Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 38
Filter
1.
Breast Cancer Res ; 25(1): 93, 2023 08 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37559094

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide studies of gene-environment interactions (G×E) may identify variants associated with disease risk in conjunction with lifestyle/environmental exposures. We conducted a genome-wide G×E analysis of ~ 7.6 million common variants and seven lifestyle/environmental risk factors for breast cancer risk overall and for estrogen receptor positive (ER +) breast cancer. METHODS: Analyses were conducted using 72,285 breast cancer cases and 80,354 controls of European ancestry from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. Gene-environment interactions were evaluated using standard unconditional logistic regression models and likelihood ratio tests for breast cancer risk overall and for ER + breast cancer. Bayesian False Discovery Probability was employed to assess the noteworthiness of each SNP-risk factor pairs. RESULTS: Assuming a 1 × 10-5 prior probability of a true association for each SNP-risk factor pairs and a Bayesian False Discovery Probability < 15%, we identified two independent SNP-risk factor pairs: rs80018847(9p13)-LINGO2 and adult height in association with overall breast cancer risk (ORint = 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.96), and rs4770552(13q12)-SPATA13 and age at menarche for ER + breast cancer risk (ORint = 0.91, 95% CI 0.88-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the contribution of G×E interactions to the heritability of breast cancer is very small. At the population level, multiplicative G×E interactions do not make an important contribution to risk prediction in breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Gene-Environment Interaction , Adult , Female , Humans , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Bayes Theorem , Genome-Wide Association Study , Risk Factors , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Case-Control Studies
2.
Cancer Causes Control ; 34(6): 533-541, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36933150

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the association between alcohol intake over the lifetime and the risk of overall, borderline, and invasive ovarian cancer. METHODS: In a population-based case-control study of 495 cases and 902 controls, conducted in Montreal, Canada, average alcohol intake over the lifetime and during specific age periods were computed from a detailed assessment of the intake of beer, red wine, white wine and spirits. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between alcohol intake and ovarian cancer risk. RESULTS: For each one drink/week increment in average alcohol intake over the lifetime, the adjusted OR (95% CI) was 1.06 (1.01-1.10) for ovarian cancer overall, 1.13 (1.06-1.20) for borderline ovarian cancers and 1.02 (0.97-1.08) for invasive ovarian cancers. This pattern of association was similarly observed for alcohol intake in early (15- < 25 years), mid (25- < 40 years) and late adulthood (≥ 40 years), as well as for the intake of specific alcohol beverages over the lifetime. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis that a higher alcohol intake modestly increases the risk of overall ovarian cancer, and more specifically, borderline tumours.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Adult , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/etiology , Risk Factors , Case-Control Studies , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/etiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Beer
3.
Can J Public Health ; 114(4): 692-704, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36809592

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Mental health and neurocognitive conditions are important causes of hospitalization among immigrants, though patterns may vary by immigrant category, world region of origin, and time since arrival in Canada. This study uses linked administrative data to explore differences in mental health hospitalization rates between immigrants and individuals born in Canada. METHODS: Hospital records from the Discharge Abstract Database and the Ontario Mental Health Reporting System for 2011 to 2017 were linked to the 2016 Longitudinal Immigrant Database and to Statistics Canada's 2011 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort. Age-standardized hospitalization rates for mental health-related conditions (ASHR-MHs) were derived for immigrants and the Canadian-born population. ASHR-MHs overall and for leading mental health conditions were compared between immigrants and the Canadian-born population, stratified by sex and selected immigration characteristics. Quebec hospitalization data were not available. RESULTS: Overall, immigrants had lower ASHR-MHs compared to the Canadian-born population. Mood disorders were leading causes of mental health hospitalization for both cohorts. Psychotic, substance-related, and neurocognitive disorders were also leading causes of mental health hospitalization, although there was variation in their relative importance between subgroups. Among immigrants, ASHR-MHs were higher among refugees and lower among economic immigrants, those from East Asia, and those who arrived in Canada most recently. CONCLUSION: Differences in hospitalization rates among immigrants from various immigration streams and world regions, particularly for specific types of mental health conditions, highlight the importance of future research that incorporates both inpatient and outpatient mental health services to further understand these relationships.


RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: Les problèmes de santé mentale et les troubles neurocognitifs sont des causes importantes d'hospitalisation chez les immigrants, bien que les tendances puissent varier selon la catégorie d'immigrants, la région d'origine mondiale et le temps écoulé depuis l'arrivée au Canada. Cette étude utilise des données administratives couplées afin d'explorer les différences dans les taux d'hospitalisation en santé mentale entre les immigrants et les personnes nées au Canada. MéTHODES: Les dossiers hospitaliers de la Base de données sur les congés des patients et du Système d'information ontarien sur la santé mentale de 2011 à 2017 ont été couplés à la Base de données longitudinales sur l'immigration de 2016 et aux cohortes santé et environnement du Recensement canadien de 2011 de Statistique Canada. Les taux d'hospitalisation normalisés selon l'âge pour les problèmes de santé mentale (THNA-SM) ont été comparés entre les immigrants et la population née au Canada, stratifiés selon le sexe et certaines caractéristiques d'immigration. Les données sur les hospitalisations au Québec n'étaient pas disponibles. RéSULTATS: Dans l'ensemble, les immigrants avaient des THNA-SM plus faibles que la population née au Canada. Les troubles de l'humeur étaient les principales causes d'hospitalisation en santé mentale pour les deux cohortes. Les troubles psychotiques, liés aux substances et neurocognitifs étaient également les principales causes d'hospitalisation en santé mentale, bien que leur importance relative varie entre les sous-groupes. Chez les immigrants, les THNA-SM étaient plus élevés chez les réfugiés et plus faibles chez les immigrants économiques, ceux de l'Asie de l'Est et ceux qui sont arrivés au Canada plus récemment. CONCLUSION: Les différences dans les taux d'hospitalisation chez les immigrants des divers groupes d'immigration et régions du monde, plus particulièrement pour certains types de problèmes de santé mentale, soulignent l'importance de recherches futures qui intègrent les services de santé mentale aux patients hospitalisés ainsi qu'aux patients externes afin de mieux comprendre ces relations.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Mental Health , Humans , Canada/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Ontario/epidemiology , Neurocognitive Disorders
4.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 76: 102058, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34800867

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Caffeine intake has been inconsistently associated with the risk of ovarian cancer in previous studies. The measure of caffeine in these studies has not always distinguished between caffeinated and decaffeinated sources, and the time for which intake was assessed was often for late adulthood and thus may have excluded the etiologic window. We investigated lifetime caffeine intake from caffeinated coffee, black tea, green tea and cola sodas in relation to ovarian cancer risk. METHODS: Among 497 cases and 904 controls in a population-based case-control study in Montreal, Canada, lifetime intake of caffeinated coffee, black tea, green tea and cola sodas was assessed and used to calculate lifetime total intake of caffeine. Unconditional multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between caffeine intake and ovarian cancer risk overall, as well as by menopausal status. Multivariable polytomous logistic regression was used to estimate the associations for invasive and borderline ovarian cancers separately. RESULTS: Almost all participants (98.4% of cases and 97.5% of controls) had consumed caffeine in their lifetime. The mean (standard deviation) daily consumption of caffeine over the lifetime was of 117 (89) mg/day among cases and 120 (118) mg/day among controls. The OR (95% CI) of ovarian cancer for the highest versus lowest quartile of lifetime caffeine intake was 1.17 (0.83-1.64). According to menopausal status, the OR (95% CI) was 1.56 (0.85-2.86) for premenopausal women and 0.94 (0.66-1.34) for postmenopausal women, comparing the highest to lowest tertiles of intake. Associations for invasive and borderline ovarian cancers separately were similar to that observed for ovarian cancer overall. CONCLUSION: Lifetime caffeine intake was not strongly associated with ovarian cancer risk. A difference in relationship by menopausal status is possible.


