Nonrestrictive diet does not increase infections during post-HSCT neutropenia: data from a multicenter randomized trial.

Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality during neutropenia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The use of a low-microbial protective diet (PD) in the peritransplantation period is a standard of care, although its efficacy has never been tested prospectively. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, enrolling all consecutive adult patients undergoing high-dose induction chemotherapy or HSCT with the objective to compare nonrestrictive diet (NRD) vs PD. Overall, 222 patients were enrolled, randomly assigned, and analyzed. One hundred seventy-five subjects (79%) received autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT), 41 (18%) received allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT), and 6 (3%) patients received high-dose induction chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in terms of incidence of grade ≥2 infections and death during neutropenia in the 2 arms. In multivariable analysis, only multiple myeloma diagnosis, fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, and the absence of mucositis were associated with a lower incidence of grade ≥2 infections. We did not report any significant variation in terms of hospitalization length, incidence of mucositis and gastrointestinal infections, body weight, and serum albumin variations in the 2 arms. In allo-HSCT recipients, the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease grade ≥3 was similar. NRD was associated with higher patient-reported satisfaction. In conclusion, NRD is not inferior to a traditional PD during neutropenia after HSCT, and our results demonstrated that implementing a restrictive diet unnecessary burdens patients' quality of life. The clinical trial was registered prospectively in the clinical trial registry of the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan as INT54/16.

The impact of education on patients' psycho-emotional status during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter prospective study by thes Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo.

PURPOSE: Depressive disorders are the most common manifestation of psychological distress in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Few studies have yet investigated the relationship between therapeutic educational interventions and outcomes in these patients with specific attention to those related to mental health. Aim of this study was to understand how much educational intervention can represent a protective factor in preventing psycho-emotional distress-related issues in this setting. DESIGN: A prospective observational study of a multicenter cohort was conducted. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. METHODS: A pre-transplant therapeutic educational programme was offered to a cohort of adult patients undergoing allo-HSCT recruited in ten transplant centers of the GITMO network between May 2018 and January 2019. Depression, Anxiety and Stress scale was used to collect data on psycho-emotional distress at admission (T0), at the day of transplant (T1) and at discharge (T2). Descriptive data were collected and reported, and comparative analyses were done among patients who were compliant with the pre-transplant educational intervention and those who did not (for any reason). FINDINGS: A cohort of 133 allo-HSCT patients was observed. In patients who did not receive pre-transplant educational intervention, higher levels of depression at admission (p = 0.01) and at the day of transplant (p = 0.03), higher levels of anxiety (p = 0.01 and p = 0.01 respectively) as well as higher levels of stress (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01) were observed. Problem solving and "face to face" interview were the best methods to provide education to patients. Those who received pre-transplant education through "face-to-face" interview reported significant low levels of depression during the whole hospital stay period (p < 0.01; p = 0.01; p = 0.01) and less anxiety and stress at admission (p < 0.05 and p = 0.01 respectively). Depression was more represented in female than male participants at T0 (16.5% vs 9.0%; p = 0.01), while among T0 and T2 the males had a significant higher increasing of depression than females (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that pretreatment therapeutic educational programs with specific learning modalities can be effective in limiting the potential risk of developing moderate-to-severe anxiety-depressive states and stress symptoms related to allo-HSCT. IMPLICATIONS FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL PROVIDERS: Further studies are needed to confirm our results and to understand whether containing psycho-emotional distress can have any relationship with medium- and long-term post-transplant complications.

Electrochemically driven mechanical energy harvesting.

Efficient mechanical energy harvesters enable various wearable devices and auxiliary energy supply. Here we report a novel class of mechanical energy harvesters via stress-voltage coupling in electrochemically alloyed electrodes. The device consists of two identical Li-alloyed Si as electrodes, separated by electrolyte-soaked polymer membranes. Bending-induced asymmetric stresses generate chemical potential difference, driving lithium ion flux from the compressed to the tensed electrode to generate electrical current. Removing the bending reverses ion flux and electrical current. Our thermodynamic analysis reveals that the ideal energy-harvesting efficiency of this device is dictated by the Poisson's ratio of the electrodes. For the thin-film-based energy harvester used in this study, the device has achieved a generating capacity of 15%. The device demonstrates a practical use of stress-composition-voltage coupling in electrochemically active alloys to harvest low-grade mechanical energies from various low-frequency motions, such as everyday human activities.

The OECI model: the experience of INT Milan with a focus on the integration of psycho-oncology support.

The procedure for Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) accreditation identified the formation of MDTs for the diagnosis and scheduling of primary treatment with integration of supportive care as a key strength at Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT). The opportunities for improvement highlighted by the OECI peer review inspired a study on the evaluation of psychological distress, with a view to integrating this evaluation into global patient management and to defining standardized criteria for the provision of psychological services. This article describes the OECI accreditation experience at INT and the study conducted between January and May 2015 on the evaluation of patients' distress levels during cancer treatment, defining a score-based cutoff point that triggers the intervention of a psychologist. The Distress Thermometer was used as a tool for evaluating psychological distress, performed by nurses on admitting the patient. A total of 261 questionnaires were completed by patients admitted to the medical oncology and hematology departments, with an average distress value of 4.1, and 60% of patients experiencing clinically detectable emotional distress. Emotion-related problems had a significant association with a greater level of distress, while there were few reports of relationship issues as a cause of distress. As a result of the improvement initiative supported by the psychological distress evaluation study, we validated the screening questionnaire to be included at the initial patient evaluation stage with a cutoff point triggering the intervention by a psychologist at a score of ≥7.