Patch test in Brazilian children with a clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis: a cross-sectional study using an extended patch test battery.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin disease mainly affecting children. Similarly, Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is an inflammatory skin disease, but unlike AD it results from direct exposure to an external agent. Theoretically, the impaired skin barrier facilitates the penetration of potential allergens. Therefore, AD patients are at risk for an associated ACD, exacerbating their skin condition. Because eczema is similar, performing a patch test (PT) for the differential diagnosis is essential. METHODS: In this cross-sectional transversal study, we performed a PT with 30 sensitizers in 26 children with AD, selected according to established criteria for suspected ACD, and treated at an AD center of a pediatric university hospital in Rio de Janeiro. Clinical presentation, patient profile, main sensitizers, and frequency of ACD caused by therapeutic skincare products were evaluated. RESULTS: In all, 23 (88.5%) patients reacted to at least one allergen, 21 (80.7%) had a relevant positive patch test, and 15 (57.7%) were polysensitized. The main positive sensitizers were nickel (38.5%), blue disperse (30.8%), fragrance mix (30.8%), and neomycin (23.1%). Nineteen (73%) patients reacted to substances present in therapeutic or skincare products. CONCLUSION: Our data underscore the importance of performing a PT in AD children whose eczema has atypical distribution. The expressive percentage of positive tests, especially of allergens in skincare products, indicates the constant need to review the proposed treatments. Therefore, we recommend a specific and expanded PT battery for pediatric AD patients, including a negative control, to increase sensitivity for diagnosing ACD.

Atopic dermatitis pediatric patients show high rates of nasal and intestinal colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) patients have high rates of colonization by Staphylococcus aureus, which has been associated with worsening of the disease. This study characterized Staphylococcus spp isolates recovered from nares and feces of pediatric patients with AD in relation to antimicrobial susceptibility, staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type, presence of pvl genes and clonality. Besides, gut bacterial community profiles were compared with those of children without AD. RESULTS: All 55 AD patients evaluated had colonization by Staphylococcus spp. Fifty-three (96.4%) patients had colonization in both clinical sites, whereas one patient each was not colonize in the nares or gut. Staphylococcus aureus was identified in the nostrils and feces of 45 (81.8%) and 39 (70.9%) patients, respectively. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. isolates were found in 70.9% of the patients, and 24 (43.6%) had methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). S. aureus (55.6%) and S. epidermidis (26.5%) were the major species found. The prevalent lineages of S. aureus were USA800/SCCmecIV (47.6%) and USA1100/SCCmecIV (21.4%), and 61.9% of the evaluated patients had the same genotype in both sites. Additionally, gut bacterial profile of AD patients exhibits greater dissimilarity from the control group than it does among varying severities of AD. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of nasal and intestinal colonization by S. aureus and methicillin-resistant staphylococci isolates were found in AD patients. Besides, gut bacterial profiles of AD patients were distinctly different from those of the control group, emphasizing the importance of monitoring S. aureus colonization and gut microbiome composition in AD patients.

Genetic screening in a Brazilian cohort with inborn errors of immunity.

BACKGROUND: Inherited genetic defects in immune system-related genes can result in Inborn Errors of Immunity (IEI), also known as Primary Immunodeficiencies (PID). Diagnosis of IEI disorders is challenging due to overlapping clinical manifestations. Accurate identification of disease-causing germline variants is crucial for appropriate treatment, prognosis, and genetic counseling. However, genetic sequencing is challenging in low-income countries like Brazil. This study aimed to perform genetic screening on patients treated within Brazil's public Unified Health System to identify candidate genetic variants associated with the patient's phenotype. METHODS: Thirteen singleton unrelated patients from three hospitals in Rio de Janeiro were enrolled in this study. Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood lymphocytes of each patient, and whole exome sequencing (WES) analyses were conducted using Illumina NextSeq. Germline genetic variants in IEI-related genes were prioritized using a computational framework considering their molecular consequence in coding regions; minor allele frequency ≤ 0.01; pathogenicity classification based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines gathered from the VarSome clinical database; and IEI-related phenotype using the Franklin tool. The genes classification into IEI categories follows internationally recognized guidelines informed by the International Union of Immunological Societies Expert Committee. Additional methods for confirmation of the variant included Sanger sequencing, phasing analysis, and splice site prediction. RESULTS: A total of 16 disease-causing variants in nine genes, encompassing six different IEI categories, were identified. X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia, caused by BTK variations, emerged as the most prevalent IEI disorder in the cohort. However, pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were also reported in other known IEI-related genes, namely CD40LG, CARD11, WAS, CYBB, C6, and LRBA. Interestingly, two patients with suspected IEI exhibited pathogenic variants in non-IEI-related genes, ABCA12 and SLC25A13, potentially explaining their phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic screening through WES enabled the detection of potentially harmful variants associated with IEI disorders. These findings contribute to a better understanding of patients' clinical manifestations by elucidating the genetic basis underlying their phenotypes.

