S1 guidelines "lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid analysis" (abridged and translated version).

INTRODUCTION: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is important for detecting inflammation of the nervous system and the meninges, bleeding in the area of the subarachnoid space that may not be visualized by imaging, and the spread of malignant diseases to the CSF space. In the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases, the importance of CSF analysis is increasing. Measuring the opening pressure of CSF in idiopathic intracranial hypertension and at spinal tap in normal pressure hydrocephalus constitute diagnostic examination procedures with therapeutic benefits.Recommendations (most important 3-5 recommendations on a glimpse): The indications and contraindications must be checked before lumbar puncture (LP) is performed, and sampling CSF requires the consent of the patient.Puncture with an atraumatic needle is associated with a lower incidence of postpuncture discomfort. The frequency of postpuncture syndrome correlates inversely with age and body mass index, and it is more common in women and patients with a history of headache. The sharp needle is preferably used in older or obese patients, also in punctures expected to be difficult.In order to avoid repeating LP, a sufficient quantity of CSF (at least 10 ml) should be collected. The CSF sample and the serum sample taken at the same time should be sent to a specialized laboratory immediately so that the emergency and basic CSF analysis program can be carried out within 2 h.The indication for LP in anticoagulant therapy should always be decided on an individual basis. The risk of interrupting anticoagulant therapy must be weighed against the increased bleeding risk of LP with anticoagulant therapy.As a quality assurance measure in CSF analysis, it is recommended that all cytological, clinical-chemical, and microbiological findings are combined in an integrated summary report and evaluated by an expert in CSF analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the importance and developments in CSF analysis, the S1 guideline "Lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid analysis" was recently prepared by the German Society for CSF analysis and clinical neurochemistry (DGLN) and published in German in accordance with the guidelines of the AWMF (https://www.awmf.org). /uploads/tx_szleitlinien/030-141l_S1_Lumbalpunktion_und_Liquordiagnostik_2019-08.pdf). The present article is an abridged translation of the above cited guideline. The guideline has been jointly edited by the DGLN and DGN.

Immunophenotyping of cerebrospinal fluid cells in ischaemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Post-ischaemic immune cell invasion into the brain is well characterized in animal stroke models and contributes to neuronal damage. Therefore, it represents a promising therapeutic target. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is easily accessible and may reflect cellular events within the parenchyma. However, comprehensive studies on CSF immune cells in patients with stroke are lacking. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we performed extensive immune-cell profiling in CSF and peripheral blood of patients with acute ischaemic stroke and healthy controls. In patients with stroke, infarct size was quantified on follow-up imaging. RESULTS: Overall, 90 patients with ischaemic stroke and 22 controls were included in our study. After stroke, the total protein was increased (537.3 vs. 353.2 mg/L, P = 0.008) and the mean total white cell count was slightly but non-significantly elevated (1.76 vs. 0.50 cells/µL, P = 0.059). Proportions of CSF lymphocytes, monocytes and granulocytes and their respective subsets did not differ between patients with stroke and controls. In addition, there were no associations between proportions of major leukocyte subsets in CSF and the time from symptom onset to CSF sampling, infarct size or infarct localization. CONCLUSIONS: Ischaemic stroke induces only a very slight increase of CSF immune cells without changes in the composition of immune cell subsets, thus indicating that parenchymal inflammation is not sufficiently reflected in the CSF. Our findings suggest that CSF is not a major invasion route for immune cells and that CSF cell analyses are not suitable as biomarkers to guide future immune therapies for stroke.

[Cytology of cerebrospinal fluid : Standards, importance and modern methods]. / Liquorzytologie : Standards, Stellenwert und moderne Methoden.

Cytology is an integral part of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis. It is relevant for the diagnostics and differential diagnosis of inflammatory, hemorrhagic and neoplastic central nervous system (CNS) processes. This article summarizes the recommended procedures and typical clinical patterns. In addition, modern immunocytochemical and flow cytometry methods for CSF cytology are presented. In particular, the diagnostic contribution and clinical relevance in several CNS conditions are discussed.

Adjunct low dose lithium carbonate in treatment-resistant depression: a placebo-controlled study.

Resistance to antidepressant therapy is a common clinical problem in the treatment of affective disorders. Adjunctive low dose lithium is a promising strategy based on biochemical models and encouraging clinical trials. After a mean duration of 9.2 months of conventional therapy, 16 healthy patients with treatment-resistant depression were treated for a minimum of 2 weeks with either adjunctive lithium or placebo using a double-blind design. We found no difference between the two groups in rate or degree of response. The two most dramatic responses occurred in patients treated with placebo, although 50% of patients treated with lithium had at least a partial response. The number of patients studied was clearly inadequate to avoid a type 2 error. The cumulative response rate reported in the literature of greater than 60%, however, suggests that lithium is indeed an effective adjunct in some patients with treatment-resistant depression. Our patients differed from those in other studies in that they were treated with a lower dose of lithium, the duration of conventional antidepressant therapy was longer, and, finally, they were less depressed and possibly depressed for a longer period. These differences may explain the comparable lithium and placebo responses in this study.