Repair of lateral temporo-sphenoidal encephalocoele via an endoscopic transorbital approach: ex vivo 3D printed simulation followed by in vivo deployment.

BACKGROUND: A temporo-sphenoidal encephalocoele occurs when temporal lobe herniates through a defect in the greater wing of the sphenoid bone into the sphenoid air sinus. The natural history is not well-understood, though presentation in adulthood with CSF rhinorrhoea and/or meningitis is typical. Lateral pneumatisation of the sphenoid sinus and elevated BMI may be contributory. AIMS: We explored the feasibility of a transorbital approach (TOA) for repair, using a combination of 3D modelling and simulation. We then successfully deployed this technique in vivo. METHODS: CT imaging for three patients who had previously undergone transcranial repair of lateral temporo-sphenoidal encephalocoele was used to generate data allowing 3D printed models of the skull base to be produced. The transorbital approach was simulated by performing a lateral orbitotomy followed by drilling of the sphenoid wing to expose the antero-basal middle fossa. 3D object scanning was used to create virtual models of the skull base post-surgery, from which surgical access was quantified in two ways: the area (mm2) of the middle fossa exposed by the TOA and the vertical attack angle. RESULTS: The mean surface area of the cranial access window achieved by simulated TOA was 325mm2. The mean vertical attack angle was 25°. One patient was subsequently treated successfully via TOA with no recurrence of their CSF leak, no orbital morbidity, excellent cosmesis, but resolving V2 numbness (follow-up 7 months). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that the transorbital approach provides adequate surgical access. In our single case, surgical repair of a lateral temporo-sphenoidal encephalocoele via TOA was feasible, safe, and effective. This approach may offer some advantages compared with transcranial or endonasal approaches.

Exploring the influence of nasal morbidity on quality of life following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 95 patients.

The endoscopic endonasal approach is more disruptive to normal anatomy (particularly nasal mucosa) than the transseptal submucosal microscopic approach. This may result in greater postoperative nasal morbidity, in turn reducing quality of life. We aimed to assess the severity and time course of nasal morbidity, and its impact on quality of life, following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in this retrospective cohort study. We identified 95 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery for anterior skull base pathologies. Nasal-specific questions from the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and the Anterior Skull Base inventory (ASB-12) were combined with quality-of-life questions. Patient demographics, diagnosis, and operative data were collected from electronic records. Age of the cohort ranged from 14-83 years. Time elapsed since surgery ranged from 3-85 months. 85/95 (89%) felt that nasal morbidity associated with surgery was acceptable, given the underlying reason for, and outcome of surgery; 10/95 (11%) did not. 71/95 (75%) reported no change or improvement in olfaction 3-months following surgery. 24/95 (25%) reported a deterioration in olfaction which was mild in 7%, moderate in 7%, and severe in 11%. Nasal crusting, nasal obstruction, and headache were moderately problematic symptoms but improved significantly by 3-month follow-up. Nasal discharge, nasal pain, and nasal whistling were mildly problematic and improved significantly by 3-months. 62/95 (65%) patients reported 'no change' in day-to-day activities due to the effects on their nose after surgery. 19/95 (20%) had 'mild inconvenience', 8/95 (8%) 'moderate inconvenience' and 6/95 (6%) 'severe inconvenience'. Endoscopic anterior skull base surgery is associated with nasal morbidity. Whilst 35% of patients appreciate a consequent negative impact on day-to-day life, the overwhelming majority feel that nasal morbidity is acceptable, given the wider surgical goals.

The impact of surgical set-up of endoscopic two surgeon four hand anterior skull base surgeries on surgeons' ergonomics.

BACKGROUND: The impact of different surgical set-ups of endoscopic two surgeon four hand anterior skull base surgeries on surgeons' ergonomics remain unclear. This study aims to explore the effect of surgeon, patient and surgical screen positioning on surgeons' ergonomics using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) tool. METHODS: A total of 20 different surgical positions of anterior skull base surgery were simulated and the ergonomic impact on surgeons' neck, truck, leg and wrist were measured using the validated Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) tool. To investigate the ergonomic effect of different surgical setups, the operating surgeon, assisting surgeon, patient head, camera and screen positions were positioned differently in each surgical position. RESULTS: The lowest REBA Score recorded is 3 whereas the highest score is 8. The REBA scores for the majority of positions are 3 highlighting that these positions are ergonomically favorable. Position 12 is the least ergonomically favorable position with a total REBA score of 19. In this position, operating surgeon is positioned to the right of the patient, assisting surgeon to the left of patient, patient head in central position with camera held by operating surgeon and one screen is placed to the right of patient. Positions 13 and 17 are the most ergonomically favorable positions with a total REBA score of 12. In these positions, the patient's head is positioned to the center, two screens were utilized, and the surgeons were positioned on either side of the patient. The utilization of 2 screens with a central patient head position with the surgeons placed on either side of the patient contribute towards a more ergonomically state in these positions. CONCLUSIONS: Certain positional behaviors are better at reducing musculoskeletal injury risk when compared to other. Positions with two screens and central head positions are more favourable ergonomically and surgeons should consider this set-up to reduce musculoskeletal injuries during anterior skull base surgery.

