Translating thyroid hormone into clinical practice: lessons learned from the post-hoc analysis on data available from the ThyRepair study.

Background: Thyroid hormone (TH) appears to have a reparative action on the postinfarcted myocardium. This novel action was recently tested in a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ThyRepair). The present study performed a post-hoc analysis of data from the ThyRepair study to provide further insights into the novel actions of TH on the human postischemic myocardium. Methods: Data from 41 patients participating in the ThyRepair study (n = 20 placebo and n = 21 LT3) were included in the analysis. LT3 treatment started after stenting and continued intravenously for 48 h. All patients had cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at hospital discharge; left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF%), LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVi; mL/m2), LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVi; mL/m2), infarct volume (IV), left ventricular mass index (LVMi) as edema index, and microvascular obstruction (MVO) were assessed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the median value of the IV: patients with IV ≤ 20% of the LV (group A) and patients with IV > 20% (group B). CMR measurements at discharge are expressed as mean ± SD. Results: In group A, the placebo and T3-treated groups had similar LVEF% (56.8 ± 10.2 vs. 52.2 ± 10.5), LVEDVi (90.9 ± 19.8 vs. 92.8 ± 14.5), and LVESVi (40.8 ± 18.2 vs. 44.9 ± 14.1) at discharge. In group B, LVEDVi and LVESVi were 112 ± 23.8 and 68.3 ± 21.5 for placebo vs. 91.8 ± 18.6 and 49.0 ± 14.0 for the T3-treated group, respectively, p < 0.05. LVEF% was significantly increased in the T3-treated group vs. placebo, 47.3 ± 6.5 vs. 39.9 ± 8.7, p < 0.05. In group B, CMR LVMi was lower in T3-treated patients vs. placebo but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.1). MVO was 1.95 ± 2.2 in placebo vs. 0.84 ± 0.9 in the LT3-treated group, p = 0.15. Conclusion: The present study suggests that acute LT3 treatment may exert more favorable effects on the recovery of cardiac function in patients with large infarct size. Furthermore, it signals a potential effect of LT3 on myocardial edema and microvascular obstruction. These novel findings merit further investigation in large trials.

Effects of Acute Triiodothyronine Treatment in Patients with Anterior Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Angioplasty: Evidence from a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial (ThyRepair Study).

Background: Thyroid hormone has a differential action on healthy and ischemic heart. Triiodothyronine (T3) administration improved postischemic cardiac function while it limited apoptosis in experimentally induced ischemia. Thus, the present study investigated the potential effects of acute liothyronine (LT3) treatment in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. Methods: This study is a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ThyRepair study). We randomized 52 patients and analyzed data from 37 patients (n = 16 placebo and n = 21 LT3), per prespecified per protocol analysis. We excluded three patients who had died of cardiovascular causes (one in placebo and two in LT3 arm), four with small infarct size below a pre-specified threshold (in the placebo arm), and the rest, who lacked follow-up data. LT3 treatment started after stenting as an intravenous (i.v.) bolus injection of 0.8 µg/kg of LT3 followed by a constant infusion of 0.113 µg/kg/h i.v. for 48 hours. All patients had cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at hospital discharge and 6 months follow-up. The primary end point was CMR left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) and secondary endpoints were LV volumes, infarct volume (IV), and safety. Results: The CMR LVEF% at 6 months was 53.6 ± 9.5 for the LT3-treated group and 48.6 ± 11 for placebo, p = 0.15. Acute LT3 treatment resulted in a significantly lower LV end-diastolic volume index (92.2 ± 16.8 mL/m2 vs. 107.5 ± 22.2, p = 0.022) and LV systolic volume index (47.5 ± 13.9 mL/m2 vs. 61.3 ± 21.7, p = 0.024) at hospital discharge, but not at 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in CMR IV at hospital discharge between the groups (p = 0.24). CMR IV tended to be lower in the LT3-treated group at 6 months (18.7 ± 9.5 vs. 25.9 ± 11.7, in placebo, p = 0.05). Serious, life-threatening events related to LT3 treatment were not observed. A tendency for an increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) was found in the LT3 group during the first 48 hours (19% for T3 group vs. 5% for placebo, p = 0.13). Conclusion: This pilot randomized, placebo-controlled trial study suggests potential favorable effects (acute cardiac dilatation and 6-month IV) as well as potential concerns regarding a higher risk of AF after LT3 administration early after myocardial infarction, which should be tested in a larger scale study.