Fully automated radiotherapy treatment planning: A scan to plan challenge.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Over the past decade, tools for automation of various sub-tasks in radiotherapy planning have been introduced, such as auto-contouring and auto-planning. The purpose of this study was to benchmark what degree of automation is possible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A challenge to perform automated treatment planning for prostate and prostate bed radiotherapy was set up. Participants were provided with simulation CTs and a treatment prescription and were asked to use automated tools to produce a deliverable radiotherapy treatment plan with as little human intervention as possible. Plans were scored for their adherence to the protocol when assessed using consensus expert contours. RESULTS: Thirteen entries were received. The top submission adhered to 81.8% of the minimum objectives across all cases using the consensus contour, meeting all objectives in one of the ten cases. The same system met 89.5% of objectives when assessed with their own auto-contours, meeting all objectives in four of the ten cases. The majority of systems used in the challenge had regulatory clearance (Auto-contouring: 82.5%, Auto-planning: 77%). Despite the 'hard' rule that participants should not check or edit contours or plans, 69% reported looking at their results before submission. CONCLUSIONS: Automation of the full planning workflow from simulation CT to deliverable treatment plan is possible for prostate and prostate bed radiotherapy. While many generated plans were found to require none or minor adjustment to be regarded as clinically acceptable, the result indicated there is still a lack of trust in such systems preventing full automation.

Deep learning-assisted interactive contouring of lung cancer: Impact on contouring time and consistency.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a deep learning (DL)-assisted interactive contouring tool on inter-observer variability and the time taken to complete tumour contouring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine clinicians contoured the gross tumour volume (GTV) using the PET-CT scans of 10 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, either using DL-assisted or manual contouring tools. After contouring a case using one contouring method, the same case was contoured one week later using the other method. The contours and time taken were compared. RESULTS: Use of the DL-assisted tool led to a statistically significant decrease in active contouring time of 23 % relative to the standard manual segmentation method (p < 0.01). The mean observation time for all clinicians and cases made up nearly 60 % of interaction time for both contouring approaches. On average the time spent contouring per case was reduced from 22 min to 19 min when using the DL-assisted tool. Additionally, the DL-assisted tool reduced contour variability in the parts of tumour where clinicians tended to disagree the most, while the consensus contour was similar whichever of the two contouring approaches was used. CONCLUSIONS: A DL-assisted interactive contouring approach decreased active contouring time and local inter-observer variability when used to delineate lung cancer GTVs compared to a standard manual method. Integration of this tool into the clinical workflow could assist clinicians in contouring tasks and improve contouring efficiency.

An approach to generate synthetic 4DCT datasets to benchmark Mid-Position implementations.

PURPOSE: The Mid-Position image is constructed from 4DCT data using Deformable Image Registration and can be used as planning CT with reduced PTV volumes. 4DCT datasets currently-available for testing do not provide the corresponding Mid-P images of the datasets. This work describes an approach to generate human-like synthetic 4DCT datasets with the associated Mid-P images that can be used as reference in the validation of Mid-P implementations. METHODS: Twenty synthetic 4DCT datasets with the associated reference Mid-P images were generated from twenty clinical 4DCT datasets. Per clinical dataset, an anchor phase was registered to the remaining nine phases to obtain nine Deformable Vector Fields (DVFs). These DVFs were used to warp the anchor phase in order to generate the synthetic 4DCT dataset and the corresponding reference Mid-P image. Similarly, a reference 4D tumor mask dataset and its corresponding Mid-P tumor mask were generated. The generated synthetic datasets and masks were used to compare and benchmark the outcomes of three independent Mid-P implementations using a set of experiments. RESULTS: The Mid-P images constructed by the three implementations showed high similarity scores when compared to the reference Mid-P images except for one noisy dataset. The biggest difference in the estimated motion amplitudes (-2.6 mm) was noticed in the Superior-Inferior direction. The statistical analysis showed no significant differences among the three implementations for all experiments. CONCLUSION: The described approach and the proposed experiments provide an independent method that can be used in the validation of any Mid-P implementation being developed.

Geometric and dosimetric analysis of CT- and MR-based automatic contouring for the EPTN contouring atlas in neuro-oncology.