Assessing whole-exome sequencing data from undiagnosed Brazilian patients to improve the diagnostic yield of inborn errors of immunity.

OBJECTIVES: Inborn error of immunity (IEI) comprises a broad group of inherited immunological disorders that usually display an overlap in many clinical manifestations challenging their diagnosis. The identification of disease-causing variants from whole-exome sequencing (WES) data comprises the gold-standard approach to ascertain IEI diagnosis. The efforts to increase the availability of clinically relevant genomic data for these disorders constitute an important improvement in the study of rare genetic disorders. This work aims to make available WES data of Brazilian patients' suspicion of IEI without a genetic diagnosis. We foresee a broad use of this dataset by the scientific community in order to provide a more accurate diagnosis of IEI disorders. DATA DESCRIPTION: Twenty singleton unrelated patients treated at four different hospitals in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil were enrolled in our study. Half of the patients were male with mean ages of 9 ± 3, while females were 12 ± 10 years old. The WES was performed in the Illumina NextSeq platform with at least 90% of sequenced bases with a minimum of 30 reads depth. Each sample had an average of 20,274 variants, comprising 116 classified as rare pathogenic or likely pathogenic according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association (ACMG) guidelines. The genotype-phenotype association was impaired by the lack of detailed clinical and laboratory information, besides the unavailability of molecular and functional studies which, comprise the limitations of this study. Overall, the access to clinical exome sequencing data is limited, challenging exploratory analyses and the understanding of genetic mechanisms underlying disorders. Therefore, by making these data available, we aim to increase the number of WES data from Brazilian samples despite contributing to the study of monogenic IEI-disorders.

Methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolates from skin and nares of Brazilian children with atopic dermatitis demonstrate high level of clonal diversity.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) primarily affects the pediatric population, which is highly colonized by S. aureus. However, little is known about the genetic features of this microorganism and other staphylococcal species that colonize AD patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize Staphylococcus spp. isolated from the nares and skin (with and without lesion) of 30 AD and 12 non-AD Brazilian children. METHODS: Skin and nasal swabs were cultured onto mannitol salt agar, and bacterial colonies were counted and identified by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by phenotypic and genotypic tests. In S. aureus isolates, Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes were detected by PCR, and their clonality was assessed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing. RESULTS: S. aureus was more prevalent in the nares (P = 0.005) and lesional skin (P = 0.0002) of children with AD, while S. hominis was more frequent in the skin of non-AD children (P < 0.0001). All children in the study, except one from each group, were colonized by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and 24% by methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Despite the great clonal diversity of S. aureus (18 sequence types identified), most AD children (74.1%) were colonized by the same genotype in both niches. CONCLUSION: High colonization by polyclonal S. aureus isolates was found among children with AD, while S. hominis was more frequent among non-AD children. The high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal isolates highlights the importance of continued surveillance, especially when considering empiric antibiotic therapy for the treatment of skin infections in these patients.

Clinical and genetic findings in two siblings with X-Linked agammaglobulinemia and bronchiolitis obliterans: a case report.

