Validity and Reliability of the Computrainer Lab™ During Simulated 40 and 100 km Time-Trials.

The validity and reliability of the Computrainer Lab™ (CT) was assessed, for the first time, using a high-precision motor-driven calibration rig during simulated variable intensity 40 and 100 km time-trials (TTs). The load patterns imposed by the CT were designed from previously published studies in trained cyclists and included multiple 1 or 4 km bursts in power output. For the 40 and 100 km TTs, cluster-based analyses revealed a mean measurement error from the true workload of respectively 0.7 and 0.9%. However, measurement errors were dependent upon the workload variations, fluctuating from 0.2 to 5.1%. Average biases between repeated trials were contained within ± 1.1% for both TTs. In conclusion, using 40 and 100 km TTs containing 1 or 4 km bursts in power output, the present results indicate that (1) the CT can reliably be used by scientists to determine differences between research interventions; (2) the CT provides valid results of power output when data are being analyzed as a whole to derive one mean value of power output and; (3) variations in workload make it difficult to determine at any one time the veracity of the true power output produced by the athlete.

Validity and Reliability of the CorTempTM Telemetric Pill during 50 h of Reuse in a Circulating Water Bath.

It has been shown that CorTempTM telemetric pills (CTTPs) provide valid measures of rectal temperature when used as suppositories. While encapsulated into a condom linked to a thread, CTTPs can be inserted in and extracted from the rectum and be reused. The validity and reliability of the CTTP throughout repeated use remains to be demonstrated. Three CTTPs were compared to a YSI 401 wired rectal probe inside a circulating water bath (temperatures varying from 36.5 to 39.4 °C) during 50 h of intermittent use. Each CTTP underwent 20 trials comprising 6 protocols of varying duration: 6 · 1 h, 5 · 2 h, 4 · 3 h, 3 · 4 h and 2 · 5 h. All CTTPs were washed, switched off and disinfected after each trial to reproduce real-life use. Acceptable agreement between sensors was taken as a mean bias within ±0.27 °C. None of the pills showed signs of deterioration following 50 h of reuse. As for relative validity, where all CTTPs showed robust coefficients of determination ranging from 0.98 to 0.99, absolute validity was excellent with each CTTP showing mean biases and typical errors of the estimate (TEE) within ±0.27 °C. Comparisons between the first and last trial each CTTP underwent resulted in means biases and TEEs within ±0.27 °C and coefficients of determination ranging from 0.97 to 0.99, which indicates strong absolute and relative reliability. The present results show that CTTPs can provide valid and reliable measurements of temperature when reused up to 50 h.

The Impact of an Ice Slurry-Induced Gastrointestinal Heat Sink on Gastrointestinal and Rectal Temperatures Following Exercise.

Gastrointestinal temperature (Tgint) measurement with a telemetric pill (TP) is increasingly used in exercise science. Contact of cool water with a TP invalidates Tgint assessment. However, what effect a heat sink created in the proximity of a TP may have on the assessment of Tgint remains unknown. We examined the impact of an ice slurry-induced heat sink on Tgint and rectal temperature (Trec) following exercise. After 20 min of seating (20-22 °C, 25-40% relative humidity (RH)), 11 men completed two intersperse exercise periods (31-32 °C, 35% RH) at 75-80% of estimated maximal heart rate until a Trec increase of 1 °C above baseline level. Following the first exercise period, participants were seated for 45 min and ingested 7.5 g·kg-1 of thermoneutral water, whereas, following the second period, they ingested 7.5 g·kg-1 of ice slurry. Both Tgint and Trec were measured continuously. The TPs were swallowed 10 h prior to the experiments. A bias ≤0.27 °C was taken as an indication that Tgint and Trec provided similar core temperature indices. Mean biases and 95% limits of agreement during passive sitting, first exercise, water ingestion, second exercise, and ice slurry ingestion periods were 0.16 ± 0.53, 0.13 ± 0.41, 0.21 ± 0.70, 0.17 ± 0.50, and 0.18 ± 0.66 °C, respectively. The rates of decrease in Tgint and Trec did not differ between the water and ice slurry ingestion periods. Our results indicate that ice slurry ingestion following exercise does not impact TP-derived assessment of Tgint compared with Trec.

Wireless measurement of rectal temperature during exercise: Comparing an ingestible thermometric telemetric pill used as a suppository against a conventional rectal probe.

