Cardiovascular and renal outcomes of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists among patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Background: Multiple cardiovascular outcomes trials (CVOTs) have shown the efficacy of GLP-1RAs in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) for high-risk patients. However, some CVOTs failed to demonstrate cardiovascular benefits. Objectives: We analyzed the impact of GLP-1RA on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with or without T2DM, with subgroup analysis based on sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body mass index (BMI), and history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: A comprehensive database search for placebo-controlled RCTs on GLP-1RA treatment was conducted until April 2024. Data extraction and quality assessment were carried out, employing a robust statistical analysis using a random effects model to determine outcomes with log odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 13 CVOTs comprising 83,258 patients were included. GLP-1RAs significantly reduced MACE (OR 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.80 to 0.94, p < 0.01) all-cause mortality OR 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.82 to 0.93, p < 0.001, CV mortality (OR 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.81 to 0.94, p < 0.001), stroke (fatal: OR 0.74, 95 % CI: 0.56 to 0.96, p = 0.03; non-fatal: OR 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.79 to 0.96, p = 0.005), coronary revascularization (OR 0.86, 95 % CI: 0.74 to 0.99, p = 0.023), and composite kidney outcome (OR 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.67 to 0.85, p < 0.001. GLP-1RA significantly reduced MACE in both sexes. Furthermore, GLP-1RA reduced MACE regardless of CVD history, BMI, and eGFR level. Conclusion: Significant reductions in MACE, overall and CV mortality, stroke, coronary revascularization, and composite kidney outcome with GLP-1RA treatment were noted across all subgroups.

Sex-based utilization of guideline recommended statin therapy and cardiovascular disease outcomes: Data from a multisite healthcare network primary prevention cohort.

Background: In the US, women have similar cardiovascular death rates as men. However, less is known about sex differences in statin use for primary prevention and associated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes. Methods: Statin prescriptions using electronic health records were examined in patients without ASCVD (myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization or ischemic stroke) between 2013 and 2019. Guideline-directed statin intensity (GDSI) at index (at least moderate intensity, defined per pooled-cohort equation) and follow-up visits were compared between sexes across ASCVD risk groups, defined by the pooled-cohort equation. Cox regression hazard ratios were calculated for statin use and outcomes (myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and all-cause mortality) stratified by sex. Interaction terms (statin and sex) were applied. Results: Among 282,298 patients, (mean age ∼ 50 years) 17.1 % women and 19.5 % men were prescribed any statin at index visit. Time to GDSI was similar between sexes, but the proportion of high-risk women on GDSI at follow-up were lower compared to high-risk men (2-years: 27.7 vs 32.0 %, and 5-years: 47.2 vs 55.2 %, p < 0.05). When compared to GDSI, no statin use was associated with higher risk of MI and ischemic stroke/TIA among both sexes. High-risk women on GDSI had a lower risk of mortality (HR=1.39 [1.22-1.59]) vs. men (HR=1.67 [1.50-1.86]) of similar risk (p value interaction=0.004). Conclusion: In a large contemporary healthcare system, there was underutilization of statins across both sexes in primary prevention. High-risk women were less likely to remain on GDSI compared to high-risk men. GDSI significantly improved the survival in both sexes regardless of ASCVD risk group. Future strategies to ensure continued use of GDSI, specifically among women, should be explored.

Polygenic risk and incident coronary heart disease in a large multiethnic cohort.

