Presence of Color Transition in Biopsy Specimens Predicts Outcome of Liver Lesion Biopsies.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the presence of tissue transition in liver lesion biopsies to predict a successful outcome, as observed by modified macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE). Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 264 ultrasound-guided liver lesion biopsies, examining the influence the presence of tissue transition (visible color changes in biopsy specimens as evaluated visually) has on two endpoints (1) material retrieval, (2) attaining a definitive diagnosis) representing successful liver lesion biopsies, compared to previously evaluated variables in this context. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0. Results: Material retrieval and a definitive diagnosis occurred in 224/264 (84.8%) and 217/264 (82.2%) cases, the latter occurring more often when visual inspection revealed macroscopic tissue transition (92/96 [95.8%]) than when not (124/165 [75.2%]), P < 0.001. Tissue transition in biopsies was more common in secondary (74/162 [45.7%]) than (18/54 [33.3%]) primary liver lesions, though this was not significant (P = 0.112). On multivariate analysis, tissue transition in biopsies was an independent predictor of a definitive diagnosis and material retrieval. Conclusion: In liver lesion biopsies, MOSE of color transition in biopsies can indicate success. This is easily incorporated into clinical practice and can help overcome the lack of an on-site pathologist.

Effect of ET-A blockade on portal pressure and hepatic arterial perfusion in patients with cirrhosis: A proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Endothelin causes vasoconstriction via the endothelin-A receptor (ET-A) in the intrahepatic circulation in cirrhosis and its increase leads to portal hypertension. The aim of the study was to investigate the acute effect of a selective ET-A antagonist in patients with portal hypertension and cirrhosis. METHODS: Proof-of-concept study with two different substudies: (a) local intrahepatic administration of the ET-A antagonist BQ 123 and (b) systemic oral administration of the ET-A antagonist Ambrisentan. Portal pressure was determined by hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG, both substudies) and hepatic arterial blood flow (HABF) by intra-arterial Doppler measurements (substudy 1) before and under the ET-A antagonist. Systemic haemodynamic parameters were measured in substudy 2. RESULTS: Twelve patients (Child-Pugh [CP] B/C n = 7/5) were included in substudy 1 and 14 patients (CP A/B/C n = 4/6/4) in substudy 2. The relative decrease in HVPG was -12.5% (IQR: -40% to 0%; P = .05) in substudy 1 and -5.0% (IQR: -11.5% to 0%; P = .01) in substudy 2. Substudy 1 revealed higher decrease in HVPG in CP B patients. HABF increased significantly and patients without portal pressure decrease showed a higher increase of HABF. Substudy 2 showed a slight decrease in the mean arterial pressure without changes of other systemic haemodynamic parameters. CONCLUSION: Administration of a selective ET-A antagonist decreases the portal pressure in cirrhotic patients. This decrease was higher in CP B patients and the non-responders showed a higher increase in hepatic arterial flow. Selective ET-A antagonists might be a future treatment option in patients with portal hypertension.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Algorithms (CEUS-LIRADS/ESCULAP) for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma - A Prospective Multicenter DEGUM Study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective multicenter study funded by the DEGUM assesses the diagnostic accuracy of standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients. METHODS: Patients at high risk for HCC with a histologically proven focal liver lesion on B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively in a multicenter approach. Clinical and imaging data were entered via online entry forms. The diagnostic accuracies for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC were compared for the conventional interpretation of standardized CEUS at the time of the examination (= CEUS on-site) and the two CEUS algorithms ESCULAP (Erlanger Synopsis for Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Liver lesion Assessment in Patients at risk) and CEUS LI-RADS (Contrast-Enhanced UltraSound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System). RESULTS: 321 patients were recruited in 43 centers; 299 (93.1 %) had liver cirrhosis. The diagnosis according to histology was HCC in 256 cases, and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) in 23 cases. In the subgroup of cirrhotic patients (n = 299), the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC was achieved with the CEUS algorithm ESCULAP (94.2 %) and CEUS on-site (90.9 %). The lowest sensitivity was reached with the CEUS LI-RADS algorithm (64 %; p < 0.001). However, the specificity of CEUS LI-RADS (78.9 %) was superior to that of ESCULAP (50.9 %) and CEUS on-site (64.9 %; p < 0.001). At the same time, the negative predictive value (NPV) of CEUS LI-RADS was significantly inferior to that of ESCULAP (34.1 % vs. 67.4 %; p < 0.001) and CEUS on-site (62.7 %; p < 0.001). The positive predictive values of all modalities were high (around 90 %), with the best results seen for CEUS LI-RADS and CEUS on-site. CONCLUSION: This is the first multicenter, prospective comparison of standardized CEUS and the recently developed CEUS-based algorithms in histologically proven liver lesions in cirrhotic patients. Our results reaffirm the excellent diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC in high-risk patients. However, on-site diagnosis by an experienced examiner achieves an almost equal diagnostic accuracy compared to CEUS-based diagnostic algorithms.

