ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, about 81% of the world's population moved their workplace to a home office. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this cross-sectional pilot study was to determine the impact of working and/or learning from home during the COVID-19 pandemic on the head, the neck and orofacial health in university students, faculty and staff. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants from 4 universities were recruited for an online survey. The survey included 33 questions related to demographics, health issues before and during the lockdown, work/study from home, and the awareness of the health effects of the lockdown. Descriptive statistics and single logistic regression analysis were employed. RESULTS: A total of 96 subjects aged 26 ±10.5 years participated in the study. Of these, 60% did not consider their home workstation to be adequate. The development of new symptoms or the worsening of the pre-existing symptoms was observed in 67%, 24%, 59%, and 37% of the participants with regard to neck pain, temporomandibular joint (TMJ)-related issues, headaches, and parafunctional oral habits, respectively. In addition, 87% of the respondents reported that their oral habits were aggravated by neck pain and a bad posture. As compared to the faculty and the staff, the students were more likely to experience headaches or the exacerbation of the pre-existing headaches during the pandemic. In the survey, 91% of the participants reported an increased awareness of the impact of the lockdown on their head and neck, and orofacial health. CONCLUSIONS: The present study helps understand the self-perceived effects of working and/or learning from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, and may facilitate implementing the appropriate models of treatment of the craniocervical-mandibular region during a pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Pandemics , Pilot Projects , SARS-CoV-2 , Neck Pain/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Communicable Disease Control , Headache/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) treated with immunotherapy. METHODS: Recurrent EC patients treated with immunotherapy alone or in combination from 2016 to 2021 were included. Demographics, pre-treatment laboratory results, pathologic data, response at first radiographic assessment, and cancer outcomes were obtained from the medical record. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare PFS and OS stratified by NLR. RESULTS: The 106 patients included in the study were stratified by NLR <6 (n = 77, 72.6%) or NLR ≥6 (n = 29, 27.3%). Most had endometrioid pathology (59%), widely metastatic disease, and 36.8% had received ≥2 treatment lines before initiating immunotherapy. Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) was noted in 52 (49.1%) tumors. Most dMMR patients (94.3%) were treated with single-agent pembrolizumab, and most MMR proficient patients (78.7%) were treated with lenvatinb plus pembrolizumab. In the overall cohort, 40.2% (partial response (PR) 29.9%, complete response (CR) 10.4%) of patients with a NLR <6 responded at first radiographic assessment, compared to 31% (PR 27.5%, CR 3.4%) of patients with NLR ≥6 (p 0.691). Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by NLR <6 vs. ≥6 showed no difference in PFS. However, NLR <6 was associated with improved OS (p < 0.05). In the NLR < 6 group, the probability of survival at one year was 69% (95% CI: 58%, 82%), compared to 41% (95% CI: 26%, 67%) for the NLR > 6 group. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment NLR <6 was associated with improved OS for recurrent EC patients treated with immunotherapy. NLR holds promise as a predictive biomarker for survival after immunotherapy treatment for patients with recurrent EC.
Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms , Neutrophils , Brain Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Endometrial Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Immunotherapy , Lymphocytes , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary , PrognosisABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the association between pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and survival outcomes among patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors from 2016 to 2021 was conducted. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes were assessed for patients stratified by NLR (<8 vs ≥ 8) utilizing Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable analysis was performed to compare baseline characteristics between the two groups. Results: A total of 49 patients were included in analysis. A majority of patients had squamous cell histology (57%), were PD-L1 positive (55%), received ≤ 1 prior lines of systemic therapy (57%), and had distant metastatic disease at the time of treatment (69%). The groups were well-balanced with respect to age, race, histology, smoking status, PD-L1 positivity, prior lines of treatment (≤1 vs > 1), prior radiation therapy, ECOG performance status, and disease distribution for patients with a NLR < 8 (n = 35) compared to those with a NLR ≥ 8 (n = 14). A pre-treatment NLR of < 8 was associated with improved survival (p < 0.01), with 57% (95% CI: 41%, 78%) probability of survival at one year compared to 26% (95% CI: 10%, 66%) for those with NLR ≥ 8. No statistically significant differences in probability of PFS at 1 year were seen between NLR < 8 compared to those with NLR ≥ 8 (p = 0.70). Conclusions: Pre-treatment NLR may hold prognostic value for patients with metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, with NLR < 8 associated with improved survival.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Asymptomatic post-renal transplant reflux is common but only 5-10% patients are diagnosed with vesico-ureteral reflux in the setting of post-transplant febrile urinary tract infections, requiring redo ureteroneocystostomy (redo-UNC). Here we report the renal function outcomes of 37 such patients, stratified by lower urinary tract (LUT) status. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that those with pre-transplant LUT dysfunction would have lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Using procedure codes, 37 patients who underwent renal transplant followed by redo-UNC for transplant reflux at our institution between 1991 and 2014 were identified. Patient characteristics and GFR levels from four different time points were recorded. Comparisons were made between those with and without LUT dysfunction, using Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank sum, or signed-rank tests. Generalized estimating equations were constructed to account for the clustered nature of GFR within each LUT group and to assess their change over time. RESULTS: Twelve patients (32%) had pre-transplant LUT dysfunction. The proportion of males in this group was significantly higher (75% vs. 32%, p = 0.032), and there was no statistical difference towards presenting earlier with post-transplant reflux (1.4 vs. 2.3 years, p = 0.087). After an average of 4.9 years, the median GFRs were similar between the two groups (53 mg/dL vs. 58 mg/dL, p = 0.936). There was no significant difference in GFR at this last follow-up time point in patients with and without LUT dysfunction. DISCUSSION: Vesicoureteral reflux in the setting of renal transplantation is common and doesn't often require repair. In our series, we found that those with LUT dysfunction did not present statistically sooner with symptomatic transplant reflux. Longer-term follow-up did show a decline in GFR but did not reveal a difference in GFR in patients' with and without LUT dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric post-transplant GFR after open redo ureteral reimplant decreases over time in similar fashion in patients with symptomatic reflux regardless of whether they have LUT dysfunction or normal anatomy. Vigilance should apply to the recognition, treatment, and follow-up of all symptomatic transplant reflux regardless of LUT status.