PURPOSE: Atlas-based and deep-learning contouring (DLC) are methods for automatic segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs). The European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) published a consensus-based atlas for delineation of OARs in neuro-oncology. In this study, geometric and dosimetric evaluation of automatically-segmented neuro-oncological OARs was performed using CT- and MR-models following the EPTN-contouring atlas. METHODS: Image and contouring data from 76 neuro-oncological patients were included. Two atlas-based models (CT-atlas and MR-atlas) and one DLC-model (MR-DLC) were created. Manual contours on registered CT-MR-images were used as ground-truth. Results were analyzed in terms of geometrical (volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (vDSC), surface DSC (sDSC), added path length (APL), and mean slice-wise Hausdorff distance (MSHD)) and dosimetrical accuracy. Distance-to-tumor analysis was performed to analyze to which extent the location of the OAR relative to planning target volume (PTV) has dosimetric impact, using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: CT-atlas outperformed MR-atlas for 22/26 OARs. MR-DLC outperformed MR-atlas for all OARs. Highest median (95 %CI) vDSC and sDSC were found for the brainstem in MR-DLC: 0.92 (0.88-0.95) and 0.84 (0.77-0.89) respectively, as well as lowest MSHD: 0.27 (0.22-0.39)cm. Median dose differences (ΔD) were within ± 1 Gy for 24/26(92 %) OARs for all three models. Distance-to-tumor showed a significant correlation for ΔDmax,0.03cc-parameters when splitting the data in ≤ 4 cm and > 4 cm OAR-distance (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MR-based DLC and CT-based atlas-contouring enable high-quality segmentation. It was shown that a combination of both CT- and MR-autocontouring models results in the best quality.

Clinical evaluation of atlas-based auto-segmentation in breast and nodal radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate contouring of anatomical structures allows for high-precision radiotherapy planning, targeting the dose at treatment volumes and avoiding organs at risk. Manual contouring is time-consuming with significant user variability, whereas auto-segmentation (AS) has proven efficiency benefits but requires editing before treatment planning. This study investigated whether atlas-based AS (ABAS) accuracy improves with template atlas group size and character-specific atlas and test case selection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One clinician retrospectively contoured the breast, nodes, lung, heart, and brachial plexus on 100 CT scans, adhering to peer-reviewed guidelines. Atlases were clustered in group sizes, treatment positions, chest wall separations, and ASs created with Mirada software. The similarity of ASs compared to reference contours was described by the Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC) and centroid distance variance (CDV). RESULTS: Across group sizes, for all structures combined, the mean JSC was 0.6 (SD 0.3, p = .999). Across atlas-specific groups, 0.6 (SD 0.3, p = 1.000). The correlation between JSC and structure volume was weak in both scenarios (adjusted R2-0.007 and 0.185).Mean CDV was similar across groups but varied up to 1.2 cm for specific structures. CONCLUSIONS: Character-specific atlas groups and test case selection did not improve accuracy outcomes. High-quality ASs were obtained from groups containing as few as ten atlases, subsequently simplifying the application of ABAS. CDV measures indicating auto-segmentation variations on the x, y, and z axes can be utilised to decide on the clinical relevance of variations and reduce AS editing. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: High-quality ABASs can be obtained from as few as ten template atlases.Atlas and test case selection do not improve AS accuracy.Unlike well-known quantitative similarity indices, volume displacement metrics provide information on the location of segmentation variations, helping assessment of the clinical relevance of variations and reducing clinician editing. Volume displacement metrics combined with the qualitative measure of clinician assessment could reduce user variability.

An investigation into the risk of population bias in deep learning autocontouring.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To date, data used in the development of Deep Learning-based automatic contouring (DLC) algorithms have been largely sourced from single geographic populations. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of population-based bias by determining whether the performance of an autocontouring system is impacted by geographic population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 80 Head Neck CT deidentified scans were collected from four clinics in Europe (n = 2) and Asia (n = 2). A single observer manually delineated 16 organs-at-risk in each. Subsequently, the data was contoured using a DLC solution, and trained using single institution (European) data. Autocontours were compared to manual delineations using quantitative measures. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test for any difference between populations. Clinical acceptability of automatic and manual contours to observers from each participating institution was assessed using a blinded subjective evaluation. RESULTS: Seven organs showed a significant difference in volume between groups. Four organs showed statistical differences in quantitative similarity measures. The qualitative test showed greater variation in acceptance of contouring between observers than between data from different origins, with greater acceptance by the South Korean observers. CONCLUSION: Much of the statistical difference in quantitative performance could be explained by the difference in organ volume impacting the contour similarity measures and the small sample size. However, the qualitative assessment suggests that observer perception bias has a greater impact on the apparent clinical acceptability than quantitatively observed differences. This investigation of potential geographic bias should extend to more patients, populations, and anatomical regions in the future.

