Ensartinib (X-396) in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from a First-in-Human Phase I/II, Multicenter Study.

Purpose: Evaluate safety and determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of ensartinib (X-396), a potent anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), and evaluate preliminary pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity in a first-in-human, phase I/II clinical trial primarily in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and Methods: In dose escalation, ensartinib was administered at doses of 25 to 250 mg once daily in patients with advanced solid tumors; in dose expansion, patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC were administered 225 mg once daily. Patients who had received prior ALK TKI(s) and patients with brain metastases were eligible.Results: Thirty-seven patients enrolled in dose escalation, and 60 enrolled in dose expansion. The most common treatment-related toxicities were rash (56%), nausea (36%), pruritus (28%), vomiting (26%), and fatigue (22%); 23% of patients experienced a treatment-related grade 3 to 4 toxicity (primarily rash and pruritus). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached, but the RP2D was chosen as 225 mg based on the frequency of rash observed at 250 mg without improvement in activity. Among the ALK-positive efficacy evaluable patients treated at ≥200 mg, the response rate (RR) was 60%, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.2 months. RR in ALK TKI-naïve patients was 80%, and median PFS was 26.2 months. In patients with prior crizotinib only, the RR was 69% and median PFS was 9.0 months. Responses were also observed in the central nervous system, with an intracranial RR of 64%.Conclusions: Ensartinib was active and generally well tolerated in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. Clin Cancer Res; 24(12); 2771-9. ©2018 AACR.

Perifosine treatment in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of a phase II clinical trial and in vitro studies.

Abstract Because of the importance of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), we evaluated in vitro cytotoxicity induced by perifosine, an AKT inhibitor, in CLL lymphocytes and found that the mean 50% effective dose (ED50) was 313 nM. We then performed a phase II trial of perifosine in patients with relapsed/refractory CLL to assess response, outcomes, toxicity and ex vivo correlative measures. After 3 months of treatment, six of eight patients showed stable disease, one achieved a partial response and one had progressive disease. Median event-free survival and overall survival in all patients treated were 3.9 and 9.7 months. Adverse events included hematologic, infectious/fever, pain, gastrointestinal and constitutional toxicities. Unexpectedly, AKT phosphorylation in CLL lymphocytes from treated patients was not correlated with response. Additionally, perifosine did not inhibit AKT phosphorylation in cultured CLL lymphocytes. Perifosine is cytotoxic to CLL cells in vitro, and largely induces stabilized disease in vivo, with an AKT-independent mechanism.

Low-dose whole brain radiotherapy combined with radiosurgery for primary CNS lymphoma achieving partial response to induction methotrexate-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: For patients with primary CNS lymphoma who achieve complete response (CR) after induction methotrexate-based chemotherapy with rituximab, low-dose whole brain radiation therapy (LD-WBRT) appears effective and is well tolerated. For patients who respond to induction methotrexate-based chemotherapy with or without rituximab but have unifocal residual disease less than 3 cm in size, we hypothesized that LD-WBRT combined with radiosurgery would be effective at controlling residual disease and well tolerated. METHODS: Four adult patients with primary CNS lymphoma with a favorable response to induction chemotherapy but had residual disease less than 3 cm were identified. Induction chemotherapy consisted of methotrexate with or without additional agents including rituximab. LD-WBRT comprised 2340 cGy in 13 fractions. This was immediately preceded or followed by a single radiosurgery treatment of 12 12.5 Gy to the focus of residual disease defined on contrast enhanced T1 weighted MRI. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 17.1 months (range 10-23 months). All patients had residual disease after induction chemotherapy but achieved complete response (CR) following LD-WBRT and radiosurgery. Three patients remained free of disease. One patient developed distant brain recurrence 12 months after radiation but remained alive at last follow-up (17 months). No treatment-related neurotoxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of induction methotrexate-based chemotherapy with or without rituximab, LD-WBRT and radiosurgery appears effective and well tolerated in patients with primary CNS lymphoma who achieve a partial response (PR) to chemotherapy with minimal residual disease. Longer follow-up and larger patient numbers are clearly needed for confirmation.

Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, version 1.2013.

These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize several key updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas (NHL) and provide a discussion of the clinical evidence that support the updates. The updates discussed in this article feature recommendations for additional treatment options in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and guidance surrounding the management of hepatitis virus reactivation/infections in high-risk patients with NHL undergoing antitumor therapy.

A Phase I study of arsenic trioxide (Trisenox), ascorbic acid, and bortezomib (Velcade) combination therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: This Phase I study assessed the feasibility of concomitant arsenic trioxide (ATO), ascorbic acid (AA), and bortezomib (Velcade™) (AAV) for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: ATO (0.25 mg/kg) and AA (1 g) were given with an escalating dose of bortezomib (1 mg/m(2) or 1.3 mg/m(2) IV bolus on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle). RESULTS: Ten patients (median age 62 years), with a median of 3 prior regimens, were enrolled. Four (40%) patients achieved clinical benefit, with one patient achieving a durable partial response. No formal DLTs were encountered. CONCLUSION: AAV combination was feasible and demonstrated some benefits in this heavily pretreated population.

