Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
2.
Heart ; 104(22): 1817-1822, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29773657

ABSTRACT

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme (MTEP) promotes the adoption of innovative diagnostic and therapeutic technologies into National Health Service (NHS) clinical practice through the publication of guidance and briefing documents. Since the inception of the programme in 2009, there have been 7 medical technologiesguidance, 3 diagnostics guidance and 23 medtechinnovation briefing documents published that are relevant to the heart and circulation. Medical technologies guidance is published by NICE for selected single technologies if they offer plausible additional benefits to patients and the healthcare system. Diagnostic guidance is published for diagnostic technologies if they have the potential to improve health outcomes, but if their introduction may be associated with an increase in overall cost to the NHS. Medtechinnovation briefings provide evidence-based advice to those considering the implementation of new medical devices or diagnostic technologies. This review provides reference to all of the guidance and briefing medical technology documents that NICE has published that are relevant to the heart and circulation and reflect on their diverse recommendations. The interaction of MTEP with other NICE programmes is integral to its effectiveness and the means by which consistency is ensured across the different NICE programmes is described. The importance of the input of clinical experts from the cardiovascular professional community and the engagement by NICE with cardiovascular professional societies is highlighted as being fundamental to ensuring the quality of guidance outputs as well as to promoting their implementation and adoption.


Subject(s)
Academies and Institutes/trends , Cardiology/trends , Quality of Health Care/trends , State Medicine/trends , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/trends , Academies and Institutes/standards , Cardiology/standards , Diffusion of Innovation , Evidence-Based Medicine/trends , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Program Evaluation , Quality of Health Care/standards , State Medicine/standards , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/standards , United Kingdom
3.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 10(3): 276-282, 2017 02 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28183467

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The authors present the UK and Irish real-world learning curve experience of the Evolut R transcatheter heart valve. BACKGROUND: The Evolut R is a self-expanding, repositionable, and fully recapturable second-generation transcatheter heart valve with several novel design features to improve outcomes and reduce complications. METHODS: Clinical, procedural, and 30-day outcome data were prospectively collected for the first 264 patients to receive the Evolut R valve in the United Kingdom and Ireland. RESULTS: A total of 264 consecutive Evolut R implantations were performed across 9 centers. The mean age was 81.1 ± 7.8 years, and the mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score was 19.9 ± 13.7%. Procedural indications included aortic stenosis (72.0%), mixed aortic valve disease (17.4%), and failing aortic valve bioprostheses (10.6%). Conscious sedation was used in 39.8% of patients and transfemoral access in 93.6%. The procedural success rate was 91.3%, and paravalvular leak immediately after implantation was mild or less in 92.3%. Major complications were rare: cardiac tamponade in 0.4%, conversion to sternotomy in 0.8%, annular rupture in 0.0%, coronary occlusion in 0.8%, major vascular in 5.3%, acute kidney injury in 6.1%, new permanent pacemaker implantation in 14.7%, and procedure-related death in 0.0%. At 30-day follow-up, survival was 97.7%, paravalvular leak was mild or less in 92.3%, and the stroke rate was 3.8%. CONCLUSIONS: This registry represents the largest published real-world experience of the Evolut R valve. The procedural success rate was high and safety was excellent, comparable with previous studies of the Evolut R valve and other second-generation devices. The low rate of complications represents an improvement on first-generation devices.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Ireland , Learning Curve , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL