Adrenocortical Cancer in the Real World: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clinical Features and Management from the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG).

INTRODUCTION: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare yet highly malignant tumor associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to delineate the clinical features, survival patterns, and treatment modalities of ACC, providing insights into the disease's prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 157 ACC patients was performed to assess treatment methodologies, demographic patterns, pathological and clinical attributes, and laboratory results. The data were extracted from the hospital's database. Survival analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, with univariate and multivariate analyses being performed through the log-rank test and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: The median age was 45, and 89.4% had symptoms at the time of diagnosis. The median tumor size was 12 cm. A total of 117 (79.6%) patients underwent surgery. A positive surgical border was detected in 26 (24.1%) patients. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 44.4% of patients. The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 44.3 months. Median OS was found to be 87.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.4-100.2) in stage 2, 25.8 (95% CI 6.5-45.1) months in stage 3, and 13.3 (95% CI 7.0-19.6) months in stage 4 disease. Cox regression analysis identified age, Ki67 value, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and hormonal activity as significant factors associated with survival in patients with nonmetastatic disease. In metastatic disease, only patients who underwent surgery exhibited significantly improved overall survival in univariate analyses. CONCLUSION: ACC is an uncommon tumor with a generally poor prognosis. Understanding the defining prognostic factors in both localized and metastatic diseases is vital. This study underscores age, Ki67 value, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and hormonal activity as key prognostic determinants for localized disease, offering critical insights into the complexities of ACC management and potential avenues for targeted therapeutic interventions.

A phase Ib/II study of eribulin in combination with cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that eribulin combined with cyclophosphamide (EC) would be an effective combination with tolerable toxicity for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC). METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or unresectable ABC with any number of prior lines of therapy were eligible to enroll. In the dose escalation cohort, dose level 0 was defined as eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, and dose level 1 was defined as eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Eribulin was given on days 1 and 8 and cyclophosphamide on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. In the dose expansion cohort, enrollment was expanded at dose level 1. The primary objective was clinical benefit rate (CBR), and secondary objectives were response rate (RR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were identified in the dose escalation cohort (n = 6). In the dose expansion cohort, an additional 38 patients were enrolled for a total of 44 patients, including 31 patients (70.4%) with hormone receptor-positive (HR +)/HER2- disease, 12 patients (27.3%) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and 1 patient (2.3%) with HR + /HER2 + disease. Patients had a median age of 56 years (range 33-82 years), 1 prior line of hormone therapy (range 0-6), and 2 prior lines of chemotherapy (range 0-7). CBR was 79.5% (35/44; 7 partial response, 28 stable disease) and the median DOR was 16.4 weeks (range 13.8-21.1 weeks). Median PFS was 16.4 weeks (95% CI: 13.8-21.1 weeks). The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropenia (47.7%, n = 21). Fourteen of 26 patients (53.8%) with circulating tumor cell (CTC) data were CTC-positive ([Formula: see text] 5 CTC/7.5 mL) at baseline. Median PFS was shorter in patients who were CTC-positive vs. negative (13.1 vs 30.6 weeks, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: In heavily pretreated patients with ABC, treatment with EC resulted in an encouraging CBR of 79.5% and PFS of 16.4 weeks, which compares favorably to single-agent eribulin. Dose reduction and delays were primarily due to neutropenia. The contribution of cyclophosphamide to eribulin remains unclear but warrants further evaluation. NCT01554371.

Advancing immunotherapy in gastroesophageal cancer through rational combinations and biomarkers.

The impact of checkpoint inhibitors on gastroesophageal cancer treatment has been tremendous in the last 2 years. KEYNOTE-590, CHECKMATE 649 and CheckMate 648 are landmark trials that have introduced immunotherapy to the field as first-line therapy, leading to a paradigm change for advanced esophageal and gastric cancer. Chemotherapy in combination with immunotherapy is now the standard of care for first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, esophagogastric junction and stomach. Several new targets and treatments are available for gastroesophageal cancer that are based on the characterization of cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. Biomarker-based therapy selection is critical to optimize outcomes and minimize toxicities, as well as give insight into the optimal timing and sequence of a patient's treatment course.

Doctors have found a better treatment for advanced esophageal and stomach cancer. They combined two types of medicines called immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy. This made more people respond to the treatment and live longer without the cancer getting worse. They use a test called PD-L1 Combined Positive Score to see if the treatment will work but, when looking at the results, there remain challenges and new treatments and tests are still needed for these cancers.

Treatment efficacy of ribociclib or palbociclib plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Background: Ribociclib, palbociclib and abemaciclib are currently approved CDK4/6 inhibitors along with aromatase inhibitors as the first-line standard-of-care for patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The authors report retrospective real-life data for 600 patients with estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who were treated with ribociclib and palbociclib in combination with letrozole. Results & conclusion: The results demonstrated that the combination of palbociclib or ribociclib with letrozole has similar progression-free survival and overall survival benefit in real life for the patient group with similar clinical features. Specifically, endocrine sensitivity may be a factor to be considered in the treatment preference.

