Patient and healthcare provider experience and perceptions of a preoperative rehabilitation class for lumbar discectomy: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar disc disease is a leading cause of low back pain. Lumbar discectomy (LD) may be indicated if symptoms are not managed conservatively. Rehabilitation has traditionally been delivered postoperatively; however, there is increasing delivery preoperatively. There are few data concerning perceptions and experiences of preoperative rehabilitation. Exploring experiences of preoperative rehabilitation may help in the development and delivery of effective care for patients. OBJECTIVES: To develop an understanding of patient and healthcare provider (HCP) experiences, perspectives and preferences of preoperative LD rehabilitation, including why patients do not attend. DESIGN: A qualitative interpretive approach using focus groups and individual interviews. METHODS: Data were collected from; a) patients listed for surgery and attended the preoperative rehabilitation (October 2019 to March 2020), b) patients listed for surgery but did not attend rehabilitation, and c) HCPs involved in the delivery of rehabilitation. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS/FINDINGS: Twenty participants were included, twelve patients and eight HCPs. The preoperative class was a valuable service for both patients and HCPs. It provided a solution to staffing and time pressures. It provided the required education and exercise content helping the patients along their surgery pathway. Travel distance, transportation links, parking difficulty and cost, lack of knowledge about the class aims, and previous negative experiences were barriers to patient attendance. CONCLUSIONS: For most patients and HCPs, the preoperative class was valuable. Addressing the challenges and barriers could improve attendance. Future research should focus on management of patient expectations and preferences preoperatively.

Physical therapy of patients undergoing first-time lumbar discectomy: a survey of current UK practice.

BACKGROUND: The type, timing, and extent of provision of rehabilitation for lumbar discectomy patients in the UK are currently unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the provision and type of rehabilitation for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy in UK neurosurgical centers. METHOD: Physical therapists involved in treating lumbar discectomy patients in UK neurosurgery centers were invited to complete an online survey that asked about the type, timing (preop, postop), and rehabilitation content for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy. RESULTS: Seventeen UK neurosurgery centers completed the survey. Twelve (36%) responded from the 33 centers targeted as well as an additional five private centers. All participating centers provided a rehabilitation service for lumbar discectomy patients. Rehabilitation was provided preoperatively in n = 6 (35%) centers, postoperatively as an inpatient in all centers, and postoperatively as an outpatient in n = 14 (82%) centers. Factors that influenced the decision to provide rehabilitation included both external and internal or patient-related factors. Preoperative rehabilitation focused mainly on education, whilst postoperative outpatient rehabilitation focused more on exercises. Rehabilitation consistently included mobility, functional task training, and exercise prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst all neurosurgical centers in this survey provided some form of rehabilitation for patients undergoing LD surgery, the approach remains inconsistent. Rehabilitation was delivered most frequently postoperatively, with one in three centers providing it preoperatively. Rehabilitation content also varied depending on when it was provided. Further research is needed to determine the optimum timing, contents, and target of rehabilitation for patients undergoing LD surgery.

Predictors of time to return to play and re-injury following hamstring injury with and without intramuscular tendon involvement in adult professional footballers: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: In one English Premier League football club over four seasons, 1) describe the number of hamstring strain injuries (HSI) sustained using the British Athletics Muscle Injury Classification (BAMIC); 2) determine if intramuscular tendon HSI influenced the time to return to play (TTRTP) and reinjury rate; 3) determine the predictors of TTRTP and reinjury. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort design. METHODS: All first team players who sustained a HSI between 2014 and 2018 were included. Players underwent an MRI scan that was graded by a Radiologist using the BAMIC (0a-4) criteria. TTRTP, reinjury rate and information on suspected predictors were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-five HSI experienced by 24 players (age = 26 ±â€¯4 years) were recorded over the 4 seasons. There was a difference in TTRTP between grades 1a and 2c (P = 0.007), but not between 2b and 2c (P = 0.845). Grade of HSI (P ≤ 0.001) and removal of the player (P < 0.001) were predictors of TTRTP, with each increase in grade resulting in an additional 3 days of TTRTP, and being removed, an additional 11 days. Grade and all other predictors did not influence reinjury rate, albeit higher odds were evident for previous HSI, experiencing the HSI during sprinting, passing a ball or stretching, and reported increase days of pain during walking. CONCLUSIONS: HSIs extending into the intramuscular tendon (2b cf. 2c) did not influence TTRTP or re-injury, albeit TTRTP was affected by the BAMIC grade and if the player was removed from activity.

