Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 319
Filter
1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 43(4): 645-648, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35332017

ABSTRACT

Lateral decubitus CT myelography is a sensitive technique for detecting CSF-venous fistulas in patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. It might be necessary to perform bilateral studies to locate a fistula. We report on the feasibility of obtaining diagnostic-quality bilateral decubitus CT myelography in a single session, avoiding the need to schedule separate examinations for the left and right sides on different days.


Subject(s)
Fistula , Intracranial Hypotension , Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Intracranial Hypotension/diagnosis , Intracranial Hypotension/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Myelography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
3.
Eur J Neurol ; 27(10): 2099-2101, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32478974

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Visual snow manifests as a pan-field, dynamic visual disturbance described as continuous television static-like tiny flickering dots. Current diagnostic criteria further require at least two additional symptoms for visual snow syndrome (VSS) from: palinopsia (afterimages and trailing); entoptic phenomena (floaters, blue field entoptic phenomenon, photopsia, self-light of the eye); photophobia and nyctalopia. Our objective was to compare the phenotype of VSS in an Italian and British population. METHODS: Patients with VSS were characterized clinically using the current criteria. An online survey was prepared in collaboration with the patient group Eye-on-Vision. Patients were directed to the site if they contacted us by email asking to be involved in research. After data collection, we compared the phenotypic characteristics of a subgroup of British versus Italian patients taking part in the survey. As we expected more responses from the UK, we matched 100 UK patients for gender and age with our Italian cohort. RESULTS: Patients were enrolled from the UK (n = 100) and Italy (n = 100). The populations had similar demography. After multiple correction testing there were no differences in VSS features between the two groups. The same was true for the prevalence of migraine and previous use of recreational drugs. CONCLUSION: This is the first study comparing the phenotype of VSS between two distinct populations. Our findings suggest that the visual snow phenotype, as well as migraine comorbidity, is similar across the two groups.


Subject(s)
Vision Disorders , Comorbidity , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Prevalence , Vision Disorders/epidemiology
5.
Eur J Neurol ; 27(4): 609-618, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31692188

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The efficacy of galcanezumab, a monoclonal antibody for migraine prevention, has been demonstrated in two pivotal trials in patients with episodic migraine. METHODS: EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2 were identical phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in patients with episodic migraine. Mean migraine headache days per month at baseline was 9. Patients were randomized 2:1:1 to monthly injections of placebo, galcanezumab 120 mg/240 mg during the 6-month double-blind treatment period. Key efficacy outcomes were assessed in subgroups amongst patients for whom, previously, for efficacy and/or safety/tolerability reasons (i) one or more (≥1) preventives failed, (ii) two or more (≥2) preventives failed and (iii) preventives were never used, or used but not failed (no prior failure). RESULTS: In an integrated analysis of EVOLVE studies, galcanezumab 120 mg/240 mg versus placebo led to larger overall mean (SE) reductions in monthly migraine headache days across 6 months in patients with prior preventive failures (P < 0.001): ≥1 failure: 120 mg: -4.0 (0.4); 240 mg: -4.2 (0.5); placebo: -1.3 (0.4); ≥2 failures: 120 mg: -3.1 (0.7); 240 mg: -3.8 (0.8); placebo: -0.5 (0.6). Similar results were observed amongst patients with no prior failure, but the placebo response was larger: 120 mg: -4.7 (0.2); 240 mg: -4.5 (0.2); placebo: -3.0 (0.2) (P < 0.001 versus placebo). Significant improvements were observed with galcanezumab versus placebo for ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine headache days. CONCLUSION: In patients with episodic migraine treated with galcanezumab, those with ≥1 or ≥2 prior preventive failures had significantly larger improvements, versus placebo, in efficacy outcomes. Similar results were observed in patients with no prior failure, with a larger placebo response.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Headache Pain ; 20(1): 69, 2019 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31185885