Real-world outcomes of pazopanib in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective Turkish oncology group (TOG) study.

AIM: Description of patient characteristics, effectiveness and safety in Turkish patients treated with pazopanib for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter study is based on retrospective review of hospital medical records of patients (≥ 18 years) treated with pazopanib for non-adipocytic metastatic STS at 37 Oncology clinics across Turkey. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated with further analysis of data on the three most common histological subtypes (leiomyosarcoma [LMS], undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma [UPS], synovial sarcoma [SS]) in the cohort. RESULTS: Data of 552 adults (57.6% women, median age: 52 years) were analyzed. DCR and ORR were 43.1% and 30.8%, respectively. Median PFS was 6.7 months and OS was 13.8 months. For LMS, UPS and SS, median PFSs were 6.1, 5.9 and 7.53 months and median OSs were 15.03, 12.87 and 12.27 months, respectively. ECOG ≥ 2 was associated with poor PFS and OS. Liver metastasis was only a factor for progression. Second-line use of pazopanib (vs. front-line) was associated with better PFS, its use beyond third line predicted worse OS. Adverse events (AE) occurred in 82.7% of patients. Most common AEs were fatigue (58.3%) and anorexia (52.3%) which were graded as ≥ 3 in 8.2% and 7.4% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pazopanib is effective and well-tolerated in treatment of non-adipocytic metastatic STS. Its earlier use (at second-line), good performance status may result in better outcomes. Worldwide scientific collaborations are important to gain knowledge on rarer STS subtypes by conducting studies in larger patient populations.

Systemic therapy for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early stage and metastatic breast cancer.

Hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer is defined by the presence of the estrogen receptor and/or the progesterone receptor and the absence of HER2 gene amplification. HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer accounts for 65%-70% of all breast cancers, and incidence increases with increasing age. Treatment varies by stage, and endocrine therapy is the mainstay of treatment in both early stage and late-stage disease. Combinations with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors have reduced distant recurrence in the early stage setting and improved overall survival in the metastatic setting. Chemotherapy is used based on stage and tumor biology in the early stage setting and after endocrine resistance for advanced disease. New therapies, including novel endocrine agents and antibody-drug conjugates, are now changing the treatment landscape. With the availability of new treatment options, it is important to define the optimal sequence of treatment to maximize clinical benefit while minimizing toxicity. In this review, the authors first discuss the pathologic and molecular features of HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer and mechanisms of endocrine resistance. Then, they discuss current and emerging therapies for both early stage and metastatic HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, including treatment algorithms based on current data.

Alpelisib induced interstitial lung disease in a patient with advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung disease interstitial lung disease is a group of respiratory diseases that causes progressive fibrosis. Many of the recently approved oncology drugs are associated with the development of interstitial lung disease as an adverse event. We report an alpelisib-induced interstitial lung disease in a patient with advanced breast cancer. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old breast cancer patient who had multiple bone metastases and had been previously treated with letrozole and ribociclib, started alpelisib and fulvestrant combination upon the development of liver metastases. Her past medical history was not significant except the history of hypertension. She developed fatigue and progressive dyspnea 3, 5 months after starting alpelisib and was hospitalized due to rapidly deteriorating hypoxia within 2-3 days. MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME: Naranjo Algorithm calculated score was 4 (probable Adverse Drug Reaction). Her thoracic computed tomography and angiography scan were consistent with interstitial infiltrate ground-glass appearance. She had no fever. Her workup for COVID-19 (coronavirus disease), other respiratory infectious agents, and pulmonary embolism was negative. There was a rapid clinical and radiologic response to corticosteroid therapy within one week. She was discharged from the hospital with a tapered steroid dose and complete resolution of her lung infiltrations. Alpelisib was discontinued despite radiological partial response in her liver metastases and a decline in her tumor marker. DISCUSSION: Drug-induced interstitial lung disease is usually a diagnosis of exclusion, difficult to identify particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic for patients with cancer. Differential diagnosis includes infectious pneumonia, radiation pneumonitis, diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, pulmonary edema, and pulmonary lymphangitic metastasis.

Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer and the Potential Role of Liquid Biopsy.

Liquid biopsy biomarkers, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), are noninvasive diagnostics that could complement predictive and prognostic tools currently used in the clinic. Recent trials of immunotherapy have shown promise in improving outcomes in a subset of breast cancer patients. Biomarkers could improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors by identifying patients whose cancers are more likely to respond to immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss the current applications of liquid biopsy and emerging technologies for evaluation of immunotherapy response and outcomes in breast cancer. We also provide an overview of the status of immunotherapy in breast cancer.

