ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Training residents in the care of hospitalized patients offers an opportunity to integrate behavioral science education with medical care and to foster professional growth, given the severity of coexisting medical and psychosocial problems and the formation of intense transient relationships. Rarely do residents have the time or guidance to reflect on how these experiences and relationships affect them. Weekly behavioral science rounds (BSR) provide dedicated time to reflect on and discuss challenging clinical and professional developmental issues arising during inpatient training. METHODS: To understand the range of issues that learners experience, we analyzed facilitator notes of 45 consecutive BSR discussions. Through open coding analysis we identified the common topics and recurring themes raised by residents. RESULTS: The most common topics related to residents' emotional responses, clinical challenges, and interpersonal conflicts. We identified frequently recurring themes, including understanding the power and limitations of the physician, defining roles and responsibilities, and articulating personal beliefs and values. Early first-year residents had difficulty acclimating to increased responsibility and worried about competence; later, they experienced strong emotional reactions, feared becoming cynical, and were apprehensive about future leadership roles. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient BSR can serve as an important educational intervention and professional development tool at a critical time in training. BSR requires a commitment of teaching resources, an assurance that they will occur regularly, and a culture of safety in which residents trust their discussions will be confidential and that they will be treated with respect and caring.
Subject(s)
Behavioral Sciences , Clinical Competence , Family Practice/education , Inpatients , Internship and Residency , Physicians/psychology , Humans , Staff DevelopmentSubject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , HIV , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection has become a treatable chronic disease with near-normal life expectancy when patients receive antiretroviral therapy (ART). Family physicians and other primary care clinicians commonly provide long-term comprehensive care for persons with HIV infection. This article describes the scope of initial care, including obtaining a thorough history; physical examination for HIV-associated manifestations; attention to HIV-specific immunization schedules; routine and HIV-specific laboratory evaluation; and ensuring standard health care maintenance to prevent HIV- and non-HIV-related morbidity and mortality. Clinicians should encourage combination ART as early as possible, although careful assessment of patient readiness and ability to sustain lifelong treatment must be weighed. After ART initiation, monitoring viral load and CD4 lymphocyte response is essential to ensure viral suppression and evaluate immune system restoration. Opportunistic infections are now less common than in the past because ART usually prevents or markedly delays progression to advanced HIV disease. The most important reasons for consultation or comanagement with an HIV expert include management of antiretroviral drug resistance or drug toxicities, as well as special circumstances such as viral hepatitis coinfection or pregnancy.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Family Practice/methods , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/standards , Clinical Competence , Counseling/methods , Humans , Physical Examination , Physician-Patient RelationsSubject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Post-Exposure Prophylaxis/standards , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Environmental Exposure , Family Practice , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Substance Abuse, Intravenous , United States , Unsafe SexABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Telemedicine can facilitate communication between primary care clinicians and specialists. Generalists who use telemedicine for consultation (teleconsultation) may be able to practice more independently and reduce the number of formal referrals to specialists. In the United States, a federally funded human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) teleconsultation service (HIV Warmline) offers clinicians live telephone access to HIV specialists; however, its impact on clinicians' self-perceived clinical competence and referral rates has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To determine if primary care clinicians who used the HIV Warmline felt more capable of managing HIV in their own practices. DESIGN: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Primary care physicians and mid-level practitioners who used the HIV Warmline for teleconsultation between 1/2008 and 3/2010. MAIN MEASURES: Participants compared the HIV Warmline to other methods of obtaining HIV clinical support, and then rated its impact on their confidence in their HIV skills and their referral patterns. KEY RESULTS: Respondents (N = 191, 59% response rate) found the HIV Warmline to be quicker (65%), more applicable (70%), and more trustworthy (57%) than other sources of HIV information. After using the HIV Warmline, 90% had improved confidence about caring for HIV, 67% stated it changed the way they managed HIV, and 74% were able to avoid referring patients to specialists. All valued the availability of live, free consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care clinicians who called the HIV Warmline reported increased confidence in their HIV care and less need to refer patients to specialists. Teleconsultation may be a powerful tool to help consolidate HIV care in the primary care setting, and could be adapted for use with a variety of other medical conditions. The direct impact of teleconsultation on actual referral rates, quality of care and clinical outcomes needs to be studied.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , HIV Infections/therapy , Physicians, Primary Care/standards , Remote Consultation/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Hotlines/organization & administration , Hotlines/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Physicians, Primary Care/psychology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Remote Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Self Efficacy , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the infrastructure, successes, and challenges of a teleconsultation service for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The HIV Warmline is a telephone consultation service providing free, live HIV/AIDS management advice to U.S. clinicians. We present descriptive data about callers, patients, and consultation topics gathered by electronic query of the HIV Warmline database for 2009. Caller satisfaction survey results for 2009 are also presented. RESULTS: The HIV Warmline has provided more than 37,000 consultations since its inception in 1992. The service provides consultations to clinicians from all 50 states, from a variety of professional backgrounds, and with a wide range of HIV experience levels. The majority of call topics concern antiretroviral therapy. Callers are generally pleased with the service, giving a mean Likert scale rating of 4.7 on satisfaction survey questions. CONCLUSION: The experience of the HIV Warmline can serve as a model for other programs planning to develop remote consultation systems. HIV teleconsultation has been relatively simple to implement and can be useful for many types of clinicians. HIV teleconsultation should continue to be evaluated as a way to improve HIV care, especially in areas without easy access to HIV expertise.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , HIV Infections/therapy , Hotlines/standards , Patient Satisfaction , Remote Consultation/methods , Consumer Behavior , Female , Financing, Government , Hotlines/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , National Health Programs , Program Evaluation , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Remote Consultation/standards , Remote Consultation/statistics & numerical data , United StatesSubject(s)
Immunization Programs/standards , Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Triage , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Health Personnel , Humans , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United StatesABSTRACT
An estimated one fourth of persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are not aware they are infected. Early diagnosis of HIV has the potential to ensure optimal outcomes for infected persons and to limit the spread of the virus. Important barriers to testing among physicians include insufficient time, reimbursement issues, and lack of patient acceptance. Current HIV testing guidelines address many of these barriers by making the testing process more streamlined and less stigmatizing. The opt-out consent process has been shown to improve test acceptance. Formal pretest counseling and written consent are no longer recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nevertheless, pretest discussions provide an opportunity to give information about HIV, address fears of discrimination, and identify ongoing high-risk activities. With increased HIV screening in the primary care setting, more persons with HIV could be identified earlier, receive timely and appropriate care, and get treatment to prevent clinical progression and transmission.
