Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 488
Filter
1.
Leukemia ; 31(11): 2398-2406, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28804124

ABSTRACT

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-study IV was designed to explore whether treatment with imatinib (IM) at 400 mg/day (n=400) could be optimized by doubling the dose (n=420), adding interferon (IFN) (n=430) or cytarabine (n=158) or using IM after IFN-failure (n=128). From July 2002 to March 2012, 1551 newly diagnosed patients in chronic phase were randomized into a 5-arm study. The study was powered to detect a survival difference of 5% at 5 years. After a median observation time of 9.5 years, 10-year overall survival was 82%, 10-year progression-free survival was 80% and 10-year relative survival was 92%. Survival between IM400 mg and any experimental arm was not different. In a multivariate analysis, risk group, major-route chromosomal aberrations, comorbidities, smoking and treatment center (academic vs other) influenced survival significantly, but not any form of treatment optimization. Patients reaching the molecular response milestones at 3, 6 and 12 months had a significant survival advantage. For responders, monotherapy with IM400 mg provides a close to normal life expectancy independent of the time to response. Survival is more determined by patients' and disease factors than by initial treatment selection. Although improvements are also needed for refractory disease, more life-time can currently be gained by carefully addressing non-CML determinants of survival.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Survival Analysis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
3.
Leukemia ; 31(8): 1752-1759, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28270691

ABSTRACT

Differences in major and minor histocompatibility antigens between donor and recipient trigger powerful graft-versus-host reactions after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The clinical effects of alloreactivity present a Janus-face: detrimental graft-versus-host disease increases non-relapse mortality, beneficial graft-versus-malignancy may cure the recipient. The ultimate consequences on long-term outcome remain a matter of debate. We hypothesized that increasing donor-recipient antigen matching would decrease the negative effects, while preserving antitumor alloreactivity. We analyzed retrospectively a predefined cohort of 32 838 such patients and compared it to 59 692 patients with autologous HSCT as reference group. We found a significant and systematic decrease in non-relapse mortality with decreasing phenotypic and genotypic antigen disparity, paralleled by a stepwise increase in overall and relapse-free survival (Spearman correlation coefficients of cumulative excess event rates at 5 years 0.964; P<0.00; respectively 0.976; P<0.00). We observed this systematic stepwise effect in all main disease and disease-stage categories. The results suggest that detrimental effects of alloreactivity are additive with each step of mismatching; the beneficial effects remain preserved. Hence, if there is a choice, the best match should be donor of choice. The data support an intensified search for predictive genomic and environmental factors of 'no-graft-versus-host disease'.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Graft vs Host Disease/immunology , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Homologous
4.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 52(5): 671-677, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28112744

ABSTRACT

Haematopoietic cell transplant activity in the 28 countries comprising Latin America is poorly defined. We conducted a voluntary survey of members of the Latin American Bone Marrow Transplantation Group regarding transplant activity 2009-2012. Collated responses were compared with data of transplant rates from the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation for other geographic regions. Several socio-economic variables were analysed to determine correlations with transplant rates. In total, 94 teams from 12 countries reported 11 519 transplants including 7033 autotransplants and 4486 allotransplants. Annual activity increased from 2517 transplants in 2009 to 3263 in 2012, a 30% increase. Median transplants rate (transplant per million inhabitants) in 2012 was 64 (autotransplants, median 40; allotransplants, median 24). This rate is substantially lower than that in North America and European regions (482 and 378) but higher than that in the Eastern Mediterranean and Asia Pacific regions (30 and 45). However, the Latin America transplant rate is 5-8-fold lower than that in America and Europe, suggesting a need to increase transplant availability. Transplant team density in Latin America (teams per million population; 1.8) is 3-4-fold lower than that in North America (6.2) or Europe (7.6). Within Latin America, there is substantial diversity in transplant rates by country partially explained by diverse socio-economic variables including per capita gross national income, health expenditure and physician density. These data should help inform future health-care policy in Latin America.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/trends , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care/trends , Forecasting , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Global Health/trends , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Latin America , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 52(3): 357-362, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27892949