Re-induction therapy decisions based on day 14 bone marrow biopsy in acute myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: The decision to re-induce patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) based on results of the day 14 bone marrow (BM) biopsy is variable and lacks evidence based data. The aim of our review was to evaluate the accuracy of a day 14 BM biopsy in determining the need for re-induction chemotherapy. METHODS: Seventy-four patients with newly diagnosed de novo AML treated with induction chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed for the purpose of evaluating treatment decisions and outcomes based on their day 14 BM biopsy. Response to therapy in this analysis was based on morphology alone. RESULTS: Of the 74 patients undergoing standard induction, 45 patients (61%) had no evidence of leukemia on their day 14 BM biopsy. Eighteen patients (24%) had definitive residual disease (RD), and 11 patient's (15%) were classified as indeterminate response (IR). Fifteen patients with RD and one with IR underwent re-induction chemotherapy. However, thirteen patients (3 RD and 10 IR) were observed until count recovery without any re-induction therapy. Eleven of these 13 patients who were observed eventually attained a morphologic complete remission (CR), including two patients with RD. CONCLUSIONS: A day 14 BM biopsy may have suboptimal sensitivity for the detection of residual leukemia. Some patients with an IR on day 14 may not require re-induction chemotherapy, but instead, may benefit from careful observation until count recovery to avoid the mortality and morbidity associated with re-induction chemotherapy.

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas, version 3.2012.

These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize several key updates to the 2012 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas (NHL) and describe the clinical evidence supporting the updates. The featured updates include changes to the recommendations for treatment options in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (including in elderly or frail patients and patients with poor-risk cytogenetics), guidance surrounding surveillance imaging for follow-up of patients with NHL, and the addition of first-line consolidation options for patients with mantle cell lymphoma.

Phase II study of cenersen, an antisense inhibitor of p53, in combination with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab for high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with deletion or mutation of TP53 have exceedingly poor clinical outcomes. Cenersen, an oligonucleotide targeting TP53, has been shown to abrogate the activity of TP53 gain-of-function mutants and to increase sensitivity of lymphoma cells to cytotoxic chemotherapy in vitro. We combined cenersen with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR) as treatment for patients with high-risk CLL. The purpose of this phase II study was to determine the overall response rate, response duration and toxicity of cenersen administered in combination with FCR. Twenty patients with relapsed or high-risk CLL were evaluated. Nineteen patients were previously treated. The complete response rate was 18%; the overall response rate was 53%. Median progression-free and overall survival was 5.3 and 10.6 months, respectively. The most common serious adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. In this single arm phase II study, cenersen combined with FCR yielded clinical responses with acceptable toxicity in patients with high-risk CLL.

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines Occult primary.

Occult primary tumors, or cancers of unknown primary (CUPs), are defined as histologically proven metastatic malignant tumors whose primary site cannot be identified during pretreatment evaluation. They have a wide variety of clinical presentations and a poor prognosis in most patients. Patients with occult primary tumors often present with general complaints, such as anorexia and weight loss. Clinical absence of primary tumor, early dissemination, aggressiveness, and unpredictability of metastatic pattern are characteristic of these tumors. Life expectancy is very short, with a median survival of 6 to 9 months. In most patients, occult primary tumors are refractory to systemic treatments, and chemotherapy is only palliative and does not significantly improve long-term survival. However, certain clinical presentations of these tumors are associated with a better prognosis. Special pathologic studies can identify subsets of patients with tumor types that are more responsive to chemotherapy. Treatment options should be individualized for this selected group of patients to achieve improved response and survival rates.

SET oncoprotein overexpression in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a predictor of aggressive disease and a new treatment target.

B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), an incurable leukemia, is characterized by defective apoptosis. We found that the SET oncoprotein, a potent inhibitor of the protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) tumor suppressor, is overexpressed in primary CLL cells and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cell line cells. In CLL, increased levels of SET correlated significantly with disease severity (shorter time to treatment and overall survival). We developed SET antagonist peptides that bound SET, increased cellular PP2A activity, decreased Mcl-1 expression, and displayed selective cytotoxicity for CLL and NHL cells in vitro. In addition, shRNA for SET was cytotoxic for NHL cells in vitro. The SET antagonist peptide COG449 inhibited growth of NHL tumor xenografts in mice. These data demonstrate that SET is a new treatment target in B-cell malignancies and that SET antagonists represent novel agents for treatment of CLL and NHL.

