Evaluation of interleukin-8 levels in the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with haematological malignancies.

This study aimed to determine the level of interleukin (IL)-8 in diagnosing of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA). We conducted this study with 50 controls and 25 IPA patients with haematological malignancies. Demographic data, haematological diagnoses, chemotherapy regimen, galactomannan level, fungal culture, and computed tomography findings of the patients were evaluated prospectively. IL-8 levels were studied with the ELISA method. The mean age of patients in the case group was 60.84 ± 15.38 years, while that of the controls was 58.38 ± 16.64 years. Of the patients, 2/25 were classified as having 'proven', 13/25 as 'probable', and 10/25 as 'possible' invasive aspergillosis (IA). Serum IL-8 levels were found to be significantly higher in the case group compared to the controls. There was a negative correlation between serum IL-8 levels and neutrophil counts and a positive correlation with the duration of neutropenia. A significant cutoff value for serum IL-8 parameter in detecting IPA disease was obtained as ≥274 ng/l; sensitivity was 72%; specificity was 64%; PPV was 50%; and NPV was 82%. In the subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in serum IL-8 levels between the case group and the patients in the neutropenic control group, while a significant difference was found in with the patients in the non-neutropenic control group. Serum IL-8 levels in neutropenic patients who develop IPA are not adequate in terms of both the diagnosis of the disease and predicting mortality. New, easily applicable methods with high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing IPA are still needed.

Although a significant cutoff value for serum interleukin (IL)-8 was found in the diagnosis of IPA, there was no statistical difference in serum IL-8 when subgroup analysis was performed with neutropenic control patients. Therefore, serum IL-8 is not a successful marker in diagnosing neutropenic patients with IPA.

Clinical Evaluation of Patients with COVID-19 Within the Framework of Comorbidities.

Objectives: Chronic systemic diseases (CSD) and cancer are closely related to the clinical course, severity and mortality of COVID-19 due to the immunosuppressive conditions caused by these diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between the effects of cancer and CSD on the clinical and laboratory parameters of patients with COVID-19. Methods: The study included patients who received inpatient treatment with the diagnosis of COVID-19 at Ondokuz Mayis University between March 16, 2020, and December 1, 2020. The participants were divided into four groups as follows: Those without comorbidities (Group 1), those with only CSD (Group 2), those with only cancer (Group 3), and those with both CSD and cancer (Group 4). Comparative statistical evaluation was performed in terms of clinical symptoms, biochemical parameters, and admission to intensive care and survival. Results: In total, 750 patients were included: 242 patients in Group 1, 442 in Group 2, 27 in Group 3, and 39 in Group 4. The mean age of the patients was 57.1±9.4 years and 53.7% were male. Patients of Group 1 were significantly different from those of the other groups in terms of age, requirement for intensive care and intubation, complications, survival, white blood cell and lymphocyte count, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and levels of hemoglobin, lactic acid dehydrogenase, ferritin, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein (for each p<0.001). Conclusion: No difference was observed among laboratory parameters, intensive care admission, intubation need, complication frequency, and survival rates in patients with CSD or cancer. It was detected that all three groups with CSD and cancer were worse than Group 1 in terms of intensive care need, intubation, and survival.

The association of antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity: The retrospective analysis of a nationwide COVID-19 cohort.

Background and objectives: Although several repurposed antiviral drugs have been used for the treatment of COVID-19, only a few such as remdesivir and molnupiravir have shown promising effects. The objectives of our study were to investigate the association of repurposed antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity. Methods: Patients admitted to 26 different hospitals located in 16 different provinces between March 11-July 18, 2020, were enrolled. Case definition was based on WHO criteria. Patients were managed according to the guidelines by Scientific Board of Ministry of Health of Turkey. Primary outcomes were length of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) requirement, and intubation. Results: We retrospectively evaluated 1,472 COVID-19 adult patients; 57.1% were men (mean age = 51.9 ± 17.7years). A total of 210 (14.3%) had severe pneumonia, 115 (7.8%) were admitted to ICUs, and 69 (4.7%) were intubated during hospitalization. The median (interquartile range) of duration of hospitalization, including ICU admission, was 7 (5-12) days. Favipiravir (n = 328), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 55), and oseltamivir (n = 761) were administered as antiviral agents, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, n = 1,382) and azithromycin (n = 738) were used for their immunomodulatory activity. Lopinavir/ritonavir (ß [95% CI]: 4.71 [2.31-7.11]; p = 0.001), favipiravir (ß [95% CI]: 3.55 [2.56-4.55]; p = 0.001) and HCQ (ß [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.02-1.67]; p = 0.046) were associated with increased risk of lengthy hospital stays. Furthermore, favipiravir was associated with increased risks of ICU admission (OR [95% CI]: 3.02 [1.70-5.35]; p = 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement (OR [95% CI]: 2.94 [1.28-6.75]; p = 0.011). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that antiviral drugs including lopinavir, ritonavir, and favipiravir were associated with negative clinical outcomes such as increased risks for lengthy hospital stay, ICU admission, and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement. Therefore, repurposing such agents without proven clinical evidence might not be the best approach for COVID-19 treatment.

