ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The provision of care to pregnant persons and neonates must continue through pandemics. To maintain quality of care, while minimizing physical contact during the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-related Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic, hospitals and international organizations issued recommendations on maternity and neonatal care delivery and restructuring of clinical and academic services. Early in the pandemic, recommendations relied on expert opinion, and offered a one-size-fits-all set of guidelines. Our aim was to examine these recommendations and provide the rationale and context to guide clinicians, administrators, educators, and researchers, on how to adapt maternity and neonatal services during the pandemic, regardless of jurisdiction. METHOD: Our initial database search used Medical subject headings and free-text search terms related to coronavirus infections, pregnancy and neonatology, and summarized relevant recommendations from international society guidelines. Subsequent targeted searches to December 30, 2020, included relevant publications in general medical and obstetric journals, and updated society recommendations. RESULTS: We identified 846 titles and abstracts, of which 105 English-language publications fulfilled eligibility criteria and were included in our study. A multidisciplinary team representing clinicians from various disciplines, academics, administrators and training program directors critically appraised the literature to collate recommendations by multiple jurisdictions, including a quaternary care Canadian hospital, to provide context and rationale for viable options. INTERPRETATION: There are different schools of thought regarding effective practices in obstetric and neonatal services. Our critical review presents the rationale to effectively modify services, based on the phase of the pandemic, the prevalence of infection in the population, and resource availability.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Maternal-Child Health Services/organization & administration , Perinatal Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Academic Medical Centers , COVID-19/therapy , Canada , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Inpatients , Organizational Policy , Outpatients , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether opioid prescriptions at discharge after Cesarean delivery decreased following implementation of a quality improvement bundle. METHODS: A quality improvement bundle was instituted at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto. Interventions included opioid prescribing instructions in resident orientation, nursing and patient education, and standard electronic prescriptions. We used an interrupted time series study design and included patients who had a Cesarean delivery six months pre intervention and six months post intervention. Primary outcome data (opioids prescribed at discharge in morphine milliequivalents [MME]), were aggregated (averaged) by calendar week and analyzed using interrupted time series. Secondary outcomes were assessed using bivariate methods and included opioid use for breakthrough pain in hospital, and amount of opioids prescribed by prescriber specialty and training level. RESULTS: We included 2,578 women in our analysis. Based on the segmented regression analysis, prescribed opioids decreased from 97.6 MME in 2018 to 35.8 MME in 2019 (difference in means, - 61.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 72.2 to - 51.3; P < 0.001), and this decrease was sustained over the study period. Post intervention, there were no visits to our postnatal assessment clinic for inadequate pain control. CONCLUSION: A quality improvement bundle was associated with a marked and sustained decrease in discharge prescriptions of opioids post Cesarean delivery at a large Canadian tertiary academic hospital.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Déterminer si les ordonnances d'opioïdes au congé après un accouchement par césarienne avaient diminué à la suite de la mise en place d'un ensemble d'améliorations de la qualité. MéTHODE: Un ensemble d'améliorations de la qualité a été mis en place à l'Hôpital Mount Sinai de Toronto. Les interventions comprenaient des instructions de prescription d'opioïdes pendant l'orientation des résidents, la formation des soins infirmiers et des patients, ainsi que des ordonnances électroniques standard. Nous avons utilisé un plan d'étude de séries chronologiques interrompues et inclus des patientes ayant accouché par césarienne six mois avant et six mois après l'intervention. Les données sur le critère d'évaluation principal (soit les opioïdes prescrits au congé en équivalents de morphine en milligrammes [EMM]) ont été agrégées (moyennes) par semaine civile et analysées à l'aide de séries chronologiques interrompues. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires ont été estimés à l'aide de méthodes bivariées et comprenaient l'utilisation d'opioïdes pour les accès douloureux paroxystiques à l'hôpital, ainsi que la quantité d'opioïdes prescrits en fonction de la spécialité et du niveau de formation du prescripteur. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 2578 femmes dans notre analyse. Selon l'analyse de régression segmentée, les opioïdes prescrits sont passés de 97,6 EMM en 2018 à 35,8 EMM en 2019 (différence de moyennes, − 61,7; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, − 72,2 à − 51,3; P < 0,001), et cette diminution s'est maintenue au cours de la période d'étude. Après l'intervention, il n'y a pas eu de visites à notre clinique d'évaluation postnatale pour remédier à un soulagement inadéquat de la douleur. CONCLUSION: Un ensemble d'améliorations de la qualité a été associé à une diminution marquée et soutenue des ordonnances d'opioïdes après les accouchements par césarienne dans un grand hôpital universitaire tertiaire canadien.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Quality Improvement , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Canada , Drug Prescriptions , Female , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Pregnancy , PrescriptionsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine the rates of residual anal sphincter defect following primary repair of obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASIS), and to assess symptomatology in these patients. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of patients who underwent primary repair of an OASIS sustained at Mount Sinai Hospital from January 2016 to June 2017. Records were reviewed for demographic and obstetrical data, symptoms of anal incontinence (AI), and the results of endoanal ultrasonography (EA-US). RESULTS: One hundred and one women sustained an OASIS during the study period, of whom 53 had EA-US performed at Mount Sinai Hospital; 4 women were excluded from this analysis. There were 42 third-degree tears and 7 fourth-degree tears. EA-US revealed residual defects in 22 patients with third-degree tears and 5 patients with fourth-degree tears (52% vs. 71%; Pâ¯=â¯0.44). Twelve patients with third-degree tears and 4 patients with fourth-degree tears reported AI (29% vs. 57%; Pâ¯=â¯0.20). EA-US revealed no evidence of a tear in 14 patients clinically diagnosed with third-degree tears and 1 patient clinically diagnosed with a fourth-degree tear (33% vs. 14%). CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate deficiencies in diagnosis and repair of OASIS. Continued training for health care providers on identification and effective repair of OASIS may improve outcomes for women who experience this complication.