ABSTRACT

In 2013, recommendations for a standardized practice in the prophylaxis and treatment of GvHD were adopted and published by the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the European LeukemiaNet. One year later, all 341 European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centres performing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation were contacted for a change-control analysis and asked to fill in a questionnaire; 111 centres (33%) responded. Of these, 83% had been aware of the recommendations. Paediatric centres (P=0.004), centres with shorter programme duration (P=0.049), not JACIE (the Joint Accreditation Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation)-accredited centres (P=0.010) and centres from middle-income countries (P=0.033) were more likely to be unaware of the recommendations. Thirty-eight per cent of the centres regarded the recommendations as relevant guidelines affecting their policies, 61% as interesting information. Thirty per cent had decided to make changes in their institutional protocols based on the recommendations. More than 80% were willing to use the recommendations for a control arm in randomized studies. This survey shows that the published recommendations had some, though insufficient, impact on the strategies and methods of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation applied by the centres. It also identified some of the weaknesses to be addressed when releasing recommendations in the future.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Guideline Adherence , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Adolescent , Adult , Allografts , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic
6.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 51(6): 778-85, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26901703

ABSTRACT

Data on 68 146 hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) (53% autologous and 47% allogeneic) gathered by 1566 teams from 77 countries and reported through their regional transplant organizations were analyzed by main indication, donor type and stem cell source for the year 2012. With transplant rates ranging from 0.1 to 1001 per 10 million inhabitants, more HSCTs were registered from unrelated 16 433 donors than related 15 493 donors. Grafts were collected from peripheral blood (66%), bone marrow (24%; mainly non-malignant disorders) and cord blood (10%). Compared with 2006, an increase of 46% total (57% allogeneic and 38% autologous) was observed. Growth was due to an increase in reporting teams (18%) and median transplant activity/team (from 38 to 48 HSCTs/team). An increase of 167% was noted in mismatched/haploidentical family HSCT. A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis revealed the global perspective of WBMT to be its major strength and identified potential to be the key professional body for patients and authorities. The limited data collection remains its major weakness and threat. In conclusion, global HSCT grows over the years without plateauing (allogeneic>autologous) and at different rates in the four World Health Organization regions. Major increases were observed in allogeneic, haploidentical HSCT and, to a lesser extent, in cord blood transplantation.


Subject(s)
Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Bone Marrow Transplantation , Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Transplantation, Haploidentical , Transplantation, Homologous
7.
Leukemia ; 30(3): 562-9, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26464170

ABSTRACT

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent today's treatment of choice in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is regarded as salvage therapy. This prospective randomized CML-study IIIA recruited 669 patients with newly diagnosed CML between July 1997 and January 2004 from 143 centers. Of these, 427 patients were considered eligible for HSCT and were randomized by availability of a matched family donor between primary HSCT (group A; N=166 patients) and best available drug treatment (group B; N=261). Primary end point was long-term survival. Survival probabilities were not different between groups A and B (10-year survival: 0.76 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.82) vs 0.69 (95% CI: 0.61-0.76)), but influenced by disease and transplant risk. Patients with a low transplant risk showed superior survival compared with patients with high- (P<0.001) and non-high-risk disease (P=0.047) in group B; after entering blast crisis, survival was not different with or without HSCT. Significantly more patients in group A were in molecular remission (56% vs 39%; P=0.005) and free of drug treatment (56% vs 6%; P<0.001). Differences in symptoms and Karnofsky score were not significant. In the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, HSCT remains a valid option when both disease and transplant risk are considered.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Family , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/mortality , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Remission Induction , Risk , Survival Analysis , Tissue Donors , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
8.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 50(12): 1542-50, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26367221

ABSTRACT

In patients treated with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for malignant disease who suffer from a relapse after the transplantation, the role of second allogeneic SCT is often uncertain. In a retrospective analysis, 2632 second allogeneic transplantations carried out for a relapse after the first transplantation were analyzed to define indications and identify predictive factors. Fifteen percent of the patients remained relapse-free until 5 years after the second SCT. Patients with CML had a better survival than patients with other diseases. In a multivariate analysis, factors associated with better survival were low disease burden, longer remission duration after the first transplantation, longer interval between the transplantations, younger age, absence of grade II-IV acute GvHD or chronic GvHD after the first transplantation, and later year of transplantation. The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation risk score predicted the outcome. Using the same donor as in the first transplantation vs another donor had no predictive value for survival. Sibling donor was a favorable predictive factor. In conclusion, second allogeneic SCT offers a reasonable option especially for young patients with a long remission after the first transplantation and a low disease burden. The present findings do not support the usefulness of changing the donor for the second transplantation.


Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Allografts , Chronic Disease , Disease-Free Survival , Follow-Up Studies , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Middle Aged , Survival Rate
9.
Leukemia ; 29(5): 1041-50, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25428261

ABSTRACT

The preferred type of post-remission therapy (PRT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1) is a subject of continued debate, especially in patients at higher risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM), including patients >40 years of age. We report results of a time-dependent multivariable analysis of allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) (n=337) versus chemotherapy (n=271) or autologous HSCT (autoHSCT) (n=152) in 760 patients aged 40-60 years with AML in CR1. Patients receiving alloHSCT showed improved overall survival (OS) as compared with chemotherapy (respectively, 57±3% vs 40±3% at 5 years, P<0.001). Comparable OS was observed following alloHSCT and autoHSCT in patients with intermediate-risk AML (60±4 vs 54±5%). However, alloHSCT was associated with less relapse (hazard ratio (HR) 0.51, P<0.001) and better relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR 0.74, P=0.029) as compared with autoHSCT in intermediate-risk AMLs. AlloHSCT was applied following myeloablative conditioning (n=157) or reduced intensity conditioning (n=180), resulting in less NRM, but comparable outcome with respect to OS, RFS and relapse. Collectively, these results show that alloHSCT is to be preferred over chemotherapy as PRT in patients with intermediate- and poor-risk AML aged 40-60 years, whereas autoHSCT remains a treatment option to be considered in patients with intermediate-risk AML.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Remission Induction , Risk , Time Factors , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
10.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 49(8): 1016-21, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24777183

ABSTRACT

Patient registries, frequently referred to as outcome registries, are 'organized systems' that use observational study methods to collect uniform data. Registries are used to evaluate specified outcomes for a population defined by a particular disease, condition or exposure that serves one or more predetermined scientific, clinical or policy purposes. Outcome registries were established very early in the development of hematopoietic SCT (HSCT). Currently, myriads of national and international HSCT registries collect information about HSCT activities and outcomes. These registries have contributed significantly to determining trends, patterns, treatment practices and outcomes. There are many different HSCT registries, each with different aims and goals; some are led by professional organizations, others by government authorities, health care providers or third parties. Some registries simply assess activity and others study outcomes. These registries are complementary and are gradually developing interoperability with each other to expand future collaborative research activities. A key development in the last few years was the incorporation of recommendations into the World Health Organization guiding principles on cell, tissue and organ transplantation. The data collection and analysis should be an integral part of therapy and an obligation rather than a choice for transplant programs. This article examines challenges in ensuring data quality and functions of outcome registries, using HSCT registries as an example. It applies to all HSCT-related data, but is predominantly focused on HSCT registries of professional organizations.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Registries , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic
11.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 49(2): 195-200, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24076552

ABSTRACT

Severe adverse events (SAE) and late hematological malignancies have been reported after PBSC donation. No prospective data on incidence and risk factors have been available for family donors so far. The Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (JSHCT) introduced therefore in 2000 a mandatory registration system. It defined standards for donor eligibility and asked harvest centers to report any SAE immediately. All donors were examined at day 30 and were to be contacted once each year for a period of 5 years. Acute SAEs within day 30 were reported from 47/3264 donations (1.44%) with 14 events considered as unexpected and severe (0.58%). No donor died within 30 days. Late SAEs were reported from 39/1708 donors (2.3%). The incidence of acute SAEs was significantly higher among donors not matching the JSHCT standards (P=0.0023). Late hematological malignancies in PBSC donors were not different compared with a retrospective cohort of BM donors (N:1/1708 vs N:2/5921; P=0.53). In conclusion, acute and late SAEs do occur in PBSC donors at relatively low frequency but risk factors can be defined.


Subject(s)
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Transplantation, Homologous/methods , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Tissue Donors , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects
12.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 49(1): 55-61, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24037023

ABSTRACT

Several T-cell depletion (TCD) techniques are used for haploidentical hematopoietic SCT (HSCT), but direct comparisons are rare. We therefore studied the effect of in vitro TCD with graft engineering (CD34 selection or CD3/CD19 depletion, 74%) or in vivo TCD using alemtuzumab (26%) on outcome, immune reconstitution and infections after haploidentical HSCT. We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis of 72 haploidentical HSCT in Switzerland. Sixty-seven patients (93%) had neutrophil engraftment. The 1-year OS, TRM and relapse incidence were 48 (36-60)%, 20 (11-33)% and 42 (31-57)%, respectively, without differences among the TCD groups. In vivo TCD caused more profound lymphocyte suppression early after HSCT, whereas immune recovery beyond the second month was comparable between the two groups. Despite anti-infective prophylaxis, most patients experienced post-transplant infectious complications (94%). Patients with in vivo TCD had a higher incidence of CMV reactivations (54% vs 28%, P=0.015), but this did not result in a higher TRM. In conclusion, TCD by graft engineering or alemtuzumab are equally effective for haploidentical HSCT.


Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Lymphocyte Depletion/methods , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Adolescent , Adsorption , Adult , Alemtuzumab , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antigens, CD19/metabolism , Antigens, CD34/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , CD3 Complex/metabolism , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Neutrophils/cytology , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Switzerland , Transplantation Conditioning , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
13.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 49(2): 168-73, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23892326

ABSTRACT

GVHD remains the major impediment to broader application of allogeneic haematopoietic SCT. It can be prevented completely, but at the expense of other complications, rejection, relapse or delayed immune reconstitution. No optimal prevention or treatment method has been defined. This is reflected by enormous heterogeneity in approaches in Europe. Retrospective comparisons between different policies, although warranted, do not give definite answers. In order to improve the present situation, an European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and the European LeukemiaNet working group has developed in a Delphi-like approach recommendations for prophylaxis and treatment of GVHD in the most common allogeneic transplant setting, transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor for standard risk malignant disease. The working group proposes these guidelines to be adopted as routine standard in transplantation centres and to be used as comparator in systematic studies evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of practices differing from these recommendations.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation, Autologous/adverse effects , Graft vs Host Disease/therapy , Humans
14.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 48(7): 988-93, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23292241

ABSTRACT

The objective of this prospective cross-sectional case-control study was to examine the prevalence of dryness symptoms and its impact on quality of life (QoL) among very long-term survivors after hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in comparison with their respective sibling donors. Forty-four allogeneic HSCT recipients with a long-term survival (median: 17.5; range: 11-26 years) were included. Their respective, HLA-identical sibling donors served as controls. Clinical examinations included saliva flow rates (SFR) and the Schirmer's test. The presence of sicca symptoms of mouth, eyes and skin were inquired. The social functioning (SF)-36 questionnaire was applied. Recipients had lower (P<0.01) unstimulated and stimulated mean SFR than donors. Schirmer's test results <5 mm was found in 45% of the recipients in comparison with 27% of the donors (P = 0.07). Xerostomia (34 vs 4 subjects), xerophtalmia (23 vs 3) and dry skin (32 vs 12) were reported more often by the recipients than donors (P<0.001). Sicca symptoms and their objective findings correlated with QoL. The mean SF-36 scores of the donors were significantly higher than those of the recipients for physical component summary. In conclusion, sicca symptoms are common amongst long-term survivors of HSCT and affect remarkably the QoL.


Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Sjogren's Syndrome/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sjogren's Syndrome/etiology , Survival Rate , Survivors , Time Factors , Xerophthalmia/etiology , Xerophthalmia/mortality
15.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 48(3): 433-8, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22941380

ABSTRACT

Adoptive immunotherapy with allogeneic purified natural killer (NK) cell products might exert graft-versus-tumor alloreactivity with little risk of GVHD. In a prospective phase II study in two centers, we administered purified NK cell products to high-risk patients treated with haploidentical T-cell-depleted SCT. Sixteen patients received a total of 29 NK cell infusions on days +3, +40 and +100 after transplantation. Median doses (and ranges) of infused NK- and T-cells per product were 1.21 (0.3-3.8) × 10(7)/kg and 0.03 (0.004-0.72) × 10(5)/kg, respectively. With a median follow-up of 5.8 years 4/16 patients are alive. Cause of death was relapse in five, GVHD in three, graft failure in three, and transplant related neurotoxicity in one patient. Four patients developed acute GVHDgrade II, all receiving a total of 0.5 × 10(5) T cells/kg. Compared with historical controls, NK cell infusions had no apparent effect on the rates of graft failure or relapse. Adoptive transfer of allogeneic NK cells is safe and feasible, but further studies are needed to determine the optimal dose and timing of NK cell therapy. Moreover, NK cell activation/expansion may be required to attain clinical benefit, while careful consideration must be given to the number of T cells infused.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Leukemia/therapy , Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Haploidy , Humans , Leukemia/immunology , Leukemia/surgery , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/surgery , Prospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning , Young Adult
16.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 48(2): 220-5, 2013 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22773129

