ABSTRACT
Despite over two decades of extensive research showing that male circumcision protects against heterosexual acquisition of HIV in men; and that includes findings from large randomized controlled trials leading to acceptance by the WHO/UNAIDS and the Cochrane Committee; opponents of circumcision continue to generate specious arguments to the contrary. In a recent issue of the Journal of Public Health in Africa; Van Howe and Storms claim that male circumcision will increase HIV infections in Africa. Here we review the statements they use in support of their thesis and show that there is no scientific basis to such an assertion. We also evaluate the statistics used and show that when these data are properly analyzed the results lead to a contrary conclusion affirming the major role of male circumcision in protecting against HIV infection in Africa. Researchers; policy makers and the wider community should rely on balanced scholarship when assessing scientific evidence. We trust that our assessment may help refute the claims by Van Howe and Storms; and provide reassurance on the importance of circumcision for HIV prevention
Subject(s)
Circumcision, Male , Evidence-Based Medicine , HIV Infections , MaleABSTRACT
Childhood mortality and morbidity patterns in the English-speaking Caribbean have changed significantly over the past 40 years. Acute respiratory illness, physical injury and conditions originating in the perinatal period have replaced malnutrition, gastroenteritis and other infectious diseases as major causes of illness and death in Caribbean children. Although population growth has slowed down, about one-third of the population of the English-speaking Caribbean remains under the age of 15 years. Infant mortality rates have also fallen but the major contributor to this decline has been a reduction in post-neonatal deaths. The decrease in mortality and morbidity from infectious diseases has led to a prominence of disorders originating in the perinatal period, psychosocial problems and chronic childhood disorders. Adverse economic conditions are held culpable for the re-emergence of protein energy malnutrition (PEM) and pulmonary tuberculosis in some territories. There is an urgent need to focus attention on the areas of perinatal and adolescent health, childhood disability, accidental and non-accidental injury, sexual abuse and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Immunization programmes also require continuing support and expansion. These tasks cannot be accomplished without meaningful long term investment of financial and human resources in the health and educational services of the region.
Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Child Health , Child Health Services , Morbidity , Mortality , Infant Mortality , Pediatrics , Caribbean Region/epidemiologyABSTRACT
To assess the effects of HIV-1 and other sexually transmitted infections on pregnancy; we undertook cross-sectional and prospective studies of a rural population in Rakai district; Uganda. Methods: 4813 sexually active women aged 15-49 years were surveyed to find out the prevalence of pregnancy by interview and selective urinary human chorionic gonadotropin tests. The incidence of recognised conception and frequency of pregnancy loss were assessed by follow-up. Samples were taken to test for HIV-1 infection; syphilis; and other sexually transmitted diseases. Findings: At time of survey 757(21.4) of 3544 women without HIV-1 infection or syphilis were pregnant; compared with 46 (14.6) or 316 HIV-1 negative women with active syphilis; 117 (14.2) or 823 HIV-1 positive women with no concurrent syphilis; and 11(8.5) of 130 women with both syphilis and HIV-1 infected women was 0.45 (95CI0.35-0.57); the odds of pregnancy were low both in HIV-1-infected women without symptoms (0.49 [0.39-0.62]) and in women with symptoms of HIV-1-associated and syphilis the odds of pregnancy were low both in HIV-1-infected women without symptoms (0.49[0.39-0.62] and in women with symptoms of HIV-1-associated disease (0.23[0.11-0.48]). In women with concurrent HIV-1 infection and syphilis the odds ratio was 0.28(0.14-0.55). The incidence rate recognised pregnancy during the prospective follow-up study was lower in HIV-1 positive than in HIV-1 negative women (23.5 vs 30. 1 per 100 woman-years; adjusted risk ration 0.73[0.57-0.93]). Rates of pregnancy loss were higher among HIV-1-infected than uninfected women (18.5 vs 12.2; odds ratio 1.50 [1.01-2.27]). The prevalence of HIV-1 infection was significantly lower in pregnant than in non-pregnant women (13.9 vs 21. 3). Interpretation: Pregnancy prevalence is greatly reduced in HIV-1-infected women; owing to lower rates of conception and increased rates of pregnancy loss. HIV-1 surveillance confined to pregnant women underestimates the magnitude of the HIV-1 epidemic in the general population