's Hospitals.

Literature has shown hospitalized infants are not often observed in recommended safe sleep environments. Our objective was to implement a quality improvement program to improve compliance with appropriate safe sleep practices in both children's and birthing hospitals. Hospitalists from both settings were recruited to join an Ohio American Academy of Pediatrics collaborative to increase admitted infant safe sleep behaviors. Participants used a standardized tool to audit infants' sleep environments. Each site implemented 3 PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles to improve safe sleep behaviors. A total of 37.0% of infants in children's hospitals were observed to follow the current American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations at baseline; compliance improved to 59.6% at the project's end (P < .01). Compliance at birthing centers was 59.3% and increased to 72.5% (P < .01) at the collaborative's conclusion. This study demonstrates that a quality improvement program in different hospital settings can improve safe sleep practices. Infants in birthing centers were more commonly observed in appropriate sleep environments than infants in children's hospitals.

Outcomes after injury prevention counselling in a paediatric office setting: a 25-year review.

OBJECTIVE: Injury is the leading cause of death and acquired disability in children. Primary care providers routinely provide age-appropriate injury prevention (IP) counselling during healthcare visits. The objective was to review evaluations of the effectiveness of office-based paediatric IP counselling research. DESIGN: This review identified studies from July 1991 to June 2016 of children <5 years and their caretakers to determine the effectiveness of office-based counselling on IP knowledge, behaviours and outcomes. Studies were included if they had: (1) an intervention for a family with a child <5 years of age; (2) an unintentional injury mechanism addressed during counselling; (3) one or more mechanisms recommended to be discussed for children <5 years in the 2007American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statement; (4) counselling occurring in the office setting; (5) an assessment of an outcome (eg, change in knowledge, behaviour or injury occurrences); and (6) English-language publication. Study characteristics (whether the study was controlled, randomised and/or blinded), target safety behaviours, the sample size, outcomes assessed (injuries, behaviour changes and/or education changes) and demonstrated effects were summarised. RESULTS: Sixteen articles met inclusion criteria. Twelve articles were randomised controlled trials, three were non-randomised trials and one was a pretest and post-test study. Fourteen articles measured a change in knowledge or reported behaviour, four included observed behaviour change and five measured change in injury outcomes. Thirteen of the 16 studies had positive effects demonstrated for certain outcomes, including for fall, poisoning, burn, fire, traffic injury and drowning prevention, while 10 showed no differences between study groups for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Published outcomes-based IP-related counselling research in the primary care setting for young children is infrequent, and additional research is necessary to further describe the effectiveness of these primary prevention efforts.

A quality improvement program in pediatric practices to increase tailored injury prevention counseling and assess self-reported changes made by families.

BACKGROUND: Many pediatric providers struggle to screen families for the majority of age-appropriate injury risks and educate them when appropriate. Standardized tools have helped physicians provide effective, more purposeful counseling. In this study, pediatricians utilized a standardized, injury prevention screening tool to increase targeted discussions and families were re-screened at subsequent visits to determine changes in their behavior. METHODS: Pediatric practices, recruited from the Ohio Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics database, self-selected to participate in a quality improvement program. Two screening tools, for children birth-4 month and 6-12 month, with corresponding talking points, were to be implemented into every well child visit. During the 7-month collaborative, screening results and pediatrician counseling for reported unsafe behaviors were calculated. Patients who completed a screening tool at subsequent visits were followed up at a later visit to determine self-reported behavior changes. We examined statistically significant differences in frequencies using the X2 test. Providers received maintenance of certification IV credit for participation. RESULTS: Seven practices (39 providers) participated. By the second month, participating providers discussed 75% of all inappropriate responses for birth-4 month screenings and 87% for 6-12 months. Of the 386 families who received specific counseling and had a follow-up visit, 65% (n = 94/144) of birth-4 month and 65% (n = 59/91) of 6-12 month families made at least one behavior change. The X2 test showed that families who received counseling versus those that did not were significantly more likely to change inappropriate behaviors (p < 0.05). Overall, of all the risks identified, 45% (136) of birth-4 month and 42% (91) of 6-12 month behaviors reportedly changed after a practitioner addressed the topic area. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in a quality improvement program within pediatric offices can increase screening for injury risks and encourage tailored injury prevention discussions during an office encounter. As a result, significantly more families reported to practice safer behaviors at later visits.

Severe Unintentional Injuries to Ohio Children: What We Should Be Addressing at Well-Child Visits.