Subject(s)
Caffeine , Ovarian Neoplasms , Adult , Caffeine/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Coffee/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/chemically induced , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Tea/adverse effects
5.
Health Rep ; 32(9): 3-13, 2021 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34523869

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As Canadian immigration levels increase, knowledge concerning immigrant health becomes increasingly important for health system policy and planning. This study compares the rate of all-cause hospitalization among immigrants with that of their Canadian-born counterparts. DATA AND METHODS: Using records from the Discharge Abstract Database (2004/2005 to 2016/2017) and the Ontario Mental Health Reporting System (2006/2007 to 2017/2018) linked to the 2016 Longitudinal Immigration Database, this study compared the age-standardized hospitalization rates (ASHRs) among immigrants with those of the Canadian-born population; the latter were obtained from a linkage based on the 2011 National Household Survey. Comparisons were made at the International Classification of Diseases chapter level by immigrant landing year, admission category and world region of birth. Quebec data were not available. RESULTS: Overall, ASHRs among immigrants were lower than for the Canadian-born population. Immigrants in the economic class had the lowest ASHR, followed by those in the family class and among refugees. After pregnancy was excluded, leading hospitalization causes were similar for immigrants and the Canadian-born population, where top causes included digestive system and circulatory diseases, injuries, and cancer. In male and female immigrants, the ASHRs were lowest among those from East Asia. By landing year, males arriving earlier had the highest ASHR compared with the most recent arrivals. When pregnancy was excluded and while the differential in ASHRs among females by landing year remained, the magnitude was smaller. INTERPRETATION: These results corroborate those from previous studies suggesting a healthy immigrant effect, but also reveal heterogeneity in ASHRs within the immigrant population. They provide a baseline for comparison of health status between populations, which enables further monitoring and informs health-system policy and planning.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Refugees , Emigration and Immigration , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Ontario
6.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 35(6): 579-589, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32026169

ABSTRACT

Experimental and epidemiologic studies suggest that light at night (LAN) exposure disrupts circadian rhythm, and this disruption may increase breast cancer risk. We investigated the potential association between residential outdoor LAN and breast cancer risk. A population-based case-control study was conducted in Vancouver, British Columbia and Kingston, Ontario, Canada with incident breast cancer cases, and controls frequency matched by age in the same region. This analysis was restricted to 844 cases and 905 controls who provided lifetime residential histories. Using time-weighted average duration at each home 5-20 years prior to study entry, two measures of cumulative average outdoor LAN were calculated using two satellite data sources. Logistic regression was used to estimate the relationship between outdoor LAN and breast cancer risk, considering interactions for menopausal status and night shift work. We found no association between residential outdoor LAN and breast cancer for either measure of LAN [OR comparing highest vs. lowest tertile (DNB) = 0.95, 95% CI 0.70-1.27]. We also found no association when considering interactions for menopausal status and past/current night work status. These findings were robust to changes to years of residential data considered, residential mobility, and longer exposure windows. Our findings are consistent with studies reporting that outdoor LAN has a small effect or no effect on breast cancer risk.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Light , Work Schedule Tolerance/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , British Columbia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Residence Characteristics , Women's Health
7.
Int J Cancer ; 146(7): 1800-1809, 2020 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31199510

ABSTRACT

Results of epidemiologic studies of physical activity and ovarian cancer risk are inconsistent. Few have attempted to measure physical activity over the lifetime or in specific age windows, which may better capture etiologically relevant exposures. We examined participation in moderate-to-vigorous recreational physical activity (MVPA) in relation to ovarian cancer risk. In a population-based case-control study conducted in Montreal, Canada from 2011 to 2016 (485 cases and 887 controls), information was collected on lifetime participation in various recreational physical activities, which was used to estimate MVPA for each participant. MVPA was represented as average energy expenditure over the lifetime and in specific age-periods in units of metabolic equivalents (METs)-hours per week. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the relation between average MVPA and ovarian cancer risk were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models. Confounding was assessed using directed acyclic graphs combined with a change-in-estimate approach. The adjusted OR (95% CI) for each 28.5 MET-hr/week increment of lifetime recreational MVPA was 1.11 (0.99-1.24) for ovarian cancer overall. ORs for individual age-periods were weaker. When examined by menopausal status, the OR (95% CI) for lifetime MVPA was 1.21 (1.00-1.45) for those diagnosed before menopause and 1.04 (0.89-1.21) for those diagnosed postmenopausally. The suggestive positive associations were stronger for invasive ovarian cancers and more specifically for high-grade serous carcinomas. These results do not support a reduced ovarian cancer risk associated with MVPA.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Leisure Activities , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Young Adult
8.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev ; 28(5): 987-995, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30842128

