Perception of pharmacological prevention and subsequent non-adherence to medication in patients with ischaemic heart disease: a population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: A patient-focused approach is advocated to embody risk of non-adherence to medication and subsequent adverse clinical outcomes following ischaemic heart disease (IHD). This study aimed to explore how patient perceived information on pharmacological prevention was associated with subsequent non-adherence to medication (measured by non-initiation, non-implementation and non-persistence) in patients with incident IHD. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Register-based cohort of 829 patients with incident IHD in 2013. MEASURES: Perception covered whether patients' experienced being adequately informed about their pharmacological prevention. Information on such was obtained from a survey and divided into 'Well informed', 'Moderately informed' and 'Poorly informed'. Information on baseline characteristics, and reimbursed prescriptions of medication (antiplatelets, statins, ACE-inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and ß-blockers) during follow-up were obtained by linkage to nationwide public registers. Non-initiation and non-implementation of medication, measured as proportion of days covered, were analysed by Poisson regression. Non-persistence to medication, measured as risk of discontinuation, was analysed by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Non-implementation and non-persistence to medication up to 365 days of follow-up were primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included non-initiation as well as non-implementation and non-persistence to medication at 180 days of follow-up. RESULTS: A dose-response association was in general found between perception of pharmacological prevention and risk of non-implementation and non-persistence. For example, the hazard of non-persistence to antiplatelets was 1.18 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.96) times higher for patients reporting 'Moderately informed' and 1.89 (95% CI 1.10 to 3.25) times higher for patients reporting 'Poorly informed', compared with patients reporting 'Well informed of perception of pharmacological prevention' up to 365 days of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Lower levels of perception of pharmacological prevention were associated with subsequent non-implementation and non-persistence to medication in patients with incident IHD.

Influence of socioeconomic status on the referral process to cardiac rehabilitation following acute coronary syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and referral to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after incident acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by dividing the referral process into three phases: (1) informed about CR, (2) willingness to participate in CR, (3) and assigned CR setting. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Department of Cardiology at a Danish University Hospital from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2014. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1229 patients assessed for CR during hospitalisation with ACS were prospectively registered in the Rehab-North Register from 2011 to 2014. SES was assessed using data from national registers, concerning: personal income, occupational status, educational level and civil status. Patients were excluded if one of the following criteria was fulfilled: (1) missing data on SES, or (2) acceptable reason for not informing patients about CR (treatment with coronary artery bypass grafting, transfer to another hospital, still under treatment or death). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were defined by dividing the referral process into three phases: (1) informed about CR, (2) willingness to participate, and (3) assigned CR setting (in-hospital/community centre) after ACS. RESULTS: A total of 854 (69.5 %) patients were referred to CR. After adjustment for age, gender, ACS diagnosis (ST-elevated myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris) and comorbidity, high income had the strongest association of referral to CR in all three phases (informed about CR: OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.64; willingness to participate in CR: OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.35; assigned in-hospital CR: OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.36). Educational level showed similar tendencies, however not statistically significant. The results did not vary according to gender. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate the referral process to CR using a three-phase structure. It suggests income and education to influence all phases in the referral process to CR after ACS.

Social inequality and barriers to cardiac rehabilitation in the rehab-North register.

AIM: Barriers to participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) may occur at three levels of the referral process (lack of information, declining to participate, and referral to appropriate CR programme). The aim is to analyse the impact of socioeconomic status on barriers to CR and investigate whether such barriers influenced the choice of referral. METHODS: The Rehab-North Register, a cross-sectional study, enrolled 5455 patients hospitalised at Aalborg University Hospital with myocardial infarction (MI) during 2011-2014. Patients hospitalised with ST-elevated MI and complicated non-ST-elevated MI were to be sent to specialized CR, whereas patients with uncomplicated non-ST-elevated MI and unstable angina pectoris were to be sent to community-based CR. Detailed selected socioeconomic information was gathered from statistical registries in Statistics Denmark. Data was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients being retired, low educated, and/or with an annual gross income <27.000 Euro/yr were significantly less informed about cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Patients being older than 70 years, retired, low educated and/or with an annual gross income <27.000 Euro were significantly less willing to participate in CR. Further, this patient population were to a higher extent referred to community-based CR. CONCLUSION: Patients with low socioeconomic status received less information about and were less willing to participate in cardiac rehabilitation. The same patient population was to a higher extent referred to community-based CR. Knowledge about barriers at different levels and the impact of social inequality may help in tailoring a better approach in the referral process to CR.

A large frontal QRS-T angle is a strong predictor of the long-term risk of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality in the diabetic population.

BACKGROUND: A large angle between the QRS vector and the T-wave vector (QRS-T angle) in electrocardiograms (ECGs) has recently been introduced as a marker of poor prognosis. The prognostic value in diabetes is unknown. We assessed the long-term predictive power of the frontal plane QRS-T angle in the diabetic population. METHODS: In 1992-93, the diabetic population of the municipality of Horsens, Denmark, was delineated by the prescription method, and an age- and gender-stratified sample of 240 diabetic persons was randomly selected. In 2015, 12-lead ECGs taken in 1993-94 were analyzed. Vital statistics were obtained from the Danish Civil Registration System and data regarding hospitalizations taken from The National Patient Registry in July 2015. RESULTS: In total, 178 people agreed to participate (74%) in the study, with the mean (sd) age being 58.9 (10.2) years and 56% being male. The total observation time was 21.5 (0.18) years, during which time 122 (69%) persons died, 32 (18%) suffered a myocardial infarction (MI) and 126 (71%) reached the composite endpoint of non-fatal MI or all-cause death. In Cox regression multivariate analysis a QRS-T angle above 90° was found to be an independent predictor of all-cause death (HR=2.2 (95% CI: 1.3-3.8)), MI (HR=2.95 (95% CI: 1.1-7.7)) and MI or all-cause death (HR=2.0 (95% CI: 1.2-3.5)) (all p<0.05), when adjusting for the effects of co-variates (gender, age, length of diabetes, BMI, total cholesterol, diabetes type, hemoglobin A1c, smoking, hypertension and previous MI). CONCLUSION: A large QRS-T angle is a strong, independent long-term predictor of all-cause mortality, MI and MI or all-cause death in the diabetic population.

[Statin intolerance]. / Statinintolerans.

Patients who take statins frequently experience adverse events, typically muscle symptoms. Some of these patients develop statin intolerance and discontinue the statin treatment. The treatment of a statin intolerant patient can be difficult. Treatment possibilities include a low dose regimen of statin, possibly in combination with another lipid-lowering agent, most commonly ezetimibe.