Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 63
Filter
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38486114

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) is the only rapidly available curative treatment modality in patients with severe sickle cell disease (SCD). The development of reduced-toxicity myeloablative conditioning (RT-MAC) regimen and the use of partially matched family donors with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) have widened the access to Allo-SCT. Antibodies against donor-specific HLA (DSA) increase the risk of engraftment failure in HLA mismatched Allo-SCT. We report the results of five patients with SCD, whereas three with DSA, who underwent an unmanipulated haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) after a busulfan-based RT-MAC regimen with PT-Cy. To reduce the risk of engraftment failure, a sequential two courses pharmacological pre-transplant immune suppression (PTIS) phase was added prior to the conditioning regimen. All patients engrafted successfully. The procedure was well tolerated. None of the patients developed acute GVHD, whereas one developed moderate chronic GVHD. After a median follow-up of 5 years (range, 2.2-9), all patients are free of pain with excellent quality of life. Our report shows that Haplo-SCT after a RT-MAC regimen is feasible and safe with stable long-term engraftment and excellent disease control. The risk of graft failure can be abrogated by adding a PTIS phase prior to initiating the conditioning regimen.

4.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 58(4): 386-392, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36585459

ABSTRACT

Although post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is effective for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, it is associated with toxicities, which might be dose-dependent. We compared the outcomes with PT-Cy at 80 mg/kg to those with PT-Cy at 100 mg/kg in elderly patients undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Inclusion criteria included peripheral blood stem cells, hematological malignancy, and age>65 years (or age>60 years if cardiac event history). Thirty-eight patients received PT-Cy at 80 mg/kg and 55 100 mg/kg, divided in two doses. The cumulative incidences (CI) of acute grade II-IV, acute grade III-IV, and moderate/severe chronic GVHD were 32%, 16%, and 13% with PT-Cy at 80 mg/kg compared to 33%, 13%, and 16% with 100 mg/kg, respectively. In multivariable analysis, reducing PT-Cy dose had no significant impact on GVHD. Neutrophil and platelet engraftments were significantly improved, and CI of BK virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis was reduced with 80 mg/kg of PT-Cy compared to 100 mg/kg. At 2 years, non-relapse mortality was 16% and 31%, progression-free survival 65% and 49%, overall survival 70% and 56%, and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival 52% and 36% with 80 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg, respectively. Reducing PT-Cy dose to 80 mg/kg is safe and associated with improved hematological recovery and lower CI of hemorrhagic cystitis in elderly patients undergoing haploidentical HCT.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematologic Neoplasms , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Aged , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Transplantation Conditioning
5.
J Transl Med ; 20(1): 503, 2022 11 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36329460

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation is currently the standard of care for a fraction of patients with newly diagnosed myelomas and relapsed or refractory lymphomas. After high-dose chemotherapy, cryopreserved HPC are either infused directly after bedside thawing or washed and concentrated before infusion. We previously reported on the comparability of washing/concentrating HPC post-thaw vs. infusion without manipulation in terms of hematopoietic engraftment, yet settled for the prior favoring cell debris and DMSO removal. For almost two decades, automation of this critical step of washing/concentrating cells has been feasible. As part of continuous process verification, we aim to evaluate reproducibility of this procedure by assessing intra-batch and inter-batch variability upon concentration of thawed HPC products using the Sepax 2 S-100 cell separation system. METHODS: Autologous HPC collected from the same patient were thawed and washed either in two batches processed within a 3-4 h interval and immediately infused on the same day (intra-batch, n = 45), or in two batches on different days (inter-batch, n = 49) for those patients requiring 2 or more high-dose chemotherapy cycles. Quality attributes assessed were CD34+ cell recovery, viability and CD45+ viability; CFU assay was only performed for allogeneic grafts. RESULTS: Intra-batch and inter-batch median CD34+ cell recovery was comparable (75% vs. 73% and 77% vs. 77%, respectively). Similarly, intra-batch and inter-batch median CD45+ cell viability was comparable (79% vs. 80% and 79% vs. 78%, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis describing agreement between batches per patient revealed a bias close to 0%. Additionally, lower HPC recoveries noted in batch 1 were noted as well in batch 2, regardless of the CD34+ cell dose before cryopreservation, both intra- and inter-batch, suggesting that the quality of the collected product plays an important role in downstream recovery. Intrinsic (high mature and immature granulocyte content) and extrinsic (delay between apheresis and cryopreservation) variables of the collected product resulted in a significantly lower CD45+ viability and CD34+ cell recovery upon thawing/washing. CONCLUSIONS: Automated post-thaw HPC concentration provides reproducible cell recoveries and viabilities between different batches. Implications of this work go beyond HPC to concentrate cell suspension/products during manufacturing of cell and gene therapy products.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hematopoietic Stem Cells , Humans , Antigens, CD34 , Reproducibility of Results , Cryopreservation/methods , Transplantation, Autologous , Cell Survival
6.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 28(3): 169.e1-169.e9, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34954296

