ABSTRACT
Dorsal preservation (DP) rhinoplasty techniques, including surface techniques (STs) and foundation techniques (FTs) have garnered significant attention internationally over the past few years. The practice patterns and opinions from 117 of these surgeons were surveyed from a cohort of these surgeons who participate in an online Evidence-Based Rhinoplasty Research Group. The findings of the survey are merely a snapshot of the international rhinoplasty community's practices, yet did capture data from surgeons from a diverse geographic, years of experience, and training background. STs were most used for the bone changes, and the high-strip technique was preferred for the cartilaginous septal surgery. STs are mostly performed by younger surgeons (<10 years of experience), whereas FTs were more common in older surgeons (10-30 years of experience). STs were considered more stable (p < 0.001), more predictable (p < 0.001), and associate with a shorter learning curve (p = 0.015). Revision surgery rates were not different. Regarding why many surgeons using DP still perform structural rhinoplasty, the most cited concern was hump persistence/recurrence. In summary, among surgeons using DP rhinoplasty techniques, the majority perform DP in over half of their primary rhinoplasty surgeries, highlighting the importance of updating educational programs in medical training, conferences, and courses.
Subject(s)
Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Rhinoplasty , Rhinoplasty/methods , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Female , Male , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The surgical treatment of children with enlarged inferior turbinates is still controversial. Foundational evidence for indicating turbinoplasty is still scarce, and there is a myriad of proposed techniques. This work aimed to address the midterm nasal obstruction outcomes of pediatric inferior turbinate surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A Literature search across PUBMED and Cochrane collaboration databases was undertaken, using the MeSH terms: turbinates, nasal obstruction, surgery, and children. Articles focusing on turbinate surgery with an exclusively pediatric cohort were included. The minimum follow-up time for inclusion was set at four months, and only the latest available follow-up in each study was considered. All the integrated studies used objective instruments to quantify nasal obstruction before and after surgery. A comprehensive review and meta-analysis were performed to assess nasal outcomes after the intervention. The 95% confidence interval of the effect magnitude for each study was calculated to elucidate effect sizes. RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria for review, and five were included in the meta-analysis, accounting for a total of 510 patients. The follow-up period ranged from 4 months to 1 year. Pooled results showed that nasal patency was significantly improved after surgery (p < 0.001) in the midterm follow-up. No significant differences were found between bone-sparing and bone-removal procedures (p = 0.38). CONCLUSION: This is the first meta-analysis to address midterm results of pediatric turbinate surgery. Our results suggest a positive impact of inferior turbinate surgery on nasal patency, irrespective of technique.
Subject(s)
Nasal Obstruction , Specialties, Surgical , Humans , Child , Turbinates/surgery , Nasal Obstruction/surgery , Databases, FactualABSTRACT
Tip support and the tip's exact final position-rotation and projection-remain a main concern among rhinoplasty surgeons. The available options can be classified into two groups: septal extension graft (variations including tongue-in-groove) and columellar strut (with all its variations). There is still the possibility of nasal tip ligament(s) preservation-namely the interdomal ligament, when anchoraged cephalically to the anterior septal angle preserving the tip support. Including this panoply of solutions, the author has identified some challenges with insufficient outcome. Based on engineering concepts, a novel septal flap was developed to facilitate a preferred tip position and shape. The septal advancement flap (SAF) is a rotational-advancement flap of the superior and caudal aspects of the cartilaginous septum that enables the surgeon to create stable and accurate tip shape and position. This flap was designed following the spare roof technique B sequence, although it can be completed along with any technique of structure or preservation rhinoplasty.