ABSTRACT

Orofacial pain may have a variety of causes and offers a significant clinical challenge for its diagnosis and management. OBJECTIVE: To assess the headache disorders presenting in a tertiary multidisciplinary orofacial pain clinic, after dental causes have been excluded. METHODS: Clinic letters from the initial consultation and subsequent follow up reviews of the 142 patients, who were seen in the tertiary Multidisciplinary Orofacial Pain clinic between January 2015 until January 2018 were reviewed as a clinical audit. RESULTS: The most common diagnoses were possible trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia (n = 62, 44%), migraine (n = 38, 27%) and painful post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy (n = 17, 12%). The most common trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia diagnosis was hemicrania continua (n = 13, 9%), which is higher than the reported prevalence in neurology and headache clinics. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosing complex orofacial pain patients and the importance of awareness of primary headache disorders, in particular trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, thereby reducing unnecessary diagnostic delays or procedures.


Subject(s)
Facial Pain/diagnosis , Headache Disorders/diagnosis , Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias/diagnosis , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Female , Humans , Male , Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Neurology , Prevalence , Referral and Consultation
7.
Eur J Neurol ; 25(6): 811-817, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29512871

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For over 20 years, as a group we have been using flunarizine in primary headache disorders. Flunarizine is widely used in Europe, but not licensed in the UK. In September 2014, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence published supportive guidelines for flunarizine use in migraine, based on randomized controlled evidence that it is as effective as propranolol and topiramate in adults. METHODS: We reviewed a cohort of adult patients (n = 200) treated with flunarizine from our practice. The clinical information of these patients, i.e. diagnosis, dose, efficacy, side effects and duration of treatment, was collected. RESULTS: The most common indication for flunarizine use was chronic migraine, followed by migraine with aura, sporadic hemiplegic migraine, familial hemiplegic migraine and new daily persistent headache with migrainous features. Flunarizine was generally effective, with only 24% (n = 47) of patients reporting no clinical effect. The most common dose used was 10 mg per day. Duration of treatment information was available for 39% (n = 78) of patients. Of these patients, 64% (n = 50) continued treatment for more than 1 year. Doses up to 15 mg were generally well tolerated, with only 10.5% (n = 21) of patients stopping treatment due to adverse effects. The most common adverse events were tiredness, mood change and weight gain. CONCLUSION: The data provide supportive evidence from tertiary headache practice in the UK for the use of flunarizine in migraine. The data encourages development of future guidance regarding flunarizine use in headache centres in countries where its use is not routine.


Subject(s)
Flunarizine/therapeutic use , Headache Disorders/prevention & control , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Headache Disorders/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom , Young Adult
8.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 21(7): 34, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28647791

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Premonitory symptoms in migraine; symptoms occurring before the onset of migraine pain or aura, are an increasingly recognised area of interest within headache research. It has been recently documented in the literature that these symptoms also occur in children and adolescents, with a comparable phenotype to adults. This review discusses the wide presentation of premonitory symptoms in migraine in children and adolescents, and the importance of understanding how these early symptoms are mediated in order to ensure that targeted abortive therapies are developed in the future. Recognition of these symptoms by parents, guardians, teachers and carers is of importance in ensuring early and effective attack treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: A previous clinic-based questionnaire study in 103 children found a prevalence of premonitory symptoms in paediatric migraine of 67%, with a mean number of reported symptoms of two. A recent study found that in a clinic population of 100 children or adolescents with a migraine diagnosis who were preselected as having at least one premonitory symptom associated with their attacks, two or more premonitory symptoms were reported by 85% of patients. The most common symptoms were fatigue, mood change and neck stiffness. Although the population prevalence of premonitory symptoms in migraine within the paediatric population, or their ability to predict accurately the onset of an impending headache cannot be deduced from the retrospective studies performed to date, premonitory symptoms occur in children as young as 18 months old. Understanding the biological basis of these, and their heterogeneous phenotype may help future targeted therapeutic research, helping the development of drugs that act before the onset of pain, limiting the morbidity associated with the migraine attack.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Prodromal Symptoms , Adolescent , Child , Fatigue/diagnosis , Humans , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Symptom Assessment
9.
J Headache Pain ; 17(1): 94, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27770403

