The vibrissal motor output following severing and repair of the facial nerve in the newborn rat reorganises less than in the adult.

This study examined the ability of facial motoneurons and motor cortex to reorganise their relationship with the somatic musculature following the severing and repair of the facial nerve in rats at birth. In each adult rat, the organisation of the facial nucleus and the cortical motor output corresponding to the normal side were compared with those corresponding to the reinnervated side. Labelling was used to reveal reinnervation-induced long-term changes in the motoneuron pool supplying vibrissal muscles. Cortical motor output was assessed by mapping the vibrissal movement area extension and thresholds evoked by intracortical microstimulation. After facial nerve reinnervation: (i) the proportion of labelled cell profiles decreased by 85.2% of that in the control side and cortical representation of vibrissal movement decreased by 66.3% of that in control hemispheres; (ii) the reorganised vibrissal representation was shrunken to the medialmost portion of the normal vibrissal representation and there was a medial extension of the forelimb representation, and a more modest lateral extension of eye representation, into the vibrissal territory; (iii) the normal pattern of contralateral vibrissal movement was observed in only 10% of the vibrissal sites, whereas ipsilateral vibrissal movement was found in 53% of the vibrissal sites; (iv) there was an increase in the mean threshold required to evoke contralateral vibrissal movement (32.5+/-11.1 vs. 20.5+/-6.9 microA). Thresholds to evoke other types of movement were similar to normal. These changes indicate that an incomplete motor axon regeneration at birth does not restore normal innervation and normal cortical control over the vibrissal muscles.

The efferent connections of the pupillary constriction area in the rat medial frontal cortex.

This study investigated, in the rat, the efferent projections of the pupillary constriction area, which is located within the medial frontal cortex. In order to identify the location of the pupillary constriction area, in preliminary experiments the medial frontal cortex was microstimulated. Intracortical microstimulation elicited pupillary constriction in a thin strip of cortex near the interhemispheric fissure and bordering the frontal eye field and vibrissae area of the somatomotor cortex. Seven animals received a single iontophoretic injection of Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin in the pupillary constriction area. In these cases, anterogradely labelled fibres and terminal-like elements were found in both hemispheres. The densest labeling was seen in several areas of the injected hemisphere, where labeled fibers prevailed in the secondary visual cortex. Dense labeled fibers were also found in the retrosplenial and cingulate cortex. In the thalamus, labeled fibers were seen in the intralaminar nuclei and posterior nuclear group. In the midbrain and pons, labeled fibers were located in the anterior pretectal area, superior colliculus and in the dorsolateral portion of the central gray. Contralaterally to the injection site, labeled fibers were distributed in the homotopic region. These findings led us to assume that, in the medial frontal cortex of the rat, besides controlling pupillary constriction, the pupillary constriction area may also be involved in controlling orientation and exploring behavior.