ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Administrative claims have been used to study the incidence and outcomes of nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), but the validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes for identifying NAION has not been examined. METHODS: We identified patients at 3 academic centers who received ≥1 ICD-10 code for NAION in 2018. We abstracted the final diagnosis from clinical documentation and recorded the number of visits with an NAION diagnosis code. We calculated positive predictive value (PPV) for the overall sample and stratified by subspecialty and the number of diagnosis codes. For patients with ophthalmology or neuro-ophthalmology visit data, we recorded presenting symptoms, examination findings, and laboratory data and calculated PPV relative to case definitions of NAION that incorporated sudden onset of symptoms, optic disc edema, afferent pupillary defect, and other characteristics. RESULTS: Among 161 patients, PPV for ≥1 ICD-10 code was 74.5% (95% CI: 67.2%-80.7%). PPV was similar when restricted to patients who had visited an ophthalmologist (75.8%, 95% CI: 68.4%-82.0%) but increased to 86.8% when restricted to those who had visited neuro-ophthalmologists (95% CI: 79.2%-91.9%). Of 113 patients with >1 ICD-10 code and complete examination data, 37 (32.7%) had documented sudden onset, optic disc swelling, and an afferent pupillary defect (95% CI: 24.7%-42.0%). Of the 76 patients who did not meet these criteria, 54 (71.0%) still received a final clinical diagnosis of NAION; for most (41/54, 75.9%), this discrepancy was due to lack of documented optic disc edema. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of ICD-10 codes for NAION in administrative claims data is high, particularly when combined with provider specialty.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Little is known about motivation for weight loss and barriers to weight loss among patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Such information is crucial for developing tailored weight management recommendations and novel interventions. METHODS: We administered a survey to patients with IIH presenting to neuro-ophthalmology clinics at The University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center (Michigan, USA) and St. Thomas' Hospital (London, England). Participants rated importance and motivation to lose weight (1-10 scale; 10 = extremely important/motivated). Facilitators and barriers to weight loss were assessed using open-ended survey questions informed by motivational interviewing methodology. Open-ended responses were coded by 2 team members independently using a modified grounded theory approach. Demographic data were extracted from medical records. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative responses. RESULTS: Of the 221 (43 Michigan and 178 London) patients with IIH (Table 1), most were female (n = 40 [93.0%] Michigan and n = 167 [94.9%] London). The majority of patients in the United States were White (n = 35 [81.4%] Michigan), and the plurality were Black in the United Kingdom (n = 67 [37.6%] London]) with a mean (SD) BMI of 38.9 kg/m2 (10.6 kg/m2) Michigan and 37.5 kg/m2 (7.7 kg/m2) London. Participants' mean (SD) level of importance to lose weight was 8.5 (2.2) (8.1 [2.3] Michigan and 8.8 [2.1] London), but their mean (SD) level of motivation to lose weight was 7.2 (2.2) (6.8 [2.4] Michigan and 7.4 [2.1] London). Nine themes emerged from the 992 open-ended coded survey responses grouped into 3 actionable categories: self-efficacy, professional resources (weight loss tools, diet, physical activity level, mental health, and physical health), and external factors (physical/environmental conditions, social influences, and time constraints). Most responses (55.6%; n = 551) were about barriers to weight loss. Lack of self-efficacy was the most discussed single barrier (N = 126; 22.9% total, 28.9% Michigan, and 20.4% London) and facilitator (N = 77; 17.5% total, 15.9% Michigan, and 18.7% London) to weight loss. Other common barriers were related to physical activity level (N = 79; 14.3% total, 13.2% Michigan, and 14.8% London) and diet (N = 79; 14.3% total, 9.4% Michigan, and 16.3% London). Commonly reported facilitators included improvements in physical activity level (N = 73; 16.6% total, 18.5% Michigan, and 15.1% London) and dietary changes (N = 76; 17.2% total, 16.4% Michigan, and 17.9% London). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IIH believe weight loss is important. Self-efficacy was the single most mentioned important patient-identified barrier or facilitator of weight loss, but professional resource needs and external factors vary widely at the individual level. These factors should be assessed to guide selection of weight loss interventions that are tailored to individual patients with IIH.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For patients with idiopathic or multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated optic neuritis (ON), the largest multicenter clinical trial (Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial [ONTT]) showed excellent visual outcomes and baseline high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA) was the only predictor of HCVA at 1 year. We aimed to evaluate predictors of long-term HCVA in a modern, real-world population of patients with ON and compare with previously published ONTT models. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, longitudinal, observational study at the University of Michigan and the University of Calgary evaluating 135 episodes of idiopathic or MS-associated ON in 118 patients diagnosed by a neuro-ophthalmologist within 30 days of onset (January 2011-June 2021). Primary outcome measured was HCVA (Snellen equivalents) at 6-18 months. Multiple linear regression models of 107 episodes from 93 patients assessed the association between HCVA at 6-18 months and age, sex, race, pain, optic disc swelling, symptoms (days), viral illness prodrome, MS status, high-dose glucocorticoid treatment, and baseline HCVA. RESULTS: Of the 135 acute episodes (109 Michigan and 26 Calgary), median age at presentation was 39 years (interquartile range [IQR], 31-49 years), 91 (67.4%) were women, 112 (83.0%) were non-Hispanic Caucasians, 101 (75.9%) had pain, 33 (24.4%) had disc edema, 8 (5.9%) had a viral prodrome, 66 (48.9%) had MS, and 62 (46.6%) were treated with glucocorticoids. The median (IQR) time between symptom onset and diagnosis was 6 days (range, 4-11 days). The median (IQR) HCVA at baseline and at 6-18 months were 20/50 (20/22, 20/200) and 20/20 (20/20, 20/27), respectively; 62 (45.9%) had better than 20/40 at baseline and 117 (86.7%) had better than 20/40 at 6-18 months. In linear regression models (n = 107 episodes in 93 patients with baseline HCVA better than CF), only baseline HCVA (ß = 0.076; P = 0.027) was associated with long-term HCVA. Regression coefficients were similar and within the 95% confidence interval of coefficients from published ONTT models. CONCLUSIONS: In a modern cohort of patients with idiopathic or MS-associated ON with baseline HCVA better than CF, long-term outcomes were good, and the only predictor was baseline HCVA. These findings were similar to prior analyses of ONTT data, and as a result, these are validated for use in conveying prognostic information about long-term HCVA outcomes.