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Shift work causing circadian disruption is classified as a "probable carcinogen" and may contribute to the pathogenesis of hormone-sensitive cancers. This study investigated shift work exposure in relation to epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. METHODS: In a population-based case-control study with 496 EOC cases and 906 controls, lifetime occupational histories were collected and used to calculate cumulative years of shift work exposure, average number of night shifts per month, and average number of consecutive night shifts per month. ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations with EOC risk were estimated using logistic regression. Associations were also examined according to chronotype and menopausal status. RESULTS: More than half of the cases (53.4%) and controls (51.7%) worked evening and/or night shifts. There was no clear pattern of increasing EOC risk with increasing years of shift work; the adjusted OR of EOC comparing the highest shift work category versus never working shift work was 1.20 (95% CI, 0.89-1.63). This association was more pronounced among those self-identified as having a "morning" chronotype (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.01-2.65). Associations did not greatly differ by menopausal status. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not strongly demonstrate a relationship between shift work and EOC risk. IMPACT: This study collected detailed shift work information and examined shift work patterns according to shift times and schedules. The findings highlight that chronotype should be considered in studies of shift work as an exposure.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Shift Work Schedule/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/etiology , Case-Control Studies , Circadian Rhythm , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/etiology , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Work Schedule Tolerance , Young Adult
9.
PLoS One ; 14(1): e0209010, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30601841

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Inflammation contributes to breast cancer development through its effects on cell damage. This damage is usually dealt with by key genes involved in apoptosis and autophagy pathways. METHODS: We tested 206 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 54 genes related to inflammation, apoptosis and autophagy in a population-based breast cancer study of women of European (658 cases and 795 controls) and East Asian (262 cases and 127 controls) descent. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for breast cancer risk, and case-only analysis to compare breast cancer subtypes (defined by ER/PR/HER2 status), with adjustment for confounders. We assessed statistical interactions between the SNPs and lifestyle factors (smoking status, physical activity and body mass index). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Although no SNP was associated with breast cancer risk among women of European descent, we found evidence for an association among East Asians for rs1800925 (IL-13) and breast cancer risk (OR = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.32-3.28; p = 0.000779), which remained statistically significant after multiple testing correction (padj = 0.0350). This association was replicated in a meta-analysis of 4305 cases and 4194 controls in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Genetics Study (OR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03-1.21, p = 0.011). Further, we found evidence of an interaction between rs7874234 (TSC1) and physical activity among women of East Asian descent.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis/physiology , Autophagy/physiology , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Inflammation/genetics , Adult , Apoptosis/genetics , Autophagy/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Genome-Wide Association Study , Humans , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Receptors, Estrogen/genetics , Receptors, Progesterone/genetics , Young Adult
10.
Occup Environ Med ; 76(1): 22-29, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30541747

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the association between occupational polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) exposure and female breast cancer. METHODS: Lifetime work histories for 1130 cases and 1169 controls from British Columbia and Ontario (Canada) were assessed for PAH exposure using a job-exposure matrix based on compliance measurements obtained during US Occupational Safety and Health Administration workplace safety inspections. RESULTS: Exposure to any level of PAHs was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (OR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.59), as was duration at high PAH exposure (for >7.4 years: OR=1.45, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.91; ptrend=0.01), compared with women who were never exposed. Increased risk of breast cancer was most strongly associated with prolonged duration at high occupational PAH exposure among women with a family history of breast cancer (for >7.4 years: OR=2.79, 95% CI: 1.25 to 6.24; ptrend<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that prolonged occupational exposure to PAH may increase breast cancer risk, especially among women with a family history of breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/chemically induced , Occupational Diseases/chemically induced , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/toxicity , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , British Columbia/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Ontario/epidemiology , Risk Factors
11.
Eur J Epidemiol ; 33(4): 369-379, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29464445