Patient and physician positioning during anterior skull base surgery impacts physician ergonomics.

BACKGROUND: The effects of anterior skull base surgery on surgeon's ergonomics remain unclear and this study explores the impact of patient, surgeon and screen positioning on surgeon's ergonomics during anterior skull base surgery using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool. METHOD: A total of 20 different surgical positions involving the operating surgeon, assisting surgeon, patient head position, camera position and screen position/number were simulated. For each position, the ergonomic effects on the upper limb, neck, trunk and lower limb of surgeons were analysed using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) tool. RESULTS: The lowest RULA score is 2 and the maximum score is 6. The majority of scores ranged from 2 to 3 suggesting the majority of positions have acceptable postures. The average RULA score of the right side of operating surgeon was 2.8 versus 2.95 on the left-side (p = 0.297). For the assisting surgeon, the average RULA score of the right side was 3.65 versus 3.25 for the left side (p = 0.053). The average combined (left and right) RULA score for the operating surgeon was 5.76 versus 6.9 for the assisting surgeon (p < 0.001). Position 17 (operating surgeon to the right of patient, assisting surgeon to the left of patient, central patient head position and two screens) is the most ergonomically favourable position. Position 2 (operating and assisting surgeon to the right of patient, patient head position to the right and one screen position to the left of patient) is the least favourable position. CONCLUSION: This simulation raises awareness of risk of musculoskeletal injury in anterior skull base surgery and highlights that certain positional behaviours are better for reducing injury risk than others. Two screens should be considered when performing a two-surgeon, four-hand anterior skull base surgery and surgeons should consider applying this to their own ergonomic environment in theatre.

Sudden onset hearing loss following intra-abdominal surgery: an unusual association.

We describe the case of a 12-year-old boy who reported unilateral hearing loss following laparoscopic appendicectomy for acute appendicitis under general anaesthesia. He was otherwise fit and well with no previous otological history. Formal audiological assessment by pure tone audiogram demonstrated a unilateral high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).In addition to describing his clinical course, a literature review of SNHL following non-otological surgery was performed. We recommend an awareness of this phenomenon, necessitating its prompt recognition, early audiological assessment and management as per sudden onset SNHL guidelines.

Not quite Pott's puffy tumour.

Pott's puffy tumour (PPT) is characterised by a subperiosteal abscess associated with osteomyelitis of the frontal bone-a rare complication of frontal sinusitis, more common in the paediatric population. We describe a case mimicking PPT, where abscess extension was facilitated by previous surgery. Usually patients with PPT would be systemically unwell, but our patient, a 63-year-old Caucasian man, was systemically well with a large swelling of his forehead. A CT was performed to evaluate possible intracranial and intracerebral complications such as epidural, subdural and brain abscesses. Emergent surgical drainage was performed with prolonged administration of antibiotic therapy. 12 weeks later, he had recollection in the frontal sinus requiring incision and drainage. 6 weeks afterwards, he underwent planned Lothrop procedure and endoscopic sinus surgery. Although clinically the patient presented with overwhelming features of PPT, we emphasise that PPT involves osteomyelitis of frontal bone, which is absent in our case.

Lyric hearing aid: a rare cause of benign necrotising otitis externa/external ear canal cholesteatoma.

An 80-year-old Caucasian man presented with an incidental and asymptomatic lesion in his right ear thought to be secondary to his use of hearing aids for presbycusis. He used Lyric hearing aids, designed for 24 hours-a-day use for 4 months at a time and had no other previous otological problems. He underwent a bony meatoplasty and vascular flap reconstruction via a retroauricular approach to remove the lesion for histological analysis and regrafting of the area. The lesion was confirmed on histopathology as an ear canal cholesteatoma.