ABSTRACT

Risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation and the impact of CMV reactivation on patient outcomes have been extensively investigated after matched related or unrelated donor transplantation, but little is known in the setting of haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy), in which recipients are considered more severely immunocompromised. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 554 consecutive patients undergoing Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy at 3 different centers. Early CMV reactivation (occurring within the first 120 days post-transplantation) occurred in 242 patients, for an estimated cumulative incidence of 44%. Among those patients, 74 (30%) had recurrent CMV and 20 (8%) had CMV disease. On multivariable analysis, positive recipient CMV serostatus (hazard ratio [HR] >2.5; P < .001), disease histology (lymphoid versus myeloid: HR, 0.66; P = .003) and increasing recipient age (HR, 1.01; P = .015) were independent predictors of CMV reactivation. At a 4-month landmark analysis, CMV reactivation was associated with higher 1-year and 5-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) relative to patients without reactivation: 13% versus 5% and 22% versus 9%, respectively (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, CMV reactivation was an independent negative predictor of NRM (HR, 2.69; P < .001) and was close to statistically significant for overall survival (HR, 1.38; P = .062). Our results suggest that CMV reactivation plays an important role at determining NRM. Because patient CMV serostatus is the main predictor of CMV reactivation, it should be considered when evaluating strategies for preventing CMV reactivation. 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus Infections , Cytomegalovirus , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , T-Lymphocytes , Transplantation, Haploidentical/adverse effects , United States
7.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 56(11): 2755-2762, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34262141

ABSTRACT

A need for social support is often expressed after hospitalization post HSCT. Emotional support and positive psychological constructs play an important role in post-HSCT recovery. Interventions generating positive affect can influence the health and well-being of transplant patients. It has been established that coaching in elite sport area leads to performance by playing a decisive role in maintaining the athlete's feelings of hope and autonomy in order to enable him or her to achieve their goals. In this single-center, prospective, one-arm study, we evaluated, in 32 post-HSCT patients, the acceptability of a coaching program inspired by elite sport coaching. Benefits were evaluated by questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The coaching program was accepted by 97% of the patients. Analysis of the scores on the "Means" sub-dimension of Hope showed a significant increase over time (p = 0.0249 < 0.05) for every patient. Qualitative analysis of patient's satisfaction pointed out that this support facilitated the transition to a life without illness in particular in the non-hospital context of coaching sessions. Our results show that a "sport-inspired coaching" may offer an innovative approach supporting psychological and social recovery after HSCT and helping to start and/or maintain the processes leading to psychological well-being.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Mentoring , Emotions , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/psychology , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Social Support
8.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 56(4): 883-889, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33191403

ABSTRACT

We report the outcome of 68 patients with advanced peripheral T-cell lymphoma receiving transplantation from haploidentical or from conventional donors. The 4-year OS, PFS, 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse and 2-year GRFS was 75%, 70%, 21%, and 51%, respectively. Survival was not affected by donor type. The 2-year NRM was 9%, lower after related or haploidentical donor (21% vs 0% vs 7%; p = 0.06). Grade 2-4 aGVHD cumulative incidence was significantly different after transplantation from haploidentical vs matched sibling vs unrelated donor, and (24% vs 35% vs 58%, p = 0.024). The familial donor cohort was compared to the unrelated cohort. Familial donor induced less grade 2-4 aGVHD, with a trend to less grade 3-4 aGVHD or moderate-severe cGVHD. The OS and PFS were not different, while the relapse risk and NRM were reduced. Allo-SCT is highly effective in T-cell lymphoma, with low NRM and low relapse rate. The incidence of aGVHD was lower after haploidentical transplantation. Related donor may challenge unrelated transplant reducing the risk of relapse and NRM.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral , Humans , Lymphoma, T-Cell, Peripheral/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning , Unrelated Donors
9.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 26(12): 2299-2305, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32822845

