ABSTRACT
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of arthroscopic video quality, determine correlation between surgeon rating and computational image metrics, and facilitate a quantitative methodology for assessing video quality. Methods: Five orthopaedic surgeons reviewed 60 clips from deidentified arthroscopic shoulder videos and rated each on a four-point Likert scale from poor to excellent view. The videos were randomized, and the process was completed a total of three times. Each user rating was averaged to provide a user rating per clip. Each video frame was processed to calculate brightness, local contrast, redness (used to represent bleeding), and image entropy. Each metric was then averaged over each frame per video clip, providing four image quality metrics per clip. Results: Inter-rater reliability for grading video quality had an intraclass correlation of .974. Improved image quality rating was positively correlated with increased entropy (.8142; P < .001), contrast (.8013; P < .001), and brightness (.6120; P < .001), and negatively correlated with redness (-.8626; P < .001). A multiple linear regression model was calculated with the image metrics used as predictors for the image quality ranking, with an R-squared value of .775 and root mean square error of .42. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates strong inter-rater reliability between surgeons when describing image quality and strong correlations between image quality and the computed image metrics. A model based on these metrics enables automatic quantification of image quality. Clinical Relevance: Video quality during arthroscopic cases can impact the ease and duration of the case which could contribute to swelling and complication risk. This pilot study provides a quantitative method to assess video quality. Future works can objectively determine factors that affect visualization during arthroscopy and identify options for improvement.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To determine whether a screw placed perpendicular to the fracture line in an oblique scaphoid fracture will provide fixation strength that is comparable with that of a centrally placed screw. METHODS: Oblique osteotomies were made along the dorsal sulcus of 8 matched pairs of cadaveric scaphoids. One scaphoid from each pair was randomized to receive a screw placed centrally down the long axis. In the other scaphoid, a screw was placed perpendicular to the osteotomy. Each scaphoid underwent cyclic loading from 80 N to 120 N at 1 Hz. Cyclic loading was carried out until 2 mm of fracture displacement occurred or 4,000 cycles was reached. The specimens that reached the 4,000-cycle limit were then loaded to failure. Screw length, number of cycles, and load to failure were compared between the groups. RESULTS: We found no difference in number of cycles or load to failure between the 2 groups. Screws placed perpendicular to the fracture line were significantly shorter than screws placed down the central axis. CONCLUSIONS: A perpendicularly placed screw provides equivalent strength to one placed along the central axis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Compared with a screw placed centrally in an oblique scaphoid fracture, a screw placed perpendicular to the fracture line allows the use of a shorter screw without sacrificing strength of fixation.