Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in acute-on-chronic liver failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials / Factor estimulante de colonias de granulocitos en el fallo hepático agudo sobre crónico: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de estudios aleatorizados controlados

Background and aims: A dysfunctional immune response is key to the pathogenesis of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). It has been suggested that treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) increases survival in patients with ACLF by improving immune cell dysfunction and promoting liver regeneration. The aim of the study is to evaluate the survival benefit associated with G-CSF administration compared with standard medical therapy (SMT) in ACLF. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was survival at 60–90 days. We searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to August 2021. Manual searches of reference lists in relevant articles and conference proceedings were also included. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for quality and risk of bias assessment. Two independent investigators extracted the data, and disagreements were solved by a third collaborator. Results: The initial search identified 142 studies. Four randomized controlled trials were selected for quantitative analysis including 310 patients (154 G-CSF and 156 SMT). Significant heterogeneity was observed (I2=74%, Chi2=11.57, p=0.009). G-CSF administration did not improve survival in patients with ACLF (random-effects model, risk ratio=0.64 [95% CI 0.39, 1.07]). However, when considering only the results from the studies performed in Asia, a significant decrease on mortality was observed (risk ratio=0.53 [95% CI 0.35, 0.81]). Severity scores (MELD and Child) and CD34+ peripheral cells mobilization did not significantly improve with G-CSF. Conclusion. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, G-CSF administration did not significantly improve overall survival compared to SMT in patients with ACLF...(AU)

Antecedentes y objetivos: La respuesta inmune disfuncional es clave en la patogénesis del fallo hepático agudo sobre crónico (ACLF). Se ha sugerido que la utilización de factor estimulante de colonias de granulocitos (G-CSF) aumenta la supervivencia de los pacientes con ACLF al mejorar la disfunción inmune y promover la regeneración hepática. El objetivo del estudio es evaluar el beneficio en supervivencia que proporciona la administración de G-CSF en comparación con el tratamiento médico estándar (SMT) en pacientes con ACLF. Métodos: Se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática y meta-análisis de estudios aleatorizados y controlados. El objetivo principal fue analizar la supervivencia a los 60-90 días. Se realizó una búsqueda en Ovid Medline, EMBASE, y el registro central de estudios controlados de Cochrane desde su inicio hasta agosto 2021. También se realizaron búsquedas manuales en la bibliografía de artículos relevantes y presentaciones a congresos. Se utilizó la herramienta revisada de Cochrane para analizar la calidad y el riesgo de sesgos. Los datos fueron extraídos por dos investigadores independientes y las discrepancias fueron resueltas por un tercer investigador. Resultados: La búsqueda inicial identificó 142 estudios. De estos, 4 aleatorizados y controlados fueron elegidos para el análisis cuantitativo, incluyendo un total de 310 pacientes (154 G-CSF y 156 SMT). Se objetivó un alto grado de heterogeneidad entre los estudios (I2 = 74%, Chi 2 = 11.57, p = 0.009). La administración de G-CSF no aumentó la supervivencia en el grupo de pacientes con ACLF (modelo de efectos aleatorios, risk ratio = 0.64 [95% CI 0.39, 1.07]). Sin embargo, cuando se analizó el subgrupo de estudios realizados en Asia, sí se objetivó una disminución significativa de la mortalidad (risk ratio = 0.53 [95% CI 0.35, 0.81]). Las escalas de gravedad (MELD y Child) y la movilización de células CD34+ periféricas no mejoró significativamente tras la administración de G-CSF....(AU)

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in acute-on-chronic liver failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A dysfunctional immune response is key to the pathogenesis of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). It has been suggested that treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) increases survival in patients with ACLF by improving immune cell dysfunction and promoting liver regeneration. The aim of the study is to evaluate the survival benefit associated with G-CSF administration compared with standard medical therapy (SMT) in ACLF. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was survival at 60-90 days. We searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to August 2021. Manual searches of reference lists in relevant articles and conference proceedings were also included. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for quality and risk of bias assessment. Two independent investigators extracted the data, and disagreements were solved by a third collaborator. RESULTS: The initial search identified 142 studies. Four randomized controlled trials were selected for quantitative analysis including 310 patients (154 G-CSF and 156 SMT). Significant heterogeneity was observed (I2=74%, Chi2=11.57, p=0.009). G-CSF administration did not improve survival in patients with ACLF (random-effects model, risk ratio=0.64 [95% CI 0.39, 1.07]). However, when considering only the results from the studies performed in Asia, a significant decrease on mortality was observed (risk ratio=0.53 [95% CI 0.35, 0.81]). Severity scores (MELD and Child) and CD34+ peripheral cells mobilization did not significantly improve with G-CSF. CONCLUSION: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, G-CSF administration did not significantly improve overall survival compared to SMT in patients with ACLF. The beneficial effects observed in Asian studies, as opposed to the European region, suggest that specific populations may benefit from further research aiming to identify certain subgroups with favourable outcomes when using G-CSF.