Prevalence of Extreme Trait Sensory Profiles and Personality Types in Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain with Predominant Central Sensitization: Secondary Analysis of an International Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) and central sensitization (CS) exhibit sensory hypersensitivity that may be related to pre-existing trait characteristics. Sensory profiles and trait anxiety-related characteristics have sensory sensitivity in common with CS. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were 1) to observe the prevalence of 4 personality types and extreme scores of 4 trait sensory profiles in people with NSCLBP and predominant CS; and 2) to compare these between 2 subgroups based on high and low self-reported CS symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: An international cross-sectional observational study was undertaken. SETTING: Adults (n = 165; mean age = 45 ± 12 standard deviation) were recruited from physiotherapy clinics across 3 countries and 2 continents. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were: NSCLBP, aged 18-64 years, with clinically identified predominant CS pain, without specific pathology. The outcome measures were: Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile, State/Trait Anxiety Inventory, and Marlowe Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Descriptive and comparative statistics were used. RESULTS: CSI scores ranged from 19-79 (mean = 50). There was a high prevalence of extreme 1) trait sensory hyper- and, unexpectedly, hyposensitivity profile scores (P < 0.001) and Defensive High Anxious personality type (P < 0.01) in the high-CSI (CSI>= 40; 78%) subgroup, and 2) trait sensory hyposensitivity profile scores (P < 0.01) and Repressor personality type (P < 0.01) in the low-CSI subgroup (CSI < 40; 22%). LIMITATIONS: Self-report measures only were used; limited demographics. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, these results are the first to demonstrate extreme trait sensory profiles and personality types in people with NSCLBP and predominant CS. A subgroup who reports low levels of CS symptoms may have a hyposensitive sensory profile and Repressor personality type. Further study is required to investigate the extent to which these trait characteristics may predict CS symptoms in people with NSCLBP. KEY WORDS: Central sensitization, nonspecific chronic low back pain, prevalence of extreme trait characteristics, sensory profiles, trait anxiety-related personality types.

Trait Sensitivity, Anxiety, and Personality Are Predictive of Central Sensitization Symptoms in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

BACKGROUND: Sensitivity-related trait characteristics involving physical and emotional sensitivities and high trait anxiety personality types have been observed in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). High trait sensitivity to sensory stimulation combined with interpretation biases based on personality type may contribute to the development of central sensitization (CS) symptoms. To date, there is limited research that has considered both sensitivity levels and personality type in NSCLBP with CS. The purpose of this study was to investigate (1) relationships between trait sensory profiles, trait anxiety, and CS symptoms, and (2) the predictive capacity of sensory profiles, trait anxiety, and personality types on CS symptoms in people with NSCLBP. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study using 4 self-report measures on adults (N = 165, mean age = 45 ± 12 [standard deviation] years) from physiotherapy clinics in England, Ireland, and New Zealand. Inclusion: NSCLBP > 6 months, age 18 to 64 years, predominant CS pain presentation, no other pathology. Parametric and nonparametric correlation statistics and regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Positive correlations were found between central sensitization inventory (CSI) scores and sensory hypersensitivity profiles and trait anxiety. CSI score increases could be predicted by sensory-sensitive, low-registration profiles; trait anxiety scores; and extreme defensive high anxious personality type. CONCLUSIONS: Trait sensory hyper- and/or hyposensitivity and high trait anxiety-related personality type characteristics predict the extent of CS symptoms in people with NSCLBP. Further investigation is required to establish causality between these characteristics and CS symptoms.

