Quality of life in SSc-ILD patients: Understanding the impact of the ILD and the needs of the SSc-ILD patients and their need for caregivers in France.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to describe the impact of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease, on quality of life, to estimate the correlation between quality of life and severity of lung disease and to assess the impact of interstitial lung disease on caregivers. Methods: Seven investigators included systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease patients from December 2019 to April 2020. Sociodemographics and clinical data were collected. Patients reported outcomes and questionnaires were used with 1 generic patients reported outcome (EQ-5D-5L), 1 specific PRO (Brief Interstitial Lung Disease) and 2 self-reported questionnaires on impact of SSc complications and impact on caregivers. The correlation between forced vital capacity and EQ-5D-5L score was estimated with a multivariate linear regression model adjusted on several covariates. Results: In all, 89 patients were included. 26.4% were males, mean age was 58.2 ± 14.5 years. Mean EQ-5D-5L score = 0.79 ± 0.22 (median = 0.85). Mean EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale score = 60.8 ± 20.4 (median = 61.5). Mean King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease score = 58.4 ± 12.7 (median = 58.0). After adjustment on covariates, a significant correlation between forced vital capacity and EQ-5D-5L score was found with an increase of 0.003 of the EQ-5D-5L score for a 1% increase of FVC (p = 0.0096). No significant correlation between forced vital capacity and the EQ-VAS and King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease score were found. The impact of SSc on other organs was significantly correlated with EQ- 5D-5L score, respectively, for the impact scores on the lung system (p = 0.0003), heart system (p = 0.0182), Raynaud's syndrome (p = 0.0015), digestive system (p = 0.0032), joints/muscles (p = 0.0003), skin (p < 0.0001), kidney (p = 0.0052) and gastro-oesophageal reflux (p = 0.0063). Significant correlations between King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease score and lung system (p < 0.0001), heart system (p < 0.0001), digital ulcers (p = 0.058), digestive system (p < 0.0001), kidney (p = 0.0004), skin (p = 0.0499) and gastro-oesophageal reflux (p = 0.0033) scores were found 68.5% of patients reported their need for a caregiver to help them in their daily life activities. Conclusion: Our study highlighted the strong burden of systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease` for patients, especially with an impact on quality of life, on other organs manifestations and need for caregivers in their daily life.

Considerations for a combined index for limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis to support drug development and improve outcomes.

Systemic sclerosis (SSc; systemic scleroderma) is characterized by a heterogeneous range of clinical manifestations. SSc is classified into limited cutaneous SSc (lcSSc) and diffuse cutaneous subgroups (dcSSc) based on the extent of skin involvement. Randomized controlled trials in scleroderma have mainly focused on dcSSc partly because the measurement of skin involvement, critical for evaluating a therapeutic intervention is more dynamic in this subset. Nonetheless, lcSSc, the most common cutaneous subset (about 2/3), is also associated with significant morbidity and detrimental impact on health-related quality of life. The lack of interventional studies in lcSSc is partly due to a lack of relevant outcome measures to evaluate this subgroup. Combining several clinically meaningful outcomes selected specifically for lcSSc may improve representativeness in clinical trials and responsiveness of outcomes measured in randomized controlled trials. A composite index dedicated to lcSSc combining such relevant outcomes could advance clinical trial development for lcSSc by providing the opportunity to test and select among candidate drugs that could act as disease-modifying treatments for this neglected subgroup of SSc. This proposed index would include items selected by expert physicians and patients with lcSSc across domains grounded in the lived experience of lcSSc. This article reviews the reasons behind the relative neglect of lcSSc, discusses the current state of outcome measures for lcSSc, identifies challenges, and proposes a roadmap for a combined lcSSc-specific treatment response index.

Impaired quality of life in systemic sclerosis and patient perception of the disease: A large international survey.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disease perception in a large, international group of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: We placed a standardized questionnaire on a website for patient access. Socio-demographic information, disease characteristics, and self-assessment questionnaires-the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R)-were collected. RESULTS: A total of 1902 patients from 60 countries were included. HRQoL appeared to be impaired in SSc, particularly for physical health (PCS, mean ± SD = 43.4 ± 23.4). SSc patients also had strong perceptions about the chronic nature and negative consequence of the disease, and experienced negative emotions due to SSc. Patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc had a poorer HRQoL than those with limited cutaneous SSc, for both physical (PCS, mean ± SD = 46.6 ± 23.7 vs. 39.8 ± 22.3; p < 0.0001) and mental components (MCS, mean ± SD = 53.8 ± 23.0 vs. 50.3 ± 23.2; p = 0.003). Late-stage SSc patients were more likely to perceive their disease chronic (p < 0.0001), less controllable (p = 0.03) and with more consequences (p = 0.008), but they had a better understanding of their disease and experienced fewer negative emotions. Raynaud's phenomenon and gastrointestinal complications were the organ involvements with the greatest impact on QoL, they were the two variables associated with the most negative perception of illness severity. CONCLUSION: This study, performed on the largest group ever set up for this purpose, confirms the major impact on QoL and the negative perceptions of their disease expressed by SSc patients. However, the perception of this illness tended to improve with disease duration, suggesting that patients find effective coping strategies.

The needs of patients with systemic sclerosis--what are the difficulties encountered?

When the diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc) is made and you are told "You have SSc", it is a strange feeling for the patient, because you don't yet know what it is exactly. It is a very intense shock to hear this, and it is also difficult to try to imagine what will follow. There is no cure for SSc; there are just treatments that are capable of reducing the symptoms. The main difficulties and pitfalls encountered by the patients occur: before the diagnosis; during treatment; at the hospital and with the physicians; if surgery is necessary; at home; with family and friends… How do you live with SSc? You need strong, active support to help you to live with this illness; without this, we cannot handle it. The way to communicate, to inform, to consider this disease is changing, because times are changing, patients are changing, and the opinions of the specialists are also changing. Of course it's a long way, but what we, the patients, hope for is to be better understood by you, the doctors. Please pay attention to what we say; we're the ones suffering from this disease. SSc is part of us; we are not merely medical cases! Please think about it. Together we can help you to fight, to find out more, to find a cure.