Analytic calculations and synthetic shapes for validation of quantitative contour comparison software.

A high level of variability in reported values was observed in a recent survey of contour similarity measures (CSMs) calculation tools. Such variations in the output measurements prevent meaningful comparison between studies. The purpose of this study was to develop a dataset with analytically calculated gold standard values to facilitate standardization and ensure accuracy of CSM implementations. The dataset was generated in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format. Both the dataset and the software used for its generation are made publicly available to encourage robust testing of CSM implementations for accuracy, improving consistency between different implementations.

Exploration of the contribution of physiotherapy students to the delivery of health services: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the perspectives of physiotherapists on the contribution of students to the delivery of health services during clinical placements. METHODS: Focus groups with a semi-structured interview guide were completed separately with new graduate physiotherapists reflecting on their student experience and experienced physiotherapists from five Queensland public health-sector hospitals. Interviews were transcribed verbatim in preparation for thematic analysis. Interview manuscripts were read independently and initially coding completed. Codes were compared and further refinement of themes occurred. Themes were reviewed by two investigators. RESULTS: There were 38 new graduate participants across nine focus groups and 35 experienced physiotherapists across six focus groups who participated in this study. Students participate in a range of activities during clinical placements some of which contribute to delivery of health services and others which support student learning. Three major themes were identified: 1) tangible student contribution; 2) non-tangible student contribution; and 3) factors that influence the student contribution. CONCLUSIONS: Overwhelmingly, both new graduate and experienced physiotherapists felt that students do contribute to the delivery of health services however careful consideration of a variety of factors is necessary to maximize the student contribution.

A collaborative clinical placement model for physiotherapy students results in equivalent (or greater) direct patient care activity than that delivered by physiotherapists alone: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: The demand for physiotherapy clinical placements is rising which requires innovative approaches and an understanding of clinical placement models. OBJECTIVE: To determine physiotherapy student contribution to direct patient care activity during a collaborative clinical placement model. Secondary aims determined the impact of clinical area and clinical educator to student (CE:student) ratio and if a group of students could reach equivalent direct patient care activity of a junior or senior physiotherapist. METHOD: Physiotherapy student, and junior and senior physiotherapist occasions of service (OOS) were collected from five Queensland Public Health Sector hospital information management systems from four physiotherapy clinical areas (i.e. cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, neurorehabilitation, and orthopedics). Number of days of clinical activity was recorded to provide average OOS/day. RESULTS: Across a 5-week clinical placement a group of physiotherapy students in a collaborative clinical placement model provided on average 10.6 OOS/day (95%CI 10.1-11.2). In three (75%) clinical areas, a group of students participating in higher CE:student ratios produced more OOS/day. Clinical area and CE:student ratio predicted 39% of the variance in student average OOS/day. On average a group of students reached the equivalent direct patient care activity of a junior and senior physiotherapist by week two of a 5-week clinical placement. CONCLUSION: Physiotherapy students in a collaborative clinical placement model met or exceeded the direct patient care activity of a physiotherapist, irrespective of clinical area and CE:student ratio.

Multicenter comparison of measures for quantitative evaluation of contouring in radiotherapy.

Background and Purpose: A wide range of quantitative measures are available to facilitate clinical implementation of auto-contouring software, on-going Quality Assurance (QA) and interobserver contouring variation studies. This study aimed to assess the variation in output when applying different implementations of the measures to the same data in order to investigate how consistently such measures are defined and implemented in radiation oncology. Materials and Methods: A survey was conducted to assess if there were any differences in definitions of contouring measures or their implementations that would lead to variation in reported results between institutions. This took two forms: a set of computed tomography (CT) image data with "Test" and "Reference" contours was distributed for participants to process using their preferred tools and report results, and a questionnaire regarding the definition of measures and their implementation was completed by the participants. Results: Thirteen participants completed the survey and submitted results, with one commercial and twelve in-house solutions represented. Excluding outliers, variations of up to 50% in Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), 50% in 3D Hausdorff Distance (HD), and 200% in Average Distance (AD) were observed between the participant submitted results. Collaborative investigation with participants revealed a large number of bugs in implementation, confounding the understanding of intentional implementation choices. Conclusion: Care must be taken when comparing quantitative results between different studies. There is a need for a dataset with clearly defined measures and ground truth for validation of such tools prior to their use.

