Electromagnetic Navigational Bronchoscopy Learning Curve Regarding Pneumothorax Rate and Diagnostic Yield.

Electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB) has emerged as an innovative technique for diagnosing peripheral and central nodules, offering an improved diagnostic yield compared to conventional bronchoscopy with fewer complications. That being said, pneumothorax remains a frequent complication. This retrospective study conducted at Castle Hill Hospital, UK, analysed ENB procedures over four years to assess the diagnostic yield and pneumothorax rates, exploring learning curves and procedural improvements specifically focusing on the diagnostic yield and pneumothorax rate as markers of change. A total of 246 patients underwent 358 peripheral lung biopsies, revealing an overall diagnostic yield of 61.3%. The diagnostic yield increased from 58.2% in 2020-2021 to 66.0% in 2022-2023 while the pneumothorax rate decreased significantly from 9.8% to 3.4% (p = 0.021*). The majority of pneumothorax cases occurred following upper lobe procedures. The study depicts the importance of procedural experience in improving outcomes, suggesting a learning curve effect. Additionally, it emphasizes the potential for technological advancements, such as robotic assistance, to mitigate operator-dependent variability and improve reproducibility in ENB procedures. These findings contribute to optimizing diagnostic pathways for lung lesions and improving patient safety in ENB interventions.

Impact of lung cancer screening on surgical stage distribution and surgical practice: a regional analysis of patients operated in and out of a screening program.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess variations in surgical stage distribution in 2 centres within the same UK region. One centre was covered by an active screening program started in November 2018 and the other was not covered by screening. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 1895 patients undergoing lung resections (2018-2022) in 2 centres. Temporal distribution was tested using Chi-squared for trends. A lowess curve was used to plot the proportion of stage 1A patients amongst those operated over the years. RESULTS: The surgical populations in the 2 centres were similar. In the screening unit (SU), we observed a 18% increase in the proportion of patients with clinical stage IA in the recent phase compared to the early phase (59% vs 50%, P = 0.004), whilst this increase was not seen in the unit without screening. This difference was attributable to an increase of cT1aN0 patients in the SU (16% vs 11%, P = 0.035) which was not observed in the other unit (10% vs 8.2%, P = 0.41). In the SU, there was also a three-fold increase in the proportion of sublobar resections performed in the recent phase compared to the early one (35% vs 12%, P < 0.001). This finding was not evident in the unit without screening. CONCLUSIONS: Lung cancer screening is associated with a higher proportion of lung cancers being detected at an earlier stage with a consequent increased practice of sublobar resections.

An analysis of long-term survival after pneumonectomy for lung cancer: A retrospective study of 20 years.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of pneumonectomy for lung cancer in the UK is continuing to decline in the era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery totalling approximately 3.5% of lung cancer resections annually. Literature is lacking for long-term survival of pneumonectomies. This study updates our previous results. Between 1998 and 2008, 206 patients underwent pneumonectomy compared to 98 patients between 2009 and 2018. METHODS: From January 1998 until December 2018, 304 patients underwent pneumonectomy. This was a retrospective study; data was analysed for age, gender, laterality, histology and time period. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 4.3% overall which was lower than the national average of 5.8%. In the last five years, there were no in-hospital, operative or 30-day mortality. During this period, 90-day mortality was 9.2%. Left-sided pneumonectomies had significantly better overall survival (3.00 vs. 2.03 years; p = 0.0015), squamous cell carcinoma (3.23 vs. 1.54 years; p = 0.00012) as well as those aged less than 70 (2.79 vs. 2.13 years; p = 0.011). There was no significant difference in survival between gender (p = 0.48). Intervention from 1998 to 2008 had significantly greater survival compared to the latter 10 years (2.68 vs. 2.46 years; p = 0.031). The Cox model shows that laterality, age, histology and time period remain significant with multivariate testing. No patient survived after 16 years. DISCUSSION: Our updated retrospective study has built on our previous results by reinforcing the success of pneumonectomies. The incidence of pneumonectomies is likely to decrease with the deployment of nation-wide lung cancer screening in the UK due to earlier detection.

Prolonged air leak after segmentectomy: incidence and risk factors.

Background: We designed this study to investigate the rate and risk factors of prolonged air leak (PAL) in patients undergoing pulmonary segmentectomy in our unit. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on 191 patients undergoing pulmonary segmentectomy (January 2017-August 2021). A PAL was defined as an air leak >5 days. Results: One hundred and sixty-eight segmentectomies were performed using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), 13 were open operations and 10 were robotic. PAL occurred in 36 patients (19%). Their average post-operative stay was 2.4 days longer than those without PAL. Logistic regression analysis showed that a low preoperative carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity (DLCO) (OR 0.98, P<0.001), low body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.95, P=0.002) and the performance of complex segmentectomies (OR 2.2, P<0.001). were significantly associated with PAL. Conclusions: Pulmonary segmentectomies are associated with a not negligible risk of PAL when using real world data, especially in patients with compromised pulmonary function and after complex segmentectomies. This finding is useful to inform the decision-making process.