Exploring the pre-morbid contexts in which central sensitisation developed in individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain. A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Central sensitisation pain is a predominant mechanism in a proportion of individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain and is associated with poor outcomes. It is proposed that the pre-morbid experiences and contexts may be related to the development of central sensitisation. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to explore the pre-morbid experiences and personal characteristics of participants with central sensitisation pain from a non-specific chronic low back pain population. METHODS: This was a qualitative, exploratory study, using a concurrent nested design within a mixed methods protocol. n=9 participants were recruited purposively based on sensory profiles and trait anxiety-related personality types. Data were collected through semi structured interviews, managed using QSR NVivo 10 software and analysed using theoretical thematic analysis. RESULTS: Four themes emerged: developmental learning experiences, personal characteristics, sensitivity and trauma. Reported was lack of confidence, low esteem and a need to please others, physical hyper-sensitivities (smell, light, sound) and emotional sensitivity (anxiety) as well as physical hypo-sensitivity. Participants had also suffered emotional and/or physical trauma. Learning difficulties, sensory sensitivities and trauma are associated with autonomic stress responses, which in turn have been linked to physiological changes seen in central sensitisation pain. CONCLUSION: Central sensitisation pain developed in the context of sensory processing differences related to learning difficulties, sensitivities and trauma, and personal characteristics of low confidence and control, in a group of participants with non-specific chronic low back pain. The role of pre-existing sensory processing differences, as a component of altered central nervous system function, in relation to central sensitisation pain warrants further investigation.

Trait anxiety and sensory processing profile characteristics in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain and central sensitisation - A pilot observational study.

INTRODUCTION: People with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) and central sensitisation (CS) exhibit sensory processing alterations, somatosensory hypersensitivity and differences in the brain's emotional networks. The concept that CS relates to pre-morbid trait sensory processing and anxiety characteristics is unknown. The aims of this pilot observational study were to test concept plausibility in a NSCLBP population with central sensitisation by investigating: 1) the range of Central Sensitisation Inventory scores, to determine the extent of symptoms of central sensitisation, 2) whether there are identifiable patient characteristics of trait anxiety and trait sensory profile differences; and 3) whether potential relationships exist between trait anxiety, trait sensory profiles and the extent of symptoms of central sensitisation. METHODS: People with NSCLBP and CS were recruited from physiotherapy outpatient clinics in New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Outcomes included the Central Sensitisation Inventory (CSI), Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile and the State/Trait Anxiety Inventory (trait section) with the Marlowe Crowne Sociable Desirability Scale. Descriptive and non-parametric tests for correlation were used to analyse the data, p=<0.05. RESULTS: Of the 21 people recruited, 16 (76.2%) had CSI scores ≥40 in association with 1) an abnormally high prevalence of extreme scores of a) high trait Sensory Sensitive, Sensation Avoiding and Low Registration sensory profiles and b) low trait Sensation Seeking profile, 2) high trait anxiety sub-types and 3) minimal low trait anxiety. Moderate correlations were identified between trait sensory profiles and 1) CS pain (Sensory Sensitive R = 0.57, p < 0.01, CI = 0.07 to 0.88, p < 0.01, Sensation Seeking R = -0.47, p < 0.05, CI = -0.72 to -0.02) and 2) trait anxiety (Sensory sensitive: R = 0.65, p < 0.01, CI = 0.27 to 0.91) and Low Registration (R = 0.49, p < 0.05, CI = 0.03 to 0.84). The CSI scores moderately correlated with trait anxiety (R = 0.63, p < 0.01, CI = 0.22 to 0.86). CONCLUSION: These results provide concept plausibility that the extent of CS pain in people with NSCLBP might be associated with pre-morbid trait anxiety sub-types and abnormal trait sensory processing profiles. A larger study to confirm the findings is warranted.

Patient and physiotherapist perceptions of rehabilitation following primary lumbar discectomy: a qualitative focus group study embedded within an external pilot and feasibility trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' and physiotherapists' perceptions, preferences and feelings about rehabilitation following lumbar discectomy surgery. DESIGN: A qualitative focus group study, informed from the theoretical perspective of phenomenology, of patients' and physiotherapists' experiences of rehabilitation following lumbar discectomy was conducted. The focus groups were used to explore patients' and physiotherapists' perceptions and their preferences and feelings about different approaches to rehabilitation. The focus groups were facilitated and observed by experienced researchers and were informed by a topic guide that had been piloted previously. SETTING: The study was embedded within an external pilot and feasibility trial that randomised patients across two secondary care spinal surgery sites in the UK to receive either 1:1 physiotherapy and leaflet or leaflet-only interventions. PARTICIPANTS: Five focus groups took place between April and July 2014. A framework analysis of thematic coding (deductive and inductive components) by two researchers captured identified themes common to both patients and physiotherapists. Data from three focus groups with patients and carers (n=11) and two with physiotherapists (n=15) contributed to the analytic framework. RESULTS: Emerging themes included: the value of patient leaflets with or without physiotherapy interventions; the importance of self-motivation in the recovery pathway; benefits of group physiotherapy for some patient groups and patient preference influencing rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Patients and physiotherapists perceived the study patient leaflet and 1:1 physiotherapy interventions as high quality and valuable. Patients' personal priorities, for example, their need to return to work, influenced their preferences for rehabilitation interventions following surgery.

