Relation of Length of Survival After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation to Age of the Donor.

We aim to evaluate the impact of donor age on the outcomes in orthotropic heart transplantation recipients. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for adult patients (age; ≥60) underwent first-time orthotropic heart transplantation between 1987 and 2019 (n = 18,447). We stratified the cohort by donor age; 1,702 patients (9.2%) received a heart from a donor age of <17 years; 11,307 patients (61.3%) from a donor age of 17 ≥, < 40; 3,525 patients (19.1%) from a donor age of 40 ≥, < 50); and 1,913 patients (10.4%) from a donor age of ≥50. There was a significant difference in the survival likelihood (p < 0.0001) based on donor's age-based categorized cohort, however, the median survival was 10.5 years in the cohort in whom the donor was <17, 10.3 years in whom the donor was 17 ≥, < 40, 9.4 years in whom the donor was 40 ≥, < 50, and 9.0 years in whom the donor was ≥ 50. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the episode of acute rejection (p = 0.19) nor primary graft failure (p = 0.24). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that patients receiving hearts from the donor age of ≥50 years old showed slight inferior survival likelihood, but appeared to be equivalent median survival.

Whole blood platelet aggregation kinetics under cardiopulmonary bypass: A pilot study.

Assessing the platelets' functional status during surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass is challenging. This study used multiple electrode impedance aggregometry (Multiplate®) to create a timeline of platelet aggregation changes as induced by cardiopulmonary bypass in antiplatelet-naive patients undergoing elective surgery for mitral valve regurgitation. We performed six consecutive measurements (T1: pre-operatively, T2: after heparinization, T3: 3 min after establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass, T4: immediately after administration of cardioplegia, T5: 5 min after administration of cardioplegia, and T6: 45 min after administration of cardioplegia). Platelet aggregation was determined after stimulation with 3.2-µg/mL collagen, 6.4-µM adenosine diphosphate, and 32-µM thrombin receptor activating peptide. Five patients were included (age: 64 ± 10 years, one female). We observed a decrease in hematocrit levels by -17.1% ± 3.7% (T1 vs T6) with a drop after establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass (T2 vs T3) and slightly decreasing platelet counts by -6.2% ± 7.7% (T1 vs T6). Immediately after establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass (T2 vs T3), we observed reduced platelet aggregation responses for stimulation with adenosine diphosphate (-19.7% ± 12.8%) and thrombin receptor activating peptide (-19.3% ± 6.3%). Interestingly, we found augmented platelet aggregation for all stimuli 45 min after administration of cardioplegia (T5 vs T6) with the strongest increase for collagen (+83.4% ± 42.8%; adenosine diphosphate: +39.0% ± 37.2%; thrombin receptor activating peptide: +34.5% ± 18.5%). Thus, after an initial drop due to hemodilution upon establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass, platelet reactivity increased over time which was not outweighed by decreasing platelet counts due to mechanical platelet destruction and absorption. These findings have implications for rational transfusion, peri-operative antiplatelet therapy, and for the management of patients on other extracorporeal support, such as extracorporeal life support or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Prolonged veno-arterial extracorporeal life support for cardiac failure.

OBJECTIVES: In intractable cardiogenic shock, extracorporeal life support frequently is the last treatment option. Outcomes of prolonged veno-arterial extracorporeal life support for cardiac failure are poorly defined. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 10 patients (4 females, age = 36 ± 16 years) who underwent prolonged extracorporeal life support (≥7 days) from December 2015 to March 2017 for cardiogenic shock. The primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Etiologies included ischemic cardiomyopathy with non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (n = 1), dilated (n = 3), hypertrophic (n = 1), postpartum cardiomyopathy (n = 1), and others (n = 4). Heart failure was left or biventricular in 80.0% (left ventricular ejection fraction = 15.6 ± 5.5%). Among the 10 patients, 80.0% underwent femoral and 20.0% central cannulation, 40.0% required changes in the cannulation strategy, and 80.0% underwent left ventricular venting. No technical malfunctions occurred, but 50.0% required circuit exchanges for thrombus formation. 80.0% suffered from infections. 60.0% could be decannulated after 717 ± 830 (168-2301) h of support, and survival to hospital discharge was 40.0%. Longest follow-up available is 160 ± 175 (12-409) days after discharge, with 30.0% alive and in satisfying functional condition. CONCLUSION: Prolonged veno-arterial extracorporeal life support for cardiac failure is feasible with low technical complication rates. Survival rates are acceptable, yet inferior to short-term support. We observed a shift from initial shock-related complications to infections during prolonged support. Since recovery and thus weaning is rather unlikely after a prolonged need for extracorporeal life support, this form of support should be limited to centers offering the full spectrum of interdisciplinary cardiac care including ventricular assist device implantation and transplantation.

