Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Dig Dis Sci ; 68(10): 3935-3942, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37548897

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Polyp recurrence is common after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of non-pedunculated colonic polyps ≥ 20 mm. Two models haven been published for polyp recurrence prediction: Sydney EMR recurrence tool (SERT) and the size, morphology, colonic site, and access to target (SMSA) score. None of these models have been evaluated in a real-world United States (U.S.) cohort. We aimed to evaluate the external validity of these two models and develop a new model. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of patients with non-pedunculated polyps ≥ 20 mm that underwent EMR between 1/1/2012 and 6/30/2020. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify predictors of polyp recurrence to build a new model. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves for the new model, SERT and a modified version of SMSA were derived and compared. RESULTS: A total of 461 polyps from 461 unique patients were included for analysis. The average polyp size was 29.1 ± 12.4 mm. Recurrence rate at first or second surveillance colonoscopy was 29.0% at a 15.6 months median follow up (IQR 12.3-17.4). A model was created with 4 variables from index colonoscopy: size > 40 mm, tubulovillous adenoma histology, right colon location and piecemeal resection. ROC curves showed that the Area Under the ROC (AUC) for the new model was 0.618, for SERT 0.538 and for mSMSA 0.550. CONCLUSION: SERT score and mSMSA have poor external validity to predict polyp recurrence after EMR of non-pedunculated polyps > 20 mm. Our new model is simpler and performs better in this multiethnic, non-referral cohort from the U.S.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Humans , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology
2.
VideoGIE ; 8(7): 260-262, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37456216

ABSTRACT

Video 1Closure of a refractory gastrocutaneous fistula with endoscopically guided percutaneous suturing with the use of miniature biopsy forceps.

4.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 58(4): 435-440, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36254785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective method for removing non-pedunculated polyps ≥ 20 mm. We aimed to examine changes in EMR techniques over a 9-year period and evaluate frequency of histologic-confirmed recurrence. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent EMR of non-pedunculated polyps ≥ 20 mm at a safety net and the Veteran's Affairs (VA) hospital in Houston, Texas between 2012 and 2020. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations with recurrence risk were estimated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: 461 unique patients were included. The histologic-confirmed recurrence was 29.0% at 15.6 months median follow up (IQR 12.3 - 17.4). Polyps removed between 2018 and 2020 had a 0.43 decreased odds of recurrence vs. polyps removed between 2012 and 2014. The use of viscous lifting agents increased over time (from 0 to 54%), and the use of saline was associated with increased risk of recurrence (OR 2.28 [CI 1.33 - 3.31]). CONCLUSIONS: Histologic-confirmed recurrence after EMR for non-pedunculated polyps ≥ 20 mm decreased over the seven year-period. Saline was associated with a higher risk of recurrence and the use of more viscous agents increased over time.


Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Humans , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery
5.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 38(6): 600-606, 2022 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36165039

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Autoimmune gastritis is characterized by atrophy of acid secreting parietal cells resulting in achlorhydria. Upper gastrointestinal symptoms are common in autoimmune gastritis and frequently result in prescriptions for acid suppressant medications despite the inability of the stomach to secrete acid. Evidence-based recommendations for management of gastrointestinal symptoms in autoimmune gastritis are lacking. RECENT FINDINGS: The most common symptoms in patients with autoimmune gastritis are dyspepsia, heartburn, and regurgitation. Gastroesophageal reflux should be confirmed by pH-impedance testing and is typically weakly acid or alkaline. Therapy for reflux focuses on mechanical prevention of reflux (i.e., elevation of the head of the bed and alginates) or when severe, antireflux surgery. The etiology of dyspepsia in autoimmune gastritis is unclear and largely unstudied. In the first half of the 20th century, oral administration of acid to "aid digestion" was widely used with reported success. However, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are lacking. Here, we provide suggestions for attempting gastric acidification therapy. SUMMARY: Upper GI symptoms are common in autoimmune gastritis. Their pathogenesis and therapy remain incompletely understood. Acid suppressant medications are useless and should be discontinued. A trial of acid replacement therapy is recommended especially in the form of placebo-controlled trials.


Subject(s)
Dyspepsia , Gastritis , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Alginates/therapeutic use , Dyspepsia/drug therapy , Gastritis/diagnosis , Gastritis/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Gastroesophageal Reflux/therapy , Heartburn/drug therapy , Humans
7.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 56(2): 125-132, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33405434

ABSTRACT

GOALS AND BACKGROUND: Clinical staging with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and positron emission tomography (PET) is used to identify esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) patients with locally advanced disease and therefore, benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. However, EUS is operator dependent and subject to interobserver variability. Therefore, we aimed to identify clinical predictors of locally advanced EAC and build a predictive model that can be used as an adjunct to current staging methods. STUDY: This was a cross-sectional study of patients with EAC who underwent preoperative staging with EUS and PET scan followed by definitive therapy at our institution from January 2011 to December 2017. Demographic data, symptoms, endoscopic findings, EUS, and PET scan findings were obtained. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-six patients met the study criteria, of which 86 (20.2%) patients had limited stage EAC and 340 (79.8%) had locally advanced disease. The mean age was 65.4±10.3 years of which 356 (83.6%) were men and 393 (92.3%) were White. On multivariable analysis, age (above 75 or below 65 y), dysphagia [odds ratio (OR): 2.84], weight loss (OR: 2.06), protruding tumor (OR: 2.99), and tumor size >2 cm (OR: 3.3) were predictive of locally advanced disease, while gastrointestinal bleeding (OR: 0.36) and presence of visible Barrett's esophagus (OR: 0.4) were more likely to be associated with limited stage. A nomogram for predicting the risk of locally advanced EAC was constructed and internally validated. CONCLUSIONS: We constructed a nomogram to facilitate an individualized prediction of the risk of locally advanced EAC. This model can aid in decision making for neoadjuvant therapy in EAC.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Aged , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...