ERS/ESTS statement on the management of pleural infection in adults.

Pleural infection is a common condition encountered by respiratory physicians and thoracic surgeons alike. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) and European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) established a multidisciplinary collaboration of clinicians with expertise in managing pleural infection with the aim of producing a comprehensive review of the scientific literature. Six areas of interest were identified: 1) epidemiology of pleural infection, 2) optimal antibiotic strategy, 3) diagnostic parameters for chest tube drainage, 4) status of intrapleural therapies, 5) role of surgery and 6) current place of outcome prediction in management. The literature revealed that recently updated epidemiological data continue to show an overall upwards trend in incidence, but there is an urgent need for a more comprehensive characterisation of the burden of pleural infection in specific populations such as immunocompromised hosts. There is a sparsity of regular analyses and documentation of microbiological patterns at a local level to inform geographical variation, and ongoing research efforts are needed to improve antibiotic stewardship. The evidence remains in favour of a small-bore chest tube optimally placed under image guidance as an appropriate initial intervention for most cases of pleural infection. With a growing body of data suggesting delays to treatment are key contributors to poor outcomes, this suggests that earlier consideration of combination intrapleural enzyme therapy (IET) with concurrent surgical consultation should remain a priority. Since publication of the MIST-2 study, there has been considerable data supporting safety and efficacy of IET, but further studies are needed to optimise dosing using individualised biomarkers of treatment failure. Pending further prospective evaluation, the MIST-2 regimen remains the most evidence based. Several studies have externally validated the RAPID score, but it requires incorporating into prospective intervention studies prior to adopting into clinical practice.

Morbidity and mortality of lung resection candidates defined by the American College of Chest Physicians as 'moderate risk': an analysis from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database.

OBJECTIVES: The American College of Chest Physicians functional guidelines classify patients with predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s or predicted postoperative carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity <60% and with maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) between 10 and 20 ml/kg/min in a heterogeneous category broadly defined as 'moderate risk' with variable morbidity and mortality. Data to support this statement are lacking. Using the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, our goal was to test this definition by evaluating the morbidity and mortality of those patients falling into this class. METHODS: All patients who had anatomical lung resection for lung cancer (2007-2019) and were deemed of moderate risk were identified in the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Cardiopulmonary morbidity and 30-day mortality of these patients were assessed by the type of operation. RESULTS: A total 2016 patients were identified. The incidence of cardiopulmonary complications in this group was 21% after lobectomy (294/1435), 29% after bilobectomy (33/112), 22% after pneumonectomy (72/333) and 16% after segmentectomy (22/136) (analysis of variance P = 0.07). The 30-day mortality was 3.4% after lobectomy (49/1435), 8.9% after bilobectomy (10/112), 7.8% after pneumonectomy (26/333) and 3.7% after segmentectomy (5/136) (analysis of variance P = 0.0005). The 30-day mortality rate was 1.6-fold higher in patients with a VO2max between 10 and 15 ml/kg/min compared to those with a higher VO2max [49/861 (5.7%) vs 41/1155 (3.5%); P = 0.022]. For operations that were less extensive than a pneumonectomy and were performed by minimally invasive surgery, there was no difference in mortality between patients with a VO2max between 10 and 15 ml/kg/min and those with a higher VO2max [7/181 (3.8%) vs 11/272 (4.0%); P = 0.92]. On the other hand, after open surgery, the mortality of patients with a lower VO2max (10-15 ml/kg/min) was higher than that of those with a higher VO2max [26/501 (5.1%) vs 20/721 (2.8%); P = 0.034]. Linear regression adjusting for the extent and access of the operation confirmed that within the moderate-risk group a VO2max <15 ml/kg/min was associated with higher mortality (P = 0.028; odds ratio 1.61; 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.5). CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality rates found in this study are not negligible and reinforce the recommendation to ensure careful patient discussion and informed decision-making prior to lung cancer resection surgery.

Evaluation of Risk for Thoracic Surgery.

Modern surgical practice places increased emphasis on treatment outcomes. There has been a paradigm shift from paternalistic ways of practicing medicine to patients having a major involvement in decision making and treatment planning. The combination of these two factors undoubtedly leaves the surgeon open to greater scrutiny in respect of results and outcomes. In dealing with this it is important that the surgeon, wider multidisciplinary team, and patient appreciate the idea of surgical risk. This article reviews the latest evidence relating to risk assessment in thoracic surgery and suggests how this should be incorporated into clinical practice.

The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on the practice of thoracic oncology surgery: a survey of members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS).

