Comprehensive genetic screening of early-onset dementia patients in an Austrian cohort-suggesting new disease-contributing genes.

Early-onset dementia (EOD), with symptom onset before age 65, has a strong genetic burden. Due to genetic and clinical overlaps between different types of dementia, whole-exome sequencing (WES) has emerged as an appropriate screening method for diagnostic testing and novel gene-finding approaches. We performed WES and C9orf72 repeat testing in 60 well-defined Austrian EOD patients. Seven patients (12%) carried likely disease-causing variants in monogenic genes, PSEN1, MAPT, APP, and GRN. Five patients (8%) were APOE4 homozygote carriers. Definite and possible risk variants were detected in the genes TREM2, SORL1, ABCA7 and TBK1. In an explorative approach, we cross-checked rare gene variants in our cohort with a curated neurodegeneration candidate gene list and identified DCTN1, MAPK8IP3, LRRK2, VPS13C and BACE1 as promising candidate genes. Conclusively, 12 cases (20%) carried variants relevant to patient counseling, comparable to previously reported studies, and can thus be considered genetically resolved. Reduced penetrance, oligogenic inheritance and not yet identified high-risk genes might explain the high number of unresolved cases. To address this issue, we provide complete genetic and phenotypic information (uploaded to the European Genome-phenome Archive), enabling other researchers to cross-check variants. Thereby, we hope to increase the chance of independently finding the same gene/variant-hit in other well-defined EOD patient cohorts, thus confirming new genetic risk variants or variant combinations.

Analysis of co-medication in people with dementia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dementia prevalence is increasing, with numbers projected to double by 2050. Risk factors for its development include age and cardiovascular comorbidities, which are found more often in patients with dementia and should be treated properly to improve outcomes. In this case-control study, we analysed a large population-based prescription database to explore the patterns of co-medication in patients with dementia. METHODS: Prescription claims covering >99% of the Austrian population from 2005 to 2016 were obtained. Patients who were treated with an approved antidementia drug (ADD) were included and co-medication exposure was recorded. A group of people not taking ADDs was matched for age, sex and follow-up duration as a control. RESULTS: We included 70,799 patients on ADDs who were exposed to a mean of 5.3 co-medications while control patients were treated with a total of 5.2 co-medications (p < 0.001). We found that patients on ADDs received less somatic (4.1 vs. 4.5) but more psychiatric medication (1.1 vs. 0.6; p < 0.001 for both). Patients on ADDs were less likely to be treated for pain, cardiovascular conditions or hyperlipidemia. More than 50% of patients on ADDs were treated with antidepressants or antipsychotics. Greater number of co-medications was associated with markers of more intensive antidementia treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients on ADDs received more medications overall but were less frequently treated for somatic conditions known to be more prevalent in this group. Together, our data suggest that management of comorbidities in dementia could be improved to optimize outcome and quality of life.

Safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy in patients with severe cerebral venous thrombosis: A meta-analysis.

Background: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a rare thrombotic condition which is traditionally treated with anti-coagulation therapy. Subsets of patients with severe CVT have been treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Despite the high estimated mortality associated with severe CVT, there has been only one randomized control trial done regarding safety and efficacy of EVT in severe CVT compared to standard medical management. Evidence in this area is lacking. Objective: The aim of this systematic review is to analyze all existing literature and generate robust information regarding the role of EVT in the management of patients with severe CVT. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guideline. PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and CNKI were searched for eligible studies from 2007 to 2021. Safety and efficacy of EVT were evaluated by meta-analyzing recanalization status, the good functional outcome at follow-up, recurrent CVT, new hematoma. A pooled proportion with a 95% confidence interval was derived from a meta-analysis of various outcomes (CI). Results: A total of 33 studies comprising 610 patients treated with EVT were included for analysis which comprised one randomized control trial, one prospective study and 31 retrospective studies. Based on pooled data, 85% of patients had good functional outcome, 62% had complete recanalization, 5% had all-cause mortality, and 3% had catheter related complications. The efficacy outcomes in this analysis had a significant heterogeneity and a subgroup analysis was also done to explain these findings. The minimum time of follow up was 3 months and varied EVT techniques were used across the studies. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests EVT may be safe and efficacious in treating patients with severe CVT. Registration: Our protocol was registered with PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews with the registration number CRD42021254760.