Real-world analysis of manual editing of deep learning contouring in the thorax region.

Background and purpose: User-adjustments after deep-learning (DL) contouring in radiotherapy were evaluated to get insight in real-world editing during clinical practice. This study assessed the amount, type and spatial regions of editing of auto-contouring for organs-at-risk (OARs) in routine clinical workflow for patients in the thorax region. Materials and methods: A total of 350 lung cancer and 362 breast cancer patients, contoured between March 2020 and March 2021 using a commercial DL-contouring method followed by manual adjustments were retrospectively analyzed. Subsampling was performed for some OARs, using an inter-slice gap of 1-3 slices. Commonly-used whole-organ contouring assessment measures were calculated, and all cases were registered to a common reference shape per OAR to identify regions of manual adjustment. Results were expressed as the median, 10th-90th percentile of adjustment and visualized using 3D renderings. Results: Per OAR, the median amount of editing was below 1 mm. However, large adjustments were found in some locations for most OARs. In general, enlarging of the auto-contours was needed. Subsampling DL-contours showed less adjustments were made in the interpolated slices compared to simulated no-subsampling for these OARs. Conclusion: The real-world performance of automatic DL-contouring software was evaluated and proven useful in clinical practice. Specific regions-of-adjustment were identified per OAR in the thorax region, and separate models were found to be necessary for specific clinical indications different from training data. This analysis showed the need to perform routine clinical analysis especially when procedures or acquisition protocols change to have the best configuration of the workflow.

Machine learning-based detection of aberrant deep learning segmentations of target and organs at risk for prostate radiotherapy using a secondary segmentation algorithm.

Objective.The output of a deep learning (DL) auto-segmentation application should be reviewed, corrected if needed and approved before being used clinically. This verification procedure is labour-intensive, time-consuming and user-dependent, which potentially leads to significant errors with impact on the overall treatment quality. Additionally, when the time needed to correct auto-segmentations approaches the time to delineate target and organs at risk from scratch, the usability of the DL model can be questioned. Therefore, an automated quality assurance framework was developed with the aim to detect in advance aberrant auto-segmentations.Approach. Five organs (prostate, bladder, anorectum, femoral head left and right) were auto-delineated on CT acquisitions for 48 prostate patients by an in-house trained primary DL model. An experienced radiation oncologist assessed the correctness of the model output and categorised the auto-segmentations into two classes whether minor or major adaptations were needed. Subsequently, an independent, secondary DL model was implemented to delineate the same structures as the primary model. Quantitative comparison metrics were calculated using both models' segmentations and used as input features for a machine learning classification model to predict the output quality of the primary model.Main results. For every organ, the approach of independent validation by the secondary model was able to detect primary auto-segmentations that needed major adaptation with high sensitivity (recall = 1) based on the calculated quantitative metrics. The surface DSC and APL were found to be the most indicated parameters in comparison to standard quantitative metrics for the time needed to adapt auto-segmentations.Significance. This proposed method includes a proof of concept for the use of an independent DL segmentation model in combination with a ML classifier to improve time saving during QA of auto-segmentations. The integration of such system into current automatic segmentation pipelines can increase the efficiency of the radiotherapy contouring workflow.

Beyond automatic medical image segmentation-the spectrum between fully manual and fully automatic delineation.

Semi-automatic and fully automatic contouring tools have emerged as an alternative to fully manual segmentation to reduce time spent contouring and to increase contour quality and consistency. Particularly, fully automatic segmentation has seen exceptional improvements through the use of deep learning in recent years. These fully automatic methods may not require user interactions, but the resulting contours are often not suitable to be used in clinical practice without a review by the clinician. Furthermore, they need large amounts of labelled data to be available for training. This review presents alternatives to manual or fully automatic segmentation methods along the spectrum of variable user interactivity and data availability. The challenge lies to determine how much user interaction is necessary and how this user interaction can be used most effectively. While deep learning is already widely used for fully automatic tools, interactive methods are just at the starting point to be transformed by it. Interaction between clinician and machine, via artificial intelligence, can go both ways and this review will present the avenues that are being pursued to improve medical image segmentation.