Subject(s)
Nasal Septum , Rhinoplasty , Humans , Nasal Septum/surgery , Rhinoplasty/methods , Surgical Flaps/surgery , Prostheses and Implants , RotationABSTRACT
SUMMARY: For V-shaped nasal bones, the authors consider that ostectomy of the dorsal keystone area can be avoided, and this has led to the development of a new preservation technique: the spare roof technique B (or Ferreira-Ishida technique), where the bony cap is preserved. It includes six main steps, as follows. Step 1, draw on the surface of the skin the desired dorsal brow-tip aesthetic lines, the pyriform aperture, the rhinion, and the amount of triangular bone that has to be taken out to allow pushing-down the bony cap, and the transversal line in the beginning of the nasal hump. Step 2, release the upper lateral cartilages from the dorsal septum ("high septal strip"). Step 3, take out the amount of dorsal septum necessary to dehump. Step 4, perform the paramedian high parallel osteotomies exactly below the marked brow-tip dorsal aesthetic lines. Then, perform the second group of lower osteotomies, until the E-point, to achieve a triangular shape of bone in each side of the bony cap. Perform the ostectomy of the mentioned triangular areas. Release the lateral keystone area. Perform partial ultrasonic ostectomy endonasally, below the nasal bones, to promote the weakening of the transverse fracture line, in the sagittal plane just above the E-point. Push-down gently the rectangular bony cap with a Luc nasal forceps (19 cm) in a greenstick fashion. Perform lateral traditional osteotomies from high to low to high to narrow the bony bridge as much as is needed. Step 5, perform a regular L-shape Cottle septoplasty (if necessary). Step 6, suture the cartilaginous middle vault (upper lateral cartilages) to the dorsal aspect of the remaining septum.
Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Rhinoplasty , Cartilage/surgery , Esthetics , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Humans , Nasal Bone/surgery , Nasal Septum/surgery , Rhinoplasty/methodsABSTRACT
Background: The literature reporting outcomes in crooked nose patients submitted to surface dorsal preservation techniques is almost nonexistent. Objectives: To evaluate aesthetic and functional outcomes in crooked nose patients undergoing rhinoplasty with the Spare Roof Technique (SRT). Methods: Prospective, interventional, and longitudinal study performed on patients presenting a crooked nose undergoing primary rhinoplasty by SRT. The validated Portuguese version of the Utrecht Questionnaire for Outcome Assessment in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty and a visual analog scale were used to assess aesthetic and functional outcomes, respectively. Patients completed the questionnaire preoperatively and again 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: The study population included 54 Caucasian Mediterranean patients (34 female), mean aged 34.5 years. The SRT resulted in a highly significant improvement in all questions regarding subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance and subjective nasal function. The mean preoperative aesthetic Utrecht Questionnaire sum score was 13.4 (standard deviation [SD] 0.5), which improved to 9.2 (SD 0.15) at 12 months postsurgery (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The SRTa is a reliable technique that can help deliver consistently good results in reduction rhinoplasty in patients with a crooked nose.
Subject(s)
Rhinoplasty , Adult , Esthetics , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Nose/surgery , Prospective Studies , Rhinoplasty/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The relation between the osteocartilaginous nasal vault and nasal hump characteristics has not been fully investigated. METHODS: Measurements were collected from computed tomographic nasal scans in the midsagittal plane in adult Caucasian patients seeking rhinoplasty because of nasal hump from January of 2015 to December of 2018. Measurements were compared to those of sex- and age-matched patients not seeking rhinoplasty (control group). Patients with other significant nasal deformities were excluded. The correlations between nasal hump length, height, and osteocartilaginous nasal vault measurements were assessed. Distances from the beginning of the nasal hump to the kyphion and ethmoidal points were measured as well. The location of the nasal hump apex in relation to the keystone area structures was detailed. RESULTS: The study included 134 Caucasian patients, with 67 presenting nasal hump. The mean patient age was 32.9 years and 69.6 percent were female patients. Nasal hump measured a mean 17 ± 2.7 mm in length and 1.8 mm (range, 1.1 to 3.8 mm) in height. Nasal hump length correlated with nose length and nasal bone length. Nasal hump height correlated with nose length and the angle over the kyphion. In 97 percent of patients, the nasal hump began caudal to the ethmoidal point, and in all patients, the kyphion was underneath the nasal hump. The nasal hump is not a symmetric structure and, in all patients, its apex was situated above the septal cartilage. CONCLUSIONS: The nasal hump characteristics are mainly attributable to the septal cartilage, and this should be the cornerstone of any dorsal hump reduction strategy. The caudal aspect of the nasal bones contributes to the nasal hump, whereas the posterior ethmoidal plate rarely does.
