A specific prebiotic oligosaccharide mixture stimulates delayed-type hypersensitivity in a murine influenza vaccination model.

Analogous to reported immunomodulatory effects of probiotics, this study was performed to analyse the immunomodulatory properties of prebiotic oligosaccharides that share chemical characteristics with human milk oligosaccharides. A mixture containing galacto- and fructo-oligosaccharides (GOS/FOS; ratio 9:1) was tested at dietary doses between 1% and 10% (w/w of total diet) in an influenza vaccination model, using 10 C56BL/6JolaHsd mice per group. The modulation of vaccine specific delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses was studied as a marker of T-helper 1 (Th1) immunity, as well as other immune parameters. GOS/FOS enhanced DTH responses dose-dependently (optimum at 5% w/w of total diet; 41.4+/-14.1% increased compared to controls, p<0.05). No significant changes were detected on splenocyte proliferation or vaccine-specific antibody concentrations. Simultaneously, GOS/FOS dose-dependently increased the proportion of faecal bifidobacteria and lactobacilli (maximal effect at 10% w/w of total diet; 16.8+/-2.4% and 5.8+/-1.3% increased compared to controls respectively, p<0.01 for both parameters). In a comparative experiment, GOS/FOS and FOS/inulin (both at 2% w/w of total diet) induced similar significant effects on the gut microbiota. In contrast to GOS/FOS, FOS/inulin did not enhance DTH responses, indicating that an increase in the proportions of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli is not sufficient for an immunomodulatory effect in this model. The use of GOS/FOS in dietary products might provide an opportunity to stimulate the adaptive immune response in a Th1-direction and subsequently inhibit infections and Th2-related immune disorders in humans, for instance allergies. Clinical studies are being performed to confirm this.

Dietary fructo-oligosaccharides in healthy adults do not negatively affect faecal cytotoxicity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial.

Fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) are widely used in commercial food products. Most studies on FOS concern the health benefits, but some negative effects were recently reported concerning the faecal cytotoxicity and excretion of mucin-type oligosaccharides in combination with a Ca-restricted diet. The present study was performed to investigate whether these effects of FOS are observed in adults consuming a regular diet unrestricted in Ca. The study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, involving eleven healthy adults, who consumed 25-30 g FOS or maltodextrin (control) in a random order for 2 weeks in addition to their regular diet. Stools were collected for analysis of pH and SCFA (as markers of fermentation), for the assessment of faecal water cytotoxicity, and for the analysis of alkaline phosphatase activity (as a marker of epithelial cell turnover) and O-linked oligosaccharides (to estimate the excretion of mucin-type oligosaccharides). FOS consumption significantly altered bacterial fermentation (increased percentage of acetate, decreased percentage of butyrate) and tended to decrease stool pH. Furthermore, FOS consumption resulted in a significantly higher stool frequency and in significantly more complaints of flatulence. No significant differences between the control and FOS period were observed in the mean cytotoxicity of faecal water (37.5 (SEM 6.9)% v. 18.5 (SEM 6.9)%; P=0.084), in mean alkaline phosphatase activity (27.7 (SEM 2.9) v. 24.6 (SEM 3.2) U/g dry faeces; P=0.496) or in the mean excretion of mucin-type oligosaccharides (49.9 (sem 4.0) v. 53.5 (SEM 4.3) mg/g dry faeces; P=0.553). We conclude that dietary FOS in a dose up to 25-30 g/d altered the bacterial fermentation pattern but did not affect faecal cytotoxicity or the faecal concentration of mucin-type oligosaccharides in human adults consuming a regular diet.

PASSCLAIM--diet-related cancer.

BACKGROUND: The role of dietary factors in the aetiology of human cancer is an area, which has attracted intense interest in recent years. The suggestion that approximately one third of all cancers may be caused by an 'inappropriate' balance of food components has led to the attractive contention that we can significantly decrease cancer incidence through dietary recommendations and a change in dietary habits in populations. Thus, a key issue must be to establish clear criteria, which must be met in order to be able to make 'cancer risk reduction' claims for food components. In this area, the one true marker is the malignant human tumour, which for practical reasons is usually not accessible to claims. In its absence, we must rely on alternative markers--biomarkers/surrogate endpoints. This paper mainly deals with the link of these biomarkers to the endpoint tumour and their usefulness for making claims. Some claims have been made based on epidemiological studies. AIM: Can we identify targets/ biomarkers in the chain of events from initial 'exposure' to overt malignant tumour, whose modification can be used to make 'anticancer' claims for food components? RESULTS: We identified 18 targets/markers in the above chain of events whose modification 'have the potential' to be used for 'reduction of cancer risk' claims for food components. These targets/markers fall under 5 broad headings: tumours and preneoplastic changes; cellular targets/markers; gut luminal markers; angiogenesis and metastasis; carcinogen metabolising enzymes; genetic events. CONCLUSIONS: The strongest markers presently available are precancerous lesions (e. g. polyps or aberrant crypt foci) in humans and precancerous lesions and tumours in animal models. The only marker that presently can be used for a 'reduction of disease risk' claim (type B) for food components is 'polyp recurrence'. Type B claims cannot be made on the basis of results in animal models. All of the other biomarkers examined presently lack validation against the 'true endpoint', the tumour, and thus cannot be used for type B claims. 'Reduction of disease risk' claims in the area of 'diet-related cancer' should be based primarily on human intervention studies using relevant/acceptable endpoints. An important area for future research will be the validation of these surrogate endpoints.