Objective: Many studies support the notion that polygenic risk scores (PRS) improve risk prediction for coronary heart disease (CHD) beyond conventional risk factors. However, PRS are not yet considered risk-enhancing factor in guidelines. Our objective was to determine the predictive performance of a commercially available PRS (CARDIO inCode-Score®) compared with the Pooled Cohorts Equations (PCE) in a contemporary, multi-ethnic cohort. Methods: Participants (n = 63,070; 67 % female; 18 % non-European) without prior CHD were followed from 2007 through 12/31/2022. The association between the PRS and incident CHD was assessed using Cox regression adjusting for genetic ancestry and risk factors. Event rates were estimated by categories of PCE and by low/intermediate/high genetic risk within PCE categories; risk discrimination and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were also assessed. Results: There were 3,289 incident CHD events during 14 years of follow-up. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for incident CHD per 1 SD increase in PRS was 1.18 (95 % CI:1.14-1.22), and the aHR for the upper vs lower quintile of the PRS was 1.66 (95 % CI:1.49-1.86). The association was consistent in both sexes, in European participants compared with all minority groups combined and was strongest in the first 5 years of follow-up. The increase in the C-statistic was 0.004 (0.747 vs. 0.751; p < 0.0001); the NRI was 2.4 (0.9-3.8) for the entire cohort and 9.7 (7.5-12.0) for intermediate PCE risk individuals. After incorporating high genetic risk, a further 10 percent of participants at borderline/intermediate PCE risk would be candidates for statin therapy. Conclusion: Inclusion of polygenic risk improved identification of primary prevention individuals who may benefit from more intensive risk factor modification.

Statin utilization and cardiovascular outcomes in a real-world primary prevention cohort of older adults.

Background: Statins are a cost-effective therapy for prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Guidelines on statins for primary prevention are unclear for older adults (>75 years). Objective: Investigate statin utility in older adults without ASCVD events, by risk stratifying in a large healthcare network. Methods: We included 8,114 older adults, without CAD, PVD or ischemic stroke. Statin utilization based on ACC/AHA 10-year ASCVD risk calculation, was evaluated in intermediate (7.5%-19.9%) and high-risk patients (≥ 20%); and categorized using low and 'moderate or high' intensity statins with a follow up period of ∼7 years. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios for incident ASCVD and mortality across risk categories stratified by statin utilization. Data was adjusted for competing risk using Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Results: Compared with those on moderate or high intensity statins, high-risk older patients not on any statin had a significantly increased risk of MI [HR 1.51 (1.17-1.95); p<0.01], stroke [HR 1.47 (1.14-1.90); p<0.01] and all-cause mortality [HR 1.37 (1.19-1.58); p<0.001] in models adjusted for Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. When comparing the no statin group versus the moderate or high intensity statin group in the intermediate risk cohort, although a trend for increased risk was seen, it did not meet statistical significance thresholds for MI, stroke or all-cause mortality. Conclusion: Lack of statin use was associated with increased cardiovascular events and mortality in high-risk older adults. Given the benefits appreciated, statin use may need to be strongly considered for primary ASCVD prevention among high-risk older adults. Future studies will assess the risk-benefit ratio of statin intervention in older adults.

Patient-Centered Adult Cardiovascular Care: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Patient-centered care is gaining widespread acceptance by the medical and lay communities and is increasingly recognized as a goal of high-quality health care delivery. Patient-centered care is based on ethical principles and aims at establishing a partnership between the health care team and patient, family member, or both in the care planning and decision-making process. Patient-centered care involves providing respectful care by tailoring management decisions to patients' beliefs, preferences, and values. A collaborative care approach can enhance patient engagement, foster shared decision-making that aligns with patient values and goals, promote more personalized and effective cardiovascular care, and potentially improve patient outcomes. The objective of this scientific statement is to inform health care professionals and stakeholders about the role and impact of patient-centered care in adult cardiovascular medicine. This scientific statement describes the background and rationale for patient-centered care in cardiovascular medicine, provides insight into patient-oriented medication management and patient-reported outcome measures, highlights opportunities and strategies to overcome challenges in patient-centered care, and outlines knowledge gaps and future directions.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Women's Cardiovascular Health in the United States and Canada.