Subject(s)
Glomerular Filtration Rate/physiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Ureter/surgery , Urinary Bladder/surgery , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/physiopathology , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/surgery , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kidney/physiopathology , Male , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/etiologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We examined the psychological adjustment of parents of children born with moderate to severe genital atypia 12 months after their child underwent genitoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parents were recruited longitudinally from a multicenter collaboration of 10 pediatric hospitals with specialty care for children with disorders/differences of sex development and/or congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Parents completed measures of depressive and anxious symptoms, illness uncertainty, quality of life, posttraumatic stress and decisional regret. RESULTS: Compared to levels of distress at baseline (before genitoplasty) and 6 months after genitoplasty, data from 25 mothers and 20 fathers indicated significant improvements in all psychological distress variables. However, a subset of parents continued endorsing clinically relevant distress. Some level of decisional regret was endorsed by 28% of parents, although the specific decision that caused regret was not specified. CONCLUSIONS: Overall the majority of parents were coping well 1 year after their child underwent genitoplasty. Level of decisional regret was related to having a bachelor's level of education, increased levels of illness uncertainty preoperatively and persistent illness uncertainty at 12 months after genitoplasty but was unrelated to postoperative complications.
Subject(s)
Disorders of Sex Development/surgery , Emotional Adjustment , Genitalia/abnormalities , Parents/psychology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/psychology , Adult , Child, Preschool , Decision Making , Disorders of Sex Development/psychology , Female , Genitalia/surgery , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Infant , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Period , Quality of Life , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Treatment Outcome , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/adverse effects , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The birth of a child with a disorder of sex development (DSD) and atypical genitalia can be traumatizing and isolating for families. Parents of children with DSD are at risk for increased levels of psychological distress, including depression, anxiety, illness uncertainty (IU), post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS), and impairments in quality of life (QOL). Our previous report indicated that although the majority of parents of children with atypical genitalia were coping well prior to the child's genitoplasty, approximately 25% of them reported experiencing some type of psychological distress. OBJECTIVE: The current study sought to examine the trajectory of parental psychological distress prior to, and 6 months after their child underwent genitoplasty. METHODS: Parents were recruited as part of an ongoing, prospective, multi-site study involving 10 pediatric hospitals with specialized care for children with atypical genitalia. Results from 49 parents (27 mothers, 22 fathers) of 28 children (17 female sex of rearing, 11 male sex of rearing) born with atypical genitalia (Prader rating of 3-5 in 46,XX DSD or by a Quigley rating of 3-6 in 46,XY DSD or 45,XO/46,XY) were included in the study. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in level of depressive or anxious symptoms or quality of life between baseline and 6-month post-operative follow-up, although mothers continued to report significantly higher levels of depressive symptoms than fathers, and as a group, these parents reported lower QOL than published norms. The level of PTSS significantly decreased for all parents, suggesting that parents may have come through the acute stress phase associated with their child's diagnosis. Finally, while there were no significant changes in IU over the time period, the level of IU for parents of boys actually increased, while parents of girls reported no change (Figure). CONCLUSION: Six months after their child has undergone genitoplasty, the majority of parents report minimal levels of psychological distress. However, a subset of these parents continue to experience significant distress related to their child's diagnosis. Specifically, parents of boys appear to be at increased risk for difficulties, which may be related to either the lack of clinical diagnosis for almost half of these children or the necessity of two-stage surgeries for the majority of them. We will continue collecting data on these families to better understand the trajectory of these adjustment variables.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Disorders of Sex Development/surgery , Parent-Child Relations , Parents/psychology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/psychology , Quality of Life , Urologic Surgical Procedures/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Disorders of Sex Development/psychology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We examined the psychosocial characteristics of parents of children with disorders of sex development at early presentation to a disorders of sex development clinic. Parental anxiety, depression, quality of life, illness uncertainty and posttraumatic stress symptoms were assessed. Additionally we evaluated the relationship of assigned child gender to parental outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 51 parents of children with ambiguous or atypical genitalia were recruited from 7 centers specializing in treatment of disorders of sex development. At initial assessment no child had undergone genitoplasty. Parents completed the Cosmetic Appearance Rating Scale, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, SF-36, Parent Perception of Uncertainty Scale and Impact of Event Scale-Revised. RESULTS: A large percentage of parents (54.5%) were dissatisfied with the genital appearance of their child, and a small but significant percentage reported symptoms of anxiety, depression, diminished quality of life, uncertainty and posttraumatic stress. Few gender differences emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Although many parents function well, a subset experience significant psychological distress around the time of diagnosis of a disorder of sex development in their child. Early screening to assess the need for psychosocial interventions is warranted.