Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 195
Filter
1.
Adv Respir Med ; 92(2): 145-155, 2024 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38525775

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many hospitalized patients decline in functional status after discharge, but functional decline in emergency admissions with hypoxemia is unknown. The primary aim of this study was to study functional outcomes as a clinical endpoint in a cohort of patients with acute hypoxemia. METHODS: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in patients with new-onset hypoxemia emergently admitted to two respiratory departments at a university hospital and an academic teaching hospital. Using the WHO scale, the patients' functional status 4 weeks before admission and at hospital discharge was assessed. The type and duration of oxygen therapy, hospital length of stay and survival and risk of hypercapnic failure were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients with a median age of 74 were included. Two-thirds declined in functional status by at least one grade at discharge. A good functional status (OR 4.849 (95% CI 2.209-10.647)) and progressive cancer (OR 6.079 (1.197-30.881)) were more associated with functional decline. Most patients were treated with conventional oxygen therapy (n = 95, 62%). The rates of in-hospital mortality and need for intubation were both 8%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute hypoxemia in the emergency room have a poorer functional status after hospital discharge. This decline may be of multifactorial origin.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Patient Discharge , Humans , Hypoxia/etiology , Hypoxia/therapy , Hospitals , Oxygen
2.
Gesundheitswesen ; 2024 Mar 11.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467147

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, medical transplant data from three institutions were merged to create a German transplant registry. Since June 2021, access to data of the registry has been available. It was planned to analyze the registry data in order to compare special allocation rules with regular allocation for heart, liver, lung, and kidney transplantation. Our approach led to a quality analysis of the registry. METHODS: Upon request, legacy data (2006-2016) of the registry was provided, divided into 61 elements. From these elements, the user had to compile the required dataset. Data checks were performed for completeness, correct allocation of information, and consistency among different sources. Software used for these tasks included R, SQL, and Excel. RESULTS: The initial elements ("waiting list" elements) of the four types of transplantations contained data from a total of 80,259 originally listed patients. However, these patients were only partially present in other elements resulting in complete datasets reflecting waiting time in only 23%, 30%, 50%, and 96%, and for post-transplantation outcomes in 14%, 11%, 38%, and 13% (heart, liver, lung, and kidney transplantation, respectively). The linking of urgency information with clinical data was successful in only a small proportion, with only 6% for heart transplantation. Incorrect and thus implausible allocations in the case of special allocation rules indicated incorrect entries in the registry. Data from different data providers were inconsistent. DISCUSSION: The incompleteness and incorrect data allocation raise doubts about the reliability of scientific studies based on the transplant registry. The complex structure also hinders the compilation of a reliable dataset, which is uncommon internationally. New data (acquisition since 2017) has only been available since December 2023. CONCLUSION: The transplant registry urgently needs restructuring. Competent clinical data management, involving transplant medical expertise, and continuous quality controls are essential in this process.

3.
Adv Respir Med ; 91(5): 432-444, 2023 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37887076

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading cause of death after the first postoperative years of lung transplantation (LTx). OBJECTIVE: To assess the number of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per patient with severe CLAD. METHODS: The clinical and demographic data of patients who received their lung transplantation between 2010 and 2020 in the Hanover Medical School (Germany) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 1025 lung transplant patients were followed for a median of 51 months (4.25 years); the median age at transplantation was 52.8 (interquartile range (IQR) 19) years. More than a quarter of transplant patients (271/1025 or 26.4%) developed CLAD, mostly (60%) of the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) phenotype. Of the CLAD patients, 99, or 36.5%, suffered from significant disability, which on average occurred after 2 years (IQR 2.55). The survival of CLAD patients with disability after transplantation was significantly lower compared to that of patients without CLAD (median 4.04 versus 5.41 years). Adjusted to the DALY estimation approach, CLAD patients lost 1.29 life years (YLL) and lived for 0.8 years with their disability (YLD), adding up to 2.09 DALYs (range 1.99-2.72) per patient. CONCLUSIONS: CLAD after lung transplantation is a major public health problem and is associated with substantial disability and costs. Further work is needed to develop therapeutic interventions that reduce its development.


Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis Obliterans , Lung Transplantation , Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Bronchiolitis Obliterans/complications , Lung , Allografts , Cost of Illness
4.
Ther Adv Respir Dis ; 17: 17534666231181541, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37526226

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obstructive airway complications (OACs) represent a significant problem after lung transplantation (LTx). Bilateral OACs after double lung transplantation are infrequently reported. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate management and outcome of OAC. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center cohort study. METHODS: Adult patients with bilateral LTx performed between 2010 and 2021 were included. Patients with follow-ups of less than 3 months and after heart-lung transplantation were excluded. OAC was defined either as the need for stenting, surgical revision, or balloon dilatation. Outcome parameters included graft survival, graft function, quality of life, and management. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,170 patients were included. Hundred thirty-five (11.5%) patients developed OAC. Forty-six (4.4%) patients had significant bilateral OAC. Thirty-seven (80%) bilateral OAC patients were treated by stent insertion; in 34 patients, biodegradable stents were used. The median number of bronchoscopies in bilateral OAC was 26 during the first postoperative year compared with nine in controls (p < 0.001). Fourteen OAC patients (n = 10 bilateral) underwent surgical revision including six re-do transplantations. Graft loss occurred significantly more frequently in patients with bilateral OAC with a graft survival of 63% and 50% in these after 3 and 5 years compared with 83% and 73% in controls without OAC (p < 0.001). Baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in patients with bilateral OAC was median 58% predicted in comparison with 90% in controls (p < 0.001). Quality of life was significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: Bilateral OACs impose a high burden of disease on patients after lung transplantation and were associated with early and late graft loss. Affected patients' OAC demonstrated reduced graft function and impaired quality of life. Most OACs were managed by bronchoscopy preferably by non-permanent stenting. Surgery including re-do transplantation was used in selected cases.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction , Lung Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , Cohort Studies , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Airway Obstruction/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy
6.
PLoS One ; 18(5): e0284653, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37200246

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data on calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI) free immunosuppression after lung transplantation (LTx) are limited. Aim of this study was to investigate CNI-free immunosuppression using mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. METHODS: This retrospective analysis was performed at a single center. Adult patients after LTx without CNI during the follow-up period were included. Outcome was compared to those LTx patients with malignancy who continued CNI. RESULTS: Among 2,099 patients in follow-up, fifty-one (2.4%) were converted median 6.2 years after LTx to a CNI-free regimen combining mTOR inhibitors with prednisolone and an antimetabolite, two patients were switched to mTOR inhibitors with prednisolone only. In 25 patients, malignancies without curative treatment options were the reason of the conversion, with a 1-year survival of 36%. The remaining patients had a 1-year survival of 100%. Most common non-malignant indication was neurological complications (n = 9). Fifteen patients were re-converted to a CNI-based regimen. The median duration of CNI-free immunosuppression was 338 days. No acute rejections were detected in 7 patients with follow-up biopsies. In multivariate analysis, CNI-free immunosuppression were not associated with improved survival after malignancy. The majority of patients with neurological diseases improved 12 months after conversion. Glomerular filtration rate increased by median 5 (25 and 75% percentiles -6; +18) ml/min/1.73 m2. CONCLUSIONS: mTOR inhibitor based CNI-free immunosuppression may be safely performed in selected patients after LTx. This approach was not associated with improved survival in patients with malignancy. Significant functional improvements were observed in patients with neurological diseases.


Subject(s)
Calcineurin , Lung Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , MTOR Inhibitors , Calcineurin Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Prednisolone , Immunosuppression Therapy , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases , Graft Rejection/prevention & control
7.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 148(12): 759-766, 2023 06.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37257478

ABSTRACT

PULSE OXIMETRY AND BLOOD GAS ANALYSES: Pulse oximetry has high sensitivity but low specificity for detecting hypoxemia. Arterial blood gas analyses are the gold standard for monitoring O2 therapy. Venous blood gas analyses should not be used in this setting. TARGET VALUES OF O2 THERAPY: The target range of acute O2 therapy for ventilated patients and nonventilated patients not at risk of hypercapnia should be between 92% and 96% for oxygen saturation (SpO2) measured by pulse oximetry. Indications for high-dose O2 therapy without a target range in critical care include carbon monoxide poisoning and patients with severe respiratory distress when SpO2 cannot be derived. Hyperoxemia, i.e., SpO2 values above 96%, has not improved survival in randomized trials of predominantly ventilated ICU patients. Under hyperoxemia in nonventilated patients at risk of hypercapnia (e.g., patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), one in three patients is at risk of increasing carbon dioxide. Therefore, a target SpO2 of 88-92% should be aimed for in these patients. O2 TARGET RANGES ON EXTRACORPOREAL PROCEDURES: There are no randomized studies recommending other SpO2 target ranges for patients on extracorporeal procedures. These patients should always be monitored with arterial blood gases-in the case of peripheral VA-ECMO on the right arm and downstream of the oxygenator. HIGH-FLOW OXYGEN THERAPY FOR ACUTE HYPERCAPNIC RESPIRATORY FAILURE: High-flow oxygen therapy (HFNC) was not associated with reduced in-hospital mortality compared with conventional O2 in a meta-analysis of predominantly patients with acute hypoxemia (type I respiratory failure), although intubation rates were reduced. Also, in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (type II), HFNC with high flow rates is not inferior to noninvasive ventilation (NIV).