OBJECTIVES: There is widespread acknowledgement that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted surgical services. The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) sent out a survey to assess what impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the practice of thoracic oncology surgery. METHODS: All ESTS members were invited (13-20 April 2020) to complete an online questionnaire of 26 questions, designed by the ESTS learning affairs committee. RESULTS: The response rate was 23.0% and the completeness rate was 91.2%. The number of treated COVID-positive cases per hospital varied from fewer than 20 cases (30.6%) to more than 200 cases (22.7%) per hospital. Most hospitals (89.1%) postponed surgical procedures. All hospitals performed patient screening with a nasopharyngeal swab, but only 6.7% routinely tested health care workers. A total of 20% of respondents reported that multidisciplinary meetings were completely cancelled and 66%, that multidisciplinary decisions were not different from normal practice. Trends were recognized in prioritizing surgical patients based on age (younger than 70), type of surgery (lobectomy or less), size of tumour (T1-2) and lymph node involvement (N1). Sixty-three percent of respondents reported that surgeons were involved in daily care of COVID-19-positive patients. Fifty-three percent mentioned that full personal protective equipment was available to them when treating a COVID-19-positive patient. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has created issues for the safety of health care workers, and surgeons have been forced to change their routine practice. However, there was no consensus about surgical priorities in lung cancer patients, demonstrating the need for the production of specific guidelines.

Unifying classification for transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernia and other costal margin injuries.

OBJECTIVES: Taxonomy of injuries involving the costal margin is poorly described and surgical management varies. These injuries, though commonly caused by trauma, may also occur spontaneously, in association with coughing or sneezing, and can be severe. Our goal was to describe our experience using sequential segmental analysis of computed tomographic (CT) scans to perform accurate assessment of injuries around the costal margin. We propose a unifying classification for transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernia and other injuries involving the costal margin. We identify the essential components and favoured techniques of surgical repair. METHODS: Patients presenting with injuries to the diaphragm or to the costal margin or with chest wall herniation were included in the study. We performed sequential segmental analysis of CT scans, assessing individual injury patterns to the costal margin, diaphragm and intercostal muscles, to create 7 distinct logical categories of injuries. Management was tailored to each category, adapted to the individual case when required. Patients with simple traumatic diaphragmatic rupture were considered separately, to allow an estimation of the relative incidence of injuries to the costal margin compared to those of the diaphragm alone. RESULTS: We identified 38 patients. Of these, 19 had injuries involving the costal margin and/or intercostal muscles (group 1). Sixteen patients in group 1 underwent surgery, 2 of whom had undergone prior surgery, with 4 requiring a novel double-layer mesh technique. Nineteen patients (group 2) with diaphragmatic rupture alone had a standard repair. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential analysis of CT scans of the costal margin, diaphragm and intercostal muscles defines accurately the categories of injury. We propose a 'Sheffield classification' in order to guide the clinical team to the most appropriate surgical repair. A variety of surgical techniques may be required, including a single- or double-layer mesh reinforcement and plate and screw fixation.

Elastic-Stable Chest Repair: Costal Plate Fixation for Sternotomy Nonunion.

Sterile sternotomy nonunion is a recognized complication after median sternotomy. It is defined as sternotomy that persists after 3 months without evidence of bony healing but with healing of the overlying soft tissues. It is a morbid condition associated with pain and sternal instability. We present two challenging cases of sterile sternotomy nonunion after cardiac operations that were treated successfully with novel methods adopted from the Elastic Stable Chest Repair for complex pectus deformity repair, using transverse costal to costal external cortical plates and bicortical screws, after debridement, autologous bone grafting and double loop wire sternal approximation.

Improving Medical Students' Application of Knowledge and Clinical Decision-Making Through a Porcine-Based Integrated Cardiac Basic Science Program.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the concerted effort of modern undergraduate curriculum designers, the ability to integrate basic sciences in clinical rotations is an ongoing problem in medical education. Students and newly qualified doctors themselves report worry about the effect this has on their clinical performance. There are examples in the literature to support development of attempts at integrating such aspects, but this "vertical integration" has proven to be difficult. We designed an expert-led integrated program using dissection of porcine hearts to improve the use of cardiac basic sciences in clinical medical students' decision-making processes. To our knowledge, this is the first time in the United Kingdom that an animal model has been used to teach undergraduate clinical anatomy to medical students to direct wider application of knowledge. METHODS: Action research methodology was used to evaluate the local curriculum and assess learners needs, and the agreed teaching outcomes, methods, and delivery outline were established. A total of 18 students in the clinical years of their degree program attended, completing precourse and postcourse multichoice questions examinations and questionnaires to assess learners' development. RESULTS: Student's knowledge scores improved by 17.5% (p = 0.01; students t-test). Students also felt more confident at applying underlying knowledge to decision-making and diagnosis in clinical medicine. An expert teacher (consultant surgeon) was seen as beneficial to students' understanding and appreciation. CONCLUSIONS: This study outlines how the development of a teaching intervention using porcine-based methods successfully improved both student's knowledge and application of cardiac basic sciences. We recommend that clinicians fully engage with integrating previously learnt underlying sciences to aid students in developing decision-making and diagnostic skills as well as a deeper approach to learning.