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The premonitory stage of migraine attacks, when symptomatology outside of pain can manifest hours to days before the onset of the headache, is well recognised. Such symptoms have been reported in adults in a number of studies, and have value in predicting an impending headache. These symptoms have not been extensively studied in children. We aimed to characterise which, if any, of these symptoms are reported in children seen within a Specialist Headache Service. METHODS: We reviewed clinic letters from the initial consultation of children and adolescents seen within the Specialist Headache Service at Great Ormond Street Hospital between 1999 and 2015 with migraine in whom we had prospectively assessed clinical phenotype data. We randomly selected 100 cases with at least one premonitory symptom recorded in the letter. For these patients, the age at headache onset, presence of family history of headache, headache diagnosis, presence of episodic syndromes which may be associated with headache, developmental milestones, gestation at birth, mode of delivery and presence of premonitory symptoms occurring before or during headache were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients selected, 65 % were female. The age range of the patients was 18 months to 15 years at the time of headache onset. The most common diagnosis was chronic migraine in 58 %, followed by episodic migraine (29 %), New Daily Persistent Headache with migrainous features (8 %) and hemiplegic migraine (5 %). A history of infantile colic was noted in 31 % and was the most common childhood episodic syndrome associated with migraine. The most common premonitory symptoms recorded were fatigue, mood change and neck stiffness. The commonest number of reported premonitory symptoms was two. CONCLUSION: Premonitory symptoms associated with migraine are reported in children as young as 18 months, with an overall clinical phenotype comparable to adults. Better documentation of this stage will aid parents and clinicians to better understand the phenotype of attacks, better recognise migraine and thus initiate appropriate management. Larger studies with a broader base are warranted to understand the extent and implications of these symptoms for childhood and adolescent migraine.


Subject(s)
Affect , Fatigue/physiopathology , Migraine with Aura/physiopathology , Yawning , Adolescent , Attention , Child , Child, Preschool , Colic/complications , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Headache , Humans , Infant , Male , Migraine Disorders , Migraine with Aura/complications , Neck , Pain
10.
Cephalalgia ; 36(9): 825-30, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26498348

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Migraine attacks may present different features in different patients and also within the same patient. The percentage of patients reporting stereotyped attacks and those reporting attacks with different phenotypes has not been the object of specific investigations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to evaluate the percentage of migraine patients reporting the same characteristics, in terms of phenotype and response to symptomatic medications on three consecutive migraine attacks. METHODS: Thirty patients with migraine without aura prospectively recorded the features of three consecutive attacks in a headache diary. Characteristics recorded were: pain intensity, presence of nausea, vomiting, photophobia, phonophophia, osmophobia, allodynia, cranial autonomic symptoms (at least one), and premonitory symptoms. Patients were allowed to take frovatriptan as symptomatic medication, whose efficacy was evaluated as the two hours pain-free status. RESULTS: None of the patients presented identical characteristics on the three studied attacks. This was still the case if we reduced the number of variables evaluated from 11 to seven of the eight core features indicated by the ICHD. Considering just six variables: unilaterality and quality of pain, presence/absence of nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia, only two patients (6%) had identical features on three consecutive attacks.With respect to the response to frovatriptan, 39% of patients had the same response, either positive (i.e. pain free after two hours) or negative (i.e. not pain free after two hours) on three consecutive attacks. CONCLUSION: Migraine attacks show a high variability not just among patients, but also within the same patient. Our data indicate that stereotypy of attacks is uncommon, and reinforces the underlying logic of the current operational classification system.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Adult , Carbazoles/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hyperacusis/etiology , Hyperalgesia/etiology , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/complications , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Phenotype , Photophobia/etiology , Serotonin Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Tryptamines/therapeutic use , Vomiting/etiology , Young Adult
11.
Oral Dis ; 22(1): 1-8, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24888770

ABSTRACT

The trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) are a group of primary headache disorders characterised by lateralized symptoms: prominent headache and ipsilateral cranial autonomic features, such as conjunctival injection, lacrimation and rhinorrhea. The TACs are: cluster headache (CH), paroxysmal hemicrania (PH), short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT)/short-lasting neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic features (SUNA) and hemicrania continua (HC). Their diagnostic criteria are outlined in the International Classification of Headache Disorders, third edition-beta (ICHD-IIIb). These conditions are distinguished by their attack duration and frequency, as well as response to treatment. HC is continuous and by definition responsive to indomethacin. The main differential when considering this headache is chronic migraine. Other TACs are remarkable for their short duration and must be distinguished from other short-lasting painful conditions, such as trigeminal neuralgia and primary stabbing headache. Cluster headache is characterised by exquisitely painful attacks that occur in discrete episodes lasting 15-180 min a few times a day. In comparison, PH occurs more frequently and is of shorter duration, and like HC is responsive to indomethacin. SUNCT/SUNA is the shortest duration and highest frequency TAC; attacks can occur over a hundred times every day.