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is a valid option in patients with refractory lymphomas. HLA haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) expanded the accessibility to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. The aims of study were to retrospectively assess the toxicity and efficacy of haplo-SCT using nonmyeloablative conditioning in patients with advanced lymphoma. In total, 147 patients with advanced lymphoma at 2 partner institutions were included. Patients received a uniform nonmyeloablative conditioning regimen and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), GVHD, nonrelapse mortality, and GVHD, relapse-free survival (GRFS). Median follow-up was 39 months (range, 6 to 114 months). The median age was 46 years (range, 19 to 71 years). Sixty-five percent of patients were in complete remission (CR) at transplantation. Cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD was 30% (95% confidence interval [Cl], 23% to 38%). Two-year cumulative incidence of all grades of chronic GVHD was 13% (95% CI, 8% to 20%). Two-year cumulative incidence of disease relapse was 19% (95% CI, 14% to 27%), with a higher incidence in patients not being in CR at allo-HCT (CR versus not CR: 12% versus 33%, P = .006). Two-year PFS, OS, and GRFS were 66% (95% CI, 59-75), 73% (95% CI, 66-81), and 56% (95% CI, 48-65), respectively. Haplo-SCT with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide may be considered a valid option for patients with aggressive lymphoma and deserves further evaluation.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Disease-Free Survival , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective Studies , T-Lymphocytes , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, Haploidentical
10.
Blood Adv ; 4(7): 1242-1249, 2020 04 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32227210

ABSTRACT

We report on 59 Hodgkin lymphoma patients undergoing haploidentical stem cell transplantation (SCT; haplo-SCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, comparing outcomes based on pretransplant exposure to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Considering pretransplant characteristics, the 2 cohorts (CPI = 29 patients vs no-CPI = 30 patients) were similar, except for the number of prior lines of therapy (6 vs 4; P < .001). With a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 7.5-55 months), by univariate analysis, the 100-day cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GVHD was 41% in the CPI group vs 33% in the no-CPI group (P = .456), whereas the 1-year cumulative incidence of moderate to severe chronic GVHD was 7% vs 8%, respectively (P = .673). In the CPI cohort, the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse appeared lower compared with the no-CPI cohort (0 vs 20%; P = .054). No differences were observed in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (at 2 years, 77% vs 71% [P = .599], 78% vs 53% [P = .066], and 15% vs 21% [P = .578], respectively). By multivariable analysis, CPI before SCT was an independent protective factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; P = .037). Stable disease (SD)/progressive disease (PD) was an independent negative prognostic factor for both OS and PFS (HR, 14.3; P < .001 and HR, 14.1; P < .001, respectively) . In conclusion, CPI as a bridge to haplo-SCT seems to improve PFS, with no impact on toxicity profile.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hodgkin Disease , Cyclophosphamide , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Transplantation, Haploidentical
11.
PLoS One ; 15(3): e0228878, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32134938

ABSTRACT

We studied a cohort of 367 healthy related donors who volunteered to donate their hematopoietic stem cells for allogeneic transplantation. All donors were homogeneously cared for at a single institution, and received rhG-CSF as a mobilization treatment prior to undergoing apheresis. Peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts were used as the main surrogate marker for rhG-CSF induced mobilization. We searched whether inter-individual variations in known genetic polymorphisms located in genes whose products are functionally important for mobilization, could affect the extent of CD34+ mobilization, either individually or in combination. We found little or no influence of individual SNPs or haplotypes for the SDF1, CXCR4, VCAM and VLA4 genes, whether using CD34+ cell counts as a continuous or a categorical variable. Simple clinical characteristics describing donors such as body mass index, age and possibly sex are more potent predictors of stem cell mobilization. The size of our cohort remains relatively small for genetic analyses, however compares favorably with cohorts analyzed in previously published reports suggesting associations of genetic traits to response to rhG-CSF; notwithstanding this limitation, our data do not support the use of genetic analyses when the choice exists of several potential donors for a given patient.