Vaccination with patient-specific tumor-derived antigen in first remission improves disease-free survival in follicular lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Vaccination with hybridoma-derived autologous tumor immunoglobulin (Ig) idiotype (Id) conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and administered with granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) induces follicular lymphoma (FL) -specific immune responses. To determine the clinical benefit of this vaccine, we conducted a double-blind multicenter controlled phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with advanced stage FL achieving complete response (CR) or CR unconfirmed (CRu) after chemotherapy were randomly assigned two to one to receive either Id vaccine (Id-KLH + GM-CSF) or control (KLH + GM-CSF). Primary efficacy end points were disease-free survival (DFS) for all randomly assigned patients and DFS for randomly assigned patients receiving at least one dose of Id vaccine or control. RESULTS: Of 234 patients enrolled, 177 (81%) achieved CR/CRu after chemotherapy and were randomly assigned. For 177 randomly assigned patients, including 60 patients not vaccinated because of relapse (n = 55) or other reasons (n = 5), median DFS between Id-vaccine and control arms was 23.0 versus 20.6 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.16; P = .256). For 117 patients who received Id vaccine (n = 76) or control (n = 41), median DFS after randomization was 44.2 months for Id-vaccine arm versus 30.6 months for control arm (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.99; P = .047) at median follow-up of 56.6 months (range, 12.6 to 89.3 months). In an unplanned subgroup analysis, median DFS was significantly prolonged for patients receiving IgM-Id (52.9 v 28.7 months; P = .001) but not IgG-Id vaccine (35.1 v 32.4 months; P = .807) compared with isotype-matched control-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Vaccination with patient-specific hybridoma-derived Id vaccine after chemotherapy-induced CR/CRu may prolong DFS in patients with FL. Vaccine isotype may affect clinical outcome and explain differing results between this and other controlled Id-vaccine trials.

A phase I study of bevacizumab (B) in combination with everolimus (E) and erlotinib (E) in advanced cancer (BEE).

PURPOSE: VEGF, mTOR, and EGFR inhibitors have demonstrated anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic effects alone and in combination with each other. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab, everolimus, and erlotinib combination. METHODS: Doublet therapy consisted of bevacizumab at 10 mg/kg every 14 days and everolimus 5 mg daily which escalated to 10 mg daily. Erlotinib 75 mg daily was added to the phase II dose recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of bevacizumab and everolimus. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed in cycle 1. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients with advanced solid malignancies were evaluable for DLT and efficacy. No DLTs were observed in the doublet dose escalation. Two DLTs (grade 3 mucositis and grade 3 rash) were observed with the addition of erlotinib 75 mg daily. Consequently, triplet doses were adjusted and were better tolerated. Four patients had a partial response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for the doublet therapy was 6.0 months (0.5 to 32+ months) and 5.5 months (0.8 to 27+ months) for the triplet therapy. Systemic exposure of everolimus was significantly higher in combination with erlotinib (476 ± 161 ng h/mL) compared to when given alone (393 ± 156 ng h/mL; P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The RPTD for the doublet therapy is bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 14 days and everolimus 10 mg daily, and the RPTD for the triplet therapy is bevacizumab 5 mg/kg every 14 days, everolimus 5 mg and erlotinib 75 mg daily. Prolonged disease stability was demonstrated in tumors known to respond to mTOR inhibition and potentially resistant to VEGF blockade.

Overcoming drug resistance in mantle cell lymphoma using a combination of dose-dense and intense therapy.

We present a study of the prevalence of genetic polymorphisms and expression of genes encoding the drug-resistance proteins glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) in order to gain insights into the pattern of failure evident in mantle cell lymphoma. We note a high preponderance of genetic alterations conferring resistance to standard chemotherapy in this illness. Concurrent with this investigation, we present a series of patients who were provided dose-dense and intense chemotherapy to circumvent these drug-resistance mechanisms. High responses were noted, though durable remissions were few, indicating non-traditional chemotherapy options are important to investigate in this illness.

"Short course" bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone as induction prior to transplant or as frontline therapy for nontransplant candidates in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of short-course bortezomib, melphalan, prednisone (VMP) in previously untreated multiple myeloma as frontline therapy for transplant-ineligible patients and induction prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients received up to 6 28-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), days 1, 4, 8, and 11, plus melphalan 6 mg/m(2) and prednisone 60 mg/m(2), days 1-7. After 2-6 cycles, eligible and consenting patients could proceed to ASCT. Responses were assessed by International Uniform Response Criteria. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate with VMP. Forty-five patients were enrolled. Among 44 evaluable patients, response rate was 95%, including 18% >or=CR (9% stringent CR), 27% very good partial responses (VGPR), and 50% partial responses (PR). Twenty patients proceeded to ASCT. Stem cell collection was successful in all; median yield was 5.6 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Posttransplant response rates were 30% >or=CR (10% stringent CR), 65% VGPR, and 5% PR. After median follow-up of 14.0/14.6 months, median time to progression and progression-free survival were both 19.8/27.9 months in non-ASCT/ASCT patients. Seven patients have died; 1-year survival rates were 82%/95% in non-ASCT/ASCT patients. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (20%), neutropenia (28%), and infection (9%). Peripheral neuropathy grade 2-4 was the most common nonhematopoietic side effect occurring 17 patients (38%), although it was typically reversible, and only 5 patients (11%) discontinued therapy as a result of it. Short-course VMP is highly effective and generally well tolerated, both as initial treatment in non-ASCT patients and induction prior to ASCT. VMP did not negatively affect stem cell collection. Longer follow-up and prospective phase III trials are required to validate these initial observations.

