ABSTRACT
Multiple primary malignancies (MPM) are rare. In particular, synchronous gallbladder and gastric malignancies are extremely rare, are associated with a concealed onset and atypical symptoms, and are highly likely to be overlooked or misdiagnosed. The clinical data of two patients with synchronous gallbladder and gastric malignancies are herein reported and integrated with the relevant literature to retrospectively analyze and summarize the pathogenesis and clinical characteristics of MPM. Case 1 was a male 46-year-old patient who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and succumbed to extensive tumor metastasis 2 months after the operation. Case 2 was an 80-year-old female patient who was treated with distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer, cholecystectomy, gastrojejunostomy and dissection of 5 suprapyloric, 6 subpyloric, 7 left gastric and 8 common hepatic artery lymph nodes, and succumbed to multiple organ failure induced by extensive tumor invasion within 1 week after the operation. Clinical physicians must pay closer attention to early symptoms of MPM in order to make an accurate diagnosis, perform timely radical surgical treatment and achieve favorable therapeutic outcomes, in terms of significantly increasing long-term patient survival rates.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To recognize the importance of analyzing the result of immunohistochemical staining correctly. METHOD: Review of the three misdiagnosed cases lymphoma and exploring the causes of misdiagnosis through reviewing their clinics, histopathology and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Case 1 of lymphocyte rich classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (LRCHL) was misdiagnosed as follicular lymphoma (FL) initially, the RS cells were overlooked morphologically and wrongly determined BCL-2 and CD20-positive cells as tumor cells immunohistochemically; also once misdiagnosed as nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma (NLPHL) because the CD20-negative RS misjudged cells as the positives. Case 2 of AML tumor cells expressed TdT, CD7 and CD43 unspecifically, which misdiagnosed as T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL). Case 3 of type B1 thymoma was misdiagnosed as T-LBL, because CK wasn't expressed satisfactorily resulting in neglecting neoplastic epithelial cells, and lymphocytes in the background were TdT and CD99-positive. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of lymphoma should be based on morphology, immunohistochemistry, clinics, and genetics. Moreover, the correct judgment of immunohistochemical staining is essential to make right diagnosis.