Injury incidence in a Premier League youth soccer academy using the consensus statement: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There is an established risk of injury to young athletes exposed to high training loads. Identifying and monitoring injury risk is essential to aid prevention. The aim of this study was to use the consensus statement to determine the incidence and pattern of injury in 1 English Premier League soccer academy during 1 season. METHODS: A prospective cohort study included 181 elite academy soccer players during the 2012-2013 season. Players were divided into 5 age groups between 9 and 18 years. The number, type and incidence of injuries were recorded during matches and training. Incidence was calculated per 1000 hours of exposure. RESULTS: 127 injuries occurred during 29 346 hours of soccer exposure. 72% of injuries were non-contact related. Under (U)18 players sustained the highest number of match injuries. U12-14 players sustained the highest number of training injuries and injuries overall. U16 players sustained the highest number of severe injuries, and U18 players sustained the highest number of moderate injuries. U18 players sustained the highest number of injuries/1000 hours of training and overall. U15 players sustained the highest number of injuries/1000 hours of matches, the highest number of recurrent injuries and the highest incidence of recurrence. The most common injuries were muscle injuries in U15 and U18 players. The most common injury location was the anterior thigh, with the majority of these occurring in training. CONCLUSIONS: Using the consensus statement, this study used a repeatable method to identify the injury profile of elite academy-level soccer players.

Physiotherapy Post Lumbar Discectomy: Prospective Feasibility and Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate: acceptability and feasibility of trial procedures; distribution of scores on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ, planned primary outcome); and efficient working of trial components. DESIGN AND SETTING: A feasibility and external pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN33808269, assigned 10/12/2012) was conducted across 2 UK secondary care outpatient physiotherapy departments associated with regional spinal surgery centres. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive consenting patients aged >18 years; post primary, single level, lumbar discectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised to either 1:1 physiotherapy outpatient management including patient leaflet, or patient leaflet alone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blinded assessments were made at 4 weeks post surgery (baseline) and 12 weeks post baseline (proposed primary end point). Secondary outcomes included: Global Perceived Effect, back/leg pain, straight leg raise, return to work/function, quality of life, fear avoidance, range of movement, medication, re-operation. RESULTS: At discharge, 110 (44%) eligible patients gave consent to be contacted. 59 (54%) patients were recruited. Loss to follow up was 39% at 12 weeks, with one site contributing 83% losses. Mean (SD) RMDQ was 10.07 (5.58) leaflet and 10.52 (5.94) physiotherapy/leaflet at baseline; and 5.37 (4.91) leaflet and 5.53 (4.49) physiotherapy/leaflet at 12 weeks. 5.1% zero scores at 12 weeks illustrated no floor effect. Sensitivity to change was assessed at 12 weeks with mean (SD) change -4.53 (6.41), 95%CI -7.61 to -1.44 for leaflet; and -6.18 (5.59), 95%CI -9.01 to -3.30 for physiotherapy/leaflet. RMDQ mean difference (95%CI) between change from baseline to twelve weeks was 1.65(-2.46 to 5.75). Mean difference (95%CI) between groups at 12 weeks was -0.16 (-3.36 to 3.04). Participant adherence with treatment was good. No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions were acceptable, and it is promising that they both demonstrated a trend in reducing disability in this population. A randomised controlled trial, using a different trial design, is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of combining the interventions into a stepped care intervention and comparing to a no intervention arm. Findings will guide design changes for an adequately powered randomised controlled trial, using RMDQ as the primary outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry 33808269.