BACKGROUND: X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) is an Inborn Errors of Immunity (IEI) characterized by pan-hypogammaglobulinemia and low numbers of B lymphocytes due to mutations in BTK gene. Usually, XLA patients are not susceptible to respiratory tract infections by viruses and do not present interstitial lung disease (ILD) such as bronchiolitis obliterans (BO) as a consequence of acute or chronic bacterial infections of the respiratory tract. Although many pathogenic variants have already been described in XLA, the heterogeneous clinical presentations in affected patients suggest a more complex genetic landscape underlying this disorder. CASE PRESENTATION: We report two pediatric cases from male siblings with X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia and bronchiolitis obliterans, a phenotype not often observed in XLA phenotype. The whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis showed a rare hemizygous missense variant NM_000061.2(BTK):c.1751G>A(p.Gly584Glu) in BTK gene of both patients. We also identified a gain-of-function mutation in TGFß1 (rs1800471) previously associated with transforming growth factor-beta1 production, fibrotic lung disease, and graft fibrosis after lung transplantation. TGFß1 plays a key role in the regulation of immune processes and inflammatory response associated with pulmonary impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Our report illustrates a possible role for WES in patients with known inborn errors of immunity, but uncommon clinical presentations, providing a personalized understanding of genetic basis, with possible implications in the identification of potential treatments, and prognosis for patients and their families.

Acquired Angioedema due to C1-Inhibitor Deficiency: A Challenging Condition.

BACKGROUND: Acquired deficiency of C1 inhibitor (AAE-C1-INH) is a very rare cause of recurrent angioedema, with few cases reported in the literature. We aimed to describe a series of patients with AAE-C1-INH who were diagnosed and received care at angioedema reference centers in Brazil, affiliated to the Brazilian Group of Studies on Hereditary Angioedema. METHODS: Fourteen patients from 8 Brazilian Angioedema Reference Centers, diagnosed with AAE-C1-INH, were included in this study. Clinical data collected included sex, date of birth, date of onset of symptoms, date of diagnosis, plasma levels of antigenic and/or functional C1-INH, levels of C4 and C1q, location and treatment of angioedema attacks, long-term prophylaxis, associated diseases, and definitive treatment. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were identified with AAE-C1-INH. Most patients (10/14; 71.4%) were female. The median age at onset of symptoms was 56.5 years (range, 14-74 years; interquartile range [IQR], 32-64 years), and median age at diagnosis was 58.0 years (range, 20-76 years; IQR, 38-65 years), with a median time until diagnosis of 2 years (range, 0-6 years; IQR, 1-3 years). The most common manifestations were cutaneous (face, eyelids, lips, trunk, hands, feet, and genitals). Most patient had low levels of C4 (13/14; 92.8%) and of antigenic C1-INH (8/14; 57.1%). Four had decreased functional activity of C1-INH (4/7; 57.1%) and C1q levels were low in 5 patients (5/12; 41.6%). Underlying diseases were identified in all 14 patients, with lymphoma of the splenic marginal zone and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance being the most frequent. Nine patients (64.2%) needed long-term prophylactic treatment for recurrent angioedema and 5 patients (46.7%) required treatment for angioedema attacks. Most of them (12/14; 85.7%) had resolution of angioedema. CONCLUSION: Therapy of AAE-C1-INH aims to control symptoms; however, diagnosis and treatment of the underlying disease, when present, should be an important target and may lead to the resolution of angioedema in patients with AAE-C1-INH.

Posicionamento da ASBAI sobre a vacinação de crianças de 5 a 11 anos contra a COVID-19 com a vacina Comirnaty/ Pfizer/BioNTech ­ 27/12/2021 / ASBAI's position on vaccination of children aged 5 to 11 years against COVID-19 with the Comirnaty/Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine ­ 12/27/2021

A Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) se manifesta totalmente favorável à imunização contra a COVID-19 em indivíduos entre 5 e 11 anos, para a proteção não somente deste grupo, mas também de seus conviventes. A vacinação de crianças, demonstrada sua eficácia e segurança, é fundamental para o controle da circulação do vírus e proteção de indivíduos cuja resposta vacinal pode não ocorrer de modo eficiente, como os imunocomprometidos e idosos. A imunização de pessoas entre 5 e 11 anos deve ser uma estratégia de saúde pública fundamental para o controle da pandemia que nos assola desde março de 2020 com todas as suas graves consequências para a saúde pública e a economia.

The Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI) is totally in favor of immunization against COVID-19 in individuals between 5 and 11 years old, for the protection not only of this group, but also of their cohabitants. The vaccination of children, once its efficacy and safety has been demonstrated, is essential for controlling the circulation of the virus and protecting individuals whose vaccine response may not occur efficiently, such as the immunocompromised and the elderly. The immunization of people between the ages of 5 and 11 must be a fundamental public health strategy to control the pandemic that has been plaguing us since March 2020 with all its serious consequences for public health and the economy.

Laboratory screening test with inhalant and food allergens in atopic Brazilian children and adolescents: a performance.

The Phadiatop Infant® (PhInf) is a panel developed to assess allergic sensitization (immunoglobulin E [IgE]) in children aged <5 years and combines inhalant and food allergens. The test has not been evaluated outside Europe. This is a cross-sectional study conducted at 11 pediatric allergy centers to evaluate PhInf as an allergic disease screening method in Brazilian children. Children as controls and patients (aged 6 months-18 years) were grouped according to their primary disease and age group. PhInf and specific serum IgE (sIgE) screening was performed for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP), cat and dog epithelia, a mix of grasses and pollens, eggs, cow's milk, peanuts, and shrimp. Values ≥ 0.35 kUA/L (or PAU/L) were considered positive. A total of 470 children and adolescents, which included 385 patients and 85 controls, participated in the study (47.7% boys, average age: 6.3 years). In all, 72.6% of the participants had positive PhInf test (n = 341), with a higher proportion of those having food allergy (92.6%), atopic dermatitis (91.9%), and those aged >13 years having allergy (95%). The PhInf and sIgE agreement between patients (Kappa = 0.94, P < 0.001) and controls (Kappa = 0.84, P < 0.001) was high. PhInf and DP agreement in patients aged >13 years was excellent (Kappa = 0.936, P < 0.001). Compared with sIgE dosage, PhInf had high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (93%). Positivity of PhInf test in this population was high and had an excellent correlation with the allergens comprising the panel. It is a useful method for screening children suspected of having allergic diseases in a non-European country.

Laboratory screening test with inhalant and food allergens in atopic Brazilian children and adolescents: a performance

The Phadiatop Infant® (PhInf) is a panel developed to assess allergic sensitization (immunoglobulin E [IgE]) in children aged <5 years and combines inhalant and food allergens. The test has not been evaluated outside Europe. This is a cross-sectional study conducted at 11 pediatric allergy centers to evaluate PhInf as an allergic disease screening method in Brazilian children. Children as controls and patients (aged 6 months–18 years) were grouped according to their primary disease and age group. PhInf and specific serum IgE (sIgE) screening was performed for Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP), cat and dog epithelia, a mix of grasses and pollens, eggs, cow’s milk, peanuts, and shrimp. Values ≥ 0.35 kUA/L (or PAU/L) were considered positive. A total of 470 children and adolescents, which included 385 patients and 85 controls, participated in the study (47.7% boys, average age: 6.3 years). In all, 72.6% of the participants had positive PhInf test (n = 341), with a higher proportion of those having food allergy (92.6%), atopic dermatitis (91.9%), and those aged >13 years having allergy (95%). The PhInf and sIgE agreement between patients (Kappa = 0.94, P < 0.001) and controls (Kappa = 0.84, P < 0.001) was high. PhInf and DP agreement in patients aged >13 years was excellent (Kappa = 0.936, P < 0.001). Compared with sIgE dosage, PhInf had high sensitivity (97%) and specificity (93%). Positivity of PhInf test in this population was high and had an excellent correlation with the allergens comprising the panel. It is a useful method for screening children suspected of having allergic diseases in a non-European country (AU)

Outcome of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in 121 Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity: A Cross-Sectional Study.

PURPOSE: There is still scarce data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity (IEI) and many unresolved questions. We aimed to describe the clinical outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Brazilian IEI patients and identify factors influencing the infection. METHODS: We did a cross-sectional, multicenter study that included patients of any age affected by IEI and SARS-CoV-2 infection. The variables studied were sex, age, type of IEI, comorbidities (number and type), treatment in use for IEI, clinical manifestations and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: 121 patients were included: 55.4% female, ages from six months to 74 yo (median age = 25.1 yo). Most patients had predominantly antibody deficiency (n = 53). The infection was mostly asymptomatic (n = 21) and mild (n = 66), and one child had multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C). We could not observe sex-related susceptibility, and there was a weak correlation between age and severity of infection. The number of comorbidities was higher in severe cases, particularly bronchiectasis and cardiopathy. There were no severe cases in hereditary angioedema patients. Six patients aged 2 to 74 years died, three of them with antibody deficiency. CONCLUSION: The outcome was mild in most patients, but the Case Fatality Ratio was higher than in the general population. However, the type of IEI was not a determining factor for severity, except for complement deficiencies linked to milder COVID-19. The severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection seems to be more related to older age, a higher number of comorbidities and type of comorbidities (bronchiectasis and cardiopathy).

Alergias e vacinas contra a COVID-19 / Allergies and vaccines against COVID-19

As vacinas são reconhecidas como uma das conquistas do século passado de maior impacto em Saúde Pública, reduzindo de modo significativo a morbidade e mortalidade associadas a grande número de doenças infecciosas. No entanto, em casos raros, as vacinas podem causar doença ou eventos adversos pós-vacinação (EAPV). Os imunologistas clínicos e alergistas possuem um papel muito importante nesse momento em que mundialmente buscamos imunizar a população contra a COVID- 19. Eles devem fornecer apoio aos indivíduos orientando sobre o diagnóstico e tratamento de EAPV, incluindo anafilaxia, e, ainda, apoiar e encorajar os pacientes a se vacinarem, mesmo após eventos adversos, desde que leves ou moderados.

Vaccines are known as one of the achievements of the last century with greatest impact on public health, significantly reducing morbidity and mortality associated with a large number of infectious diseases. However, in rare cases, vaccines may cause disease or adverse events following immunization. Clinical immunologists and allergists have a very important role in the worldwide vaccination against COVID-19. They should provide support to individuals by advising on the diagnosis and treatment of adverse events following immunization, including anaphylaxis, and also support and encourage patients to be vaccinated, even after adverse events, as long as they are mild or moderate.

Vacinas contra a COVID-19 e os erros inatos da imunidade (ou imunodeficiências primárias) / COVID-19 vaccines and inborn errors of immunity (or primary immunodeficiencies)

Desde o início da pandemia de COVID-19 iniciou-se a corrida por uma imunização ativa, eficaz e segura. Todas as vacinas desenvolvidas até o momento vêm demostrando boa eficácia na prevenção de casos graves de COVID-19, de hospitalizações e mortes. Muitos pacientes com erros inatos da imunidade (EII) não terão capacidade de desenvolver uma resposta imune semelhante ao indivíduo imunocompetente. Esses pacientes foram incluídos nos grupos prioritários definidos pelo Ministério da Saúde, como pessoas entre 18 a 59 anos com uma ou mais das comorbidades, incluindo as imunodeficiências primárias. Eles podem e devem receber as vacinas em uso contra o SARS-CoV-2, mas nem sempre apresentarão uma resposta imunológica satisfatória e protetora, e, portanto, seus contactantes também devem ser vacinados.

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the race for an active, effective, and safe immunization has started. All vaccines developed to date have shown good efficacy in preventing serious cases of COVID-19, hospitalization, and death. Many patients with inborn errors of immunity will not be able to develop an immune response similar to that of immunocompetent individuals. These patients were included in the priority groups defined by the Brazilian Ministry of Health, as people between 18 and 59 years of age with one or more comorbidities, including primary immunodeficiencies. They can and should receive the vaccines in use against SARS-CoV-2, but they will not always have a satisfactory and protective immune response, and, therefore, those in direct contact with them should also be vaccinated.

