Emergency department patient navigators successfully connect patients to care within a rapidly evolving healthcare system.

In the United States, adherence to follow up medical appointments among patients discharged from the emergency department varies between 26% and 56%, depending on the population. It is well known that patients face significant barriers to care within an increasingly complicated system of care. In an effort to better support patients, in 2020, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens implemented a Patient Navigator Program with 7 bilingual Patient Navigators who were trained to deliver culturally sensitive education and support, and to schedule follow up appointments for patients experiencing barriers to care. Between February 2020 and December 2022, 30,164 patients were supported by the 7 Patient Navigators. Ninety-four percent of patients without a primary care provider had a new provider and appointment upon discharge, and 81% of patients attended the appointment scheduled by the Patient Navigator. This study demonstrates that Patient Navigators can work alongside clinical colleagues, and as members of emergency department health care teams, to support patients to connect to care and to attend follow up appointments. It also highlights that Patient Navigators are uniquely qualified to build trust and to support patients to achieve appropriate, continuous care within a rapidly evolving health care system.

Emergency Department Patient Navigator Program Demonstrates Reduction in Emergency Department Return Visits and Increase in Follow-up Appointment Adherence.

BACKGROUND: An estimated 56% of emergency department (ED) visits are avoidable. One motivation for return visits is patients' perception of poor access to timely outpatient care. Efforts to facilitate access may help reduce preventable ED visits. We aimed to analyze whether an ED patient navigator (PN) program improved adherence with outpatient appointments and reduced ED return visits. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients evaluated and discharged from two EDs from October 2016 to December 2019. Using propensity score matching, an intervention case group was matched against two control groups - patients similar to the case group who presented either (1) pre-PN intervention or (2) post-PN intervention and did not receive intervention. The four outcomes included 72-h return ED visits, 30-day return ED visits, overall ED utilization, as well as the intervention group's adherence rates to PN-scheduled outpatient appointments. From 482,896 charts, propensity matching led to a total of 14,295 patients in each group. RESULTS: PN intervention decreased both acute and subacute ED return visits. Compared to both pre-PN and post-PN controls, navigated patients had a decrease in 72-h and 30-day return visits from 2% to 1% and 7% to 4% (p < 0.001) respectively. Navigated patients also had outpatient appointment adherence rates of 74-80% compared to the estimated national average of 25-56%. While there was no difference in mean ED utilization between the intervention group and pre-PN control group, mean ED utilization was found to be higher in the intervention group compared to the post-PN control group with 0.62 visits compared to 0.38 mean visits (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: By facilitating access to post-ED care, PNs may reduce avoidable ED utilization and improve outpatient follow-up adherence. While overall ED utilization did not change, this may be due to the overall vulnerability of the navigated group which is the goal PN intervention group.