Segmentation-guided multi-modal registration of liver images for dose estimation in SIRT.

PURPOSE: Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) requires a good liver registration of multi-modality images to obtain precise dose prediction and measurement. This study investigated the feasibility of liver registration of CT and MR images, guided by segmentation of the liver and its landmarks. The influence of the resulting lesion registration on dose estimation was evaluated. METHODS: The liver segmentation was done with a convolutional neural network (CNN), and the landmarks were segmented manually. Our image-based registration software and its liver-segmentation-guided extension (CNN-guided) were tuned and evaluated with 49 CT and 26 MR images from 20 SIRT patients. Each liver registration was evaluated by the root mean square distance (RMSD) of mean surface distance between manually delineated liver contours and mass center distance between manually delineated landmarks (lesions, clips, etc.). The root mean square of RMSDs (RRMSD) was used to evaluate all liver registrations. The CNN-guided registration was further extended by incorporating landmark segmentations (CNN&LM-guided) to assess the value of additional landmark guidance. To evaluate the influence of segmentation-guided registration on dose estimation, mean dose and volume percentages receiving at least 70 Gy (V70) estimated on the 99mTc-labeled macro-aggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) SPECT were computed, either based on lesions from the reference 99mTc-MAA CT (reference lesions) or from the registered floating CT or MR images (registered lesions) using the CNN- or CNN&LM-guided algorithms. RESULTS: The RRMSD decreased for the floating CTs and MRs by 1.0 mm (11%) and 3.4 mm (34%) using CNN guidance for the image-based registration and by 2.1 mm (26%) and 1.4 mm (21%) using landmark guidance for the CNN-guided registration. The quartiles for the relative mean dose difference (the V70 difference) between the reference and registered lesions and their correlations [25th, 75th; r] are as follows: [- 5.5% (- 1.3%), 5.6% (3.4%); 0.97 (0.95)] and [- 12.3% (- 2.1%), 14.8% (2.9%); 0.96 (0.97)] for the CNN&LM- and CNN-guided CT to CT registrations, [- 7.7% (- 6.6%), 7.0% (3.1%); 0.97 (0.90)] and [- 15.1% (- 11.3%), 2.4% (2.5%); 0.91 (0.78)] for the CNN&LM- and CNN-guided MR to CT registrations. CONCLUSION: Guidance by CNN liver segmentations and landmarks markedly improves the performance of the image-based registration. The small mean dose change between the reference and registered lesions demonstrates the feasibility of applying the CNN&LM- or CNN-guided registration to volume-level dose prediction. The CNN&LM- and CNN-guided registrations for CTs can be applied to voxel-level dose prediction according to their small V70 change for most lesions. The CNN-guided MR to CT registration still needs to incorporate landmark guidance for smaller change of voxel-level dose estimation.

The transition from physiotherapy student to new graduate: are they prepared?

Background: The transition from physiotherapy student to new graduate poses many challenges. In other health disciplines concerns have been raised about new graduate preparedness for practice.Objective: To explore the perspectives of new graduate and experienced physiotherapists on the transition from student to new graduate.Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 focus groups; nine new graduate groups and six experienced physiotherapist groups. Interviews were transcribed in preparation for thematic analysis whereby researchers examined transcripts independently and identified codes. Codes were compared and themes developed, discussed, and refined. Themes were reviewed by all authors.Results: Four themes emerged surrounding the transition from physiotherapy student to new graduate: 1) preparedness for practice; 2) protected practice; 3) independent and affirmation of practice; and 4) performance expectations. Both groups identified increased caseload volume and complexity were challenging, and that students were typically protected from realistic workloads. New graduates at times felt unprepared for their new roles and highlighted that coping with change in independence and managing expectations of themselves was difficult. Strategies identified that may assist the transition from student to new graduate included organizational, clinical placement experiences and building self-efficacy.Conclusions: Challenges are experienced during the transition from physiotherapy student to new graduate. To enhance this transition a multifactorial approach is required that includes all key stakeholders and strategically targets challenges associated with the student transition to new graduate.