ABSTRACT

Night shift work has been suspected to increase breast cancer risk but epidemiological studies have been inconsistent due to heterogeneous assessment of exposure to night work. To overcome this limitation, we pooled data of five population-based case-control studies from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, and Spain into a single harmonized dataset using a common definition of night work including 6093 breast cancer cases and 6933 population controls. The odds ratio for breast cancer in women who ever worked at night for at least 3 h between midnight and 5 a.m. as compared to never night workers was 1.12 (95% CI 1.00-1.25). Among pre-menopausal women, this odds ratio was 1.26 [1.06-1.51], increasing to 1.36 [1.07-1.74] for night shifts ≥ 10 h, 1.80 [1.20-2.71] for work ≥ 3 nights/week, and 2.55 [1.03-6.30] for both duration of night work ≥ 10 years and exposure intensity ≥ 3 nights/week. Breast cancer risk in pre-menopausal women was higher in current or recent night workers (OR = 1.41 [1.06-1.88]) than in those who had stopped night work more than 2 years ago. Breast cancer in post-menopausal women was not associated with night work whatever the exposure metric. The increase in risk was restricted to ER+ tumors, particularly those who were both ER+ and HER2+ . These results support the hypothesis that night shift work increases the risk of breast cancer in pre-menopausal women, particularly those with high intensity and long duration of exposure. Risk difference between pre- and post-menopausal women deserves further scrutiny.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Circadian Rhythm , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Work Schedule Tolerance , Female , Humans , Risk Assessment
12.
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can ; 37(8): 238-247, 2017 Aug.
Article in English, French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28800293

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: While some studies have suggested associations between shift work and obesity, few have been population-based or considered multiple shift schedules. Since obesity is linked with several chronic health conditions, understanding which types of shift work influence obesity is important and additional work with more detailed exposure assessment of shift work is warranted. METHODS: Using multivariate polytomous logistic regression, we investigated the associations between shift work (evening/night, rotating and other shift schedules) and overweight and obesity as measured by body mass index cross-sectionally among 1561 men. These men had previously participated as population controls in a prostate cancer case-control study conducted in northeastern Ontario from 1995 to 1999. We obtained information on work history (including shift work), height and weight from the existing self-reported questionnaire data. RESULTS: We observed an association for ever (vs. never) having been employed in rotating shift work for both the overweight (OR [odds ratio] = 1.34; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.05-1.73) and obese (OR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.12-2.21) groups. We also observed nonsignificant associations for ever (vs. never) having been employed in permanent evening/night shifts. In addition, we found a significant trend of increased risk for both overweight and obesity with increasing duration of rotating shift work. CONCLUSION: Both the positive association between rotating shift work and obesity and the suggested positive association for permanent evening/night shift work in this study are consistent with previous findings. Future population-based research that is able to build on our results while examining additional shift work characteristics will further clarify whether some shift patterns have a greater impact on obesity than others.


INTRODUCTION: Même si certaines études suggèrent une association entre le travail par quarts et l'obésité, peu sont fondées sur la population ou tiennent compte de divers horaires de travail par quarts. L'obésité étant associée à plusieurs problèmes de santé chroniques, il est important de comprendre quelles formes de travail par quarts ont une incidence sur elle et d'effectuer des travaux permettant d'évaluer de façon plus détaillée l'exposition au travail par quarts. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Au moyen d'une régression logistique polytomique multivariée, nous avons étudié l'association entre le travail par quarts (de soir ou nuit, par quarts ou autre type de rotation) et le surpoids et l'obésité, en fonction d'une mesure transversale de l'indice de masse corporelle chez 1 561 hommes. Ces hommes avaient déjà servi de témoins dans une étude cas-témoins sur le cancer de la prostate menée dans le nord-est de l'Ontario de 1995 à 1999. Nous avons obtenu l'information sur leurs antécédents de travail (notamment sur le travail par quarts), leur taille et leur poids à partir de données autodéclarées recueillies par questionnaire. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons observé une association entre le fait d'avoir déjà travaillé par quarts (par opposition au fait de n'avoir jamais travaillé par quarts) et le surpoids (RC [rapport de cotes] = 1,34; IC [intervalle de confiance] à 95 % : 1,05 à 1,73) ainsi que l'obésité (RC = 1,57; IC à 95 % : 1,12 à 2,21). Nous avons également observé des associations statistiquement non significatives avec le fait d'avoir déjà travaillé (par opposition au fait de n'avoir jamais travaillé) de façon permanente selon un quart de soir ou de nuit. Nous avons par ailleurs observé une tendance à la hausse statistiquement significative en ce qui concerne le risque de surpoids et d'obésité en fonction de la durée du travail par quarts. CONCLUSION: Tant l'association positive observée entre le travail par quarts et l'obésité que l'association positive suggérée dans notre étude en ce qui concerne le travail permanent selon un quart de soir ou nuit concordent avec ce qui a été observé antérieurement. D'autres études en population tenant compte de nos résultats seront à mener pour examiner d'autres caractéristiques du travail par quarts, afin de mieux déterminer si certains types de travail par quarts ont une plus grande incidence sur l'obésité que d'autres.