Subject(s)
Chemokine CXCL12/genetics , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Integrin alpha4beta1/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Receptors, CXCR4/genetics , Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1/genetics , Adult , Aged , Female , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/pharmacology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/drug effects , Humans , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Transplantation, Homologous , Young Adult
12.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 55(2): 349-355, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31534196

ABSTRACT

Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is an efficient GVHD prophylaxis but has not been extensively evaluated in mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) allo-HSCT, for which antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is still considered as a standard. Thus, we evaluated the outcome of MMUD allo-HSCT with PT-Cy (n = 22) and performed a historical comparison with a control group receiving ATG (n = 40) in a single center experience. Compared with the ATG group, the risk of grade 2-4 acute GVHD was significantly lower in the PT-Cy group (HR = 0.12, 95% CI = [0.03-0.48], p = 0.002). No difference was observed in the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD. The risk of both NRM and relapse was significantly lower in the PT-Cy group (NRM: HR = 0.05, 95% CI = [0.00-0.63], p = 0.021; relapse: HR = 0.31; 95% CI = [0.09-1.10], p = 0.07). Thus, we observed significantly better PFS (HR = 0.22, 95% CI = (0.07-0.65); p = 0.006), OS (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = (0.07-0.84); p = 0.026), and GRFS (HR = 0.37, 95% CI = (0.17-0.80); p = 0.011) in the PT-Cy group. We conclude that PT-Cy is an effective GVHD prophylaxis in the setting of MMUD allo-HSCT, resulting in a better outcome compared with standard prophylaxis using ATG. This suggests that as it was shown in the setting of haploidentical allo-HSCT, the use of PT-Cy can overcome the impact of HLA disparity, leading to promising survivals that approach those observed after HLA matched allo-HSCT.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Unrelated Donors
13.
Transfusion ; 59(11): 3442-3447, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31625183

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In a small proportion of cases, hematopoietic function is insufficient after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, as a result of poor graft function or graft failure. These complications are common indications of re-mobilization of the initial donor, either for a second allograft or for an infusion of CD34+ Selected stem Cell Boost (SCB). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of two cycles of CD34+ cell mobilization and collection. CD34+ cells mobilized and collected at each cycle were compared. When CD34+ cell selection from the collected allogeneic mononuclear cells was indicated, it was performed with the Clinimacs Plus® medical device, and results from in-process and final quality checks were analyzed. To assess the efficacy of CD34+ SCB, transfusion needs before and after the infusion of selected CD34+ cells were calculated. RESULTS: The median peripheral blood concentration of CD34+ cells/µL was marginally reduced during the second cycle (35.6 vs 33.8, p < 0.05); results revealed a strong correlation between paired values (r = 0.85). The cumulative number of collected CD34+ cells were similar for both cycles; the total processed blood volume was higher during the second cycle (p = 0.023). For CD34+ immune-selection procedures, CD34+ cell recovery and purity were respectively 57% and 95%, with a median T-cell depletion of 6.7 log. Recipients' needs for platelet and red blood cell transfusions were significantly reduced after CD34+ SCB. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the feasibility of a second cycle of mobilization in healthy related donors and the benefits of CD34+ SCB on hematopoietic reconstitution.


Subject(s)
Antigens, CD34/analysis , Cell Separation , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods , Peripheral Blood Stem Cells/cytology , Tissue Donors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Blood Transfusion , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Immunomagnetic Separation , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
14.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 25(9): 1803-1809, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31128325