Interactive contouring through contextual deep learning.

PURPOSE: To investigate a deep learning approach that enables three-dimensional (3D) segmentation of an arbitrary structure of interest given a user provided two-dimensional (2D) contour for context. Such an approach could decrease delineation times and improve contouring consistency, particularly for anatomical structures for which no automatic segmentation tools exist. METHODS: A series of deep learning segmentation models using a Recurrent Residual U-Net with attention gates was trained with a successively expanding training set. Contextual information was provided to the models, using a previously contoured slice as an input, in addition to the slice to be contoured. In total, 6 models were developed, and 19 different anatomical structures were used for training and testing. Each of the models was evaluated for all 19 structures, even if they were excluded from the training set, in order to assess the model's ability to segment unseen structures of interest. Each model's performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance, and relative added path length (APL). RESULTS: The segmentation performance for seen and unseen structures improved when the training set was expanded by addition of structures previously excluded from the training set. A model trained exclusively on heart structures achieved a DSC of 0.33, HD of 44 mm, and relative APL of 0.85 when segmenting the spleen, whereas a model trained on a diverse set of structures, but still excluding the spleen, achieved a DSC of 0.80, HD of 13 mm, and relative APL of 0.35. Iterative prediction performed better compared to direct prediction when considering unseen structures. CONCLUSIONS: Training a contextual deep learning model on a diverse set of structures increases the segmentation performance for the structures in the training set, but importantly enables the model to generalize and make predictions even for unseen structures that were not represented in the training set. This shows that user-provided context can be incorporated into deep learning contouring to facilitate semi-automatic segmentation of CT images for any given structure. Such an approach can enable faster de-novo contouring in clinical practice.

Changes in direct patient care from physiotherapy student to new graduate.

Background: Clinical placements offer students an opportunity to provide direct patient care and are essential to develop safe and effective practitioners. It is unknown what changes in direct patient care activities are required as students transition to graduate physiotherapists. Objective: To determine the change in direct patient care activity from physiotherapy student to new graduate. Methods: Five hospitals provided clinical activity data from 412 physiotherapy students and 50 new graduate physiotherapists working in four physiotherapy clinical areas. Main Outcome Measures: Percentage of day spent in direct patient care, average occasions of service (OOS) per day and average length of one OOS (LOOS) for physiotherapy students and new graduates. Results: Students spent less time during their day providing direct patient care (24%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 19 to 29), performed fewer OOS (4.4, 95%CI 4.0 to 4.8) and had longer LOOS (18 min, 95%CI 13 to 23) compared to new graduates. This was consistent across all clinical areas. Conclusions: Physiotherapy student caseload is half that of a new graduate physiotherapist, with students taking longer to complete an OOS. Given this disparity in workload, active stakeholder engagement is essential to implement strategies that support and optimize the transition from student to graduate.

Head and neck cancer patient images for determining auto-segmentation accuracy in T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging through expert manual segmentations.

PURPOSE: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy treatment planning has rapidly increased due to its ability to evaluate patient's anatomy without the use of ionizing radiation and due to its high soft tissue contrast. For these reasons, MRI has become the modality of choice for longitudinal and adaptive treatment studies. Automatic segmentation could offer many benefits for these studies. In this work, we describe a T2-weighted MRI dataset of head and neck cancer patients that can be used to evaluate the accuracy of head and neck normal tissue auto-segmentation systems through comparisons to available expert manual segmentations. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS: T2-weighted MRI images were acquired for 55 head and neck cancer patients. These scans were collected after radiotherapy computed tomography (CT) simulation scans using a thermoplastic mask to replicate patient treatment position. All scans were acquired on a single 1.5 T Siemens MAGNETOM Aera MRI with two large four-channel flex phased-array coils. The scans covered the region encompassing the nasopharynx region cranially and supraclavicular lymph node region caudally, when possible, in the superior-inferior direction. Manual contours were created for the left/right submandibular gland, left/right parotids, left/right lymph node level II, and left/right lymph node level III. These contours underwent quality assurance to ensure adherence to predefined guidelines, and were corrected if edits were necessary. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: The T2-weighted images and RTSTRUCT files are available in DICOM format. The regions of interest are named based on AAPM's Task Group 263 nomenclature recommendations (Glnd_Submand_L, Glnd_Submand_R, LN_Neck_II_L, Parotid_L, Parotid_R, LN_Neck_II_R, LN_Neck_III_L, LN_Neck_III_R). This dataset is available on The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) by the National Cancer Institute under the collection "AAPM RT-MAC Grand Challenge 2019" (https://doi.org/10.7937/tcia.2019.bcfjqfqb). POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: This dataset provides head and neck patient MRI scans to evaluate auto-segmentation systems on T2-weighted images. Additional anatomies could be provided at a later time to enhance the existing library of contours.