Cardiovascular disease has been the leading cause of death in the United States and Canada for decades. Although it affects millions of people across a multitude of backgrounds, notable disparities in cardiovascular health are observed among women and become more apparent when accounting for race and socioeconomic status. Although intrinsic sex-specific physiologic differences predispose women to poorer outcomes, social determinants of health (SDOH) and biases at both the individual provider and the larger health care system levels play an equal, if not greater, role. This review examines socioeconomic disparities in women compared with men regarding cardiovascular risk factors, treatments, and outcomes. Although various at-risk subpopulations exist, we highlight the impact of SDOH in specific populations, including patients with disabilities, transgender persons, and South Asian and Indigenous populations. These groups are underrepresented in studies and experience poorer health outcomes owing to structural barriers to care. These findings emphasise the significance of understanding the interplay of different socioeconomic factors and how their stacking can negatively affect women's cardiovascular health. To address these disparities, we propose a multipronged approach to augment culturally sensitive and patient-centred care. This includes increased cardiovascular workforce diversity, inclusion of underrepresented populations into analyses of cardiovascular metrics, and greater utilisation of technology and telemedicine to improve access to health care. Achieving this goal will necessitate active participation from patients, health care administrators, physicians, and policy makers, and is imperative in closing the cardiovascular health gap for women over the coming decades.

Elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and adverse outcomes in women with symptoms of ischemic heart disease.

Background: Emerging data in the general population and those with coronary artery disease demonstrate higher risk of adverse outcomes with high (>70 mg/dL) HDL-C levels. There are limited data on the risk of adverse outcomes in women with suspected ischemic heart disease. Objective: To investigate relationships between high (>70 mg/dL), average (50-70 mg/dL), and low (<50 mg/dL) HDL-C levels with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization), and all-cause mortality in women referred for coronary angiography for suspected myocardial ischemia. Methods: A total of 607 women enrolled in the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) original cohort (NCT00000554) with available HDL-C values were included in this analysis. Associations between HDL-C level and outcomes were evaluated using both multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression and spline regression analysis. Results: The mean age was 59 ± 12 years, 62 % had 3 or more cardiac risk factors, and 66 (10.9 %) had a high HDL-C. High and low HDL-C were both associated with higher MACE risk compared to average HDL-C after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics (HR 1.80, CI 1.03-3.14, p = 0.038; HR 1.63, CI 1.09-2.42, p = 0.016, respectively). Similarly, high, and low HDL-C were associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 3.64, CI 1.84-7.20, p < 0.001; HR 2.81, CI 1.67-4.71, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: High and low HDL-C levels are both independently associated with higher MACE and all-cause mortality in women with suspected ischemia undergoing coronary angiography.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists modestly reduced blood pressure among patients with and without diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis and meta-regression.

AIM: The cardiovascular benefits provided by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) extend beyond weight reduction and glycaemic control. One possible mechanism may relate to blood pressure (BP) reduction. We aim to quantify the BP-lowering effects of GLP1-RAs. METHODS: A comprehensive database search for placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials on GLP-1RA treatment was conducted until December 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were carried out, employing a robust statistical analysis using a random effects model to determine outcomes with a mean difference (MD) in mmHg and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary endpoint was the mean difference in systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP. Subgroup analyses and meta-regressions were done to account for covariates. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, GLP-1RAs modestly reduced SBP [semaglutide: MD -3.40 (95% CI -4.22 to -2.59, p < .001); liraglutide: MD -2.61 (95% CI -3.48 to -1.74, p < .001); dulaglutide: MD -1.46 (95% CI -2.20 to -0.72, p < .001); and exenatide: MD -3.36 (95% CI -3.63 to -3.10, p < .001)]. This benefit consistently increased with longer treatment durations. Diastolic BP reduction was only significant in the exenatide group [MD -0.94 (95% CI -1.78 to -0.1), p = .03]. Among semaglutide cohorts, mean changes in glycated haemoglobin and mean changes in body mass index were directly associated with SBP reduction. CONCLUSION: Patients on GLP-1RA experienced modest SBP lowering compared with placebo. This observed effect was associated with weight/body mass index reduction and better glycaemic control, which suggests that BP-lowering is an indirect effect of GLP-1RA and unlikely to be responsible for the benefits.

Cardiovascular Outcomes With Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin in Patients Without Diabetes.

