[The role of proton therapy in esophageal cancer]. / Le rôle de la protonthérapie dans les cancers de l'oesophage.

Because of the physical properties of proton beam radiation therapy (PT), which allows energy to be deposited at a specific depth with a rapid energy fall-off beyond that depth, PT has several theoretical advantages over photon radiation therapy for esophageal cancer (EC). Protons have the potential to reduce the dose to healthy tissue and to more safely allow treatment of tumors near critical organs, dose escalation, trimodal treatment, and re-irradiation. In recent years, larger multicenter retrospective studies have been published showing excellent survival rates, lower than expected toxicities and even better outcomes with PT than with photon radiotherapy even using IMRT or VMAT techniques. Although PT was associated with reduced toxicities, postoperative complications, and hospital stays compared to photon radiation therapy, these studies all had inherent biases in relation with patient selection for PT. These observations were recently confirmed by a randomized phase II study in locally advanced EC that showed significantly reduced toxicities with protons compared with IMRT. Currently, two randomized phase III trials (NRG-GI006 in the US and PROTECT in Europe) are being conducted to confirm whether protons could become the standard of care in locally advanced and resectable esophageal cancers.

Clinical and technical considerations for mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma protontherapy based on a single-center early experience.

PURPOSE: Protontherapy for mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma reduces cardiac, lung and breast exposure, which may limit radiation-induced adverse events. While this technique is already widely implemented in the United-States, clinical experience is still limited in France. This study analyses the practice of mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma protontherapy at the Institut Curie to implement this technique at a larger scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from all mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma patients from the hematology department of the Institut Curie who were subsequently evaluated at the Protontherapy Center of Orsay (CPO) of Institut Curie for adjuvant protontherapy were retrieved. We analyzed why these patients were ultimately treated with protontherapy or not. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and January 2021, twenty mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma patients from the hematology department of the Institut Curie have been screened for protontherapy at the CPO. Four of them (20%) were ultimately treated with proton beams. Treatment was well tolerated without grade 3-4 adverse events. With a median follow-up of two years, none of these patients relapsed. The others sixteen patients were not treated with protontherapy due to multiple reasons including: lack of treatment room disponibility, accessibility difficulties, psychiatric disorder, and anatomic or dosimetric considerations. CONCLUSION: Despite notable dosimetric superiority over photon radiotherapy and excellent clinical tolerance, lack of availability of protontherapy facilities limit implementation of mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma protontherapy. Additionally, strict selection criteria must be defined.

Clinical practice of breast cancer protontherapy: A single-centre experience from selection to treatment.

PURPOSE: Breast protontherapy efficiently limits cardiac, lung and contralateral breast exposure, which may clinically translate into better late tolerance profile compared with classic photon techniques. While breast protontherapy is already implemented in the United States and in some European countries, clinical experience of breast cancer protontherapy is currently limited in France. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical practice of breast cancer protontherapy at the Institut Curie in order to implement this technique at a larger scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from all breast cancer patients that have been addressed to the protontherapy centre of Orsay (CPO, Institut Curie) for adjuvant breast protontherapy were retrieved. We analysed why these patients were ultimately treated with protontherapy or not. RESULTS: Between November 2019 and November 2020, eleven breast cancer patients have been evaluated for adjuvant protontherapy at the CPO. Two of them were ultimately treated with proton beams; adjuvant breast protontherapy therapy was well tolerated. The nine other patients were not treated with protontherapy due to lack of availability of protontherapy treatment rooms in acceptable time limits, at the time of patient evaluation. CONCLUSION: Despite dosimetric advantages and excellent clinical tolerance, lack of availability of protontherapy machines currently limits wider implementation of breast protontherapy.

Dosimetric comparison of four high performance techniques for irradiation of breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The use of IMRT for the treatment of breast cancer has been growing considerably in our institution since 2009. Alternatively, helical tomotherapy (HT) using a field width of 2.5 and 5cm (HT_FW_5), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), or proton therapy with pencil-beam scanning (PT-PBS) have also been used to reduce treatment duration or optimize organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. The purpose of this study was to compare the 4 treatment modalities available at our site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 10 patients treated for breast cancer with lymph node involvement. The prescribed dose was 51.8Gy to the breast with a simultaneous integrated boost up to 63Gy, and 50.4Gy to lymph nodes in 28 fractions. The CTV was delineated according to ESTRO Guidelines. Dosimetric planning in routine clinical practice was performed using HT_FW_2.5. The approved clinical plan was compared to the 3 other plans. Dosimetric goals for PTV coverage were D95%≥95% and D2%≤107% of the prescribed dose. Mean and maximum doses to OAR were recorded. RESULTS: HT_FW_5 and VMAT plans ensure equivalent or even better PTV coverage compared to the initial clinically approved plan but at the cost of poorer OAR sparing. PT_PBS plans showed that an excellent PTV coverage can be maintained with significantly lower doses to OAR. CONCLUSION: HT_FW_5 and VMAT plans allow a significant reduction of treatment duration and can be a good alternative to HT_FW_2.5 for specific populations. HT_FW_2.5 could be chosen for patients at higher risk of side effects. In addition, PT_PBS should be considered in the near future as it has been shown to have a major potential benefit to lower the risk of side effects with the same level of PTV coverage.

Experimental characterisation of a proton kernel model for pencil beam scanning techniques.

The aim of this work is to perform Monte Carlo simulations of a proton pencil beam scanning machine, characterise the low-dose envelope of scanned proton beams and assess the differences between various approximations for nozzle geometry. Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations were carried out in order to describe the dose distribution of a proton pencil beam in water for energies between 100 and 220 MeV. Dose distributions were simulated by using a Geant4 Monte Carlo platform (TOPAS), and were measured in water using a two-dimensional ion chamber array detector. The beam source in air was adjusted for each configuration. Double Gaussian parameterisation was proposed for definition of the beam source model in order to improve simulations starting at the nozzle exit. Absolute dose distributions and field size factors were measured and compared with simulations. The influence of the high-density components present in the treatment nozzle was also investigated by analysis of proton phase spaces at the nozzle exit. An excellent agreement was observed between experimental dose distributions and simulations for energies higher than 160 MeV. However, minor differences were observed between 100 and 160 MeV, suggesting poorer modelling of the beam when the full treatment head was not taken into account. We found that the first ionisation chamber was the main cause of the tail component observed for low proton beam energies. In this work, various parameterisations of proton sources were proposed, thereby allowing reproduction of the low-dose envelope of proton beams and excellent agreement with measured data.

[Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: From physics to clinic]. / Protonthérapie des carcinomes épidermoïdes des voies aérodigestives supérieures : de la physique à la clinique.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presently the recommended technique for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Proton therapy would allow to reduce the volume of irradiated normal tissue and, thus, to decrease the risk of late dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia and hypothyroidism. An exhaustive research was performed with the search engine PubMed by focusing on the papers about the physical difficulties that slow down use of proton therapy for head and neck carcinomas. Range uncertainties in proton therapy (±3 %) paradoxically limit the use of the steep dose gradient in distality. Calibration uncertainties can be important in the treatment of head and neck cancer in the presence of materials of uncertain stoichiometric composition (such as with metal implants, dental filling, etc.) and complex heterogeneities. Dental management for example may be different with IMRT or proton therapy. Some uncertainties can be somewhat minimized at the time of optimization. Inter- and intrafractional variations and uncertainties in Hounsfield units/stopping power can be integrated in a robust optimization process. Additional changes in patient's anatomy (tumour shrinkage, changes in skin folds in the beam patch, large weight loss or gain) require rescanning. Dosimetric and small clinical studies comparing photon and proton therapy have well shown the interest of proton therapy for head and neck cancers. Intensity-modulated proton therapy is a promising treatment as it can reduce the substantial toxicity burden of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared to IMRT. Robust optimization will allow to perform an optimal treatment and to use proton therapy in current clinical practice.

Protontherapy versus best photon for mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma: Dosimetry comparison and treatment using ILROG guidelines.

The purpose of this work was reducing treatment-related toxicity for Hodgkin lymphomas using practical procedure inspired by the ILROG guidelines. Reporting the first case of localized Hodgkin lymphoma treated with protontherapy in France. A 24-year-old female with mediastinal, bulky, localized, mixed-cellularity, classic Hodgkin lymphoma required an involved-site radiation therapy after complete response following polychemotherapy. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy was not acceptable due to high doses to breasts, heart and lungs. We realized a four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) to evaluate target movements and another CT with gating and breath-hold technique. Delineation was performed on both CT using the initial fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/CT. One dosimetric plan with rotational intensity-modulated radiation therapy with a helical Tomotherapy© was realized and compared to another one with conformational protontherapy. Ninety-five percent of the planning target volume was covered by 98 and 99% of the prescribed dose with protontherapy and helical Tomotherapy©. Protontherapy provided the best organ at risk protection. Lung and heart protections were better with protontherapy: lung mean dose (3.7Gy vs. 8.4Gy) and median dose (0.002Gy vs. 6.9Gy), heart mean dose (2.6Gy vs. 3.7Gy). Breast sparing was better for both breasts using protontherapy: right breast mean dose (2.4Gy vs. 4.4Gy) and left (1.9Gy vs. 4.6Gy). The biggest difference was seen with low doses, which were better with protontherapy: volume of lung receiving 5Gy was 17.5% vs. 54.2% with Helical Tomotherapy©. In view of these results, we decided to treat our patient with protontherapy using respiratory assessment. We delivered 30Gy (15 fractions) using protontherapy with one direct anterior field using pencil beam scanning and deep inspiration breath-hold technique. We observed only grade 1 skin erythema during treatment and no toxicity during early follow-up.

[Boost in proton for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A Curie Institute experience]. / Complément de dose de protons pour les cancers du nasopharynx localement évolués : une expérience de l'institut Curie.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the treatment outcome and toxicity for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with a complementary dose with proton. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1999 and September 2016, 17 patients have been treated for a stage III-IVa nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the proton therapy centre of Curie Institute. Bilateral lymph node in the neck (I-V levels) received from 40 to 54Gy with photon beam. The primary tumor volume including microscopically extensions received a complementary dose with proton in order to reach the dose of 70 to 78Gy. All the patients received a concomitant chemotherapy. The end-points of the study were loco-regional control, survival, and treatment-related toxicity. RESULTS: Patients characteristics were: median age 49, 71 % male, 88% stage IVa, with a majority (82%) of T4N0M0. The median follow-up was 99 months. The 2-, 5- and 10-year actuarial locoregional free survival and overall survival were 94% and 88%, 86% and 74%, and 86% and 66%, respectively. The grade≥3 late adverse events were sphenoid bone radionecrosis (5.9%) and hearing loss (23.5%). CONCLUSION: This study showed that a complementary dose with proton seems to be a good option for the treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, particularly for T4N0M0.

Three-year results after radiotherapy for locally advanced sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma, using highly conformational radiotherapy techniques proton therapy and/or Tomotherapy.

PURPOSE: We report the patient outcomes of a treatment combining proton therapy and Tomotherapy in sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma involving skull base. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients treated at Curie Institute, Paris, France, between March 2010 and February 2014 for an advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma involving skull base. Patients received Tomotherapy, proton therapy or both. We evaluated treatment toxicity (according to CTCAE V4), local control, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included, with a median follow-up of 34 months. Radiation therapy followed surgery for 77% of the patients and margins were positive in all those cases. Median dose was 73.8Gy. Local control, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival at 3 years were respectively 60%, 48% and 60%. One-sided grade 3 hearing impairment occurred in 46% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Combining high-dose proton therapy and Tomotherapy is effective and has moderate toxicity in the treatment of T4 sinonasal adenoid cystic carcinoma involving skull base.

Protontherapy of head and neck paragangliomas: A monocentric study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess efficacy and safety of proton beam therapy of paragangliomas of the head and neck, rare benign tumours developed close to crucial structures such as cranial nerves and vascular tissues. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients with a paraganglioma of the head and neck were treated from 2001 to 2014 with image-guided proton therapy. Neurological and ear nose throat symptoms were collected in addition to audiometric testing, before and after the treatment. Acute and late toxicities were assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 52.6years (range: 18.2-65.8years). Proton therapy was the exclusive treatment in six patients and four patients had a postoperative radiotherapy. Median dose was 50.4Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE; range: 45.0-67.0Gy). With a median follow-up of 24.6months (range: 6.7-46.2 months), local tumour control rate was 100% (stable, n=10). No upper grade 2 acute toxicity was reported. To the latest news, seven patients had controlled symptoms (improved, n=1, stabilized, n=6). One patient out of seven with initial tinnitus had a decrease in his symptoms, while the six other patients had a sustained stabilization. CONCLUSION: Proton beam therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment modality of skull base paragangliomas, with documented functional benefit. A longer follow-up is planned in order to assess local control and long-term toxicities.

[Severe congenital toxoplasmosis secondary to toxoplasma reactivation in an HIV-infected mother]. / Toxoplasmose congénitale sévère secondaire à une réactivation toxoplasmique chez une mère infectée par le VIH.

Congenital toxoplasmosis is a potentially serious fetal infection associated with maternal seroconversion or a reactivation of toxoplasmosis during pregnancy. We report the case of congenital toxoplasmosis with severe neurological injury with normal prenatal obstetric ultrasounds in a mother infected with HIV at the AIDS stage and previously immunized against toxoplasmosis.