Pneumatic dental extractions: an unusual cause of extensive cervical surgical emphysema.

A 50-year-old fit and well man presented to the Accident and Emergency Department in a tertiary centre following lower molar extraction, complaining of voice hoarseness with neck and facial swelling. Clinical examination along with plain film radiography revealed pneumomediastinum and extensive cervical surgical emphysema. He was subsequently admitted for observation and managed conservatively under the ENT team with input from the maxillofacial and anaesthetic teams. With supportive treatment only, the emphysema resolved and he remained well up until discharge.

Benign anlage tumour: a very unusual neck mass.

A 44-year-old woman presented with a slow-growing asymptomatic neck swelling at the left medial clavicle. Haematological and biochemical work up was normal and an ultrasound confirmed the swelling, but needle aspiration was non-diagnostic. As lymphoma was the main differential diagnosis, the swelling was completely excised. Immunohistochemistry yielded a rare lesion, suspected to represent a myoepithelial/mixed cellularity tumour of soft tissue. The extreme rarity of these tumours required a confirmatory secondary opinion, which ultimately led to it being identified as a benign anlage tumour (previously known as an ectopic hamartomatous thymoma) This case highlights the fact that thorough assessment of patients with neck swellings should be undertaken to rule out sinister causes-keeping in mind more rare differentials-helping to guide final management.

Dysphagia due to oesophageal obstruction: A case report of unusual occupational aetiology.

INTRODUCTION: We report the rare case of a patient presenting with dysphagia secondary to a large vertebral osteophyte, which formed from his previous occupation. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 76-year-old gentleman presented with a year-long history of dysphagia to solids, at the laryngeal level. He was otherwise well, with no red-flag symptoms. Nasoendoscopy showed a left-sided bulge obstructing the piriform fossa. Barium swallow demonstrated a large C4/C5 vertebral osteophyte. Excluding other abnormalities the patient's dysphagia was determined to be due to the osteophyte. The patient mentioned carrying large (50 kg) bags of coal for his previous occupation. This chronic trauma was concluded to be the cause for the osteophyte. DISCUSSION: We use this case as an opportunity to outline mechanism of swallowing, and the causes and classification of dysphagia are additionally described. We also review the literature regarding vertebral osteophytes to contextualise the rarity of this case, especially in regard to the strong occupational association. CONCLUSION: A structured and thorough history and examination in dysphagia is emphasized. It is important to enquire about 'red-flag' symptoms, suggestive of head and neck or upper gastrointestinal malignancy. Barium swallow is a critical investigation in dysphagia-it can also demonstrate large bony abnormalities, which is a rare causative factor.

Acute airway obstruction by Ascaris lumbricoides in a 14-month-old boy.

We describe the case of a 14-month-old child with airway obstruction caused by a mature Ascaris lumbricoides worm. The child had been admitted to the paediatric intensive care unit due to overwhelming sepsis, and during the course of his illness developed acute airway obstruction that resolved once the worm was removed from the airway. The Ascaris life-cycle is detailed, and a literature review of patients with airway obstruction due to Ascaris worms is presented.

Pre-operative serum albumin and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are associated with prolonged hospital stay following colorectal cancer surgery.

AIMS: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in European populations. It has been shown previously that neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), pre-operative albumin, and haemoglobin are useful prognostic indicators. The aim of this study was to assess how these factors influence the length of postoperative stay (LOS) following colorectal cancer surgery. METHODOLOGY: All patients undergoing elective colorectal resections for malignancy between 2010 and 2011 in Pilgrim Hospital, Boston, U.K. were considered for the study. Hospital archive systems were used to ascertain pre-operative NLR, albumin and haemoglobin levels. LOS was calculated from electronic discharge documents with day 1 being the day after surgery. Unifactorial and multifactorial analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of prolonged stay. RESULTS: 196 patients were included in the study. Pre-operative haemoglobin was not associated with prolonged hospital stay. On univariate analysis, pre-operative serum albumin and pre-operative NLR were associated with prolonged hospital stay. On multivariate analysis, pre-operative serum albumin >34.5 g/dl (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 - 0.92; p = 0.027) retained independent association for prolonged hospital stay .However, pre-operative NLR failed to reach statistical significance on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low albumin and elevated NLR are more likely to have an increased hospital stay following colorectal cancer surgery. This may be useful for surgeons in terms of identifying the 'high-risk' patient post-operatively and allow for early intervention.