Subject(s)
AIDS Serodiagnosis/standards , HIV Infections/diagnosis , Physician-Patient Relations , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Young AdultABSTRACT
In 2007, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Pfizer Inc recommended immediate discontinuation of nelfinavir (NFV) during pregnancy due to contamination with a potential teratogen. A few weeks after the announcement, we surveyed antenatal HIV care providers to determine how widely the warning was disseminated. Overall, 69 of 121 (57.0%) providers knew to discontinue NFV. Callers with more than 50 HIV-infected patients were 2.54 times as likely to be aware as callers with 1-3 HIV-infected patients (P < .01). Only 12 (33.3%) obstetricians were aware, compared to 21 (80.8%) infectious diseases specialists (P < .001). The FDA/Pfizer Inc recommendation to avoid nelfinavir mesylate (NFV) in pregnancy appears to have successfully reached HIV experts. However, not all pregnant women have access to experts and may receive most of their care from providers without extensive HIV experience. More effective dissemination of critical HIV-related information to all antenatal care providers, including general obstetricians, family physicians, and midwives, may be needed.
Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/prevention & control , Clinical Competence , HIV Protease Inhibitors , Nelfinavir , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced/etiology , Contraindications , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Medicine , Nurses , Pharmacists , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy , Specialization , United States , United States Food and Drug AdministrationABSTRACT
This analysis compares patient and provider characteristics of African-American clinicians and non-African-American clinicians who called the National HIV Telephone Consultation Service (Warmline). In 2004, a total of 2,077 consultations were provided for 1,020 clinicians, 70 (6.9%) of whom were African American. Compared to the non-African-American group, a higher percentage of African-American clinicians were nurses (20.0% vs. 8.8%, p=0.002). A significantly lower percentage of African-American physicians were infectious disease specialists (3.5% vs. 25.6%, p=0.007). African-American clinicians were more likely to work in a community clinic (48.5% vs. 34.1%, p=0.015). Both African-American and non-African American clinicians reported caring for a similar number of HIV-infected patients. Patient-provider racial concordance was common among African-American clinicians (76.4%), whereas non-African-American clinicians called about patients of more diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds. African-American clinicians who called Warmline exhibited differences in patient and provider characteristics when compared to all other clinicians. These findings contribute to the growing body of research on HIV providers in the United States.
Subject(s)
Black or African American , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome , Databases as Topic , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Hotlines , Humans , Referral and Consultation , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
HIV disproportionately affects the Latino population in the United States. Little is known about clinicians who provide HIV care to the Latino community or the types of issues they face. This report presents descriptive analyses of calls made by clinicians who care for HIV-infected Latinos to two lines of the National HIV/AIDS Clinicians' Consultation Center, the National HIV Telephone Consultation Service (Warmline) and the National Perinatal HIV Consultation and Referral Service (Perinatal HIV Hotline). Separate analyses of data from Latino clinicians are also presented. The majority of Warmline calls about Latino patients (81.0%) concerned antiretroviral treatment strategies or HIV-related conditions. More than half (54.3%) of perinatal-specific calls concerned HIV management during pregnancy and the care of HIV-exposed infants. Latino clinicians most frequently called about minority patients. This descriptive study adds to the growing literature about the care of the Latino HIV-infected patient. The Warmline and Perinatal HIV Hotline are resources for HIV care providers in the nursing and medical care of Latinos.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/ethnology , HIV Infections/therapy , Hispanic or Latino , Hotlines , Remote Consultation , Adult , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Humans , Male , United StatesABSTRACT
This study evaluates the consultation needs of clinicians who provide perinatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care in the United States. The Perinatal Hotline (1-888-448-8765) is a telephone consultation service for providers who treat HIV-infected pregnant women and their infants. Hotline calls were analyzed for demographics about callers and their patients and information about consultation topics. There were 430 calls to the hotline from January 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006. Most calls (59.5%) were related to pregnant patients; 5.1% of the calls pertained to women currently in labor. The most common topic was HIV care in pregnancy (49.1%), particularly antiretroviral drug use (42.1%). HIV testing was discussed in 21.9%, and intrapartum treatment was discussed in 24.0%. Callers most often requested help choosing antiretroviral drug regimens; many of the discussions were about drug toxicities and viral resistance. Although the hotline received few calls about women in labor, the need for these consultations is expected to increase with the expanding use of rapid HIV testing. Access to 24-hour consultation can help ensure that state-of-the-art care is provided.