Subject(s)
Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/etiology , Shift Work Schedule/adverse effects , Shift Work Schedule/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology , Overweight/epidemiology , Overweight/etiology , Risk Factors
13.
CMAJ Open ; 5(2): E529-E534, 2017 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28663187

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Radon is carcinogenic, and exposure to radon has been shown to increase the risk of lung cancer. The objective of this study was to quantify the proportion and number of lung cancer cases in Alberta in 2012 that could be attributed to residential radon exposure. METHODS: We estimated the population attributable risk of lung cancer for residential radon using radon exposure data from the Cross-Canada Survey of Radon Concentrations in Homes from 2009-2011 and data on all-cause and lung cancer mortality from Statistics Canada from 2008-2012. We used cancer incidence data from the Alberta Cancer Registry for 2012 to estimate the total number of lung cancers attributable to residential radon exposure. Estimates were also stratified by sex and smoking status. RESULTS: The mean geometric residential radon level in Alberta in 2011 was 71.0 Bq/m3 (geometric standard deviation 2.14). Overall, an estimated 16.6% (95% confidence interval 9.4%-29.8%) of lung cancers were attributable to radon exposure, corresponding to 324 excess attributable cancer cases. The estimated population attributable risk of lung cancer due to radon exposure was higher among those who had never smoked (24.8%) than among ever smokers (15.6%). However, since only about 10% of cases of lung cancer occur in nonsmokers, the estimated total number of excess cases was higher for ever smokers (274) than for never smokers (48). INTERPRETATION: With about 17% of lung cancer cases in Alberta in 2012 attributable to residential radon exposure, exposure reduction has the potential to substantially reduce Alberta's lung cancer burden. As such, home radon testing and remediation techniques represent important cancer prevention strategies.

14.
CMAJ Open ; 5(3): E540-E545, 2017 Jul 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28687643

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Estimates of the proportion of cancer cases that can be attributed to modifiable risk factors are not available for Canada and, more specifically, Alberta. The purpose of this study was to estimate the total proportion of cancer cases in Alberta in 2012 that could be attributed to a set of 24 modifiable lifestyle and environmental risk factors. METHODS: We estimated summary population attributable risk estimates for 24 risk factors (smoking [both passive and active], overweight and obesity, inadequate physical activity, diet [inadequate fruit and vegetable consumption, inadequate fibre intake, excess red and processed meat consumption, salt consumption, inadequate calcium and vitamin D intake], alcohol, hormones [oral contraceptives and hormone therapy], infections [Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis B and C viruses, human papillomavirus, Helicobacter pylori], air pollution, natural and artificial ultraviolet radiation, radon and water disinfection by-products) by combining population attributable risk estimates for each of the 24 factors that had been previously estimated. To account for the possibility that individual cancer cases were the result of a combination of multiple risk factors, we subtracted the population attributable risk for the first factor from 100% and then applied the population attributable risk for the second factor to the remaining proportion that was not attributable to the first factor. We repeated this process in sequential order for all relevant exposures. RESULTS: Overall, an estimated 40.8% of cancer cases in Alberta in 2012 were attributable to modifiable lifestyle and environmental risk factors. The largest proportion of cancers were estimated to be attributable to tobacco smoking, physical inactivity and excess body weight. The summary population attributable risk estimate was slightly higher among women (42.4%) than among men (38.7%). INTERPRETATION: About 41% of cancer cases in Alberta may be attributable to known modifiable lifestyle and environmental risk factors. Reducing the prevalence of these factors in the Alberta population has the potential to substantially reduce the provincial cancer burden.

15.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 165(1): 201-213, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28589367