Evolução da infecção por COVID-19 em um grupo de pacientes com erros inatos da imunidade / Evolution of a Brazilian group of patients with inborn errors of immunity with COVID-19

Introdução: O novo coronavírus causou uma pandemia e desafio na saúde pública em todo o mundo. Até hoje muitos mecanismos do vírus no hospedeiro foram desvendados, cujo conhecimento é essencial para entender a evolução clínica e desenvolver uma estratégia de terapia adequada para a infecção com COVID-19. Contudo, pouco se sabe da infecção por COVID-19 em pacientes com erros inatos da imunidade (EII), principalmente em pacientes com síndromes autoinflamatórias. Objetivo: Descrever a evolução de pacientes com erros inatos da imunidade acometidos por SARS-CoV-2 em um centro de referência em doenças raras e da imunidade no Brasil. Material e métodos: Foram analisados retrospectivamente dados clínicos, radiológicos, patológicos e laboratoriais de pacientes com erros inatos da imunidade infectados por SARS-CoV-2 de março a dezembro de 2020. Resultados: Ao total, dados de 13 pacientes com diversos EII foram coletados para descrever tanto a evolução da doença quanto para buscar mais conhecimento sobre o tratamento desses pacientes. Em nenhum paciente a síndrome da angústia respiratória aguda foi observada, e também não foi observado nenhum óbito. A grande maioria dos pacientes teve evolução com síndrome gripal. Observou-se, em um paciente com CAPS-NLRP3, rash cutâneo vasculítico responsivo ao uso de anti-IL1. Conclusão: Neste pequeno grupo de pacientes com erros inatos da imunidade e com infecção por SARS-CoV-2, o risco de fatalidade foi menor do que observado na literatura. Especialmente, o fato de que a maioria apresenta maior predisposição a inflamação do que infecção deve ser levada em conta na análise dos dados finais. Reportamos pela primeira vez a presença de urticária vasculítica em paciente com CAPS, que habitualmente apresentam-se com urticária neutrofílica. Tal achado ressalta a capacidade de injúria vascular do vírus, mesmo em indivíduos predispostos geneticamente.

Introduction: The pandemic caused by the new coronavirus has become a global public health challenge. To date, many pathophysiological mechanisms of the virus have been explained, which is essential to understand clinical evolution and to develop appropriate therapeutic strategies for patients with COVID-19. However, less is known about COVID-19 in patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI), especially in those with autoinflammatory disorders. Objective: To report the natural evolution of a group of patients with IEI infected with SARS-CoV-2 treated at a center of excellence in rare diseases and immunity in Brazil. Material and methods: Clinical, radiological, pathological, and laboratory data of patients treated from March to December 2020 were retrospectively retrieved and analyzed. Results: Data of 13 patients with IEI were collected to describe the natural course of the infection with SARS-CoV-2 and to enhance understanding of treatment for these patients. Neither acute respiratory distress syndrome nor death were observed. The vast majority of patients had flu-like symptoms. Urticarial vasculitis was observed in one patient with CAPS-NLRP3 responsive to the use of anti-IL1. Conclusion: In this small group of patients with IEI and SARSCoV- 2 infection, fatality risk was lower than that observed in the literature. Importantly, the fact that our group is composed mainly of patients with predisposition to inflammation instead of infection should be taken into account for final data analysis. Furthermore, we observed for the first time the presence of urticarial vasculitis in a patient with CAPS, which is usually characterized by neutrophilic urticaria. Such finding reinforces the virus ability to cause vascular injury, even in individuals with a genetic predisposition.

Inborn Errors of Immunity: how to diagnose them?