Whole liver segmentation based on deep learning and manual adjustment for clinical use in SIRT.

PURPOSE: In selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), an accurate total liver segmentation is required for activity prescription and absorbed dose calculation. Our goal was to investigate the feasibility of using automatic liver segmentation based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) for CT imaging in SIRT, and the ability of CNN to reduce inter-observer variability of the segmentation. METHODS: A multi-scale CNN was modified for liver segmentation for SIRT patients. The CNN model was trained with 139 datasets from three liver segmentation challenges and 12 SIRT patient datasets from our hospital. Validation was performed on 13 SIRT datasets and 12 challenge datasets. The model was tested on 40 SIRT datasets. One expert manually delineated the livers and adjusted the liver segmentations from CNN for 40 test SIRT datasets. Another expert performed the same tasks for 20 datasets randomly selected from the 40 SIRT datasets. The CNN segmentations were compared with the manual and adjusted segmentations from the experts. The difference between the manual segmentations was compared with the difference between the adjusted segmentations to investigate the inter-observer variability. Segmentation difference was evaluated through dice similarity coefficient (DSC), volume ratio (RV), mean surface distance (MSD), and Hausdorff distance (HD). RESULTS: The CNN segmentation achieved a median DSC of 0.94 with the manual segmentation and of 0.98 with the manually corrected CNN segmentation, respectively. The DSC between the adjusted segmentations is 0.98, which is 0.04 higher than the DSC between the manual segmentations. CONCLUSION: The CNN model achieved good liver segmentations on CT images of good image quality, with relatively normal liver shapes and low tumor burden. 87.5% of the 40 CNN segmentations only needed slight adjustments for clinical use. However, the trained model failed on SIRT data with low dose or contrast, lesions with large density difference from their surroundings, and abnormal liver position and shape. The abovementioned scenarios were not adequately represented in the training data. Despite this limitation, the current CNN is already a useful clinical tool which improves inter-observer agreement and therefore contributes to the standardization of the dosimetry. A further improvement is expected when the CNN will be trained with more data from SIRT patients.

CT images with expert manual contours of thoracic cancer for benchmarking auto-segmentation accuracy.

PURPOSE: Automatic segmentation offers many benefits for radiotherapy treatment planning; however, the lack of publicly available benchmark datasets limits the clinical use of automatic segmentation. In this work, we present a well-curated computed tomography (CT) dataset of high-quality manually drawn contours from patients with thoracic cancer that can be used to evaluate the accuracy of thoracic normal tissue auto-segmentation systems. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 60 patients undergoing treatment simulation for thoracic radiotherapy were acquired from three institutions: MD Anderson Cancer Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and the MAASTRO clinic. Each institution provided CT scans from 20 patients, including mean intensity projection four-dimensional CT (4D CT), exhale phase (4D CT), or free-breathing CT scans depending on their clinical practice. All CT scans covered the entire thoracic region with a 50-cm field of view and slice spacing of 1, 2.5, or 3 mm. Manual contours of left/right lungs, esophagus, heart, and spinal cord were retrieved from the clinical treatment plans. These contours were checked for quality and edited if necessary to ensure adherence to RTOG 1106 contouring guidelines. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: The CT images and RTSTRUCT files are available in DICOM format. The regions of interest were named according to the nomenclature recommended by American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 263 as Lung_L, Lung_R, Esophagus, Heart, and SpinalCord. This dataset is available on The Cancer Imaging Archive (funded by the National Cancer Institute) under Lung CT Segmentation Challenge 2017 (http://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.3r3fvz08). POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: This dataset provides CT scans with well-delineated manually drawn contours from patients with thoracic cancer that can be used to evaluate auto-segmentation systems. Additional anatomies could be supplied in the future to enhance the existing library of contours.