The effectiveness of hydrotherapy in the management of rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Hydrotherapy is frequently indicated for the rehabilitation of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA); nevertheless, there has been inadequate appraisal of its effectiveness. The potential benefits of hydrotherapy for patients with RA are to improve and/or maintain functional ability and quality of life. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of hydrotherapy in the management of patients with RA. METHOD: AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Direct and Web of Science were searched between 1988 and May 2011. Keywords used were rheumatoid arthritis, hydrotherapy, aquatic physiotherapy, aqua therapy and water therapy. Searches were supplemented with hand searches of references of selected articles. Randomized controlled trials were assessed for their methodological quality using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. This scale ranks the methodological quality of a study scoring 7 out of 10 as 'high quality', 5-6 as 'moderate quality' and less than 4 as 'poor quality'. RESULTS: Initially, 197 studies were identified. Six studies met the inclusion criteria for further analysis. The average methodological quality for all studies was 6.8 using the PEDro scale. Most of the studies reported favourable outcomes for a hydrotherapy intervention compared with no treatment or other interventions for patients with RA. Improvement was particularly noted in reducing pain, joint tenderness, mood and tension symptoms, and increasing grip strength and patient satisfaction with hydrotherapy treatment in the short term. CONCLUSIONS: There is some evidence to suggest that hydrotherapy has a positive role in reducing pain and improving the health status of patients with RA compared with no or other interventions in the short term. However, the long-term benefit is unknown. Further studies are needed.

Using the knee-specific Hughston Clinic Questionnaire, EQ-5D and SF-6D following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy surgery: a comparison of psychometric properties.

PURPOSE: To compare the psychometric properties of the Hughston Clinic Questionnaire (HCQ), EQ-5D and SF-6D in patients following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy surgery. METHODS: A total of 84 participants (86% men; mean age 40) were recruited. The questionnaires were completed on average 5 days, 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery and compared for internal consistency, convergent validity, sensitivity to change and floor and ceiling effects. RESULTS: Internally, the HCQ was the most consistent instrument (α = 0.923) followed by the SF-6D and EQ-5D. The EQ-5D and SF-6D were moderately correlated with the HCQ (ρ = 0.499 and 0.394, respectively). Six weeks after surgery, the most sensitive measures were the HCQ and EQ-5D (effect size: 2.04 and 0.99, respectively), at 6 months, with a smaller cohort (n = 42), again it was the HCQ and EQ-5D (effect size: 2.03 and 1.04, respectively). The SF-6D demonstrated no ceiling or floor effect during the study; the HCQ demonstrated a ceiling affect for 5% of respondents at 6 months after surgery compared to 26% of respondents for the EQ-5D. CONCLUSION: For this patient population, our findings indicated that the EQ-5D was more consistently responsive to change over time, as a utility index was better at distinguishing differences between groups and reflected the results of the joint-specific HCQ for knee recovery better than the SF-6D. It is therefore recommended that for similar populations, the EQ-5D is preferable to the SF-6D for utilisation alongside the HCQ.

Factors related to early recovery rate after partial knee meniscectomy.

A main role of clinicians treating patients after orthopedic surgery is to inform patients about their anticipated recovery rate and recovery endpoint. In estimating recovery rate, clinicians consider a series of potentially influencing factors, including the type and severity of injury and the characteristics of the patient. Unfortunately, this is done largely without evidence to support factors believed to be important in recovery rate. To our knowledge, no studies exist where factors that might influence recovery rate after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy have been evaluated. Eighty-three patients (11 women and 72 men) were evaluated 4 days after and then again 6 weeks after knee arthroscopic partial meniscectomy surgery. Recovery rate was calculated by dividing the change in a patient's Hughston Clinic knee self-assessment questionnaire during this period by his or her baseline Hughston score and relationships to independent variables (gender, age, body mass index [BMI], injury chronicity, affected meniscus, Hughston Clinic knee self-assessment score at baseline, knee flexion passive range of motion, and knee circumference). These were evaluated using backward stepwise regression analysis. The relationship between recovery rate and the independent variables was statistically significant (P,.05) for the following variables: injury chronicity, gender, and gender/injury type combination. The most unexpected finding in this study was the statistically nonsignificant relationship between recovery rate and the following variables: age, Hughston score, BMI, knee swelling, and knee flexion passive range of motion loss.

Correlates of knee extensor training load used in rehabilitation after knee surgery.