This was a retrospective study examining severe injuries to Ohio children in order to provide pediatricians with targeted injury talking points at well visits. We included children ≤14 years old from the Ohio Trauma Acute Care Registry with severe unintentional injuries from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2012. There were 45 347 patients; 611 died, and the mean age was 6.8 years. Fractures/dislocations were common (46.6%), and many injuries occurred at home (49.1%). In children ≤2 years old, the leading causes of injury were falls and burns/fire; falls and motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) predominated above this age. Leading causes of death were MVCs, drowning, and suffocation. We concluded that national data may not always reflect state-specific injury patterns. In Ohio, though falls and MVCs were the most common mechanisms, fire and drowning also caused significant injury. Given limited time to discuss injury prevention, pediatricians should concentrate on statewide injuries.

Laryngeal Injury in a Male Lacrosse Player: A Case for Prevention.

Lacrosse has become increasingly popular among US children and teens. Because a lacrosse ball can serve as a projectile, neck injuries, although uncommon, can cause a severe and long-lasting injury. We report the case of a 16-year-old adolescent who experienced direct neck trauma while playing lacrosse. The clinical presentation, treatment strategies, and intubation considerations are reviewed. Finally, a call to action to prevent future, similar injuries is discussed.

The EASE Quality Improvement Project: Improving Safe Sleep Practices in Ohio Children's Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Despite American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations, many hospitalized infants are not observed in the appropriate safe sleep environment. Caregivers tend to model sleep patterns observed in a hospital setting. This project assessed the change in infant safe sleep practices within 6 children's hospitals after the implementation of a statewide quality improvement program. METHODS: The AAP recruited hospitalists from each of the state's children's hospitals and asked them to form "safe sleep teams" within their institutions. Teams used a standardized data tool to collect information on the infant's age and sleep position/environment. They collected baseline data and then weekly for the duration of the 12-month project. Teams were required to implement at least 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. We calculated changes in safe sleep practices over time. Providers received Maintenance of Certification Part IV credit for participation. RESULTS: Teams collected 5343 audits at all participating sites. At baseline, only 279 (32.6%) of 856 of the sleeping infants were observed to follow AAP recommendations, compared with 110 (58.2%) of 189 (P < .001) at the project's conclusion. The presence of empty cribs was the greatest improvement (38.1% to 67.2%) (P < .001). Removing loose blankets (77.8% to 50.0%) (P < .001) was the most common change made. Audits also showed an increase in education of families about safe sleep practices from 48.2% to 75.4% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Multifactorial interventions by hospitalist teams in a multi-institutional program within 1 state's children's hospitals improved observed infant safe sleep behaviors and family report of safe sleep education. These behavior changes may lead to more appropriate safe sleep practices at home.

An effective way to utilize daycare organizations to distribute home safety equipment.

BACKGROUND: Safety equipment installed in the home can reduce pediatric injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare the proper use of home safety equipment installed by an injury prevention specialist to equipment installed by a family after distribution at a daycare. METHODS: A prospective study involving two daycare organizations from a high-risk community was performed. Both groups consisted of families with children 4 to 24 months old who received a packet containing: cabinet and drawer latches, carbon monoxide (CO) detector, magnetic phone list, and five other items. After consent was obtained, both groups completed a prescreen survey to determine current equipment use. The self-installation group (SI) from one daycare received home safety equipment and education for self-installation of the equipment. The professional installation group (PI) from a comparable daycare received the same equipment and education; however, equipment was installed for them. Assessments of equipment usage and maintenance were performed at follow-up home visits 6 to 9 months after equipment disbursement. Frequencies and χ analysis were used for comparisons. RESULTS: Seventy-nine SI families and 81 PI families were enrolled. There was no difference in home equipment use between the groups prior to interventions with CO detectors (11.4% vs. 12.3%), cabinet locks (2.5% vs. 11.1%), drawer locks (0% vs. 2.5%), or posted emergency numbers (24.1% vs. 19.8%). Follow-up home visits occurred in 71 SI families (87.7%) and 75 PI families (92.6%). In both groups, there was a significantly increased use of CO detectors (73.2% vs. 89.3%, p = 0.02), cabinet locks (38.0% vs. 78.7%, p < 0.001), and drawer locks (22.5% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001); posted emergency number increased in both groups, but the difference was not significant (78.9% vs. 89.3%, p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: When provided with home safety equipment, it is used much of the time; however, equipment installed by a professional resulted in higher use than if self-installed. For some equipment, distribution of products in daycare settings may be just as effective as if professionally installed.

Severe unintentional injuries sustained by Ohio children: Is there urban/rural variation?