ABSTRACT

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is an alternative treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who lack HLA-matched donors. Relapse after haplo-SCT remains a major concern, especially after nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens. Promising results were reported for TBF-based conditioning regimens (thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine) in patients transplanted from different categories of donors and for various disease types but not specifically in PT-Cy haplo-SCT for AML. Here we evaluate the outcome of 100 AML patients who received haplo-SCT with PT-Cy after TBF conditioning regimens (reduced-intensity conditioning, n = 77; myeloablative conditioning, n = 23) in 2 transplant programs. Cumulative incidences of grades III to IV acute and moderate or severe chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 7% and 14%, respectively. NRM at 2 years was 28%, significantly influenced by disease status at haplo-SCT (first complete response [CR1] versus advanced AML: 16% versus 38%, P = .016) but not by conditioning intensity or age. The cumulative incidences of relapse at 2 years were 17% and 24% in CR1 and advanced AML, respectively (not significant). Progression-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD and relapse-free survival at 2 years were 67%, 71%, and 49% in CR1 patients, respectively, whereas comparative values in patients with advanced disease were 37%, 41%, and 32%. Our study suggests that TBF conditioning for PT-Cy haplo-SCT is safe and effective for AML patients in CR1. In patients with more advanced disease, the relatively low incidence of relapse seems counterbalanced by a high nonrelapse mortality, underlining the need for alternative strategies to decrease relapse risk, without increasing the intensity of conditioning regimen.


Subject(s)
Busulfan/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Graft vs Host Disease , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Stem Cell Transplantation , T-Lymphocytes , Thiotepa/administration & dosage , Transplantation Conditioning , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Allografts , Chronic Disease , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Rate , Vidarabine/administration & dosage
15.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 25(9): 1810-1817, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31128326

ABSTRACT

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) represents a potential curative strategy for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) when a matched related or unrelated donor is not available. The role of graft source, either bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs), in this setting has not been fully elucidated. We performed a retrospective study on 91 patients with HL to compare the outcome after BM (n = 53) or PBSC (n = 38) transplant. Eighty-nine patients engrafted with no difference between BM and PBSCs in terms of median time for neutrophil (20 versus 20 days, P = .405) and platelet (26 versus 26.5 days, P = .994) engraftment. With a median follow-up of 40.2 months, 100-day cumulative incidences of grades II to IV acute graft-versus host disease (GVHD) and grades II to IV acute GVHD were 24% and 4%, respectively. Graft source was not associated with a different risk of acute GVHD both by univariate and multivariate analyses. Consistently, 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 7% with no differences between the 2 graft types (P = .761). Two-year rates of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), nonrelapse mortality, and GVHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 67%, 58%, 20%, and 52%, respectively. By univariate analysis, pretransplant disease status was the main variable affecting all outcomes. By multivariate analysis, PBSCs resulted in a protective factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], .29; P = .006), PFS (HR, .38; P = .001), and GRFS (HR, .44; P = .020). The other independent variables affecting the final outcome were pretransplant disease status and hematopoietic cell transplant-specific comorbidity index. In conclusion, when planning a haplo-SCT with PT-Cy for patients with poor-risk HL, graft type is an important variable to take into account when selecting the best available donor.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Graft vs Host Disease , Hodgkin Disease , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Adolescent , Adult , Allografts , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hodgkin Disease/mortality , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
16.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 54(11): 1730-1737, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30890770

ABSTRACT

While bone marrow (BM) grafts were initially used for T-replete HLA-haploidentical related donors transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy), the use of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) remains debated. We thus conducted a detailed analysis evaluating the incidence, risk factors, and prevalence of GVHD after PBSC Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy. One hundred and eighty-one patients with hematological diseases were included. Median time for neutrophil and platelet recovery was 21 and 30 days, respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD and severe chronic GVHD were 8% and 4%, respectively, approaching what was observed after BM Haplo-SCT. NRM at 2 years was 21%, and 41% of the non-relapse deaths were caused by GVHD. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 17% in the whole cohort, and 13% among AML patients (n = 54), suggesting a high GVL effect. As surrogate markers for good quality of life, we observed a 2-year GVHD-relapse-free survival probability of 50% and found that 6% and 2% of disease-free patients at 2 years were still living with GVHD and immunosuppressive treatments, respectively. Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy using PBSC grafts results in low incidence GVHD and promising disease control, making PBSCs a valuable alternative to BM graft in this setting.