Resistance training is one of the major components of rehabilitation after musculoskeletal injury and surgery. Despite the importance of resistance training and the frequency of its use in rehabilitation, little is known about factors that are related to training load that might be useful in devising and monitoring training in a patient and comparing training intensities between individuals and groups. We hypothesized that the following would show a statistically significant relationship to training load: injury chronicity, self-assessed knee function (Hughston Clinic questionnaire), knee swelling (injured-uninjured midpatellar knee girth), uninjured knee girth, and body mass. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether factors such as body mass are related to the load used in training the knee extensors in rehabilitation after knee surgery. Thirty-six individuals undergoing early-phase rehabilitation after knee arthroscopic meniscectomy surgery participated in this study. Subjects were tested 5 days after surgery, just prior to commencing a 6-week outpatient rehabilitation program, and again soon after the end of this rehabilitation program. The independent variables evaluated were age, gender, body mass, meniscus injured, injury chronicity, knee function self-assessment, knee swelling (injured-uninjured midpatellar girth), uninjured knee girth, and knee flexion and extension passive range of motion (difference between injured and uninjured side). The dependent variable was the load used for training the knee extensors on the knee extension machine in the final training session prior to the posttest. The only variable exhibiting a statistically significant (p = 0.001) relationship to knee extensor final training was age (r = -0.529). This finding, that age was the only variable to have a significant relationship with training load, suggests that clinicians' expectation of training intensity should decrease with an increase in the patient's age in the range studied (20-58 years) for patients recovering from knee arthroscopic meniscectomy.

Evaluating treatment effectiveness: benchmarks for rehabilitation after partial meniscectomy knee arthroscopy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to give a detailed description of recovery benchmarks that occur in patients whose therapy after partial meniscectomy knee arthroscopy consists of a home program of exercise. These benchmarks can be used as a basis for clinicians to compare improvements to individual patients who receive supervised care. DESIGN: Thirty-nine patients (five females, mean age = 41) who underwent an uncomplicated arthroscopic partial meniscectomy were included. Test sessions occurred at 5 and 50 days after surgery. Outcome measures included: 1) Hughston Clinic knee self-assessment questionnaire; 2) EQ-5D Tariff for assessment of quality of life; 3) number of days taken to return to work after surgery; 4) knee passive range of motion; and 5) knee swelling assessed by evaluation of knee circumference. Stepwise regression analysis was used to evaluate factors that might have influenced the amount of pre- to posttest change in the outcome measures (the benchmarks) during the first 7 wks after surgery. The factors used in this analysis were: 1) age, 2) body mass index, 3) period from injury to surgery, and 4) the baseline value of the variable to be examined (except for return to work, where we used a score estimating the challenge to the knee offered by work). RESULTS: None of the factors considered (age, body mass index, period from injury to surgery, stressfulness of the work on the knee) affected the number of days taken to return to work. Baseline scores affected change in all the other outcomes, and knee girth change was also affected by body mass index. Regression equations are presented where suitable for the benchmarks presented. CONCLUSIONS: Quick recovery occurs in these patients when only a home exercise program is given. This paper highlights the utility of using historical control group data instead of test-retest analysis of measurement error in evaluating patients whose recovery with a home exercise program is rapid. Of the variables analyzed in this study, quality of life and knee self-assessment changes offer the most useful benchmarks for evaluating treatment effectiveness.

Effectiveness of supervised physical therapy in the early period after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Controversy exists about the effectiveness of physical therapy after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of supervised physical therapy with a home program versus a home program alone. SUBJECTS: Eighty-four patients (86% males; overall mean age=39 years, SD=9, range=21-58; female mean age=39 years, SD=9, range=24-58; male mean age=40, SD=9, range=21-58) who underwent an uncomplicated arthroscopic partial meniscectomy participated. METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to either a group who received 6 weeks of supervised physical therapy with a home program or a group who received only a home program. Blinded test sessions were conducted 5 and 50 days after surgery. Outcome measures were: (1) Hughston Clinic questionnaire, (2) Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and EuroQol EQ-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaires, (3) number of days to return to work after surgery divided by the Factor Occupational Rating System score, (4) kinematic analysis of knee function during level walking and stair use, and (5) horizontal and vertical hops. RESULTS: No differences between groups were found for any of the outcomes measured. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the supervised physical therapy used in this study is not beneficial for patients in the early period after uncomplicated arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

Physical therapy after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy: is it effective?

Controversy in the literature has prompted clinicians to question the effectiveness of physical therapy after knee arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. Studies reviewed in this paper show there is little evidence that formal physical therapy is necessary to return patients to their normal receiving this care.