Although the cardiovascular (CV) benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are well known, their effects in patients without DM continue to be explored. We provide a meta-analysis of the available evidence. Online databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT2i to placebo/control in patients without DM. The end points of interest were composite CV death/hospitalization for heart failure (HF) with individual components, all-cause death, major adverse CV events, and serious adverse events. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of SGLT2i. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated through a random-effects model. A total of 6 RCTs with 12,984 patients (6,501 in the SGLT2i group and 6,483 in the placebo group) were included, followed over a mean duration of 17.7 months. Four RCTs had patients with HF, 1 with chronic kidney disease, and 1 with myocardial infarction. The mean age was 64 years, 72% of patients were men and mean hemoglobin A1C was 5.7%. As compared with a placebo, SGLT2i treatment was associated with significant reduction in composite CV death or hospitalization for HF (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.87, p <0.0001), primarily because of a decrease in hospitalization for HF (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.81, p <0.00001). No significant differences were found pertaining to CV death (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.01, p = 0.06), all-cause death (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.11, p = 0.29) and major adverse CV events (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.32, p = 0.75). Serious adverse events were lower with use of empagliflozin vs placebo. In conclusion, this study shows significant CV benefits in terms of reduction in CV death or hospitalization for HF in patients without DM treated with SGLT2i as compared with placebo. The underlying heterogeneity of patients in terms of co-morbidities (HF, chronic kidney disease, or myocardial infarction) needs to be considered while interpreting the results.

Atherosclerotic coronary plaque regression from lipid-lowering therapies: A meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Background: Studies reporting collective and comprehensive data on plaque regression of different lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) are limited. Objectives: We evaluated plaque regression of LLTs based on multiple markers and performed subgroup analyses based on LLT type and post-treatment LDL-C levels. Methods: A literature search was performed to identify studies assessing plaque regression from LLTs. The following LLTs groups were included: High-intensity statin (HIS), HIS+ eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), HIS + ezetimibe, Low-intensity statin (LIS), LIS + EPA, LIS + Ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors. Our primary outcomes were change in percent atheroma volume (PAV). Secondary outcomes included mean differences in total atheroma volume (TAV), lumen, plaque, and vessel volumes, fibrous cap thickness (FCT), and lipid arc (LA). Subgroup analyses were performed on LLT type and post-treatment LDL-C levels. Meta-regression was performed to control for covariates. Results: We identified 51 studies with 9,113 adults (22 % females). LLTs reduced PAV levels (-1.10 % [-1.63, -0.56], p < 0.01), with significant reduction observed with HIS, LIS + ezetimibe, LIS + EPA, and PCSK9 inhibitors. LLTs reduced TAV levels (-5.84 mm3 [-8.64 to -3.04] p < 0.01), mainly driven by HIS (-7.60 mm3 [-11.89, -3.31] p < 0.01). LLTs reduced plaque volume and LA and increased FCT. Conclusion: The plaque regression associated with LLTs is observed to be mainly driven by HIS, reducing both TAV and PAV. This suggest that HIS is the most effective LLT for plaque regression. Unstructured abstract: We evaluated plaque regression of LLTs from 51 studies. We found that while reduction of PAV (-1.10 % [-1.63, -0.56], p < 0.01) were present across different LLT types, reduction of TAV (-5.84 mm3 [-8.64 to -3.04] p < 0.01) was mainly driven by HIS (-7.60 mm3 [-11.89, -3.31] p < 0.01). These results suggest that HIS is the most effective LLT for plaque regression.

Closing the sex gap in cardiovascular mortality by achieving both horizontal and vertical equity.

Addressing sex differences and disparities in coronary heart disease (CHD) involves achieving both horizontal and vertical equity in healthcare. Horizontal equity in the context of CHD means that both men and women with comparable health statuses should have equal access to diagnosis, treatment, and management of CHD. To achieve this, it is crucial to promote awareness among the general public about the signs and symptoms of CHD in both sexes, so that both women and men may seek timely medical attention. Women often face inequity in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Current guidelines do not differ based on sex, but their applications based on gender do differ. Vertical equity means tailoring healthcare to allow equitable care for all. Steps towards achieving this include developing treatment protocols and guidelines that consider the unique aspects of CHD in women. It also requires implementing guidelines equally, when there is not sex difference rather than inequities in application of guideline directed care.