Subject(s)
Noninvasive Ventilation , Respiratory Insufficiency , Humans , Hypercapnia , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/methods , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/diagnosis , Noninvasive Ventilation/adverse effects , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Critical Care , Hypoxia/therapy , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Oximetry
8.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 120(11): 191, 2023 03 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37222035
9.
Radiology ; 307(4): e221958, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37070996

ABSTRACT

Background Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), the physiologic correlate of chronic rejection, remains a major barrier to long-term survival following lung transplant. Biomarkers for early prediction of future transplant loss or death due to CLAD might open a window of opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment of CLAD. Purpose To evaluate the prognostic use of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI in predicting CLAD-related transplant loss or death. Materials and Methods In this prospective, longitudinal, single-center study, PREFUL MRI-derived ventilation and parenchymal lung perfusion parameters of bilateral lung transplant recipients without clinically suspected CLAD were assessed 6-12 months (baseline) and 2.5 years (follow-up) after transplant. MRI scans were acquired between August 2013 and December 2018. Regional flow volume loop (RFVL)-based ventilated volume (VV) and perfused volume were calculated using thresholds and spatially combined as ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching. Spirometry data were obtained on the same day. Exploratory models were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis, and subsequent survival analyses (Kaplan-Meier, hazard ratios [HRs]) of CLAD-related graft loss were performed to compare clinical and MRI parameters as clinical end points. Results At baseline MRI examination, 132 clinically stable patients of 141 patients (median age, 53 years [IQR, 43-59 years]; 78 men) were included (nine were excluded for deaths not associated with CLAD), 24 of which had CLAD-related graft loss (death or retransplant) within the observational period of 5.6 years. PREFUL MRI-derived RFVL VV was a predictor of poorer survival (cutoff, 92.3%; log-rank P = .02; HR for graft loss, 2.5 [95% CI: 1.1, 5.7]; P = .02), while perfused volume (P = .12) and spirometry (P = .33) were not predictive of differences in survival. In the evaluation of percentage change at follow-up MRI (92 stable patients vs 11 with CLAD-related graft loss), mean RFVL (cutoff, 97.1%; log-rank P < .001; HR, 7.7 [95% CI: 2.3, 25.3]), V/Q defect (cutoff, 498%; log-rank P = .003; HR, 6.6 [95% CI: 1.7, 25.0]), and forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (cutoff, 60.8%; log-rank P < .001; HR, 7.9 [95% CI: 2.3, 27.4]; P = .001) were predictive of poorer survival within 2.7 years (IQR, 2.2-3.5 years) after follow-up MRI. Conclusion Phase-resolved functional lung MRI ventilation-perfusion matching parameters were predictive of future chronic lung allograft dysfunction-related death or transplant loss in a large prospective cohort who had undergone lung transplant. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Fain and Schiebler in this issue.


Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation , Lung , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Chronic Disease , Retrospective Studies , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Perfusion , Allografts
10.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 42(7): 908-916, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36964084

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in lung transplant recipients is associated with high morbidity. This study evaluated the RSV fusion inhibitor presatovir in RSV-infected lung transplant recipients. METHODS: In this international Phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02534350), adult lung transplant recipients with symptomatic confirmed RSV infection for ≤7 days received oral presatovir 200 mg on day 1 and 100 mg daily on days 2 to 14, or placebo (2:1), with follow-up through day 28. There were 2 coprimary endpoints: time-weighted average change in nasal RSV load from day 1 to 7, calculated from nasal swabs, in the full analysis set ([FAS]; all patients who received study drug and had quantifiable baseline nasal RSV load) and time-weighted average change in nasal RSV load from day 1 to 7 in the subset of patients with pretreatment symptom duration at the median or shorter of the FAS. Secondary endpoints were changes in respiratory infection symptoms assessed using the Influenza Patient-Reported Outcomes questionnaire and lung function measured by spirometry. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were randomized, 40 received presatovir, 20 placebo, and 54 were included in efficacy analyses. Presatovir did not significantly improve the primary endpoint in the FAS (treatment difference [95% CI], 0.10 [-0.43, 0.63] log10 copies/ml; p = 0.72) or the shorter symptom-duration subgroup (-0.12 [-0.94, 0.69] log10 copies/ml; p = 0.76). Secondary endpoints were not different between presatovir and placebo groups. Presatovir was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Presatovir treatment did not significantly improve change in nasal RSV load, symptoms, or lung function in lung transplant recipients.


Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation , Pneumonia, Viral , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Adult , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use
11.
Infection ; 51(5): 1481-1489, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36929650

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Lung transplant (LTx) recipients are at risk for poor outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of the study was to assess the outcome of patients receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab and cilgavimab after LTx. METHODS: All LTx recipients with outpatient visits from February 28th to October 31st, 2022 at two German centers were included. Baseline characteristics were recorded and patients followed until November 30rd, 2022. Infections with SARS-CoV-2, disease severity, and COVID-19-associated death were compared between patients with and without PrEP. RESULTS: In total, 1438 patients were included in the analysis, and 419 (29%) received PrEP. Patients receiving PrEP were older and earlier after transplantation, had lower glomerular filtration rates, and lower levels of SARS-CoV-2-S antibodies. In total, 535 patients (37%) developed SARS-CoV-2 infection during a follow-up of median of 209 days. Fewer infections occurred in patients with PrEP during the study period (31% vs. 40%, p = 0.004). Breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections after PrEP occurred in 77 patients (19%). In total, 37 infections (8%) were severe or critical. No difference in severity of COVID-19 was observed between patients with and without PrEP. There were 15 COVID-19-associated deaths (n = 1 after PrEP). Compared to matched controls, there was a non-significant difference towards a lower risk for moderate to critical COVID-19 (p 0.184). CONCLUSION: The number of SARS-CoV-2 infections was lower in LTx recipients with PrEP. Despite being at higher risk for worse outcome severity of COVID-19 and associated mortality were similar in patients with and without PrEP.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Transplantation , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Cohort Studies , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Antibodies, Viral
12.
Eur Respir Rev ; 32(167)2023 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36948499

ABSTRACT

COPD and α-1 antitrypsin deficiency emphysema remain one of the major indications for lung transplantation. If all other treatment possibilities are exhausted or not possible (including rehabilitation, oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation, lung volume reduction), patients may qualify for lung transplantation. Strict selection criteria are implemented with a lot of relative and absolute contraindications. Because of an ongoing donor shortage, only a minority of endstage COPD patients will finally get transplanted. The procedure may involve a single or a double lung transplantation, dependent on the experience of the centre, the waiting list, the availability of donor lungs and the patient's risk-benefit ratio. In general, the life expectancy as well as the health-related quality of life after lung transplantation for COPD are usually increased, and may be somewhat better after double compared with single lung transplantation. Several specific complications can be encountered, such as the development of solid organ cancer and chronic lung allograft dysfunction, which develops in up to 50% of patients within 5 years of their transplant and has a major impact on long-term survival, because of the current inefficient treatment modalities.


Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation , Pulmonary Emphysema , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency , Humans , Pulmonary Emphysema/diagnosis , Pulmonary Emphysema/surgery , Pulmonary Emphysema/complications , Quality of Life , Lung/surgery , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency/diagnosis , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency/surgery , alpha 1-Antitrypsin Deficiency/complications
13.
Infection ; 51(3): 749-757, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36083405

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is currently the major threat for immunocompromised individuals. The course of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients in the Omicron era remains unknown. The aim of the study was to assess outcome and associated factors in lung transplant recipients in a German-wide multicenter approach. METHODS: All affected individuals from January 1st to March 20th, 2022 from 8 German centers during the Omicron wave were collected. Baseline characteristics and antiviral measures were associated with outcome. RESULTS: Of 218 patients with PCR-proven SARS-CoV-2 infection 166 patients (76%) received any early (< 7 days) antiviral therapy median 2 (interquartile range 1-4) days after symptom onset. Most patients received sotrovimab (57%), followed by remdesivir (21%) and molnupiravir (21%). An early combination therapy was applied in 45 patients (21%). Thirty-four patients (16%) developed a severe or critical disease severity according to the WHO scale. In total, 14 patients (6.4%) died subsequently associated with COVID-19. Neither vaccination and antibody status, nor applied treatments were associated with outcome. Only age and glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 were independent risk factors for a severe or critical COVID-19. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 due to Omicron remains an important threat for lung transplant recipients. In particular, elderly patients and patients with impaired kidney function are at risk for worse outcome. Prophylaxis and therapy in highly immunocompromised individuals need further improvement.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant Recipients , Antiviral Agents , Combined Modality Therapy
14.
Transpl Int ; 36: 11551, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38282747