Subject(s)
Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Graft vs Host Disease , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Aged , Allografts , Blood Platelets/metabolism , Chronic Disease , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/blood , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Neutrophils/metabolism , Survival Rate
17.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 54(7): 1164-1167, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30679826

ABSTRACT

We propose to test whether the new refined Minnesota risk score, which represents a new tool for acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (aGVHD) grading, may be useful to predict the final outcome of patients with aGVHD after haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy). Hundred consecutive patients with grade 2-4 aGVHD were included. Twenty-two percent of the patients had high-risk (HR) aGVHD and had a lower chance to respond at day 28: 41% of non-responders (NR) were in the HR vs 13% in the standard-risk (SR) group (p = 0.003). By multivariate analysis, grade 3-4 aGVHD according to the traditional Keystone classification was the main independent predictor of non-response to front-line treatment at day 28, while HR aGVHD by the new refined Minnesota score remained the main independent variable associated with adverse NRM and OS. The new Minnesota refined risk score is a useful tool to predict the outcome of patients with aGVHD after Haplo-SCT with PT-Cy. Due to the few patients exchanging between categories in the two classifications, it is not possible to discriminate which system better predicts the outcome of patients with aGVHD in the setting of Haplo-SCT. Extending these preliminary observations to a larger cohort is warranted.


Subject(s)
Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Graft vs Host Disease , Severity of Illness Index , Stem Cell Transplantation , Acute Disease , Adult , Allografts , Disease-Free Survival , Female , France , Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Rate
19.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 54(7): 1067-1076, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30401970

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is limited by availability of HLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs). The alternative use of unrelated donors (UDs) is currently challenged by haploidentical-related donors (HRDs). We retrospectively analyzed 209 consecutive patients younger than 60 years undergoing allo-HSCT from UDs (n = 128) or HRDs (n = 81). Cumulative incidences of grade 3-4 acute (17 vs. 2%, p = 0.003) and 2-year moderate and severe chronic (20 vs. 2%, p < 0.001) GVHD were significantly higher with UD. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly better with HRD (51 vs. 69%, p = 0.019), without significant difference in the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), non-relapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analyses confirmed the lower risk of acute and chronic GVHD (grade 2-4, HR = 0.43, p = 0.005; grade 3-4, HR = 0.20, p = 0.017; all grades, HR = 0.43, p = 0.012; moderate or severe, HR = 0.12, p = 0.004), better PFS (HR = 0.61, p = 0.046), and GRFS (HR = 0.47, p = 0.001) with HRD. This was confirmed in match-paired analysis. In the absence of MSDs, HRD could be considered as a suitable alternative for patients younger than 60 years.


Subject(s)
Antilymphocyte Serum/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematologic Neoplasms , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Unrelated Donors , Acute Disease , Adult , Allografts , Chronic Disease , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Survival Rate
20.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 24(7): 1449-1454, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29448057

ABSTRACT

Haploidentical related donor (HRD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was developed as a valid option for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the absence of a matched donor. However, many investigators are reluctant to consider the use of this alternative in elderly patients, anticipating high morbidity. Here, we report a single-center comparison of HRD versus matched sibling donor (MSD) and unrelated donor (UD) allo-HSCT for patients with AML aged ≥60 years. Ninety-four patients (MSD: n = 31; UD: n = 30; HRD: n = 33) were analyzed. The median age was 65 (range, 60 to 73) years. We observed a higher cumulative incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after UD allo-HSCT (MSD versus UD versus HRD: 3% versus 33% versus 6%, respectively; P = .006). Two-year cumulative incidence of moderate or severe chronic GVHD was 17%, 27%, and 16% in the MSD, UD, and HRD groups, respectively (P = .487). No difference was observed in the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse or nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (relapse: MSD versus UD versus HRD: 32% versus 25% versus 25%, respectively; P = .411; NRM: MSD versus UD versus HRD: 19% versus 27% versus 24%, respectively; P = .709). At 2 years, progression-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD- and relapse-free survival were 48%, 50%, and 39%, respectively, in the MSD group; 48%, 51%, and 23%, respectively, in the UD group; and 50%, 52%, and 32%, respectively, in the HRD group, without statistically significant differences between the groups. We conclude that HRD allo-HSCT is highly feasible and no less efficient than MSD or UD allo-HSCT in patients with AML aged ≥60 years. Thus, the absence of a HLA-identical donor should not limit the consideration of allo-HSCT for the treatment of AML.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Transplantation, Homologous/methods , Aged , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Siblings , Tissue Donors , Unrelated Donors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...