Subject(s)
Nasal Bone/anatomy & histology , Nasal Cartilages/anatomy & histology , Nasal Septum/anatomy & histology , Rhinoplasty/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Anatomic Landmarks , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Bone/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Bone/surgery , Nasal Cartilages/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Cartilages/surgery , Nasal Septum/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Septum/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
Preservation rhinoplasty in general and dorsal preservation in particular are for sure one of the most attractive topics in modern rhinoplasty and probably the most puzzling concept in this field. Recent major meetings and many other publications have led to an increased interest in these old/new techniques. New strategies for preservation have been developed in recent years, with a broader range of indications than the older push/let down. A simple classification urges to clarify this puzzled semantic concept of "preservation". Is it possible to systematize all new preservation variations in a simple classification? Yes, in this viewpoint, we propose a simple classification that systematizes all kinds of preservation techniques-the old and the new techniques. Classifying preservation will clarify the relative position of all techniques. It will allow comparing procedures from similar families there so to compare outcomes and indications from each technique.
Subject(s)
Rhinoplasty/methods , Humans , Nose/anatomy & histology , Nose/surgery , Rhinoplasty/trendsABSTRACT
Importance: Diced cartilage (DC) is a reported technique that has been used for dorsal camouflage after reduction rhinoplasty. Nevertheless, there are certain issues regarding its use on nasal dorsum, especially its variable resorption rate and risk of graft distortion or migration, especially in thin-skinned patients. Recently, regenerative medicine protocols have been used to overcome drawbacks of methods based on DC. Thus, cartilage embedded in platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) has been described as a promising and reliable alternative to existing procedures. Objective: To compare long-term aesthetic outcomes of two different techniques for dorsal camouflage: DC versus shaved cartilage plus platelet-rich fibrin (SC+PRF)-shaved cartilage gel. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a prospective, interventional, and longitudinal study at an academic tertiary medical center. Participants were 200 consecutive patients undergoing primary reduction rhinoplasty by spare roof technique (SRT) or component dorsal reduction (CDR). Materials and Methods: The inclusion criteria were primary rhinoplasty, in Caucasian patients with dorsal hump, and camouflage of the dorsum by DC or SC+PRF. Exclusion criteria were ≤18 years of age, revision rhinoplasty and reconstructive rhinoplasty for neoplasic or severe traumatic nasal deformities. The "Utrecht Questionnaire for outcome assessment in aesthetic rhinoplasty" was used. Patients answered it before and after surgery (3 and 12 months after). Results: The study population included 200 patients divided into two groups considering the type of dorsal camouflage: DC (n = 132) and shaved cartilage gel (n = 68). The mean age at the time of surgery was 35.44 years (standard deviation ±9.78) and the study population included 130 females (65.0%) and 70 males (35.0%). Regarding aesthetic outcomes, analyses of postoperative means showed a significant improvement, in both groups, over time. However, self-assessment, based on the visual analogue scale (VAS), at 12 months postsurgery, was higher for patients with SC+PRF than with DC (p = 0.004). Twelve months after surgery, patients with thin skin had better aesthetic outcome with SC+PRF than with DC (p = 0.001). For both reduction rhinoplasty techniques, aesthetic outcomes, based on the VAS at 12 months after surgery, were significantly better for patients with SC+PRF (SRT: p = 0.016; CDR: p = 0.004). For both rhinoplasty approaches, either open or closed, aesthetic outcomes, based on the VAS at 12 months after surgery, were significantly better for patients with SC+PRF (closed approach: p = 0.046; open approach: p = 0.017). Conclusions: SC+PRF provides better long-term aesthetic outcomes, not only for thin-skinned patients, but also for patients who had undergone rhinoplasty by a structured or preservation technique, or by an open or closed approach, for dorsal hump reduction.