Endoscopist-directed propofol is more efficient than anesthesiologist-administered propofol in patients at low-intermediate anesthetic risk.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopist-directed propofol (EDP) sedation is becoming more popular, with a reported safety and efficacy similar to anesthesiologist-administered propofol (AAP). The aim of this study is to compare the efficiency of EDP and AAP in patients of low-intermediate anesthetic risk. METHODS: A prospective cost-effectiveness comparison study was conducted. The costs of the endoscopic procedures in the EDP and AAP group were calculated using the full cost methodology after breaking down the endoscopic activity into relative value units to allocate costs in an equitable way. To determine the effectiveness, adverse events related to endoscopic sedation and the number of incomplete procedures were registered for the EDP group and compared with those published by anesthesiologists for AAP. RESULTS: A total of 1165 and 18 919 endoscopic procedures were, respectively, included in the EDP and AAP groups. The average costs of EDP vs. AAP for gastroscopy, colonoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound were &OV0556; 182.81 vs. &OV0556; 332.93, &OV0556; 297.07 vs. &OV0556; 459.76, and &OV0556; 319.92 vs. &OV0556; 485.12, respectively. No significant differences were detected regarding the rate of overall adverse events (4.43 vs. 4.46%) or serious adverse events (0 vs. 0.17%); the rate of arterial hypotension was significantly lower in the EDP group: 0.34 vs. 1.78% [odds ratio (OR), 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.08-0.46] and the desaturation rate was significantly lower in the AAP group: 3.26 vs. 1.29% (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.85-3.60). No significant differences were found in terms of incomplete examinations (0.17 vs. 0.14%). CONCLUSION: In patients with low-intermediate anesthetic risk referred for an endoscopic examination, EDP appears to be more efficient than AAP.

Efficacy and safety of ERCP in a low-volume hospital.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: there is little scientific evidence on the outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed in low-volume hospitals; however, in our country, it is growing up its implementation. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique performed by two endoscopists with basic training in a center of this nature and analyze the learning curve in the first procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: single-center retrospective study of the first 200 ERCP performed in our hospital (analyzing the evolution between the first 100 and 100 following procedures), comparing them with the quality standards proposed in the literature. RESULTS: from February 2009 to April 2011, we performed 200 ERCP in 169 patients, and the most common indications were: Choledocholithiasis (77 %), tumors (14.5 %) and other conditions (8.5 %). The cannulation rate rose from 85 % in the first 100 ERCPto 89 % in the next 100 procedures, clinical success from 81 % to 87 %, decreasing the post-ERCP acute pancreatitis rate from 11 % to 4 %, upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) from 3 % to 2 % and acute cholangitis from 4 % to 1 %. There was a death from a massive UGIB in a cirrhotic patient in the first group of patients and a case of biliary perforation resolved by surgery in the second one. CONCLUSIONS: the results obtained after performing 200 procedures support the ability to practice ERCP in low-volume hospitals obtaining levels of efficacy and safety in accordance with published quality standards.

Eficacia y seguridad de la CPRE en un hospital con bajo volumen / Efficacy and safety of ERCP in a low-volume hospital

Introducción y objetivos: existe poca evidencia científica sobre los resultados de la CPRE realizada en hospitales con bajo volumen, sin embargo su puesta en marcha en nuestro medio es creciente. Los objetivos de nuestro estudio son evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de dicha técnica realizada por dos endoscopistas biliares noveles en un centro de estas características y analizar la curva de aprendizaje en los primeros procedimientos. Pacientes y métodos: estudio retrospectivo de las primeras 200 CPRE practicadas en nuestro hospital, analizando la progresión entre los 100 primeros procedimientos y los 100 segundos, comparándolos con los estándares de calidad propuestos en la literatura. Resultados: desde febrero de 2009 hasta abril de 2011 se realizaron 200 procedimientos a 169 pacientes con las siguientes indicaciones: coledocolitiasis (77 %), neoplasias (14,5 %) y otras patologías (8,5 %). La tasa de canulación ascendió del 85 % en las 100 primeras CPRE al 89 % en las siguientes, el éxito clínico del 81 % al 87 %, disminuyendo la tasa de pancreatitis aguda post-CPRE del 11 al 4 %, la de hemorragia digestiva alta del 3 al 2 % y la de colangitis aguda del 4 al 1 %. Hubo un éxitus secundario a una hemorragia digestiva alta en una paciente cirrótica en el primer grupo y un caso de perforación biliar resuelto mediante cirugía en el segundo. Conclusiones: los resultados obtenidos tras la realización de 200 procedimientos apoyan la posibilidad de practicar CPRE en hospitales con bajo volumen consiguiendo niveles de eficacia y seguridad acorde con los estándares de calidad publicados(AU)