The Development of a Chest-Pain Protocol for Women Presenting to the Emergency Department.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in women worldwide, and of premature death in women in Canada. Despite improvements in cardiovascular care over the past 15-20 years, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and CVD mortality continue to increase among women in Canada. Chest pain is a common symptom leading to emergency department visits for both men and women. However, women with ACS experience worse outcomes. compared with those of men, due to misdiagnosis or lack of diagnosis resulting in delayed care and underuse of guideline-directed medical therapies. CVD mortality rates are highest in Indigenous and racialized women and those with a disproportionately high number of adverse social determinants of health. CVD remains underrecognized, underdiagnosed, undertreated, and underresearched in women. Moreover, a lack of awareness of unique symptoms, clinical presentations, and sex-and-gender specific CVD risk factors, by healthcare professionals, leads to outcome disparities. In response to this knowledge gap, in acute recognition and management of chest-pain syndromes in women, the Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance performed a needs assessment and review of CVD risk factors and ACS pathophysiology, through a sex and gender lens, and then developed a unique chest-pain assessment protocol utilizing modified dynamic programming algorithmic methodology. The resulting algorithmic protocol is presented. The output is intended as a quick reference algorithm that could be posted in emergency departments and other acute-care settings. Next steps include protocol implementation evaluation and impact assessment on CVD outcomes in women.

Les maladies cardiovasculaires (MCV) sont la principale cause de décès chez les femmes dans le monde et de décès prématuré chez les femmes au Canada. Malgré les progrès réalisés dans le domaine des soins cardiovasculaires au cours des 15 à 20 dernières années, les taux de syndrome coronarien aigu (SCA) et de mortalité due aux MCV continuent d'augmenter chez les femmes au Canada. La douleur thoracique est un symptôme fréquent qui pousse les hommes et les femmes à se rendre aux urgences. Toutefois, les femmes atteintes d'un SCA présentent de moins bons résultats cliniques que les hommes, en raison d'erreurs de diagnostic ou d'une absence de diagnostic causant des retards dans les soins prodigués et une sous-utilisation des traitements médicaux préconisés dans les lignes directrices. Les taux de mortalité liée aux MCV sont les plus élevés chez les femmes autochtones et les femmes racialisées ainsi que chez celles qui présentent un nombre particulièrement élevé de déterminants sociaux de la santé défavorables. Les MCV continuent d'être sous-estimées, sous-diagnostiquées et sous-traitées chez les femmes et ne sont pas suffisamment étudiées dans cette population. De plus, la méconnaissance par les professionnels de la santé des symptômes, des tableaux cliniques et des facteurs de risque de MCV selon le sexe et le genre entraînent des disparités dans les résultats cliniques. Pour combler ces lacunes dans les connaissances en matière de reconnaissance et de prise en charge des symptômes de douleur thoracique chez les femmes, l'Alliance canadienne de la santé cardiaque des femmes a réalisé une évaluation des besoins et un examen des facteurs de risque de MCV et de la physiopathologie du SCA en tenant compte des particularités liées au sexe et au genre, et a ensuite élaboré un protocole unique d'évaluation de la douleur thoracique faisant appel à une méthodologie algorithmique par programmation dynamique modifiée. Nous présentons le protocole algorithmique qui en est issu. Ce résultat se veut un algorithme de référence rapide pouvant être diffusé dans les services d'urgences et les autres services de soins de courte durée. Les prochaines étapes de notre travail seront d'évaluer la mise en œuvre du protocole et son incidence sur les issues cardiovasculaires chez les femmes.

The Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance ATLAS on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Women - Chapter 9: Summary of Current Status, Challenges, Opportunities, and Recommendations.

This final chapter of the Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance "ATLAS on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Women" presents ATLAS highlights from the perspective of current status, challenges, and opportunities in cardiovascular care for women. We conclude with 12 specific recommendations for actionable next steps to further the existing progress that has been made in addressing these knowledge gaps by tackling the remaining outstanding disparities in women's cardiovascular care, with the goal to improve outcomes for women in Canada.