Subject(s)
Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias/physiopathology , Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias/diagnosis , Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgias/drug therapy
12.
J Headache Pain ; 16: 87, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26449227

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The physiology and pharmacology of activation or perception of activation of pain-coding trigeminovascular afferents in humans is fundamental to understanding the biology of headache and developing new treatments. METHODS: The blink reflex was elicited using a concentric electrode and recorded in four separate sessions, at baseline and two minutes after administration of ramped doses of diazepam (final dose 0.07 mg/kg), fentanyl (final dose 1.11 µg/kg), ketamine (final dose 0.084 mg/kg) and 0.9 % saline solution. The AUC (area under the curve, µV*ms) and the latency (ms) of the ipsi- and contralateral R2 component of the blink reflex were calculated by PC-based offline analysis. Immediately after each block of blink reflex recordings certain psychometric parameters were assessed. RESULTS: There was an effect due to DRUG on the ipsilateral (F 3,60 = 7.3, P < 0.001) AUC as well as on the contralateral (F 3,60 = 6.02, P < 0.001) AUC across the study. A significant decrement in comparison to placebo was observed only for diazepam, affecting the ipsilateral AUC. The scores of alertness, calmness, contentedness, reaction time and precision were not affected by the DRUG across the sessions. CONCLUSION: Previous studies suggest central, rather than peripheral changes in nociceptive trigeminal transmission in migraine. This study demonstrates a robust effect of benzodiazepine receptor modulation of the nociception specific blink reflex (nBR) without any µ-opiate or glutamate NMDA receptor component. The nociception specific blink reflex offers a reproducible, quantifiable method of assessment of trigeminal nociceptive system in humans that can be used to dissect pharmacology relevant to primary headache disorders.


Subject(s)
Analgesics/pharmacology , Blinking/drug effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Muscle Relaxants, Central/pharmacology , Nociception/drug effects , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Area Under Curve , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Electric Stimulation , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Pain Measurement/methods , Psychometrics , Young Adult
13.
Cephalalgia ; 35(14): 1298-307, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25792688

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonism is an approach to migraine therapy. The locus of action of antimigraine treatment is not resolved. The objective was to investigate CGRP receptors in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (vlPAG) involved in the modulation of trigeminovascular nociception by descending influences on neurotransmission. METHODS: The presence of calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) and receptor activity modifying protein 1 (RAMP1), which form functional CGRP receptors, was investigated. CGRP and its receptor antagonists, olcegepant and CGRP (8-37), were microinjected into the vlPAG while changes of neural responses in the trigeminocervical complex (TCC) were monitored. RESULTS: Immunoreactivity indicated the presence of functional CGRP receptor components in the vlPAG and adjacent mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus. Inhibition of TCC responses to stimulation of dural afferents and ophthalmic cutaneous receptive fields after microinjection of bicuculline into vlPAG indicated a connection between the vlPAG and TCC neurons. CGRP facilitated these TCC responses, whereas olcegepant and CGRP (8-37) decreased them. CONCLUSIONS: CGRP and its receptor antagonists act on neurons in the region of vlPAG to influence nociceptive transmission in the TCC. This suggests CGRP receptor antagonists may act at loci outside of the TCC and reinforces the concept of migraine as a disorder of the brain.


