Clinical Use of Trabecular Bone Score: The 2023 ISCD Official Positions.

Osteoporosis can currently be diagnosed by applying the WHO classification to bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, skeletal factors other than BMD contribute to bone strength and fracture risk. Lumbar spine TBS, a grey-level texture measure which is derived from DXA images has been extensively studied, enhances fracture prediction independent of BMD and can be used to adjust fracture probability from FRAX® to improve risk stratification. The purpose of this International Society for Clinical Densitometry task force was to review the existing evidence and develop recommendations to assist clinicians regarding when and how to perform, report and utilize TBS. Our review concluded that TBS is most likely to alter clinical management in patients aged ≥ 40 years who are close to the pharmacologic intervention threshold by FRAX. The TBS value from L1-L4 vertebral levels, without vertebral exclusions, should be used to calculate adjusted FRAX probabilities. L1-L4 vertebral levels can be used in the presence of degenerative changes and lumbar compression fractures. It is recommended not to report TBS if extreme structural or pathological artifacts are present. Monitoring and reporting TBS change is unlikely to be helpful with the current version of the TBS algorithm. The next version of TBS software will include an adjustment based upon directly measured tissue thickness. This is expected to improve performance and address some of the technical factors that affect the current algorithm which may require modifications to these Official Positions as experience is acquired with this new algorithm.

Executive Summary of the 2023 Adult Position Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: DXA Reporting, Follow-up BMD Testing and Trabecular Bone Score Application and Reporting.

After 15 months of preparation by task force chairs and teams, ISCD's 9th Position Development Conference (PDC) convened in Northbrook, IL, USA on March 28th and 29th, 2023 to approve new ISCD Official Positions in the topic areas of DXA Reporting, Follow-up BMD Testing and TBS Application and Reporting. Three teams of participants work to bring the PDC to fruition: the Steering Committee, Task Forces and Chairs, and the Expert Panel. To reach agreement on draft Official Positions, the PDC follows a scripted process with the UCLA/RAND Appropriateness Method (UCLA/RAM) as its foundation. Multiple rounds of data review, public debate and voting resulted in 32 new or modified Official Positions. Six companion position papers are also published along with this Executive Summary, serving as the detailed substantiation for the Official Positions. This Executive Summary reviews the personnel groups, activities and products of the 2023 PDC, with the entirety of the updated 2023 Official Positions presented in Appendix A. New Official Positions are highlighted in bold.

FRAX® Adjustment Using Renormalized Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) from L1 Alone may be Optimal for Fracture Prediction: The Manitoba BMD Registry.

Lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) used in conjunction with FRAX® improves 10-year fracture prediction. The derived FRAX risk adjustment is based upon TBS measured from L1-L4, designated TBSL1-L4-FRAX. In prior studies, TBS measurements that include L1 and exclude L4 give better fracture stratification than L1-L4. We compared risk stratification from TBS-adjusted FRAX using TBS derived from different combinations of upper lumbar vertebral levels renormalized for level-specific differences in individuals from the Manitoba Bone Density Program aged >40 years with baseline assessment of TBS and FRAX. TBS measurements for L1-L3, L1-L2 and L1 alone were calculated after renormalization for level-specific differences. Corresponding TBS-adjusted FRAX scores designated TBSL1-L3-FRAX, TBSL1-L2-FRAX and TBSL1-FRAX were compared with TBSL1-L4-FRAX for fracture risk stratification. Incident major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and hip fractures were assessed. The primary outcome was incremental change in area under the curve (ΔAUC). The study population included 71,209 individuals (mean age 64 years, 89.8% female). Before renormalization, mean TBS for L1-3, L1-L2 and L1 was significantly lower and TBS-adjusted FRAX significantly higher than from using TBSL1-L4. These differences were largely eliminated when TBS was renormalized for level-specific differences. During mean follow-up of 8.7 years 6745 individuals sustained incident MOF and 2039 sustained incident hip fractures. Compared with TBSL1-L4-FRAX, use of FRAX without TBS was associated with lower stratification (ΔAUC = -0.009, p < 0.001). There was progressive improvement in MOF stratification using TBSL1-L3-FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.001, p < 0.001), TBSL1-L2-FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.004, p < 0.001) and TBSL1-FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.005, p < 0.001). TBSL1-FRAX was significantly better than all other combinations for MOF prediction (p < 0.001). Incremental improvement in AUC for hip fracture prediction showed a similar but smaller trend. In conclusion, this single large cohort study found that TBS-adjusted FRAX performance for fracture prediction was improved when limited to the upper lumbar vertebral levels and was best using L1 alone.