A genomic approach to improve prognosis and predict therapeutic response in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

PURPOSE: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a B-cell malignancy characterized by a variable clinical course. Several parameters have prognostic capabilities but are associated with altered response to therapy in only a small subset of patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used gene expression profiling methods to generate predictors of therapy response and prognosis. Genomic signatures that reflect progressive disease and responses to chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy were created using cancer cell lines and patient leukemia cell samples. We validated and applied these three signatures to independent clinical data from four cohorts, representing a total of 301 CLL patients. RESULTS: A genomic signature of prognosis created from patient leukemic cell gene expression data coupled with clinical parameters significantly differentiated patients with stable disease from those with progressive disease in the training data set. The progression signature was validated in two independent data sets, showing a capacity to accurately identify patients at risk for progressive disease. In addition, genomic signatures that predict response to chlorambucil or pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab were generated and could accurately distinguish responding and nonresponding CLL patients. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, microarray analysis of CLL lymphocytes can be used to refine prognosis and predict response to different therapies. These results have implications for standard and investigational therapeutics in CLL patients.

Outcomes of patients who undergo aggressive induction therapy for secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Response and survival in 96 patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) who received aggressive induction chemotherapy was reviewed. METHODS: The median follow-up of survivors was 2.3 years. A total of 70 (73%) patients achieved a morphologic complete remission (CR) confirmed by absence of leukemic blasts by flow cytometry. RESULTS: For all 96 patients, the median event-free survival (EFS) was 8 months, and overall survival (OS) was 13.6 months (range, 1-119 months). Eight patients died shortly after induction therapy because of disease or side effects, and 13 are currently in continuous first remission. The median disease-free survival (DFS) for all 70 patients who achieved a morphologic CR was 9 months (range, 1-51 months), with a 64% chance of surviving 1 year. Patients with AML after previous chemotherapy or radiation therapy had a higher morphologic remission rate compared with those arising from myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative disease (82% vs 62%; P = .027). However, among the patients from the 2 groups who attained a morphologic remission, there was no difference in terms of CR rate (P = .94), DFS, EFS, or OS (P = .55, .83, and .71, respectively). This is a similar DFS to the group of 7 patients who went directly to ablative allogeneic transplant rather than having induction therapy first. In this population of patients who received aggressive chemotherapy, Charlson comorbidity index or a higher number of factors recognized as high risk in leukemia patients did not affect the chance of OS, DFS, and EFS, although having more recognized leukemia risk factors was related to a lower chance of surviving 1 year. However, it is important to note that those with higher comorbidity indexes were underrepresented in this aggressively treated cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The data from the current study demonstrate that many patients with sAML can tolerate aggressive induction therapy and attain remission, but duration of response and the chance of long-term survival remain poor.

Sequential high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide with rituximab for relapsed Hodgkin and large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: increased toxicity without improvement in progression-free survival.

Non-cross resistant drugs given at high-dose intensity may maximise tumor cell kill leading to improved patient outcomes. We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of administering ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide +/- rituximab as sequential high-dose single agents. Twenty-two patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 9) or non-Hodgkin (n = 13) lymphoma (NHL) were included. Therapy included: cycle 1 ifosfamide (15 g/m(2)), cycle 2 etoposide (900 mg/m(2)) and cycle 3 carboplatin (area under the curve 15). Patients with NHL received rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) with cycles 1 and 2. Blood stem cell collection was performed after etoposide. Primary endpoints were overall response (complete response (CR) + PR) and ability to mobilise stem cells after etoposide. Secondary endpoints were to assess the toxicity of the regimen and to evaluate the ability of patients to proceed to stem cell transplant (SCT). Overall response rate was 54% with CR in 4/22 (18%) subjects and PR in 8/22 (36%). Median progression-free survival was 15 months and overall survival has not been reached at 40 months. Thirteen participants proceeded to SCT. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 58% of cycles and 91% of subjects respectively. Forty-five percent of patients required hospitalisation for toxicity and two patients died from complications of therapy. Sequential dose intense ifosfamide, etoposide, carboplatin +/- rituximab was more toxic and no more effective than the same drugs given in a conventional fashion.