Increased Intraocular Pressure During Hemodialysis: Ocular Dialysis Disequilibrium.

A man in his early 70s presented with a 1-month history of headache, left-sided photophobia, periorbital pain, and redness occurring during hemodialysis. He had a history of ESKD secondary to diabetic nephropathy and of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. We observed elevated intraocular pressure during dialysis. A diagnosis of neovascular glaucoma with a compromised iridocorneal angle was made. Medical management of glaucoma and modifications to the hemodialysis regimen were initiated but were insufficient. The resolution of symptoms required surgical management, including cataract extraction with intraocular lens placement, pars plana vitrectomy, and peripheral retina endolaser, and placement of an Ahmed glaucoma drainage valve. This case illustrates the importance of attention to intraocular pressure and risk factors for glaucoma in patients treated with hemodialysis. Clinicians caring for patients treated by hemodialysis should consider hemodialysis-related elevation in intraocular pressure as a possible etiology for headache, visual changes, or ocular symptoms during dialysis and should pursue ophthalmic evaluation.

Genetic evidence for an alternative citrate-dependent biofilm formation pathway in Staphylococcus aureus that is dependent on fibronectin binding proteins and the GraRS two-component regulatory system.

We reported previously that low concentrations of sodium citrate strongly promote biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus laboratory strains and clinical isolates. Here, we show that citrate promotes biofilm formation via stimulating both cell-to-surface and cell-to-cell interactions. Citrate-stimulated biofilm formation is independent of the ica locus, and in fact, citrate represses polysaccharide adhesin production. We show that fibronectin binding proteins FnbA and FnbB and the global regulator SarA, which positively regulates fnbA and fnbB gene expression, are required for citrate's positive effects on biofilm formation, and citrate also stimulates fnbA and fnbB gene expression. Biofilm formation is also stimulated by several other tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates in an FnbA-dependent fashion. While aconitase contributes to biofilm formation in the absence of TCA cycle intermediates, it is not required for biofilm stimulation by these compounds. Furthermore, the GraRS two-component regulator and the GraRS-regulated efflux pump VraFG, identified for their roles in intermediate vancomycin resistance, are required for citrate-stimulated cell-to-cell interactions, but the GraRS regulatory system does not impact the expression of the fnbA and fnbB genes. Our data suggest that distinct genetic factors are required for the early steps in citrate-stimulated biofilm formation. Given the role of FnbA/FnbB and SarA in virulence in vivo and the lack of a role for ica-mediated biofilm formation in S. aureus catheter models of infection, we propose that the citrate-stimulated biofilm formation pathway may represent a clinically relevant pathway for the formation of these bacterial communities on medical implants.

Catheter lock solutions influence staphylococcal biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces.

BACKGROUND: Microbial biofilms form on central venous catheters and may be associated with systemic infections as well as decreased dialysis efficiency due to catheter thrombosis. The most widely used anticoagulant catheter lock solution in the US is sodium heparin. We have previously shown that sodium heparin in clinically relevant concentrations enhances Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. In the present study, we examine the effect of several alternative catheter lock solutions on in vitro biofilm formation by laboratory and clinical isolates of S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). METHODS: Lepirudin, low molecular weight heparin, tissue plasminogen activator, sodium citrate, sodium citrate with gentamicin and sodium ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) were assessed for their effect on biofilm formation on polystyrene, polyurethane and silicon elastomer. RESULTS: Sodium citrate at concentrations above 0.5% efficiently inhibits biofilm formation and cell growth of S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Subinhibitory concentrations of sodium citrate significantly stimulate biofilm formation in most tested S. aureus strains, but not in CNS strains. Sodium EDTA was effective in prevention of biofilm formation as was a combination of sodium citrate and gentamicin. Low molecular weight heparin stimulated biofilm formation of S. aureus, while lepirudin and tissue plasminogen activator had little effect on S. aureus biofilm formation. CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro study demonstrates that heparin alternatives, sodium citrate and sodium EDTA, can prevent the formation of S. aureus biofilms, suggesting that they may reduce the risk of biofilm-associated complications in indwelling catheters. This finding suggests a biological mechanism for the observed improvement in catheter-related outcomes in recent clinical comparisons of heparin and trisodium citrate as catheter locking solutions. A novel and potential clinically relevant finding of the present study is the observation that citrate at low levels strongly stimulates biofilm formation by S. aureus.

Heparin stimulates Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation.

Heparin, known for its anticoagulant activity, is commonly used in catheter locks. Staphylococcus aureus, a versatile human and animal pathogen, is commonly associated with catheter-related bloodstream infections and has evolved a number of mechanisms through which it adheres to biotic and abiotic surfaces. We demonstrate that heparin increased biofilm formation by several S. aureus strains. Surface coverage and the kinetics of biofilm formation were stimulated, but primary attachment to the surface was not affected. Heparin increased S. aureus cell-cell interactions in a protein synthesis-dependent manner. The addition of heparin rescued biofilm formation of hla, ica, and sarA mutants. Our data further suggest that heparin stimulation of biofilm formation occurs neither through an increase in sigB activity nor through an increase in polysaccharide intracellular adhesin levels. These finding suggests that heparin stimulates S. aureus biofilm formation via a novel pathway.