Subject(s)
Anal Canal/injuries , Fecal Incontinence/epidemiology , Lacerations/surgery , Obstetric Labor Complications/surgery , Adult , Anal Canal/diagnostic imaging , Anal Canal/surgery , Canada/epidemiology , Delivery, Obstetric , Female , Humans , Lacerations/diagnostic imaging , Lacerations/etiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/diagnostic imaging , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To reduce opioids consumed after discharge from hospital after elective cesarean delivery by 50%. METHODS: This was a 2-week parallel group non-blinded randomized controlled trial at Mount Sinai Hospital. Eligible women undergoing elective cesarean delivery were assigned by random number generation to receive the hospital's standard post-cesarean opioid prescription of 20 1-mg hydromorphone tablets or a prescription for 10 1-mg hydromorphone tablets if opioids were required in hospital or no hydromorphone if no opioids were required in hospital. Patients completed a study questionnaire at 2 weeks postpartum detailing outcome measures. The primary outcome was the amount of opioid consumed after discharge. RESULTS: A total of 40 women were randomly assigned to a study group and 37 were included in the data analysis; 17 patients were in the control group and 20 in the experimental group. The median number of tablets consumed did not differ between groups (Pâ¯=â¯0.407). The median number of excess tablets prescribed was 20 (range 2-18) in the control group and 0 (range 0-10) in the experimental group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The current standard discharge practice of giving 20 1-mg hydromorphone tablets to all patients post-discharge after cesarean delivery contributes to a substantial excess of opioids in the community. These opioids can be diverted for unintended or accidental usage, and exacerbate larger societal issues of opioid misuse and addiction. Decreasing the number of opioids prescribed with tailored discharge prescriptions based on in-hospital opioid use provides nearly all patients with adequate pain control.
Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Drug Overdose/prevention & control , Hydromorphone/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Patient Discharge , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aftercare , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Cesarean Section , Female , Humans , Hydromorphone/adverse effects , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , PregnancyABSTRACT
Pregnancy risks rise with age and the average age of first time mothers is rising. This study aimed to assess women's actual knowledge and their perceived knowledge of pregnancy complications relating to advanced maternal age. A cross-sectional survey was administered to primiparous women measuring demographics, knowledge of age-related pregnancy risks, previous counselling and health literacy. Of the 218 women surveyed, the mean knowledge score was not significantly different for women <35 years of age compared to women ≥35 years of age (p = .09). Although there was no difference in knowledge between the two groups, women ≥35 years of age perceived themselves to be more knowledgeable than those under 35 (p < .01). The majority of women (67%) wanted further counselling on this topic and indicated a preference for their doctor to counsel them (76%). Women require counselling informing them of their increased risk of complications if they begin childbearing at older ages. Impact statement What is already known on this subject: The average age of first time mothers is rising worldwide. Pregnancy risks rise with age, especially in first time mothers. Previous studies have shown that knowledge of age-related pregnancy risks correlate with educational level and health literacy. What the results of this study add: This study supports those findings and also demonstrates that perceived knowledge does not correlate with measured knowledge of age-related pregnancy risks. Women ≥35 years of age (higher-risk women) are no more knowledgeable than their younger counterparts though they perceive themselves to be better informed. Greater education regarding these risks may allow women to mitigate some of these risks through lifestyle and diet alteration and will prepare women for what to expect if these risks and complications occur. The majority of women in this study seek pregnancy information on the internet, but desire further counselling from their doctors regarding age-related pregnancy risks. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: Given these results, physicians must consider making greater efforts to counsel women about pregnancy risks in advanced maternal age and tailor these conversations to suit the educational level and health literacy of each individual patient.