Dans ce chapitre final de l'ATLAS sur l'épidémiologie, le diagnostic et la prise en charge de la maladie cardiovasculaire chez les femmes de l'Alliance canadienne de santé cardiaque pour les femmes, nous présentons les points saillants de l'ATLAS au sujet de l'état actuel des soins cardiovasculaires offerts aux femmes, ainsi que des défis et des occasions dans ce domaine. Nous concluons par 12 recommandations concrètes sur les prochaines étapes à entreprendre pour donner suite aux progrès déjà réalisés afin de combler les lacunes dans les connaissances, en s'attaquant aux disparités qui subsistent dans les soins cardiovasculaires prodigués aux femmes, dans le but d'améliorer les résultats de santé des femmes au Canada.

The Canadian Women's Heart Health Alliance ATLAS on the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Cardiovascular Disease in Women - Chapter 7: Sex, Gender, and the Social Determinants of Health.

Women vs men have major differences in terms of risk-factor profiles, social and environmental factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Women are more likely than men to experience health issues that are complex and multifactorial, often relating to disparities in access to care, risk-factor prevalence, sex-based biological differences, gender-related factors, and sociocultural factors. Furthermore, awareness of the intersectional nature and relationship of sociocultural determinants of health, including sex and gender factors, that influence access to care and health outcomes for women with cardiovascular disease remains elusive. This review summarizes literature that reports on under-recognized sex- and gender-related risk factors that intersect with psychosocial, economic, and cultural factors in the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of women's cardiovascular health.

Les profils de facteurs de risque, les facteurs sociaux et environnementaux, le tableau clinique, le diagnostic et le traitement des maladies cardiovasculaires montrent des différences importantes entre les femmes et les hommes. Il est plus probable que les femmes expérimentent des problèmes de santé complexes et multifactoriels, qui sont souvent en relation avec les disparités dans l'accès aux soins, la prévalence des facteurs de risque, les différences biologiques entre les sexes, les facteurs liés au genre et les facteurs socioculturels. De plus, la sensibilisation à la nature et à la relation intersectionnelles des déterminants socioculturels de santé, notamment les facteurs liés au sexe et au genre, qui influencent l'accès aux soins et les résultats cliniques des femmes atteintes d'une maladie cardiovasculaire demeure insaisissable. La présente revue résume la littérature qui porte sur les facteurs de risque liés au sexe et au genre peu reconnus qui se recoupent aux facteurs psychosociaux, économiques et culturels dans le diagnostic, le traitement et les résultats cliniques en lien avec la santé cardiovasculaire des femmes.

Recent advances in cardiovascular risk assessment: The added value of non-invasive anatomic imaging.

In 2022, multiple original research studies were conducted highlighting the utility of coronary artery calcium (CAC) imaging in young individuals and provided further evidence for the role of CAC to improve atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk assessment. Mean calcium density was shown to be a more reliable predictor than peak density in risk assessment. Additionally, in light of the ACC/AHA/Multispecialty Chest Pain Guideline's recent elevation of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to a Class I (level of evidence A) recommendation as an index diagnostic test for acute or stable chest pain, several studies support the utility of CCTA and guided future directions. This review summarizes recent studies that highlight the role of non-invasive imaging in enhancing ASCVD risk assessment across different populations.

Recommended and observed statin use among US adults with and without cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased cardiovascular risk. We aimed to compare the recommended and observed statin use among individuals with and without cancer. METHODS: Using three 2-year cycles from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES] (2013-2018), we analyzed data from 17,050 USA adults. We compared the prevalence of class 1 statin recommendations and use between individuals with and without cancer, overall and among different demographic groups. RESULTS: Individuals with a history of cancer were older and had a higher burden of co-morbidities. Stratified by age groups, they were more likely to have a secondary prevention indication compared to individuals without cancer, but not a primary prevention indication for statin. Among individuals with an indication for statin therapy, the prevalence of statin use was higher in the cancer group compared to those without cancer (60.8% vs 47.8%, p < 0.001), regardless of sex, type of indication (primary vs secondary prevention), and education level. However, the higher prevalence of statin use in the cancer group was noted among younger individuals, ethnic minorities, and those with lower family income. CONCLUSION: Our finding highlights the importance of optimization of cardiovascular health in patients with cancer, as Individuals with cancer were more likely to have a class 1 indication for statin treatment when compared to individuals without cancer. Important differences in statin use among cohorts based on sex, age, ethnicity, and SES were identified, which may provide a framework through which cardiovascular risk factor control can be targeted in this population.