Subject(s)
Nasal Cartilages/transplantation , Rhinoplasty/methods , Adult , Esthetics , Female , Gels , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Nose/anatomy & histology , Nose/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to undergo a comprehensive analysis of the thermo-mechanical properties of nasal cartilages for the future design of a composite polymeric material to be used in human nose reconstruction surgery. A thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) in tension and compression modes within the ranges 1 to 20 Hz and 30 °C to 250 °C was performed on human nasal cartilage. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), as well as characterization of the nasal septum (NS), upper lateral cartilages (ULC), and lower lateral cartilages (LLC) reveals the different nature of the binding water inside the studied specimens. Three peaks at 60-80 °C, 100-130 °C, and 200 °C were attributed to melting of the crystalline region of collagen matrix, water evaporation, and the strongly bound non-interstitial water in the cartilage and composite specimens, respectively. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed that the degradation of cartilage, composite, and subcutaneous tissue of the NS, ULC, and LLC take place in three thermal events (~37 °C, ~189 °C, and ~290 °C) showing that cartilage releases more water and more rapidly than the subcutaneous tissue. The water content of nasal cartilage was estimated to be 42 wt %. The results of the DMA analyses demonstrated that tensile mode is ruled by flow-independent behaviour produced by the time-dependent deformability of the solid cartilage matrix that is strongly frequency-dependent, showing an unstable crystalline region between 80-180 °C, an amorphous region at around 120 °C, and a clear glass transition point at 200 °C (780 kJ/mol). Instead, the unconfined compressive mode is clearly ruled by a flow-dependent process caused by the frictional force of the interstitial fluid that flows within the cartilage matrix resulting in higher stiffness (from 12 MPa at 1 Hz to 16 MPa at 20 Hz in storage modulus). The outcomes of this study will support the development of an artificial material to mimic the thermo-mechanical behaviour of the natural cartilage of the human nose.
ABSTRACT
Humpectomy is one of the most common steps in reduction rhinoplasty among Caucasian patients. The most widespread procedures to address hump removal are both the "en bloc humpectomy" (with reconstruction of the middle third with spreader grafts) and the "split hump technique" (with confection of spreader flaps). The spare roof technique, for rhinoplasty reduction, has been developed over the past 4 years. In this technique, the upper lateral cartilages are completely preserved-even the hidden part under the caudal aspect of the nasal bones. It consists of five main steps: step 1, the upper lateral cartilages are released from the dorsal aspect of the nasal septum; step 2, a 1-mm strip of the dorsal septum is taken in each movement as required; step 3, ostectomy of the caudal aspect of nasal bones, keeping the upper lateral cartilages intact and releasing the "lateral" (left and right) pyriform aperture ligament; step 4, classic medial and lateral osteotomies (closing the open bony roof); and step 5, suturing the upper lateral cartilages to the dorsal septum and thus avoiding the natural spring effect. The outcomes of the first 100 patients have been validated by a prospective, interventional, and longitudinal study performed on patients undergoing primary rhinoplasty by means of the spare roof technique. This study confirms that the spare roof technique significantly improved patient quality of life regarding nose function and appearance. It is a reliable technique that can help deliver consistently good results in Caucasian and Mediterranean patients with a dorsal hump seeking rhinoplasty.