Subject(s)
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide/administration & dosage , Neurons/physiology , Periaqueductal Gray/physiology , Receptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide/physiology , Trigeminal Nuclei/physiology , Animals , Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists , Male , Microinjections/methods , Neurons/drug effects , Peptide Fragments/administration & dosage , Periaqueductal Gray/drug effects , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Receptors, Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide/agonists , Trigeminal Nuclei/drug effects
14.
J Headache Pain ; 17: 5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26857820

ABSTRACT

The diagnosis of primary headache disorders is clinical and based on the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society (ICHD-3-beta). However several brain conditions may mimic primary headache disorders and laboratory investigation may be needed. This necessity occurs when the treating physician doubts for the primary origin of headache. Features that represent a warning for a possible underlying disorder causing the headache are new onset headache, change in previously stable headache pattern, headache that abruptly reaches the peak level, headache that changes with posture, headache awakening the patient, or precipitated by physical activity or Valsalva manoeuvre, first onset of headache ≥50 years of age, neurological symptoms or signs, trauma, fever, seizures, history of malignancy, history of HIV or active infections, and prior history of stroke or intracranial bleeding. All national headache societies and the European Headache Alliance invited to review and comment the consensus before the final draft. The consensus recommends brain MRI for the case of migraine with aura that persists on one side or in brainstem aura. Persistent aura without infarction and migrainous infarction require brain MRI, MRA and MRV. Brain MRI with detailed study of the pituitary area and cavernous sinus, is recommended for all TACs. For primary cough headache, exercise headache, headache associated with sexual activity, thunderclap headache and hypnic headache apart from brain MRI additional tests may be required. Because there is little and no good evidence the committee constructed a consensus based on the opinion of experts, and should be treated as imperfect.


Subject(s)
Headache Disorders, Primary/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Consensus , Humans , Neuroimaging , Physical Examination
15.
Eur J Neurol ; 21(9): 1178-83, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24780052

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Sensitivity to light (photophobia) is a common ill-understood symptom of migraine, whose neurobiology is important in understanding the disorder. METHODS: Patients reporting premonitory symptoms before migraine headache were infused with nitroglycerin (GTN) at a first visit. Patients who responded with premonitory symptoms followed by a delayed headache resembling their migraine had positron emission tomography (PET) scans at least 1 week later, during which GTN infusion was repeated. H2 (15) O PET scans were performed during baseline (pain free), premonitory phase (pain free) and migraine headache. Patients were divided into two groups, with and without photophobia in the premonitory phase. The differences between the premonitory and baseline scans were analysed within groups and between groups using statistical parametric mapping. RESULTS: Thirteen patients participated in the PET study, 10 of whom had at least one PET scan during the premonitory phase in the absence of pain. Data from these 10 patients were included in the final analysis. Five patients had photophobia and five patients did not have photophobia in the premonitory phase. Comparing the premonitory scans to baseline scans, there was activation of extrastriate visual cortex (BA18) in patients with photophobia. This activation was significantly greater than in the patients without photophobia. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that photic hypersensitivity is linked to activation of the visual cortex during the premonitory phase of migraine in the absence of headache.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Cerebrovascular Circulation/physiology , Migraine Disorders/complications , Migraine Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Photophobia/complications , Adult , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Male , Positron-Emission Tomography , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
17.
Cephalalgia ; 34(12): 986-93, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24607501

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We sought to assess a novel, noninvasive, portable vagal nerve stimulator (nVNS) for acute treatment of migraine. METHODS: Participants with migraine with or without aura were eligible for an open-label, single-arm, multiple-attack study. Up to four migraine attacks were treated with two 90-second doses, at 15-minute intervals delivered to the right cervical branch of the vagus nerve within a six-week time period. Subjects were asked to self-treat at moderate or severe pain, or after 20 minutes of mild pain. RESULTS: Of 30 enrolled patients (25 females, five males, median age 39), two treated no attacks, and one treated aura only, leaving a Full Analysis Set of 27 treating 80 attacks with pain. An adverse event was reported in 13 patients, notably: neck twitching (n = 1), raspy voice (n = 1) and redness at the device site (n = 1). No unanticipated, serious or severe adverse events were reported. The pain-free rate at two hours was four of 19 (21%) for the first treated attack with a moderate or severe headache at baseline. For all moderate or severe attacks at baseline, the pain-free rate was 12/54 (22%). CONCLUSIONS: nVNS may be an effective and well-tolerated acute treatment for migraine in certain patients.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/therapy , Vagus Nerve Stimulation , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects
18.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 129(2): e6-8, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23924392