Relation between ADHD and COVID-19: A Narrative Review to Guide Advancing Clinical Research and Therapy.

Objective: To cope with the COVID-19 pandemic, national health authorities temporarily closed cultural, religious, and educational institutions such as universities and schools. Children and adolescents with ADHD were challenged with the restrictions caused by the Covid-19 pandemic such as homeschooling and reduced physical activity. The present narrative review aimed to summarize the state-of-the-art regarding associations between COVID-19-related social restrictions and possible psychological and behavioral issues in children and adolescents with ADHD. Additionally, we discussed the underlying possible reasons of the association focusing on the role of parental influence and physical activity, vulnerabilities of individuals with ADHD to Covid-19 infection and to school closure and remote learning. Method: To collect data for the present narrative review, recent publications on these topics between February 1st, 2020 and January 10th, 2021 were retrieved from the most popular search engines (PubMed; Scopus; Google Scholar; Psych Info; Embase) through a comprehensive search using relevant keywords. Results: During confinement, children and adolescents with ADHD reported increased behavioral and ADHD-related symptoms and overall decreased psychological well-being. Factors negatively impacting children's and adolescents' behavioral symptoms and well-being were: less physical activity, adverse parental behavior, difficulties in coping with preventive guidelines, and school closure and remote learning consequences. Conclusion: Children and adolescents with ADHD and their caregivers faced both specific and general psychological issues related to the school lockdowns and homeschooling. Additionally, Individuals with ADHD seem to be more vulnerable to Covid-19 infection which highlights the need for better healthcare adaptation.

Safety and efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with a history of intracranial hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a fatal and debilitating condition killing 2.7 million people each year worldwide. The most commonly used treatment modality for AIS is intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase which is indicated for those presenting within 4.5 h of onset. Due to a lack of reliable evidence on harm or benefit, the 2019 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) guidelines consider a history of previous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) as potentially harmful and no longer an absolute contraindication for IVT in patients with AIS, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) removed chronic ICH as a specific contraindication for IVT from the label in 2015. Despite a shift in guidelines, physicians frequently face the dilemmatic choice whether to administer IVT in this subset of patients due to the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). The benefit of IVT in such patients has not been thoroughly investigated, and there are only a few studies on the subject in the literature to date. We conducted the present meta-analysis in an aim to provide solid evidence on the efficacy and safety of IVT for treating AIS in patients with a history of remote ICH. Our meta-analysis found that IVT improves functional outcomes in AIS patients with prior remote ICH without increasing SICH or all-cause mortality. These findings may contribute to the decision-making process for IVT administration in AIS patients.

Reduction of physical activity during the COVID-19 pandemic is related to increased neuropsychiatric symptoms in memory clinic patients.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented restrictions on social contacts and mobility. Memory clinic patients were disproportionately affected when care was disrupted and routines were abruptly changed. This trial was designed as a pragmatic, prospective, observational study to evaluate the effects of lockdown on memory clinic patients. Outpatients were included when they returned in May to July 2020 for their first follow-up after the lockdown. Indicators of lockdown intensity and its effect on patients were recorded, patients and caregivers were interviewed, and neuropsychological tests were performed. We included 72 patients, most of them suffering from Alzheimer's dementia or mild cognitive impairment. The median time of isolation was 8 weeks and social contacts were significantly reduced from five to two per week (p<0.001). Light physical activity was significantly reduced (3.8 hours to 3 hours, p=0.016) during the lockdown, and this reduction was significantly correlated with higher scores on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory score (R -0.43, p>0.001). Fears regarding the pandemic were common and mostly related to the patients' health. Lockdown restrictions reduced physical activity in memory clinic patients which was associated with increased neuropsychiatric symptoms. Future restrictions should aim to mitigate the impacts on this vulnerable population.