Family planning in inflammatory bowel disease: childlessness and disease-related concerns among female patients.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) frequently affects women when family planning and pregnancy (FPP) are important issues. This survey aimed to identify patients with an increased need for medical counselling. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An internet-based questionnaire was offered to women with IBD. Characteristics in terms of FPP were analysed with respect to sociodemographic and disease-related factors. RESULTS: Childlessness was frequently reported (64.8% of 443 participants). In women older than 35 years with IBD, childlessness was significantly more prevalent than that in the general population (36.7 vs. 22.9%, odds ratio=1.9, P<0.001). Overall, 44.2% of the women were satisfied with counselling in general, and only 27.3% with the specific advice on FPP. Women younger than 25 years were rarely satisfied with the advice in terms of FPP (18.2%) and demanded an intensified counselling (44.6%). Frequent concerns were the heritability of IBD (all women, 59.2%; mothers, 51.5%; childless, 62.5%, P<0.01), medication during FPP (44.7, 26.1, 52.4%, P<0.01) and miscarriage (38.9, 16.8, 48.7%, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of childlessness in women with IBD compared with the general population increases with age. FPP-related worries, especially in terms of heredity, medication and miscarriage, are associated with an increased risk for childlessness. The results underline the importance of qualified counselling as early as possible during the course of the disase.

Minimizing procedural cost in diagnosing small bowel bleeding: comparison of a strategy based on initial capsule endoscopy versus initial double-balloon enteroscopy.

INTRODUCTION: Capsule endoscopy (CE) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) detect small bowel bleeding with equal diagnostic yield. We aimed to detect factors that influence procedural cost of CE and DBE in diagnosing and treating small bowel bleeding, and to compare them with reimbursement. METHODS: A cost model analysed procedural cost for diagnostic CE versus diagnostic, unidirectional DBE(scenario 1) and CE plus directed therapeutic DBE(positive findings in CE) versus unidirectional diagnostic plus therapeutic DBE (scenario 2). The frequency of investigations per annum (p.a.) at which cost per procedure is equalized (break-even point) was determined for CE versus DBE. A retrospectively collected cohort of patients was used to validate the cost model and to compare procedural costs with reimbursement (German diagnosis related groups, G-DRG). RESULTS: The break-even point at which cost per procedure is equalized for CE versus DBE was reached at 100 procedures p.a. in scenario 1 and 79 in scenario 2 for a rate of therapeutic enteroscopy of 14%, and 27 for a therapeutic enteroscopy rate of 30%. Personnel cost, procedure time,procedures p.a. and the rate of therapeutic enteroscopy had a major influence on procedural cost. In this patient cohort, the 'CE-first' and the 'DBE-first' strategies produced procedural costs of pound sterling 830 and pound sterling 1,076 per patient to attain a diagnosis, and pound sterling 1,042 versus pound sterling 1,181 to achieve therapeutic enteroscopy, respectively. For this cohort, potential reimbursement was pound sterling 2,320 and pound sterling 3,047 for the 'CE-first' and the 'DBE-first' strategies, respectively (G-DRG). CONCLUSION: Workflow management of CE versus DBE should consider frequency of investigations p.a. and probability for therapeutic enteroscopy to minimize procedural costs. The cost of DBE increases with less frequent or time-consuming investigations; CE is more robust with regard to these factors. From a third-party payer perspective, a strategy incorporating CE seems to minimize costs in G-DRG.