Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Can J Rural Med ; 28(4): 203-204, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37861606
2.
J Surg Oncol ; 125(5): 824-830, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34989410

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) requires coordination of various services to ensure timely and accurate delivery of care. This can result in multiple hospital visits and extend time to treatment (TTT). The primary purpose of our study was to evaluate time to NAC for patients at a regional cancer centre. Healthcare resource use in the form of hospital visits before NAC was also evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective chart analysis of patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent NAC between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2018 was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 286 patients underwent NAC. Median TTT was 22 days (range: 2-105). Median number of visits between first consultation and NAC was 5 (range: 0-12). Majority of additional visits were for diagnostic imaging/interventions, with a median number of 4 visits (range: 0-10). Each additional hospital visit increased time to NAC treatment by 14%. CONCLUSIONS: Women undergoing NAC require multiple visits before initiating treatment-the majority of these visits are for diagnostic imaging. These results support the need for the coordination of multidisciplinary care and diagnostic imaging for breast cancer patients undergoing NAC to reduce hospital visits, improve the patient experience, and reduce TTT.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Single-Payer System , Time-to-Treatment
4.
Gastroenterology ; 162(4): 1147-1159.e4, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34995526

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing internationally, particularly in nations with historically low rates. Previous reports of the epidemiology of pediatric-onset IBD identified a paucity of data. We systematically reviewed the global trends in incidence and prevalence of IBD diagnosed in individuals <21 years old over the first 2 decades of the 21st century. METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Airiti Library, and SciELO from January 2010 to February 2020 to identify population-based studies reporting the incidence and/or prevalence of IBD, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and/or IBD-unclassified. Data from studies published before 2000 were derived from a previously published systematic review. We described the geographic distribution and trends in children of all ages and limiting to very early onset (VEO) IBD. RESULTS: A total of 131 studies from 48 countries were included. The incidence and prevalence of pediatric-onset IBD is highest in Northern Europe and North America and lowest in Southern Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Among studies evaluating trends over time, most (31 of 37, 84%) studies reported significant increases in incidence and all (7 of 7) reported significant increases in prevalence. Data on the incidence and prevalence of VEO-IBD are limited to countries with historically high rates of IBD. Time trends in the incidence of VEO-IBD were visually heterogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of pediatric-onset IBD continue to rise around the world and data are emerging from regions where it was not previously reported; however, there remains a paucity of data on VEO-IBD and on pediatric IBD from developing and recently developed countries.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Crohn Disease , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Adult , Child , Chronic Disease , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Colitis, Ulcerative/epidemiology , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Crohn Disease/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Prevalence , Young Adult
5.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(4): 2254-2260, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34837134

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer in young women (ages 18-40 years) is rare, yet remains a leading cause of cancer-related death. Time to treatment (TTT) is an increasingly important factor in breast cancer outcomes, specifically time to systemic therapy. Our objective was to review patterns of care for young women presenting with invasive breast cancer and compare TTT for surgery first versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of young women with non-metastatic, non-inflammatory invasive breast cancer between 2012 and 2018 at a single institution was completed. The primary outcome was time to first treatment (surgery or NAC). RESULTS: One hundred forty-two young women were treated for invasive breast cancer during the study period. The majority of patients underwent surgery first (57.7%) compared with NAC (42.3%). Women who underwent NAC were more likely to have abnormal lymph nodes on imaging (p = 0.002) and clinical exam (p < 0.0001) and were also more likely to have larger tumor sizes (p < 0.05). The majority of triple negative patients underwent NAC first (88% [14/16]). Median TTT was significantly longer for surgery (27 [range 7-70] days) versus (20.5 [3-50] days) chemotherapy (p = 0.004). Median number of additional hospital visits prior to surgery was 4 (range 1-8) versus 5 (0-11) for NAC (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Young women with breast cancer who undergo NAC have a shorter TTT and clinically similar median number of hospital visits compared with women undergoing surgery first. These results support the use of NAC in young women, when indicated, as additional workup and consultations prior to NAC do not delay care.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Adolescent , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Female , Humans , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Time-to-Treatment , Young Adult
6.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 169: 103540, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34808376

ABSTRACT

AIM: Conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of systemic therapies for adult recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). METHODS: We electronically searched for randomized controlled trials from three major databases and four conferences from 2009-Dec 2020. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. RESULTS: 48 randomized trials were identified. Outcome reporting was inconsistent: overall survival (OS) in 46 studies, progression free survival in 37 studies, 6-month PFS in 30 studies, objective response rate in 28 studies, and 6-month OS in 7 studies. Network meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity in outcome reporting and single-study linkages. Most studies compared lomustine (8 studies), bevacizumab (18), or temozolomide (8) with other treatments. The median OS across all studies ranged from 3 to 17.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Based on level one evidence, there is no superior systemic regimen for rGBM. rGBM is a heterogeneous population with no single regimen demonstrating OS benefit. Registration number: CRD42020148512.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Adult , Bevacizumab , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Progression-Free Survival , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Temozolomide
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...