Preclinical Evaluation of the FGFR-Family Inhibitor Futibatinib for Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common pediatric soft tissue sarcoma. Despite decades of clinical trials, the overall survival rate for patients with relapsed and metastatic disease remains below 30%, underscoring the need for novel treatments. FGFR4, a receptor tyrosine kinase that is overexpressed in RMS and mutationally activated in 10% of cases, is a promising target for treatment. Here, we show that futibatinib, an irreversible pan-FGFR inhibitor, inhibits the growth of RMS cell lines in vitro by inhibiting phosphorylation of FGFR4 and its downstream targets. Moreover, we provide evidence that the combination of futibatinib with currently used chemotherapies such as irinotecan and vincristine has a synergistic effect against RMS in vitro. However, in RMS xenograft models, futibatinib monotherapy and combination treatment have limited efficacy in delaying tumor growth and prolonging survival. Moreover, limited efficacy is only observed in a PAX3-FOXO1 fusion-negative (FN) RMS cell line with mutationally activated FGFR4, whereas little or no efficacy is observed in PAX3-FOXO1 fusion-positive (FP) RMS cell lines with FGFR4 overexpression. Alternative treatment modalities such as combining futibatinib with other kinase inhibitors or targeting FGFR4 with CAR T cells or antibody-drug conjugate may be more effective than the approaches tested in this study.

TNIK Is a Therapeutic Target in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Regulates FAK Activation through Merlin.

Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) is the second most prevalent type of lung cancer. Despite extensive genomic characterization, no targeted therapies are approved for the treatment of LSCC. Distal amplification of the 3q chromosome is the most frequent genomic alteration in LSCC, and there is an urgent need to identify efficacious druggable targets within this amplicon. We identify the protein kinase TNIK as a therapeutic target in LSCC. TNIK is amplified in approximately 50% of LSCC cases. TNIK genetic depletion or pharmacologic inhibition reduces the growth of LSCC cells in vitro and in vivo. In addition, TNIK inhibition showed antitumor activity and increased apoptosis in established LSCC patient-derived xenografts. Mechanistically, we identified the tumor suppressor Merlin/NF2 as a novel TNIK substrate and showed that TNIK and Merlin are required for the activation of focal adhesion kinase. In conclusion, our data identify targeting TNIK as a potential therapeutic strategy in LSCC. SIGNIFICANCE: Targeted therapies have not yet been approved for the treatment of LSCC, due to lack of identification of actionable cancer drivers. We define TNIK catalytic activity as essential for maintaining LSCC viability and validate the antitumor efficacy of TNIK inhibition in preclinical models of LSCC.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1307.

The root causes of pharmacodynamic assay failure.

Robust pharmacodynamic assay results are valuable for informing go/no-go decisions about continued development of new anti-cancer agents and for identifying combinations of targeted agents, but often pharmacodynamic results are too incomplete or variable to fulfill this role. Our experience suggests that variable reagent and specimen quality are two major contributors to this problem. Minimizing all potential sources of variability in procedures for specimen collection, processing, and assay measurements is essential for meaningful comparison of pharmacodynamic biomarkers across sample time points. This is especially true in the evaluation of pre- and post-dose tumor biopsies, which suffer from high levels of tumor insufficiency due to variations in biopsy collection techniques and significant specimen heterogeneity within and across patients. Developing methods to assess heterogeneous biopsies is necessary in order to evaluate a majority of tumor biopsies collected for pharmacodynamic biomarker studies. Improved collection devices and standardization of methods are being sought in order to improve the tumor content and quality of tumor biopsies. In terms of reagent variability, we have found that stringent initial reagent qualification and quality control of R&D-grade reagents is critical to minimize lot-to-lot variability and prevent assay failures, especially for clinical pharmacodynamic questions, which often demand assay performance that meets or exceeds clinical diagnostic assay standards. Rigorous reagent specifications and use of appropriate assay quality control methodologies help to ensure consistency between assay runs, laboratories and trials to provide much needed pharmacodynamic insights into the activity of investigational agents.