ABSTRACT

The number of allogeneic hematopoietic SCTs performed globally each year continues to increase, paralleled by an increased demand for donors of therapeutic cells. Donor characteristics and collection procedures have undergone major changes during recent decades, and further changes are foreseen. Information on short- and long-term donor outcomes is of crucial importance to ensure maximal donor safety and availability. Current data, predominantly from unrelated donors, give reliable information on the frequent early events associated with donation-most of them of mild-to-moderate intensity. Information on the type and relative risk of serious adverse reactions is more limited. Moreover, only few data exist on long-term donor outcome. On the basis of this need, recommendations for a minimum data set for prospective donor follow-up were developed in a workshop with the participation of an international group of investigators actively involved in allogeneic stem cell donation under the auspices of and approved by the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Establishment of a standardized global follow-up for both, related and unrelated, donors will enable monitoring of the short- and long-term safety profiles of hematopoietic cell donation and form a solid basis for future donor selection and counseling.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Tissue Donors , Adolescent , Adult , Donor Selection , Humans , Middle Aged , Transplantation, Homologous , Young Adult
17.
Infection ; 40(6): 677-84, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22802096

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The clinical characteristics of human metapneumovirus (hMPV)-associated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is not well described. We describe the clinical course in eight HSCT recipients suffering from hMPV infection. METHODS: We prospectively included all patients with hMPV-associated LRTI after allogeneic HSCT during a period of 1 year. hMPV was diagnosed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). RESULTS: Eight patients with hMPV-associated LRTI were identified from 93 BAL samples. Three of the eight patients had co-infections with other pathogens. The median age of the patients was 45 years [interquartile range (IQR) 36.8-53.5], the median time posttransplant was 473 days (IQR 251-1,165), 5/8 patients had chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD), and 6/8 patients received immunosuppression. Chest computed tomography (CT) scanning showed a ground-glass pattern in 7/8 patients. Seven of eight patients required hospitalization due to severe symptoms and hypoxemia. All were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), which was combined with oral ribavirin in six patients. The mortality rate was 12.5 % (1/8). CONCLUSIONS: hMPV-associated LRTI in allogeneic HSCT recipients are not uncommon and present with unspecific respiratory symptoms, ground-glass pattern in CT scanning, and co-infection.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Metapneumovirus/isolation & purification , Paramyxoviridae Infections/etiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/etiology , Adult , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Paramyxoviridae Infections/diagnosis , Paramyxoviridae Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Transplantation, Homologous
18.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 47(7): 906-23, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22543746

ABSTRACT

A total of 654 centers from 48 countries were contacted for the 2010 survey. In all, 634 centers reported a total of 33 362 hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) with 30 012 patients receiving their first transplant (12 276 allogeneic (41%) and 17 736 autologous (59%)). Main indications were leukemias: 9355 (31%; 93% allogeneic), lymphoid neoplasias specifically Non Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma and plasma cell disorders: 17 362 (58%; 12% allogeneic), solid tumors: 1585 (5%; 6% allogeneic) and non-malignant disorders: 1609 (6%; 88% allogeneic). There were more unrelated donors than HLA-identical sibling donors (53% versus 41%); the proportion of peripheral blood as stem cell source was 99% for autologous and 71% for allogeneic HSCT. Cord blood was primarily used in allogeneic transplants (6% of total) with three autologous cord blood HSCT being reported. The number of transplants has increased by 19% since 2005 (allogeneic 37% and autologous 9%) and continued to increase by about 1100 HSCT per year since 2000. Patterns of increase were distinct and different. The data show the development of transplantation in Europe since 1990, with the number of patients receiving a HSCT increasing from 4200 to over 30 000 annually. The most impressive trend seen is the steady increase of unrelated donor transplantation, in parallel to the availability of unrelated donors through donor registries.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Europe , Humans , Neoplasms/surgery
19.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 47(11): 1459-64, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22410750

ABSTRACT

Recommendations on indications for allogeneic haematopoietic SCT have been presented, but transplantation techniques remain poorly standardized. Pre-transplant risk factors are well defined, and reported outcomes vary markedly among patients with similar risk characteristics. It would be of importance to know the impact of differences in treatment procedures. To study properly the different components of allogeneic transplantation, standardization of at least some central procedures would be needed. As the first step, the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) performed a survey among all its 372 member centres performing allogeneic transplantations about their strategies in preventing and treating GVHD. Responses from 79 centres (21% return) from 25 countries (60% return) were received. Although some trends toward more uniform policies compared with a survey carried out 15 years earlier were observed, the present survey still showed marked variability in the GVHD prophylaxis and treatment strategies. On the basis of these findings, EBMT is developing a consensus process aiming at a standardized strategy.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/drug therapy , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematologic Neoplasms/surgery , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Data Collection , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Humans , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation Conditioning/standards , Transplantation, Homologous
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...