BACKGROUND: Determining at risk populations is essential to developing interventions that prevent injuries. This study examined the rates of severe unintentional injuries among urban versus rural Ohio children. METHODS: Demographic and injury data for children 0 to 14 years old who had unintentional injuries from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2012, were extracted retrospectively from the Ohio Trauma Acute Care Registry. Cases with no designated county were excluded. Injury rates per 100,000 children 14 years or younger were calculated annually using county of residence and US census data. Each county was assigned an urbanization level based on population density (A = most urban, D = most rural). RESULTS: There were 40,625 patients from 88 Ohio counties who met the inclusion criteria; the overall annual injury rate was 231.9. The mean age was 6.7 (SD, 4.5) years; 26,035 (64.1%) were male, and 31,468 (77.5%) were white. There were 593 deaths (1.5%). Injury rates by urbanization level were as follows: A: 120.4, B: 196.8, C: 249.1, and D: 247.4 (p = 0.04). Nearly 50% of all deaths occurred in the most urban counties. Those in the most urban areas were more likely to suffer injury from burns, drownings, and suffocations and less likely to be injured by animal bites or motorized vehicle collisions (p < 0.001). Length of stay and injury severity score were highest in the most urban children (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: While rural counties experienced higher injury rates, urban areas suffered more severe injuries. Specific mechanisms of injury differed by demographics and urbanization in Ohio, suggesting areas for targeted injury prevention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.

Evaluating the reliability of an injury prevention screening tool: Test-retest study.

BACKGROUND: A standardized injury prevention (IP) screening tool can identify family risks and allow pediatricians to address behaviors. To assess behavior changes on later screens, the tool must be reliable for an individual and ideally between household members. Little research has examined the reliability of safety screening tool questions. This study utilized test-retest reliability of parent responses on an existing IP questionnaire and also compared responses between household parents. METHODS: Investigators recruited parents of children 0 to 1 year of age during admission to a tertiary care children's hospital. When both parents were present, one was chosen as the "primary" respondent. Primary respondents completed the 30-question IP screening tool after consent, and they were re-screened approximately 4 hours later to test individual reliability. The "second" parent, when present, only completed the tool once. All participants received a 10-dollar gift card. Cohen's Kappa was used to estimate test-retest reliability and inter-rater agreement. Standard test-retest criteria consider Kappa values: 0.0 to 0.40 poor to fair, 0.41 to 0.60 moderate, 0.61 to 0.80 substantial, and 0.81 to 1.00 as almost perfect reliability. RESULTS: One hundred five families participated, with five lost to follow-up. Thirty-two (30.5%) parent dyads completed the tool. Primary respondents were generally mothers (88%) and Caucasian (72%). Test-retest of the primary respondents showed their responses to be almost perfect; average 0.82 (SD = 0.13, range 0.49-1.00). Seventeen questions had almost perfect test-retest reliability and 11 had substantial reliability. However, inter-rater agreement between household members for 12 objective questions showed little agreement between responses; inter-rater agreement averaged 0.35 (SD = 0.34, range -0.19-1.00). One question had almost perfect inter-rater agreement and two had substantial inter-rater agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The IP screening tool used by a single individual had excellent test-retest reliability for nearly all questions. However, when a reporter changes from pre- to postintervention, differences may reflect poor reliability or different subjective experiences rather than true change.

High School Football Players' Knowledge and Attitudes About Concussions.

OBJECTIVES: To assess high school (HS) football players' knowledge of concussions and to determine whether increased knowledge is correlated with better attitudes toward reporting concussion symptoms and abstaining from play. DESIGN: Two survey tools were used to assess athletes' knowledge and attitudes about concussions. Surveys collected information about demographics, knowledge about concussions, and attitudes about playing sports after a concussion. All athletes present completed one of the 2 surveys. A knowledge and attitude score for each survey was calculated. Frequencies and mean values were used to characterize the population; regression analysis, analysis of variance, and t tests were used to look for associations. SETTING: A football camp for HS athletes in the Cincinnati area. PARTICIPANTS: Male HS football players from competitive football programs in the Cincinnati area. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Scores on knowledge and attitude sections; responses to individual questions. RESULTS: One hundred twenty (100%) athletes were enrolled although not every athlete responded to every question. Thirty (25%) reported history of a concussion; 82 (70%) reported receiving prior concussion education. More than 75% correctly recognized all concussion symptoms that were asked, except "feeling in a fog" [n = 63 (53%)]. One hundred nine (92%) recognized a risk of serious injury if they return to play too quickly. Sixty-four (54%) athletes would report symptoms of a concussion to their coach; 62 (53%) would continue to play with a headache from an injury. There was no association between knowledge score and attitude score (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Despite having knowledge about the symptoms and danger of concussions, many HS football athletes in our sample did not have a positive attitude toward reporting symptoms or abstaining from play after a concussion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Physicians should be aware that young athletes may not report concussion symptoms.