Adjusting Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) for Level-Specific Differences Reduces FRAX®-Based Treatment Reclassification in Patients with Vertebral Exclusions: The Manitoba BMD Registry.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a FRAX®-independent risk factor for fracture prediction. TBS values increase from cranial to caudal, with the following mean differences between TBSL1-L4 and individual lumbar vertebrae: L1 -0.093, L2 -0.008, L3 +0.055 and L4 +0.046. Excluding vertebral levels can affect FRAX-based treatment recommendations close to the intervention threshold. We examined the effect of adjusting for level-specific TBS differences in individuals with vertebral exclusions due to structural artifact on TBS-adjusted FRAX-based treatment recommendations. We identified 71,209 individuals aged ≥40 years with TBS and FRAX calculations through the Manitoba Bone Density Program. In the 24,428 individuals with vertebral exclusions, adjusting TBS using these level-specific factors agreed with TBSL1-L4 (mean difference -0.001). We compared FRAX-based treatment recommendations for TBSL1-L4 and for non-excluded vertebral levels before and after adjusting for level-specific TBS differences. Among those with baseline major osteoporotic fracture risk ≥15 %, TBS with vertebral exclusions reclassified FRAX-based treatment in 10.6 % of individuals compared with TBSL1-L4, and was reduced to 7.2 % after adjusting for level-specific differences. In 11,131 patients where L1-L2 was used for BMD reporting (the most common exclusion pattern with the largest TBS effect), treatment reclassification was reduced from 13.9 % to 2.4 %, respectively. Among individuals with baseline hip fracture risk ≥2 %, TBS vertebral exclusions reclassified 7.1 % compared with TBSL1-L4, but only 4.5 % after adjusting for level-specific differences. When L1-L2 was used for BMD reporting, treatment reclassification from hip fracture risk was reduced from 9.2 % to 5.2 %. In conclusion, TBS and TBS-adjusted FRAX-based treatment recommendations are affected by vertebral level exclusions for structural artifact. Adjusting for level-specific differences in TBS reduces reclassification in FRAX-based treatment recommendations.

Trabecular Bone Score Vertebral Exclusions Affect Risk Classification and Treatment Recommendations: The Manitoba Bmd Registry.

Lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS), a texture measure derived from spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, is a bone mineral density (BMD)-independent risk factor for fracture. Lumbar vertebral levels that show structural artifact are excluded from BMD measurement. TBS is relatively unaffected by degenerative artifact, and it is uncertain whether the same exclusions should be applied to TBS reporting. To gain insight into the clinical impact of vertebral exclusion on TBS, we examined the effect of lumbar vertebral exclusions in routine clinical practice on tertile-based TBS categorization and TBS adjusted FRAX-based treatment recommendations. The study population consisted of 71,209 individuals aged 40 years and older with narrow fan-beam spine DXA examinations and retrospectively-derived TBS. During BMD reporting, 34.3% of the scans had one or more vertebral exclusions for structural artifact. When TBS was derived from the same vertebral levels used for BMD reporting, using fixed L1-L4 tertile cutoffs (1.23 and 1.31 from the McCloskey meta-analysis) reclassified 17.9% to a lower and 6.5% to a higher TBS category, with 75.6% unchanged. Reclassification was reduced from 24.4% overall to 17.2% when level-specific tertile cutoffs from the software manufacturer were used. Treatment reclassification based upon FRAX major osteoporotic fracture probability occurred in 2.9% overall, but in 9.6% of those with baseline risk ≥15%. For treatment based upon FRAX hip fracture probability, reclassification occurred in 3.4% overall, but in 10.4% in those with baseline risk ≥2%. In summary, lumbar spine TBS measurements based upon vertebral levels other than L1-L4 can alter the tertile category and treatment recommendations based upon TBS-adjusted FRAX calculation, especially for those close to or exceeding the treatment cut-off. Manufacturer level-specific tertile cut-offs should be used if vertebral exclusions are applied.

Fracture risk gradient assessed by categories of bone mineral density and trabecular bone score: the Manitoba BMD Registry.

