Patient-specific risk of undetected malignant disease after investigation for haematuria, based on a 4-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: • To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of a guidelines-based haematuria clinic protocol by measuring the incidence of undetected malignancy during a follow-up period. • To estimate an individual's post-test risk of having undetected malignancy using the protocol likelihood ratio and the population prevalence of disease. METHODS: • Data were collected prospectively on a cohort of 4020 consecutive patients who were referred to a 'one-stop' haematuria clinic between 1998 and 2003. • All patients had a plain radiograph taken and underwent ultrasonography and flexible cystoscopy as a part of 'first-line' investigation. • Intravenous urography was performed where indicated after abnormal first-line tests or in patients with persistent haematuria where no abnormality had been detected. • Records of the initial 687 participants from the first year of the study were reviewed 4 years after the original consultation. Missed diagnoses of urinary tract malignancy were recorded and sensitivities, likelihood ratios and the post-test probability of missing all disease and upper tract malignancy were calculated. RESULTS: • As previously reported, the overall prevalence of malignant disease was 12.1% (18.9% for macroscopic haematuria compared with 4.8% for microscopic haematuria). • The records of the first year's cohort of patients (N = 687) were analysed 4 years after their original consultation and 10 potentially 'missed' tumours were identified. • The sensitivity of the protocol was 90.9% for the detection of all urinary tract malignancy (95% CI, 82.4 to 95.5) and 71% for upper tract tumours alone (95% CI, 45.4-88.3). The latter improves to 78.6% (95% CI, 52.4-92.4) with the addition of further upper tract testing. • The probability of missing malignant disease overall was 1.7% (95% CI, 0.95-3.04) but this rose sharply to >4% for males over 60 with macroscopic haematuria. • For those with non-visible haematuria, the percentage probability of missed malignant disease was less than 1%. CONCLUSIONS: • The haematuria clinic protocol described is robust but it is not infallible. • The risk of missing malignant disease in the higher risk groups identified in the study is much greater than previous studies would suggest. • If additional upper tract testing or interval follow-up were to be recommended, it could be rationally targeted at these groups, given the measurable risk shown here.

A prospective analysis of the diagnostic yield resulting from the attendance of 4020 patients at a protocol-driven haematuria clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the prevalence of disease as determined by age, sex and the degree of haematuria at presentation, and to ascertain the merits of using ultrasonography (US), i.v. urography (IVU) or both when imaging the upper urinary tract, in a prospective cohort of patients attending a protocol-based haematuria clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a two-tier protocol, as a part of first-line investigation, all 4020 patients attending the clinic between October 1998 and August 2003 had US and flexible cystoscopy. Subsequently, IVU was used where indicated following abnormal first-line tests and in patients with persistent haematuria where no abnormality had been detected. RESULTS: In all, 2627 men and 1393 women presented with microscopic (53.2%) or macroscopic haematuria (46.8%). The overall prevalence of malignant disease was 12.1%, but for macroscopic haematuria it was 18.9% and for microscopic haematuria 4.8%. Age and sex also influenced the observed rates of disease. Of the upper tract tumours, 70 were identified after abnormal US, with three cases of transitional cell carcinoma identified on IVU after a normal US. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides a rationale for the appropriate investigation of all patients, moderated by the age, sex and degree of haematuria, and the ubiquitous use of US with selective IVU based on age, sex and degree of (and persistence of) haematuria.

Management of urinary retention.

An inability to void urine from the bladder is described as retention of urine. It is not uncommon after surgical procedures or childbirth but is usually temporary. It also occurs as a result of obstruction or of a neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis (Getliffe and Dolman, 2003).