Background and aims: there is little scientific evidence on the outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) performed in low-volume hospitals; however, in our country, it is growing up its implementation. The objectives of our study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique performed by two endoscopists with basic training in a center of this nature and analyze the learning curve in the first procedures. Patients and methods: single-center retrospective study of the first 200 ERCP performed in our hospital (analyzing the evolution between the first 100 and 100 following procedures), comparing them with the quality standards proposed in the literature. Results: from February 2009 to April 2011, we performed 200 ERCP in 169 patients, and the most common indications were: Choledocholithiasis (77 %), tumors (14.5 %) and other conditions (8.5 %). The cannulation rate rose from 85 % in the first 100 ERCP to 89 % in the next 100 procedures, clinical success from 81 % to 87 %, decreasing the post-ERCP acute pancreatitis rate from 11 % to 4 %, upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) from 3 % to 2 % and acute cholangitis from 4 % to 1 %. There was a death from a massive UGIB in a cirrhotic patient in the first group of patients and a case of biliary perforation resolved by surgery in the second one. Conclusions: the results obtained after performing 200 procedures support the ability to practice ERCP in low-volume hospitals obtaining levels of efficacy and safety in accordance with published quality standards(AU)

[Physiopathology of bacterial translocation and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis]. / Fisiopatología de la translocación y la peritonitis bacteriana espontánea en la cirrosis.

The key pathogenic mechanism initiating spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is bacterial translocation (BT), a process through which enteric bacteria cross the intestinal barrier and infect the mesenteric lymph nodes, thus entering the blood circulation and ascitic fluid. The high rate of bacterial translocation in cirrhosis is due to injury to the three pilars composing the intestinal mucosal barrier (the balance of intraluminal bacterial flora, the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier, and the local immune system). Blood dissemination and microbial growth in ascitic fluid resulting from SBP are a consequence of damage to the immune system in cirrhosis. Hyperproduction of proinflammatory cytokines and other vasoactive substances contributes to the arterial vasodilation and renal failure that frequently complicate the course of SBP. Even in the absence of SBP, translocation of bacteria and bacterial products from the intestinal lumen contribute to systemic inactivation of immune cells in cirrhosis.

Fisiopatología de la translocación y la peritonitis bacteriana espontánea en la cirrosis / Physiopathology of bacterial translocation and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis

El mecanismo patogénico clave que inicia la peritonitis bacteriana espontánea (PBE) es la translocación bacteriana (TB), proceso por el cual las bacterias entéricas cruzan la barrera mucosa intestinal e infectan los ganglios linfáticos mesentéricos, y desde donde alcanzan la circulación sanguínea y, posteriormente, el líquido ascítico. La alta tasa de TB en la cirrosis se debe al daño en los 3 pilares que constituyen la barrera mucosa del intestino: equilibrio de la flora bacteriana intraluminal, integridad de la barrera epitelial intestinal y sistema inmunitario local. La diseminación sanguínea y el crecimiento de los gérmenes en el líquido ascítico que se produce en la PBE es consecuencia del daño en el sistema inmunitario que conlleva la cirrosis. La hiperproducción en el líquido ascítico de citocinas proinflamatorias y otras sustancias con propiedades vasoactivas contribuye a la vasodilatación arterial y a la insuficiencia renal que, con frecuencia, complica el curso de la PBE. Aun en ausencia de PBE, la translocación de bacterias y productos bacterianos desde la luz intestinal contribuye a la activación sistémica de las células inmunitarias en la cirrosis

The key pathogenic mechanism initiating spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is bacterial translocation (BT), a process through which enteric bacteria cross the intestinal barrier and infect the mesenteric lymph nodes, thus entering the blood circulation and ascitic fluid. The high rate of bacterial translocation in cirrhosis is due to injury to the three pilars composing the intestinal mucosal barrier (the balance of intraluminal bacterial flora, the integrity of the intestinal epithelial barrier, and the local immune system). Blood dissemination and microbial growth in ascitic fluid resulting from SBP are a consequence of damage to the immune system in cirrhosis. Hyperproduction of proinflammatory cytokines and other vasoactive substances contributes to the arterial vasodilation and renal failure that frequently complicate the course of SBP. Even in the absence of SBP, translocation of bacteria and bacterial products from the intestinal lumen contribute to systemic inactivation of immune cells in cirrhosis