OBJECTIVES: Inborn Errors of Immunity are characterized by infectious conditions and manifestations of immune dysregulation. The diversity of clinical phenotypes can make it difficult to direct the laboratory investigation. This article aims to update the investigation of immunological competence in the context of primary defects of the immune system. SOURCE OF DATA: Searches were carried out on Pubmed to review articles published in the last five years, in English, French or Spanish, using the terms "diagnosis" OR "investigation" AND "immunodeficiency" or "primary immunodeficiency" or "inborn errors of immunity" NOT "HIV". Recent textbook editions have also been consulted. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: The immune system competence investigation should be started based on clinical phenotypes. Relevant data are: characterization of infectious conditions (location, recurrence, types of infectious agents, response to treatment), age during symptom onset and associated manifestations (growth impairment, allergy, autoimmunity, malignancies, fever and signs of inflammation without the identification of infection or autoimmunity) and family history. These data contribute to the selection of tests to be performed. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic investigation of Inborn Errors of Immunity should be guided by the clinical characterization of patients, aiming to optimize the use of complementary tests. Many diagnoses are attained only through genetic tests, which are not always available. However, the absence of a diagnosis of certainty should never delay the implementation of therapeutic measures that preserve patient life and health.

Immunodeficiencies: non-infectious manifestations.

OBJECTIVES: Classical immunodeficiencies are mainly characterized by infectious conditions. In recent years, manifestations related to allergy, inflammation, autoimmunity, lymphoproliferation, and malignancies related to this group of diseases have been described. The text intends to make an update on the non-infectious manifestations of the primary defects of the immune system. SOURCE OF DATA: Searches were carried out in the PubMed database for review articles published in the last five years, in English, French, or Spanish, using the terms "allergy," "inflammation," "autoimmunity," "lymphoproliferation," "cancer," AND "immunodeficiency" or "primary immunodeficiency" or "inborn errors of immunity" NOT "HIV". SYNTHESIS OF DATA: Non-infectious manifestations characterize the primary defects in which there is dysregulation of the immune system. The most common manifestations of autoimmunity in this group of diseases are autoimmune cytopenias. Exacerbated inflammatory processes, benign lymphoproliferation, and propensity to malignancy of the lymphoreticular system are related to several diseases in this group. Severe manifestations of atopy or food allergy characterize some immunodeficiencies. Disorders of inborn immunity of the autoinflammatory type are characterized by an aseptic inflammatory process in the absence of autoimmunity, with fever and recurrent manifestations in different organs. CONCLUSIONS: Not only infectious conditions should raise the suspicion of immunodeficiencies, but also manifestations of allergy, inflammation, autoimmunity, lymphoproliferation, or cancer, especially if they are recurrent, associated to each other, affecting young patients, or in severe and/or difficult to treat conditions.

Vacinas COVID-19 e reações imunoalérgicas / COVID-19 vaccines and immunoallergic reactions

A avaliação dos riscos e benefícios deve ser realizada para qualquer intervenção preventiva, diagnóstica ou terapêutica em Medicina. As vacinas, assim como qualquer imunobiológico, são consagradas pelas inúmeras vantagens inerentes à proteção da saúde, apesar dos potenciais riscos de eventos adversos que, na imensa maioria das vezes, são raros, leves e controláveis. O desenvolvimento de vacinas contra o novo SARS-CoV-2 representa um dos principais anseios da população mundial e representa extraordinário avanço da Ciência. Pacientes com histórico de alergias graves a algum componente das vacinas ou a uma dose prévia de alguma delas, devem ser avaliados com cautela pelo especialista para decidir se esta deverá ser contraindicada, aplicada com supervisão médica, ou se estará indicado protocolo de dessensibilização.

The assessment of risks and benefits must be carried out for any preventive, diagnostic, or therapeutic intervention in medicine. Vaccines, like any biologic, are recognized for the innumerable advantages in public health, despite the potential risks of adverse events that, in the vast majority of cases, are rare, mild, and controllable. The development of vaccines against the new SARSCoV- 2 represents one of the main wishes of the world population as well as an extraordinary advance in science. Patients with a history of severe allergies to any component of the vaccines or reaction to a previous dose of any of them should be carefully evaluated by the specialist to decide whether vaccination should be contraindicated or administered with medical supervision, or if a desensitization protocol will be indicated.