Wireless measurement of rectal temperature during exercise may circumvent some limitations associated with the use of a conventional wired probe. We determined, for the first time, whether temperatures provided in vivo by wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pills and a rectal probe compare favorably under conditions producing slow and rapid increases and decreases in rectal temperature. While wearing a rectal probe linked to a wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pill, 13 participants completed the following phases: 1) 30 min sitting; 2) 45 min passive heat exposure (40-42 °C); 3) 45 min sitting while ingesting 7.5 g of ice slurry · kg body mass-1; 4) running exercise (38 °C) at 68% V˙O2max until a 39.5 °C increase in rectal probe temperature and; 5) cold-water (10 °C) immersion until a 1.5 °C decrease in rectal probe temperature. Acceptable differences between devices were taken as ≤ 0.3 °C. Mean differences within phases were all < 0.3 °C, whereas 95% limits of agreement ranged from ±0.2 °C to ±0.4 °C, coefficient of variations from ±0.3% to ±0.6% and typical error of measurements from ±0.1 °C to ±0.2°. Of the 14881 rectal temperature values measured over the experiment with the wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pills and rectal probe, 91% of the differences between devices were found to be ≤ 0.3 °C. Results suggest that rectal temperatures provided by a wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pill used as a suppository agree with those of a conventional wired probe. Hence, rectal temperature can reliably be measured using a wireless ingestible thermometric telemetric pill as a suppository.

Salt + Glycerol-Induced Hyperhydration Enhances Fluid Retention More Than Salt- or Glycerol-Induced Hyperhydration.

Hyperhydration has been demonstrated to improve work capacity and cardiovascular and thermoregulatory functions, enhance orthostatic tolerance, slow or neutralize bone demineralization, and decrease postdive bubble formation. Adding sodium or glycerol to a hyperhydration solution optimizes fluid retention. Sodium and glycerol produce their effect through different physiological mechanisms. If combined into a hyperhydration solution, their impact on fluid retention could potentially be greater than their singular effect. We compared the effect of salt-induced hyperhydration (SIH), glycerol-induced hyperhydration (GIH), and salt + glycerol-induced hyperhydration (SGIH) on fluid balance responses during a 3-hr passive experiment. Using a randomized, crossover, and counterbalanced experiment, 15 young men (22 ± 4 years) underwent three, 3-hr hyperhydration experiments during which they ingested 30 ml/kg fat-free mass (FFM) of water with an artificial sweetener plus either (a) 7.5 g of table salt/L (SIH), (b) 1.4 g glycerol/kg FFM (GIH), or (c) 7.5 g of table salt/L + 1.4 g glycerol/kg FFM (SGIH). After 3 hr, there were no significant differences in plasma volume changes among experiments (SIH: 11.3% ± 9.9%; GIH: 7.6% ± 12.7%; SGIH: 11.3% ± 13.7%). Total urine production was significantly lower (SIH: 775 ± 329 ml; GIH: 1,248 ± 270 ml; SGIH: 551 ± 208 ml) and fluid retention higher (SIH: 1,127 ± 212 ml; GIH: 729 ± 115 ml; SGIH: 1,435 ± 140 ml) with SGIH than either GIH or SIH. Abdominal discomfort was low and not significantly different among experiments. In conclusion, results show that SGIH reduces urine production and provides more fluid retention than either SIH or GIH.

Measurement of sodium concentration in sweat samples: comparison of 5 analytical techniques.

Sweat sodium concentration (SSC) can be determined using different analytical techniques (ATs), which may have implications for athletes and scientists. This study compared the SSC measured with 5 ATs: ion chromatography (IChr), flame photometry (FP), direct (DISE) and indirect (IISE) ion-selective electrode, and ion conductivity (IC). Seventy sweat samples collected from 14 athletes were analyzed with 5 instruments: the 883 Basic IC Plus (IChr, reference instrument), AAnalyst 200 (FP), Cobas 6000 (IISE), Sweat-Chek (IC), and B-722 Laqua Twin (DISE). Instruments showed excellent relative (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ≥ 0.999) and absolute (coefficient of variation (CV) ≤ 2.6%) reliability. Relative validity was also excellent between ATs (ICC ≥ 0.961). In regards to the inter-AT absolute validity, compared with IChr, standard error of the estimates were similar among ATs (2.8-3.8 mmol/L), but CV was lowest with DISE (3.9%), intermediate with IISE (7.6%), and FP (6.9%) and highest with IC (12.3%). In conclusion, SSC varies depending on the AT used to analyze samples. Therefore, results obtained from different ATs are scarcely comparable and should not be used interchangeably. Nevertheless, taking into account the normal variability in SSC (∼±12%), the imprecision of the recommendations deriving from FP, IISE, IC, and DISE should have trivial health and physiological consequences under most exercise circumstances.