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the relationship of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in leisure-time, household, and occupational domains across the total lifetime and in four age periods with breast cancer risk, as defined by estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR) status and ER/PR/human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2) status, among post-menopausal women. METHODS: Data were from 692 women with incident breast cancer and 644 controls in the Canadian Breast Cancer Study, a case-control study of women aged 40-80 years in British Columbia and Ontario. Mean metabolic equivalent (MET)-hours/week for questionnaire-assessed leisure-time, household, and occupational MVPA were calculated for the total lifetime and four age periods (12-17, 18-34, 45-49, and ≥50 years). Odds ratios (ORs) for the relationships between domain-specific MVPA at each lifetime period and risks of ER/PR-defined and ER/PR/HER2-defined breast cancers were estimated using polytomous logistic regression. Trend tests for dose-response relationships were calculated for the ORs across increasing tertiles of mean MET-hours/week of MVPA. RESULTS: Total lifetime leisure-time MVPA was associated with reduced risk of ER-/PR- breast cancer in a dose-response fashion (p trend = 0.014). In contrast, total lifetime household MVPA was associated with reduced risk of ER+ and/or PR+ breast cancer (p trend < 0.001). When further stratified by HER2 status, the effect of leisure-time MVPA appeared confined to HER2- breast cancers, and the effect of household MVPA did not differ according to HER2 status. Similar trends were observed when stratified by age period. CONCLUSIONS: Lifetime leisure-time MVPA appeared to be associated with reduced risk of ER-/PR-/HER2- breast cancers and lifetime household MVPA was associated with reduced risk of ER+ and/or PR+ breast cancer, regardless of HER2 status.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Healthy Lifestyle , Postmenopause , Risk Reduction Behavior , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , British Columbia/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Household Work , Humans , Job Description , Leisure Activities , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Ontario/epidemiology , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology
16.
CMAJ Open ; 5(2): E524-E528, 2017 Jun 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28659352

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified outdoor air pollution (fine particulate matter [PM2.5]) as a Group 1 lung carcinogen in humans. We aimed to estimate the proportion of lung cancer cases attributable to PM2.5 exposure in Alberta in 2012. METHODS: Annual average concentrations of PM2.5 in 2011 for 22 communities across Alberta were extracted from the Clean Air Strategic Alliance Data Warehouse and were population-weighted across the province. Using 7.5 µg/m3 and 3.18 µg/m3 as the annual average theoretical minimum risk concentrations of PM2.5, we estimated the proportion of the population above this cut-off to determine the population attributable risk of lung cancer due to PM2.5 exposure. RESULTS: The mean population-weighted concentration of PM2.5 for Alberta in 2011 was 10.03 µg/m3. We estimated relative risks of 1.02 and 1.06 for theoretical minimum risk PM2.5 concentration thresholds of 7.5 µg/m3 and 3.18 µg/m3, respectively. About 1.87%-5.69% of incident lung cancer cases in Alberta were estimated to be attributable to PM2.5 exposure. INTERPRETATION: Our estimate of attributable burden is low compared to that reported in studies in other areas of the world owing to the relatively low levels of PM2.5 recorded in Alberta. Reducing PM2.5 emissions in Alberta should continue to be a priority to help decrease the burden of lung cancer in the population.

17.
CMAJ Open ; 5(2): E338-E344, 2017 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28468830

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity has been consistently associated with increased risk of colorectal, endometrial, breast (in postmenopausal women), prostate, lung and ovarian cancers. The objective of the current analysis was to estimate the proportion and absolute number of site-specific cancer cases attributable to inadequate physical activity in Alberta in 2012. METHODS: We used population attributable risks to estimate the proportion of each site-specific cancer attributable to inactivity. Relative risk estimates were obtained from the epidemiological literature, and prevalence estimates were calculated with the use of data from the Canadian Community Health Survey cycle 2.1 (2003). Respondents who acquired 1.5-2.9 kcal/kg per day and less than 1.5 kcal/kg per day of physical activity were classified as moderately active and inactive, respectively, and both levels were considered inadequate for mitigating cancer risks. We obtained age-, sex- and site-specific cancer incidence data from the Alberta Cancer Registry for 2012. RESULTS: About 59%-75% of men and 69%-78% of women did not engage in adequate physical activity. Overall, 13.8% of cancers across all associated cancers were estimated to be attributable to inadequate physical activity, representing 7.2% of all cancers diagnosed in Alberta in 2012. Suboptimal levels of physical activity had a greater impact among women: the proportion of all associated cancers attributable to inadequate physical activity was 18.3% for women and 9.9% for men. INTERPRETATION: A substantial proportion of cancer cases diagnosed in Alberta were estimated to be attributable to inadequate physical activity. With the high prevalence of physical inactivity among adults in the province, developing strategies to increase physical activity levels could have a notable impact on reducing future cancer burden in Alberta.