Root Replacement for Graft Infection Using an All-Biologic Xenopericardial Conduit.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The management of graft infection following ascending aortic replacement (AAR) and/or aortic valve replacement (AVR) with destruction of the root remains a challenge. Besides technical issues, the choice of graft material is controversial. The study aim was to investigate the initial results of aortic root replacement (ARR) as redo-surgery for infection using the xenopericardial all-biologic conduit (BioIntegral) as an alternative to a homograft or prosthetic material. METHODS: Between February 2013 and January 2015, a total of 18 consecutive patients (16 males, two females; mean age 61 ± 14 years) were reoperated on for infection at a mean of 55 ± 61 months (range: 3 to 219 months) following previous AVR (n = 6), supracoronary aortic replacement (SAR, n = 2), AVR + SAR (n = 1), root replacement (n = 7), and root reconstruction (n = 2). Two patients (11%) had undergone more than one previous cardiac operation. Signs of infection were seen on computed tomography (CT) scanning in 17 patients (94%). Additional 18F-FDG PET-CT was performed in nine patients (50%). RESULTS: The cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp were 289 ± 77 min and 187 ± 59 min, respectively. Hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) + selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SACP) was necessary in nine patients (50%) and concomitant procedures in 11 (61%). Postcardiotomy extracorporeal life support (ECLS) was necessary in five patients, and renal replacement therapy in eight. One patient died intraoperatively, and the overall 30-day mortality was 22% (n = 4) secondary to multi-organ failure. Risk factors for mortality were myocardial failure requiring ECLS (p = 0.02) and the need for root replacement following previous isolated AVR (p = 0.05). The mean follow up was 12 ± 5 months. Early graft reinfection occurred in one patient (6%), and another presented with pleural empyema without evidence of persisting conduit infection. Thus, freedom from graft reinfection was 94%. No case of structural valve deterioration was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic root replacement using a xenopericardial conduit in patients with graft infection is technically feasible. Hemodynamics and surgical handling are comparable to that of homografts, but the off-the-shelf availability favors this approach. Mortality was substantial but comparable to that of other series and grafts, with low reinfection rates. Long-term outcome regarding the eradication of infection and durability of the graft remains to be demonstrated.

Coding and non-coding variants in the SHOX2 gene in patients with early-onset atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia with a strong genetic component. Molecular pathways involving the homeodomain transcription factor Shox2 control the development and function of the cardiac conduction system in mouse and zebrafish. Here we report the analysis of human SHOX2 as a potential susceptibility gene for early-onset AF. To identify causal variants and define the underlying mechanisms, results from 378 patients with early-onset AF before the age of 60 years were analyzed and compared to 1870 controls or reference datasets. We identified two missense mutations (p.G81E, p.H283Q), that were predicted as damaging. Transactivation studies using SHOX2 targets and phenotypic rescue experiments in zebrafish demonstrated that the p.H283Q mutation severely affects SHOX2 pacemaker function. We also demonstrate an association between a 3'UTR variant c.*28T>C of SHOX2 and AF (p = 0.00515). Patients carrying this variant present significantly longer PR intervals. Mechanistically, this variant creates a functional binding site for hsa-miR-92b-5p. Circulating hsa-miR-92b-5p plasma levels were significantly altered in AF patients carrying the 3'UTR variant (p = 0.0095). Finally, we demonstrate significantly reduced SHOX2 expression levels in right atrial appendages of AF patients compared to patients with sinus rhythm. Together, these results suggest a genetic contribution of SHOX2 in early-onset AF.

Immediate, Early and Late Failure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: How to Deal with the Inoperable?

BACKGROUND: Currently, the use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is constantly increasing, whilst cardiosurgical back-up varies substantially. Besides immediate conversion to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for periprocedural complications, SAVR for TAV failure may be necessary within the early or late post-implant course. The etiology, incidence, risk-stratification, management and outcome for both scenarios are largely unclear. The study aim was to provide details of the authors' experience of SAVR after the failure of TAVI at a single institution. METHODS: Nineteen patients (14 males, five females) underwent SAVR after TAVI at the authors' institution between June 2008 and December 2015. The patients' initial EuroSCORE II was 8.54 ± 9.81. In eight cases (42%; 50% transfemoral) an immediate conversion was necessary due to paravalvular leakage and insufficiency (n = 1), valve-malpositioning (n = 1), valve dislocation (n = 3), valve-trapping in mitral chordae (n = 1), and annular rupture (n = 2). The 50% transfemoral EuroSCORE II was 19.06 ± 8.61. In 11 patients transcatheter valve failure occurred at a mean of 18 ± 17 months after TAVI (two patients with structural valve failure and one with severe paravalvular leakage, seven with prosthetic valve endocarditis, and one patient with aortic aneurysm); the mean EuroSCORE II was 13.42 ± 13.06. RESULTS: For immediate conversion, the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time and aortic cross-clamp time were 104 ± 40 min and 60 ± 16 min, respectively. Concomitant procedures were necessary in two patients, one patient required hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) and one died intraoperatively. For early and late failure, the CPB and cross-clamp times were 115 ± 32 min and 82 ± 20 min, respectively. HCA was necessary in one patient, and concomitant procedures in seven patients. The 30-day survival was 63% for immediate SAVR and 100% for early and late SAVR, even though one more patient died on postoperative day 31 after immediate SAVR. Besides, the longest follow up periods were 29 ± 15 months and 19 ± 14 months for immediate and early/late failure, respectively. In both groups, one patient died from cardiovascular-related causes, and one from non-valve-related causes. CONCLUSIONS: SAVR after previous TAVI will become increasingly relevant. Due to the increasing use of TAVI in medium- or lower-risk patients, adequate strategies must be established since, in comparison to multimorbid patients, not taking action in these patients is not an option. Due to potentially high-risk patients and unique technical implications, SAVR after TAVI differs from conventional (redo) AVR. Under optimal conditions, acceptable survival rates can be achieved, but effective interdisciplinary approaches are essential.