This study reveals that individuals with cancer more likely to have a secondary prevention indication compared to individuals without cancer, but not a primary prevention indication for statin. And that hey had higher rates of compliance with statin treatment, compared to those without cancer.

Sex Differences in Association of Physical Activity With All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Although physical activity is widely recommended for reducing cardiovascular and all-cause mortality risks, female individuals consistently lag behind male individuals in exercise engagement. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether physical activity derived health benefits may differ by sex. METHODS: In a prospective study of 412,413 U.S. adults (55% female, age 44 ± 17 years) who provided survey data on leisure-time physical activity, we examined sex-specific multivariable-adjusted associations of physical activity measures (frequency, duration, intensity, type) with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality from 1997 through 2019. RESULTS: During 4,911,178 person-years of follow-up, there were 39,935 all-cause deaths including 11,670 cardiovascular deaths. Regular leisure-time physical activity compared with inactivity was associated with 24% (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.73-0.80) and 15% (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.82-0.89) lower risk of all-cause mortality in women and men, respectively (Wald F = 12.0, sex interaction P < 0.001). Men reached their maximal survival benefit of HR 0.81 from 300 min/wk of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, whereas women achieved similar benefit at 140 min/wk and then continued to reach a maximum survival benefit of HR 0.76 also at ∼300 min/wk. Sex-specific findings were similar for cardiovascular death (Wald F = 20.1, sex interaction P < 0.001) and consistent across all measures of aerobic activity as well as muscle strengthening activity (Wald F = 6.7, sex interaction P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Women compared with men derived greater gains in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk reduction from equivalent doses of leisure-time physical activity. These findings could enhance efforts to close the "gender gap" by motivating especially women to engage in any regular leisure-time physical activity.

Sex-Based Utilization of Guideline Recommended Statin Therapy and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes: A Primary Prevention Healthcare Network Registry.

Background: In the US, women have similar cardiovascular death rates than men. Less is known about sex differences in statin use for primary prevention and associated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes. Methods: Statin prescriptions using electronic health records were examined in patients without ASCVD (myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization or ischemic stroke) between 2013-2019. Guideline-directed statin intensity (GDSI) at index and follow-up visits were compared among sexes across ASCVD risk groups, defined by pooled-cohort equation. Cox regression hazard ratios (HR) [95% CI] were calculated for statin use and outcomes (myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and all-cause mortality) stratified by sex. Interaction terms (statin and sex) were applied. Results: Among 282,298 patients, (mean age ∼ 50 years) 17.1% women and 19.5% men were prescribed any statin at index visit. Time to GDSI was similar between sexes, but the proportion of high-risk women on GDSI at follow-ups was lower compared to high-risk men (2-years: 27.7 vs 32.0%, and 5-years: 47.2 vs 55.2%, p<0.05). When compared to GDSI, no statin use was associated with higher risk of MI and ischemic stroke/TIA amongst both sexes. High-risk women on GDSI had a lower risk of mortality (HR=1.39 [1.22-1.59]) versus men (HR=1.67 [1.50-1.86]) of similar risk (p value interaction=0.004). Conclusion: In a large contemporary healthcare system, there was underutilization of statins across both sexes in primary prevention. High-risk women were less likely to be initiated on GDSI compared with high-risk men. GDSI significantly improved the survival in both sexes regardless of ASCVD risk group. Future strategies to ensure continued use of GDSI, specifically among women, should be explored.