Early home-based group education to support informed decision-making among patients with end-stage renal disease: a multi-centre randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to test the effectiveness of early home-based group education on knowledge and communication about renal replacement therapy (RRT). METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial using a cross-over design among 80 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Between T0 and T1 (weeks 1-4) Group 1 received the intervention and Group 2 received standard care. Between T1 and T2 (weeks 5-8) Group 1 received standard care and Group 2 received the intervention. The intervention was a group education session on RRT options held in the patient's home given by social workers. Patients invited members from their social network to attend. Self-report questionnaires were used at T0, T1 and T2 to measure patients' knowledge and communication, and concepts from the Theory of Planned Behaviour such as attitude. Comparable questionnaires were completed pre-post intervention by 229 attendees. Primary RRT was registered up to 2 years post-intervention. Multilevel linear modelling was used to analyse patient data and paired t-tests for attendee data. RESULTS: Statistically significant increases in the primary targets knowledge and communication were found among patients and attendees after receiving the intervention. The intervention also had a significant effect in increasing positive attitude toward living donation and haemodialysis. Of the 80 participants, 49 underwent RRT during follow-up. Of these, 34 underwent a living donor kidney transplant, of which 22 were pre-emptive. CONCLUSIONS: Early home-based group education supports informed decision-making regarding primary RRT for ESRD patients and their social networks and may remove barriers to pre-emptive transplantation.

Tapering immunosuppression in recipients of living donor kidney transplants.

We have previously suggested that the in vitro donor-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte precursor (CTLp) assay can guide us to identify patients in which the immunosuppressive load can be tapered. In a clinical trial we had observed that a low (<10/10(6) PBMC) frequency of these CTLp was predictive for an uneventful rejection-free clinical course in patients that were converted from calcineurin inhibitors to mycophenolate mofetil or azathiopine. In the present prospective study in 81 stable kidney transplant recipients, already converted from calcineurin inhibitors, we measured CTLp frequencies and reduced the immunosuppressive load on a routine basis when CTLp were <10/10(6) PBMC. Donor-specific cytotoxicity could not be measured in 50/81 patients, while their reactivity against third-party lymphocytes was not impaired. These 50 patients were tapered in their immunosuppression. Only in one patient, who had stopped all his medication, was a rejection episode diagnosed. We conclude that in patients with a low donor-specific CTLp frequency it is safe to reduce the immunosuppression.

Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and MDR-1 genes and pharmacokinetics of the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus.

BACKGROUND: The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine (INN, cyclosporin) and tacrolimus have a narrow therapeutic index and show considerable interindividual variability in their pharmacokinetics. The low oral bioavailability of calcineurin inhibitors is thought to result from the actions of the metabolizing enzymes cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and CYP3A5 and the multidrug efflux pump P-glycoprotein, encoded by MDR-1. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the role of genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and MDR-1 with respect to interindividual variability in cyclosporine and tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine (n = 110) or tacrolimus (n = 64) were genotyped for CYP3A4*1B and *3, CYP3A5*3 and *6, and MDR-1 C3435T. Dose-adjusted trough levels were determined and correlated with the corresponding genotype. RESULTS: Tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough levels were higher in CYP3A5*3/*3 patients (n = 45) than in *1/*3 plus *1/*1 patients (n = 17), as follows: median and range, 94 (34-398) ng/mL per mg/kg versus 61 (37-163) ng/mL per mg/kg (P <.0001, Mann-Whitney test). CYP3A4*1B allele carriers (n = 10) had lower tacrolimus dose-adjusted trough levels compared with those in patients with the wild-type (*1/*1) genotype (n = 54): median and range, 57 (40-163) ng/mL per mg/kg versus 89 (34-398) ng/mL per mg/kg) (P =.003, Mann-Whitney test). No evidence was found supporting a role for the MDR-1 C3435T polymorphism in tacrolimus dose requirement. None of the polymorphisms studied correlated with cyclosporine dose-adjusted predose concentrations. CONCLUSION: As a group, patients with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype require less tacrolimus to reach target predose concentrations compared with CYP3A5*1 allele carriers, whereas CYP3A4*1B carriers require more tacrolimus to reach target trough concentrations compared with CYP3A4*1 homozygotes.

Tacrolimus dose requirement in renal transplant recipients is significantly higher when used in combination with corticosteroids.

AIMS: To evaluate the effect of corticosteroids on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. METHODS: In a randomized trial, kidney transplant recipients were treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil with either daclizumab (n = 31) or 3 months of prednisone (n = 34). Tacrolimus dose-adjusted predose concentrations (C0) at month 1-6 were compared between both groups and within the corticosteroid group before and after prednisone withdrawal. RESULTS: At month 1 the tacrolimus dose-adjusted C0 in the corticosteroid group was 83 +/- 8 vs 119 +/- 17 ng ml-1 mg-1 kg-1 in the daclizumab group. The tacrolimus dose-adjusted C0 within the corticosteroid group at month 1 and 2 was 42% and 29% lower compared with month 4 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A higher tacrolimus dose is required to reach target concentrations when used in combination with corticosteroids.

A controlled trial comparing two doses of cyclosporine in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids.

It is unknown whether the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone after renal transplantation (RTx) allows for a reduced dose of CsA, to minimize the incidence of CsA-related side effects and to reduce costs. Therefore, 313 renal allograft recipients were randomized for treatment with MMF (1000 mg twice a day), prednisone, and either conventional- or low-dose CsA during the first 3 mo after RTx. The target trough levels were 300 and 150 ng/ml, respectively, during the first 3 mo and 150 ng/ml in both groups thereafter. A total of 313 patients were included: 161 patients received a conventional dose and 152 received a low dose of CsA. During the first 6 mo after RTx, graft failure or patient death occurred in 19 of 161 patients (12%) in the conventional-dose group and in 11 of 152 patients (7%) in the low-dose group (not significant). Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 36 of 161 patients (22%) in the conventional-dose group and in 29 of 152 patients (19%) in the low-dose group (not significant). The incidence of delayed graft function was similar in both groups (31 of 161 [19%] versus 28 of 152 [18%]; not significant). Serum creatinine did not differ between the conventional- and the low-dose groups: 151 +/- 56 micromol/L versus 142 +/- 49 micromol/L at 3 mo and 141 +/- 60 micromol/L versus 136 +/- 49 micromol/L at 6 mo. There were no differences between the groups regarding BP, lipid metabolism, and infectious complications. In the low-dose group, an estimated $500 per patient was saved on the costs of CsA. In conclusion, the addition of MMF to CsA and prednisone after RTx allows the use of a lower-than-conventional dose of CsA, without increasing the risk of rejection.