ABSTRACT

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is used by few lung transplant centers to treat chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Although reported results suggest a beneficial effect on CLAD progression, evidence is limited to single center experiences. The aim of this study is to analyze outcomes of ECP in a large multicenter European cohort. The primary endpoint was patient survival after initiation of ECP. This study included 631 patients, 87% suffered from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), and 13% had restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). Long-term stabilization was achieved in 42%, improvement in 9%, and no response in 26%. Within the first 12 months of therapy, 23% of patients died. Patients' survival after initiation of ECP at 5 years was 56% in stable, 70% in responders, and 35% in non-responders (p = 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression, both stabilization (HR: 0.48, CI: 0.27-0.86, p = 0.013) and response (HR: 0.11, CI: 0.04-0.35, p < 0.001) to ECP were associated with survival. Absolute FEV1 at baseline was also protective (HR: 0.09, CI: 0.01-0.94, p = 0.046). RAS phenotype was the only risk factor for mortality (HR: 2.11, 1.16-3.83, p = 0.006). This study provides long-term outcomes of ECP use in CLAD patients in the largest published cohort to date. Two-thirds of the cohort had a sustained response to ECP with excellent long-term results.


Subject(s)
Allografts , Lung Transplantation , Photopheresis , Humans , Allografts/physiopathology , Lung Transplantation/methods , Photopheresis/methods , Cohort Studies
15.
Pneumologie ; 76(10): 697-704, 2022 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36257309

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oxygen (O2) therapy is one of the most commonly applied medications in German hospitals and rescue services. Both hypoxemia and hyperoxemia can be associated with complications. There is currently a lack of reliable data on the use, documentation and surveillance of O2-therapy in German hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on the use of O2 in three hospitals in Hannover, Germany. RESULTS: Of 343 patients included in this study, 20 % received O2 therapy. Twenty-nine percent of patients receiving O2 were at increased risk for hypercapnia. A standard operating procedure (SOP) for O2 therapy was available in only 68 % of patients. In 22 % patients the applied O2-therapy was appropriate in the context of the documented vital parameters. A complete documentation of vital parameters was conducted in only 30 % of all patients and 41 % of patients receiving O2-therapy. A surveillance of O2-therapy using capillary or arterial blood gas analysis was performed in 76 % of patients. Here, 64 % of patients showed normoxemia, 17 % showed hyperoxemia and 19 % of patients showed hypoxemia. The only identifiable predictor for an adequate O2-therapy was a previous invasive ventilation. DISCUSSION: Our data point towards and inadequate prescription, application and documentation of O2 therapy. The recently released German S3-guideline should be used to increase awareness among physicians and nursing staff regarding the use of O2-therapy to improve O2 therapy and consequently patient safety.


Subject(s)
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Oxygen , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Oxygen/therapeutic use , Hospitals , Hypoxia
16.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 119(25): 438, 2022 06 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36178312
17.
Am J Transplant ; 22(12): 2990-3001, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35988032

ABSTRACT

In patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) complicating classical or amyopathic idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), lung transplantation outcomes might be affected by the disease and treatments. Here, our objective was to assess survival and prognostic factors in lung transplant recipients with IIM-ILD. We retrospectively reviewed data for 64 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2009 and 2021 at 19 European centers. Patient survival was the primary outcome. At transplantation, the median age was 53 [46-59] years, 35 (55%) patients were male, 31 (48%) had classical IIM, 25 (39%) had rapidly progressive ILD, and 21 (33%) were in a high-priority transplant allocation program. Survival rates after 1, 3, and 5 years were 78%, 73%, and 70%, respectively. During follow-up (median, 33 [7-63] months), 23% of patients developed chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Compared to amyopathic IIM, classical IIM was characterized by longer disease duration, higher-intensity immunosuppression before transplantation, and significantly worse posttransplantation survival. Five (8%) patients had a clinical IIM relapse, with mild manifestations. No patient experienced ILD recurrence in the allograft. Posttransplantation survival in IIM-ILD was similar to that in international all-cause-transplantation registries. The main factor associated with worse survival was a history of muscle involvement (classical IIM). In lung transplant recipients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, survival was similar to that in all-cause transplantation and was worse in patients with muscle involvement compared to those with the amyopathic disease.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Lung Transplantation , Myositis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Myositis/surgery , Myositis/complications , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/surgery , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects
18.
ERJ Open Res ; 8(3)2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35898810