Trabecular bonescore (TBS) helps to predict fracture risk in older adults. In this registry-based cohort study of patients aged 40 years and older, reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) and TBS are complementary for fracture risk prediction enhancement with lower BMD imparting greater risk than reduction in TBS. PURPOSE: Trabecular bone score (TBS) enhances fracture risk prediction independent of bone mineral density (BMD) in older adults. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the gradient of fracture risk based on TBS tertile categories and WHO BMD categories, adjusted for other risk factors. METHODS: Using the Manitoba DXA registry, patients aged 40 years and older with spine/hip DXA and L1-L4 TBS were identified. Any incident fractures, major osteoporotic fractures (MOF), and hip fractures were identified. Cox regression models were used to estimate unadjusted and covariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HR, 95%CI) for incident fracture by BMD and TBS category and for each SD decrease in BMD and TBS. RESULTS: The study population included 73,108 individuals, 90% female with mean age 64 years. Mean (SD) minimum T-score was - 1.8 (1.1), and mean L1-L4 TBS was 1.257 (0.123). Lower BMD and TBS, both per SD, by WHO BMD category and by TBS tertile category, were significantly associated with MOF, hip, and any fracture (all HRs p < 0.001). However, the quantum of risk was consistently greater for BMD than TBS, with HRs showing non-overlapping CIs. CONCLUSION: TBS is complementary to BMD in prediction of incident major, hip, and any osteoporosis-related fracture, but reductions in BMD impart greater risk than reductions in TBS on both continuous and categorical scales.

A Comprehensive Review of COVID-19-Associated Endocrine Manifestations.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has played a significant part in systematic damage, affecting lives and leading to significant mortality. The endocrine system is one of the systems affected by this pandemic outbreak. The relationship between them has been identified in previous and ongoing research. The mechanism through which severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) can achieve this is similar to that for organs that express angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors, which is the primary binding site of the virus. Endocrine cells widely express angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors and transmembrane serine protease 2, the primary mediators initiating the acute phase of the disease. This review aimed to identify and discuss the endocrine complications of COVID-19. This primary focus is on presenting thyroid disorders or newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM). Thyroid dysfunction with subacute thyroiditis, Graves' disease, and hypothyroidism caused by primary autoimmune thyroiditis has been reported. Pancreatic damage leads to type 1 DM because of the autoimmune nature of the disease and type 2 DM because of postinflammatory insulin resistance. Because follow-up data on COVID-19 on the endocrine glands are limited, long-term investigations are needed to assess specific effects.

Bone density and trabecular bone score to predict fractures in adults aged 20-39 years: a registry-based study.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) enhances fracture risk assessment in older adults; whether this is true in younger people is uncertain. In this registry-based study of adults aged 20-39 years, low BMD, but not low TBS, predicted fracture. PURPOSE: Trabecular bone score (TBS), a bone texture measurement, is associated with fracture risk independent of bone mineral density (BMD) in older adults. In adults aged 20-40 years, TBS remains stable and its role in fracture risk assessment is unclear. We utilized the Manitoba Bone Density Registry to explore the relationship of fracture risk with BMD and TBS in younger adults. METHODS: Women and men aged 20-39 years referred for DXA testing were studied. Incident major and any fractures were captured from health records. Categories based on WHO BMD T-score classification and TBS tertile were considered using Cox regression models to estimate covariate-adjusted (including sex) hazard ratios (aHR, 95%CI) for incident fracture by category, and each SD decrement in BMD and TBS. RESULTS: The study included 2799 individuals (77% female, mean age 32 years). Mean (SD) minimum T-score was - 0.9 (1.1) and TBS 1.355 (0.114); 7% had osteoporosis and 13% were in the lowest TBS tertile. Incident major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and any fracture risk was elevated in those with osteopenia (aHRs 1.20/1.45) and osteoporosis (aHRs 4.60/5.16). Fracture risk was unrelated to TBS tertile. Each SD decrement in BMD was associated with increased MOF risk (aHR 1.64) and any fracture (aHR 1.71); lower TBS was unrelated to fractures. CONCLUSION: In young adults, low BMD, but not low TBS, was predictive of MOF and any fracture. Routine clinical TBS measurement is not recommended for young adults. Further study is indicated to evaluate whether TBS is beneficial in subsets of younger adults.

Contributions of Clinical and Technical Factors to Longitudinal Change in Trabecular Bone Score and Bone Density: A Registry-Based Individual-Level Analysis.

Lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS), a gray-level texture measure derived from spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, is a bone mineral density (BMD)-independent risk factor for fracture. An unresolved question is whether TBS is sufficiently responsive to change over time or in response to widely used osteoporosis therapy at the individual level to serve as a useful biomarker. Using the Manitoba DXA Registry, we identified 11,643 individuals age 40 years and older with two fan-beam DXA scans performed on the same instrument within 5 years (mean interval 3.2 years), of whom 6985 (60.0%) received antiresorptive osteoporosis medication (majority oral bisphosphonate) between the scans. We examined factors that were associated with a change in lumbar spine TBS, lumbar spine BMD, and total hip BMD exceeding the 95% least significant change (LSC). Change exceeding the LSC was identified in 23.0% (9.3% increase, 13.8% decrease) of lumbar spine TBS, 38.2% (22.1% increase, 16.1% decrease) lumbar spine BMD, and 42.5% (17.6% increase, 24.9% decrease) total hip BMD measurement pairs. From regression models, the variables most strongly associated with significant change in TBS (decreasing order) were tissue thickness change, acquisition mode change, weight change, and spine percent fat change. Consistent with the insensitivity of TBS to oral antiresorptive therapies, use of these agents showed very little effect on TBS change. In contrast, for both spine BMD change and total hip BMD change, osteoporosis medication use was the most significant variable, whereas tissue thickness change, acquisition mode change, and weight change had relatively weak effects. In summary, change in spine TBS using the present algorithm appears to be strongly affected by technical factors. This suggests a limited role, if any, for using TBS change in untreated individuals or for monitoring response to antiresorptive treatment in routine clinical practice with the current version of the TBS algorithm. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Possible Long-Term Cardiovascular Effects of COVID-19.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has become a worldwide pandemic. Since 2019, the virus has mutated into multiple variants that have made it harder to eradicate and have increased the rate of infection. This virus can affect the structure and the function of the heart and can lead to cardiovascular symptoms that can have long-lasting effects despite recovery from COVID-19. These symptoms include chest pain, palpitations, fatigue, shortness of breath, rapid heartbeat, arrhythmias, cough and hypotension. These symptoms may persist due to myocardial injury, cardiac inflammation or systemic damage that may have been caused during infection. If these symptoms persist, the patient should visit their cardiologist for diagnosis and treatment plan for any type of cardiovascular disease that may have developed Post-COVID 19.

A pilot study comparing daily teriparatide with monthly cycles of teriparatide and raloxifene.

This 6-month pilot study in osteoporotic postmenopausal women evaluated cyclic TPD/RLX compared to daily subcutaneous TPD with the concept of optimizing bone formation. Compared to daily subcutaneous TPD, cyclic therapy showed comparable increase in spine BMD and favorable effects on total proximal femur BMD and cortical thickness. PURPOSE: There is no cure for osteoporosis; better medications or different approaches with current agents are needed. We hypothesized that monthly cycles of teriparatide (TPD) followed by raloxifene (RLX) might promote ongoing bone formation. Additionally, as TPD might initially adversely affect hip BMD, such effects may be mitigated by a cyclic approach. Therefore, this 6-month pilot study evaluated the effect of cyclic TPD/RLX compared to daily subcutaneous TPD on bone markers, BMD, trabecular bone score (TBS), and hip parameters assessed by 3D modeling. METHODS: Postmenopausal osteoporotic women (n=26) were randomized to open-label TPD 20 daily or alternating monthly cycles of TPD followed by monthly RLX 60 mg daily. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine (LS), femur, and radius by DXA. To further assess LS BMD, QCT and opportunistic CT (L1 Hounsfield units [HU]) were performed. LS TBS and hip cortical and trabecular parameters were assessed using DXA. Baseline group comparisons were performed by unpaired T-test with change over time evaluated by repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Participant mean age, BMI, and lowest T-score were 67.0 years, 26.0 kg/m2, and -2.7; no between-group differences in serum chemistries, 25(OH)D, or BMD were observed. LS-BMD increased (p<0.001) with TPD or TPD/RLX as measured by DXA (4.8%/5.2%), QCT (13%/9.4%), or HU (15.6%/10.2%) with no between-group difference. TPD/RLX produced beneficial between-group differences in total proximal femur BMD (1.5%, p<0.05) and cortical thickness (1.6%, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with daily TPD, cyclic TPD/RLX comparably increased spine BMD and might have favorable effects on proximal femur BMD and cortical thickness.

A probable atypical ulnar fracture in a man receiving denosumab.

BACKGROUND: Atypical femur fractures are widely recognized and associated with anti-resorptive therapy, most commonly bisphosphonates. These fractures generally occur in the femoral shaft or subtrochanteric region. Cases of atypical fractures at non-femur sites, including the ulna, have been reported. CASE REPORT: Here we report a probable atypical ulnar fracture in a man receiving denosumab, who had been using his upper extremities for transfers and ambulation. Radiographs demonstrated a non-comminuted, transverse fracture somewhat similar to findings of atypical femur fractures. He was deemed a poor surgical candidate and treated with teriparatide. To our knowledge, this is the first reported probable atypical ulnar fracture potentially associated with denosumab use. CONCLUSION: We believe it important that clinicians be aware of the association of anti-resorptive therapy with atypical fractures not only of the femur, but also at other skeletal sites. In patients on long-term anti-resorptive therapy, it is appropriate to consider that persistent "prodromal" pain might indicate an impending atypical fracture at an atypical skeletal site.