Comparison of full-face and oronasal mask effectiveness in hypercapnic respiratory failure patients with non-invasive mechanical ventilation.

Introduction: Non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is a successful treatment modality in hypercapnic respiratory failure. Patient compliance and mask selection are the most important factors in the success of NIMV. In our prospective randomized study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of full-face and oronasal masks in the treatment of patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure who underwent NIMV and to investigate the mask compliance of the patients. Materials and Methods: In this prospective randomized study, 60 patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure were divided into two groups; the full face mask group (n= 30) and the oronasal mask group (n= 30). Arterial blood gas values and respiratory rates were measured before the treatment and at the 1st, 6th, 24th, and 72nd hours of the treatment. The compliance of the patients with the treatment was evaluated with the patient compliance scale (PCS) at the 1st, 6th, and 24th hours of the treatment. Result: Eight patients from the full-face mask group were excluded because of mask-face mismatch and claustrophobia, and two patients from the oronasal mask group due to persistent hypercapnia. In the full face mask group, improvement in pH was observed at the 1st and 24th hours of treatment (p= 0.042, p= 0.033), and PCO2 decreased at the 72nd hour of treatment (p= 0.024). There was no difference in patient compliance and respiratory rate between groups. The complaints of burning sensation and pressure in the eyes were higher in the full face mask group (p= 0.025), and pressure ulcers were more common in the oronasal mask group (p= 0.025). Conclusions: The reduction in PCO2 and improvement in pH were greater with a full face mask. Pressure sores were less common with a full face mask. In our study, no difference was found in terms of patient compliance between groups. It should be noted that choosing a full face mask in patients with high compliance will increase the success in the treatment of hypercapnic respiratory failure.

A novel intubation prediction model for patients hospitalized with COVID-19: the OTO-COVID-19 scoring model.

OBJECTIVE: The method for predicting the risk of intubation in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is yet to be standardized. This study aimed to introduce a new disease prognosis scoring model that may predict the intubation risk based on the symptoms, signs, and laboratory tests of patients hospitalized with the diagnosis of COVID-19. METHOD: This cross-sectional retrospective study analyzed the intubation status of 733 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 diagnosis between March and December 2020 at Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Turkey, based on 33 variables. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to select the variables that significantly affect intubation, which constitute the risk factors. The Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detection algorithm, one of the data mining methods, was used to determine the threshold values of the important variables for intubation classification. RESULTS: The following variables found were mostly associated with intubation: C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, age, lymphocyte count, and malignancy. The logistic function based on these variables correctly predicted 81.13% of intubated (sensitivity), 99.52% of nonintubated (specificity), and 96.86% of both intubated and nonintubated (accurate classification rate) patients. The scoring model revealed the following risk statuses for the intubated patients: very high risk, 75.47%; moderate risk, 20.75%; and very low risk, 3.77%. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of certain variables measured at admission, the OTO-COVID-19 scoring model may help clinicians identify patients at the risk of intubation and subsequently provide a prompt and effective treatment at the earliest.

The predictors of COVID-19 mortality in a nationwide cohort of Turkish patients.