ABSTRACT

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) may develop after either lung or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with similarities in histopathological features and clinical manifestations. However, there are differences in the contributory factors and clinical trajectories between the two conditions. BOS after HSCT occurs due to systemic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), whereas BOS after lung transplantation is limited to the lung allograft. BOS diagnosis after HSCT is more challenging, as the lung function decline may occur due to extrapulmonary GVHD, causing sclerosis or inflammation in the fascia or muscles of the respiratory girdle. Treatment is generally empirical with no established effective therapies. This review provides rare insights and commonalities of both conditions, which are not well elaborated elsewhere in contemporary literature, and highlights the importance of cross disciplinary learning from experts in other transplant modalities. Treatment algorithms for each condition are presented, based on the published literature and consensus clinical opinion. Immunosuppression should be optimised, and other conditions or contributory factors treated where possible. When initial treatment fails, the ultimate therapeutic option is lung transplantation (or re-transplantation in the case of BOS after lung transplantation) in carefully selected candidates. Novel therapies under investigation include aerosolised liposomal cyclosporine, Janus kinase inhibitors, antifibrotic therapies and (in patients with BOS after lung transplantation) B-cell-directed therapies. Effective novel treatments that have a tangible impact on survival and thereby avoid the need for lung transplantation or re-transplantation are urgently required.

19.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 41(10): 1501-1510, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35907758

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation (LTx) can be considered for selected patients suffering from COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill (SSC-CIP) patients has been described as a late complication in COVID-19 ARDS survivors, however, rates of SSC-CIP after LTx and factors predicting this detrimental sequela are unknown. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all LTx performed for post-COVID ARDS at 8 European LTx centers between May 2020 and January 2022. Clinical risk factors for SSC-CIP were analyzed over time. Prediction of SSC-CIP was assessed by ROC-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients were included in the analysis. Fifteen patients (37.5%) developed SSC-CIP. GGT at the time of listing was significantly higher in patients who developed SSC-CIP (median 661 (IQR 324-871) vs 186 (109-346); p = 0.001). Moreover, higher peak values for GGT (585 vs 128.4; p < 0.001) and ALP (325 vs 160.2; p = 0.015) were found in the 'SSC' group during the waiting period. Both, GGT at the time of listing and peak GGT during the waiting time, could predict SSC-CIP with an AUC of 0.797 (95% CI: 0.647-0.947) and 0.851 (95% CI: 0.707-0.995). Survival of 'SSC' patients was severely impaired compared to 'no SSC' patients (1-year: 46.7% vs 90.2%, log-rank p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: SSC-CIP is a severe late complication after LTx for COVID-19 ARDS leading to significant morbidity and mortality. GGT appears to be a sensitive parameter able to predict SSC-CIP even at the time of listing.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cholangitis, Sclerosing , Lung Transplantation , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , COVID-19/complications , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/complications , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/surgery , Humans , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , gamma-Glutamyltransferase
20.
Transpl Int ; 35: 10332, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35812158

ABSTRACT

Infections are leading causes of morbidity/mortality following solid organ transplantation (SOT) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) is among the most frequent pathogens, causing a considerable threat to SOT recipients. A survey was conducted 19 July-31 October 2019 to capture clinical practices about CMV in SOT recipients (e.g., how practices aligned with guidelines, how adequately treatments met patients' needs, and respondents' expectations for future developments). Transplant professionals completed a ∼30-minute online questionnaire: 224 responses were included, representing 160 hospitals and 197 SOT programs (41 countries; 167[83%] European programs). Findings revealed a heterogenous approach to CMV diagnosis and management and, sometimes, significant divergence from international guidelines. Valganciclovir prophylaxis (of variable duration) was administered by 201/224 (90%) respondents in D+/R- SOT and by 40% in R+ cases, with pre-emptive strategies generally reserved for R+ cases: DNA thresholds to initiate treatment ranged across 10-10,000 copies/ml. Ganciclovir-resistant CMV strains were still perceived as major challenges, and tailored treatment was one of the most important unmet needs for CMV management. These findings may help to design studies to evaluate safety and efficacy of new strategies to prevent CMV disease in SOT recipients, and target specific educational activities to harmonize CMV management in this challenging population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Organ Transplantation , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Ganciclovir/therapeutic use , Humans , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Transplant Recipients
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...