18.
CMAJ Open ; 5(1): E7-E13, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28401112

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Insufficient fibre consumption has been associated with a increased risk of colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to estimate the proportion and absolute number of cancers in Alberta that could be attributed to insufficient fibre consumption in 2012. METHODS: The number and proportion of colorectal cancers in Alberta attributable to insufficient fibre consumption were estimated using the population attributable risk. Relative risks were obtained from the World Cancer Research Fund's 2011 Continuous Update Project on colorectal cancer, and the prevalence of insufficient fibre consumption (< 23 g/d) was estimated using dietary data from Alberta's Tomorrow Project. Age- and sex-specific colorectal cancer incidence data for 2012 were obtained from the Alberta Cancer Registry. RESULTS: Between 66% and 67% of men and between 73% and 78% of women reported a diet with insufficient fibre consumption. Population attributable risk estimates for colorectal cancer were marginally higher in men, ranging from 6.3% to 6.8% across age groups, whereas in women they ranged from 5.0% to 5.5%. Overall, 6.0% of colorectal cancers or 0.7% of all cancers in Alberta in 2012 were estimated to be attributable to insufficient fibre consumption. INTERPRETATION: Insufficient fibre consumption accounted for 6.0% of colorectal cancers in Alberta in 2012. Increasing fibre consumption in Alberta has the potential to reduce to the future burden of colorectal cancer in the province.

19.
CMAJ Open ; 5(2): E330-E336, 2017 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28455439

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Excess body weight has been consistently associated with colorectal, breast, endometrial, esophageal, gall bladder, pancreatic and kidney cancers. The objective of this analysis was to estimate the proportion of total and site-specific cancers attributable to excess body weight in adults in Alberta in 2012. METHODS: We estimated the proportions of attributable cancers using population attributable risk. Risk estimates were obtained from recent meta-analyses, and exposure prevalence estimates were obtained from the Canadian Community Health Survey. People with a body mass index of 25.00-29.99 kg/m2 and of 30 kg/m2 or more were categorized as overweight and obese, respectively. RESULTS: About 14%-47% of men and 9%-35% of women in Alberta were classified as either overweight or obese; the proportion increased with increasing age for both sexes. We estimate that roughly 17% and 12% of obesity-related cancers among men and women, respectively, could be attributed to excess body weight in Alberta in 2012. The heaviest absolute burden in terms of number of cases was seen for breast cancer among women and for colorectal cancer among men. Overall, about 5% of all cancers in adults in Alberta in 2012 were estimated to be attributable to excess body weight in 2000-2003. INTERPRETATION: Excess body weight contributes to a substantial proportion of cases of cancers associated with overweight and obesity annually in Alberta. Strategies to improve energy imbalance and reduce the proportion of obese and overweight Albertans may have a notable impact on cancer incidence in the future.

20.
Cancer Causes Control ; 28(5): 393-403, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28102526

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Hormone-related factors have been associated with ovarian cancer, the strongest being parity and oral contraceptive use. Given reductions in birth rates and increases in oral contraceptive use over time, associations in more recent birth cohorts may differ. Furthermore, consideration of ovarian cancer heterogeneity (i.e., Type I/II invasive cancers) may contribute to a better understanding of etiology. We examined hormone-related factors in relation to ovarian cancer risk overall, for Type I and Type II cancers, as well as borderline tumors. METHODS: A population-based case-control study was carried out in Montreal, Canada from 2011 to 2016, including 496 cases and 908 controls. For each hormone-related variable, adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression for ovarian cancer overall, and using polytomous logistic regression for associations by tumor behavior and ovarian cancer type. RESULTS: Parity was inversely associated with risk overall and by tumor behavior and type, with a stronger OR (95% CI) for Type I [0.09 (0.04-0.24) for ≥3 full-term births vs. nulliparity] vs. Type II [0.66 (0.43-1.02)] invasive cancers; the OR (95% CI) for borderline tumors was 0.41 (0.22-0.77). Oral contraceptive ever use was not associated with risk overall, but ≥10 years of use vs. never use reduced risk, particularly for invasive cancers. A history of endometriosis was most strongly associated with Type I cancers. Associations with other factors were less clear. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that associations with some hormone-related factors may differ between borderline and invasive Type I and II ovarian cancers.


Subject(s)
Contraceptives, Oral/adverse effects , Ovarian Neoplasms/etiology , Parity , Reproductive History , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Canada , Case-Control Studies , Child , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...