The COVID-19-related death rate varies between countries and is affected by various risk factors. This multicenter registry study was designed to evaluate the mortality rate and the related risk factors in Turkey. We retrospectively evaluated 1500 adults with COVID-19 from 26 centers who were hospitalized between March 11 and July 31, 2020. In the study group, 1041 and 459 cases were diagnosed as definite and highly probable cases, respectively. There were 993 PCR-positive cases (66.2%). Among all cases, 1144 (76.3%) were diagnosed with non-severe pneumonia, whereas 212 (14.1%) had severe pneumonia. Death occurred in 67 patients, corresponding to a mortality rate of 4.5% (95% CI:3.5-5.6). The univariate analysis demonstrated that various factors, including male sex, age ≥65 years and the presence of dyspnea or confusion, malignity, chronic obstructive lung disease, interstitial lung disease, immunosuppressive conditions, severe pneumonia, multiorgan dysfunction, and sepsis, were positively associated with mortality. Favipiravir, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were not associated with survival. Following multivariate analysis, male sex, severe pneumonia, multiorgan dysfunction, malignancy, sepsis and interstitial lung diseases were found to be independent risk factors for mortality. Among the biomarkers, procalcitonin levels on the 3rd-5th days of admission showed the strongest associations with mortality (OR: 6.18; 1.6-23.93). This study demonstrated that the mortality rate in hospitalized patients in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic was a serious threat and that those patients with male sex, severe pneumonia, multiorgan dysfunction, malignancy, sepsis and interstitial lung diseases were at increased risk of mortality; therefore, such patients should be closely monitored.

The relationship between serum uric acid level and uric acid/creatinine ratio with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity (stable or acute exacerbation) and the development of cor pulmonale.

BACKGROUND: There are studies reporting that uric acid elevation is a marker for hypoxemia and pulmonary hypertension secondary to some diseases. AIM: The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between serum uric acid level and uric acid/creatinine ratio with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation, hypoxemia in exacerbation and development of cor pulmonale. METHODS: A total of 96 COPD patients who were admitted to Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine emergency department and Chest Diseases outpatient clinic and whose written consent was obtained were included in our study. Forty-three of these patients were in the period of exacerbation (Group 1), and 53 were in the stable period (Group 2). Complete blood count, blood biochemistry (including serum uric acid level) and arterial blood gas analysis were performed in our patients. In addition, spirometry and echocardiography findings were examined. RESULTS: Serum uric acid level of patients in the period of exacerbation group (Group 1) was 6.97 ± 1.34 and in stable COPD group (Group 2) was 4.30 ± 1.01 (P < .05). Uric acid/creatinine ratios in Group 1 was 8.00 ± 2.06; in Group 2, it was 5.52 ± 1.57 (P < .05). In patients with hypoxemia, serum uric acid level and uric acid/creatinine ratio were significantly higher than nonhypoxemic patients (P < .05). Serum uric acid level and serum uric acid/creatinine ratio of Group 1 were significantly higher than Group 2 (P < .001). Serum uric acid level and serum uric acid/creatinine ratio of patients who developed cor pulmonale were significantly higher than patients without cor pulmonale (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Serum uric acid level and uric acid/creatinine ratio were found to be higher in patients with exacerbation of COPD and those developing cor pulmonale. Consequently, it suggests that serum uric acid level and serum uric acid/creatinine ratio may be a stimulating laboratory test for the severity of COPD and the development of COPD induced cor pulmonale.

Excellence in non-small cell lung cancer staging by endobronchial-TBNA: Comparison with PET-CT and surgery.

Objective: To determine the correlation and/or discrepancies between positron emission tomography (PET-CT) findings, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and surgery in the staging of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Material and methods: Data were evaluated retrospectively from a prospective interventional endoscopy database. Positive results with EBUS-TBNA was the first end point and all cytology negatives were confirmed with mediastinoscopy/surgery. Results: Four hundred and eighty three patients were included and 1017 lymph nodes (LNs) were sampled in the study. One hundred and twenty eight LNs were excluded (positive with EBUS-TBNA). Four hundred and sixty five LN (52.3%) were found benign with EBUS-TBNA; however, only 15 of these were confirmed to be malignant by surgery (1.7%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA were 96.5, 100, 100, 96.7 and 98.3%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of PET-CT for maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) 2.5 were 90.1, 29.2, 55.3, 75.4, 59.2%, respectively. A cut-off SUVmax of 5.2 was detected with 74.8% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 82.0% PPV, 77.5% NPV and 79.5% accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) of 0.818, 95% CI 0.791-0.843, p<.001). Conclusion: EBUS is a reliable, repeatable and safe technique with a high diagnostic accuracy and should be performed quickly to avoid superfluous time loss in the staging of lung cancer. Abbreviations PET-CT F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography NSCLC Non-small cell lung cancer EBUS-TBNA Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration SUVmax Maximum standardized uptake value LNs Lymph nodes TTF-1 Thyroid transcription factor-1 H&E Hematoxylin and eosin; Med: Mediastinoscopy VATS Video associated thoracic surgery AUC Area under curve OR Odds ratio CI Confidence intervals.