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although not typically considered as part of the clinical phenotype of migraine, cranial autonomic symptoms, such as lacrimation or conjunctival injection, can certainly occur. Their appearance can lead to the common misdiagnosis of sinus headache in clinical practice. CASE: The patient presented developed post-ganglionic sympathetic denervation at the level of the superior cervical ganglion/carotid plexus. Her subsequent partial Horner's syndrome symptoms intensified during subsequent migraine attacks indicating increasing sympathetic autonomic dysfunction. At the time of the pain, recruitment and activation of the trigeminal autonomic reflex were demonstrated by lacrimation. CONCLUSION: The clinical picture suggests peripheral unmasking of the underlying central trigeminal autonomic reflex that is active in migraine. Recognition of cranial autonomic symptoms in migraine is a key to confident differential diagnosis from trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias and from sinus-related headache disorders.


Subject(s)
Autonomic Denervation , Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/etiology , Migraine Disorders/etiology , Postoperative Complications , Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Neurilemmoma/surgery , Superior Cervical Ganglion/surgery
19.
J Headache Pain ; 13(5): 361-78, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22644214

ABSTRACT

Migraine is a disabling neurological disease that affects 14.7 % of Europeans. Studies evaluating the economic impact of migraine are complex to conduct adequately and with time become outdated as healthcare systems evolve. This study sought to quantify and compare direct medical costs of chronic migraine (CM) and episodic migraine (EM) in five European countries. Cross-sectional data collected via a web-based survey were screened for migraine and classified as CM (≥15 headache days/month) or EM (<15 headache days/month), and included sociodemographics, resource use data and medication use. Unit cost data, gathered using publicly available sources, were analyzed for each type of service, stratified by migraine status. Univariate and multivariate log-normal regression models were used to examine the relationship between various factors and their impact on total healthcare costs. This economic analysis included data from respondents with migraine in the UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. CM participants had higher level of disability and more prevalent psychiatric disorders compared to EM. CM participants had more provider visits, emergency department/hospital visits, and diagnostic tests; the medical costs were three times higher for CM than EM. Per patient annual costs were highest in the UK and Spain and lower in France and Germany. CM was associated with higher medical resource use and total costs compared to EM in all study countries, suggesting that treatments that reduce headache frequency could decrease the clinical and economic burden of migraine in Europe. Comparing patterns of care and outcomes among countries may facilitate the development of more cost-effective care, and bring greater recognition to patients affected by migraine.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Migraine Disorders/economics , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disabled Persons , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Migraine Disorders/complications
20.
Int J Neurosci ; 121(12): 655-61, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21777163

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of allodynia on treatment outcomes in the patients with acute migraine treated in the "Act when Mild" (AwM) study. AwM, a randomized placebo-controlled trial, studied almotriptan 12.5 mg in the early treatment (within 1 hr) of acute migraine when the pain was still mild, and investigated clinical outcomes in the presence or absence of allodynia, which was prospectively recorded using patient questionnaires. Of the total population, 39% (n = 404) reported allodynia that did not alter the efficacy of almotriptan administered for early/mild pain in terms of 2-hr pain-free rates (53.9% for allodynic patients vs. 52.5% for nonallodynic patients). Similarly, sustained pain-free rates were 47.2% versus 45.5%, and migraine duration 1.40 versus 1.54 hr, respectively. However, allodynia impaired the effectiveness of almotriptan in the patients with moderate/severe pain in terms of longer migraine duration, fewer patients achieving pain-free status, and more requiring rescue medication. In conclusion, the lack of effect of allodynia on the efficacy of almotriptan given for early/mild migraine pain might help explain the improved outcomes associated with the early-treatment strategy in AwM. Moreover, the data suggest that pain intensity is the main driver of triptan response, and not the presence or absence of allodynia.


Subject(s)
Hyperalgesia/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Pain/drug therapy , Tryptamines/administration & dosage , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hyperalgesia/epidemiology , Hyperalgesia/physiopathology , Male , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Pain/epidemiology , Pain Measurement/methods , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...