Subject(s)
Nasal Septum/surgery , Rhinoplasty/methods , Humans , Nasal Bone/surgery , Osteotomy/methods , Postoperative Care/methods , Surgical FlapsABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction: Evaluation of surgery outcome measured by patient satisfaction or quality of life is very important, especially in plastic surgery. There is increasing interest in self-reporting outcomes evaluation in plastic surgery. Objective: The aim of our study was to determine patient satisfaction in regard to nose appearance and function with the use of a validated questionnaire, before and after rhinoplasty surgery. Methods: A prospective study was realized at a tertiary centre. All rhinoplasty surgeries performed in adults between February 2013 and August 2014 were included. Many patients underwent additional nasal surgery such as septoplasty or turbinoplasty. The surgical procedures and patients' characteristics were also recorded. Results: Among 113 patients, 107 completed the questionnaires and the follow-up period. Analysis of pre-operative and post-operative Rhinoplasty Evaluation Outcome showed a significant improvement after 3 and 6 months in functional and aesthetic questions (p < 0.01). In the pre-operative, patients anxious and insecure had a worse score (p < 0.05). Difference in improvement of scores was not significant when groups were divided on basis of other nasal procedures, primary or revision surgery and open versus closed approach. Conclusion: We found that patients with lower literacy degree were more satisfied with the procedure. Rhinoplasty surgery significantly improved patient quality of life regarding nose function and appearance.
Resumo Introdução: A avaliação do desfecho de cirurgia medido pela satisfação ou qualidade de vida do paciente é muito importante, especialmente em cirurgia plástica. Existe um interesse crescente na autoavaliação de desfechos nesta especialidade cirúrgica. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a satisfação do paciente em relação à aparência e função do nariz com o uso de um questionário validado, antes e depois da cirurgia de rinoplastia. Método: Estudo prospectivo realizado em um centro terciário. Todas as cirurgias de rinoplastia feitas em adultos entre fevereiro de 2013 e agosto de 2014 foram incluídas. Muitos pacientes foram submetidos à cirurgia nasal adicional, como septoplastia ou turbinoplastia. Os procedimentos cirúrgicos e as características dos pacientes também foram registrados. Resultados: Entre 113 pacientes, 107 completaram os questionários e o período de acompanhamento. A análise da avaliação do desfecho de rinoplastia (ADR) no pré-operatório e pós-operatório mostrou uma melhoria significativa após 3 e 6 meses em questões funcionais e estéticas (p < 0,01). No pré-operatório, os pacientes ansiosos e inseguros apresentaram um escore pior (p < 0,05). A diferença na melhoria dos escores não foi significativa quando os grupos foram divididos com base em outros procedimentos nasais, cirurgia primária ou revisão e abordagem aberta versus fechada. Conclusão: Verificou-se que pacientes com menor grau de alfabetização estavam mais satisfeitos com o procedimento. A cirurgia de rinoplastia melhorou significativamente a qualidade de vida do paciente quanto à função e ao aspecto do nariz.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Rhinoplasty/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Quality of Life , Rhinoplasty/psychology , Nasal Obstruction/surgery , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Educational Status , Esthetics , Nasal Septum/surgeryABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Evaluation of surgery outcome measured by patient satisfaction or quality of life is very important, especially in plastic surgery. There is increasing interest in self-reporting outcomes evaluation in plastic surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to determine patient satisfaction in regard to nose appearance and function with the use of a validated questionnaire, before and after rhinoplasty surgery. METHODS: A prospective study was realized at a tertiary centre. All rhinoplasty surgeries performed in adults between February 2013 and August 2014 were included. Many patients underwent additional nasal surgery such as septoplasty or turbinoplasty. The surgical procedures and patients' characteristics were also recorded. RESULTS: Among 113 patients, 107 completed the questionnaires and the follow-up period. Analysis of pre-operative and post-operative Rhinoplasty Evaluation Outcome showed a significant improvement after 3 and 6 months in functional and aesthetic questions (p<0.01). In the pre-operative, patients anxious and insecure had a worse score (p<0.05). Difference in improvement of scores was not significant when groups were divided on basis of other nasal procedures, primary or revision surgery and open versus closed approach. CONCLUSION: We found that patients with lower literacy degree were more satisfied with the procedure. Rhinoplasty surgery significantly improved patient quality of life regarding nose function and appearance.