Emerging treatment strategies for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer that is often associated with an aggressive phenotype and a poor prognosis. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for most patients with metastatic TNBC (mTNBC), but duration of response is often short and median overall survival is only 12-18 months. Therefore, it is critical to identify novel treatment strategies to improve outcomes for these patients. In this review article, we discuss recent advances in treatment strategies for patients with mTNBC including the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates. For each topic, we summarize important preclinical and clinical data, discuss implications for clinical practice, and highlight future research directions.

The role of percutaneous vertebral augmentation in patients with metastatic breast cancer: Literature review including report of two cases.

Patients with metastatic breast cancer are at high risk for developing vertebral compression fractures due to underlying bone metastases and bone density loss. Vertebral augmentation techniques including percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty are techniques used to stabilize compression fractures and improve pain. However, rare complications from these interventions have been observed, including spinal cord compression, nerve root compression, venous cement embolism, and pulmonary cement embolism. These complications pose unique potential challenges for patients with cancer who may already have decreased lung function and potential for venous thromboembolism. In this review, we first describe the role of percutaneous vertebral augmentations in patients with metastatic cancer, with a particular focus on patients with breast cancer. Then, we describe complications of vertebral augmentation in two patients with metastatic breast cancer including long-term symptomatic and radiographic follow-up.

Reshaping Treatment Paradigms for Advanced Renal Cell Cancer Patients and Improving Patient Management : Optimal Management for Renal Cell Cancer Patients.

OPINION STATEMENT: The treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the great success stories in the field of oncology, which was revolutionized with the development of therapies aimed at disrupting crucial pathways. Tumor biology of RCC has provided insight into the disease through elucidation of the role of vascular endothelial growth-factor (VEGF) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Targeted agents against VEGF and mTOR, as well as agents targeting relevant immunomodulatory pathways, have shown clinical benefit for advanced disease. The targeted agents are highly effective in achieving a response and survival, particularly in high-risk patients. These include the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) axitinib and cabozantinib, and programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) nivolumab and pembrolizumab. There is a wealth of evidence investigating different therapeutic options and combinations for first-line treatment of advanced RCC including the CheckMate 214 study, KEYNOTE-426, JAVELIN Renal 101, and CheckMate 9ER. Dual ICI and combination agents targeting the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) and VEGF, began to demonstrate superiority over previously accepted standards in advanced clear-cell RCC. Data from a number of clinical studies are available to help physicians with evidence-based decisions for the sequence of second-line and future treatments for patients with progressive RCC. In this review, we focus on essentials for clinicians treating patients with clear-cell RCC.

CDK4/6 inhibitors: mechanisms of resistance and potential biomarkers of responsiveness in breast cancer.

Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative tumors represent the most common form of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and endocrine therapy has been the mainstay treatment for several decades. Recently, a novel drug class called CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy have remarkably improved the outcome of patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC by targeting the cell cycle machinery and overcoming aspects of endocrine resistance. Several potential cell-cycle-specific and nonspecific mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors have been reported in recent studies. This review discusses potential resistance mechanisms to CDK4/6 inhibitors, the use of biomarkers to guide treatment for HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC and possible approaches to overcome resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Approximately 70% of breast cancers are hormone receptor (HR)-positive. A CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine therapy is the first-line standard of care for patients with HR-positive, HER-2 negative advanced breast cancer. Markers to predict the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer are limited. In this review, we summarize the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer, as well as possible approaches to overcome resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Optimal Treatment for Patients with Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer.

Oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa) can be defined as cancer with a limited number of metastases, typically fewer than 5 lesions, and involves lesions contained within the axial versus the appendicular skeleton. Patients can present with de novo oligometastatic, oligorecurrent, or oligoprogressive PCa. Oligometastatic PCa patients demonstrate considerable improvements in survival outcomes, with a better prognosis than patients with extensive metastatic disease. However, the management of patients that present with nonsymptomatic oligometastatic PCa remains difficult. In the oligometastatic setting, the benefit of local therapies such as prostatectomy and radiotherapy on survival outcomes is an intriguing topic; however, their impact on oncological outcomes is still unknown.

Merkel cell carcinoma in Turkey: A multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but highly aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment outcomes, and survival of MCC cases in Turkey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patients diagnosed with MCC between 1999 and 2018 at twenty different centers in Turkey were included in the study. Patient and tumor characteristics and adjuvant and metastatis treatment outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The median age of totally 89 patients was 70 (26-93). The most common primary location was lower limbs (n = 29, 32.5%). Immunohistochemically, CK20 positivity was present in 59 patients (66.3%). Only two patients had secondary malignancy. The majority of the patients (n = 76, 85.4%) were diagnosed at the localized stage. Surgery was performed for all patients in the early stage, and adjuvant radiotherapy or/and chemotherapy was applied to 52.6% (n = 40) of nonmetastatic patients. The median follow-up was 29 months. Recurrence developed in 21 (27.6%) of the 76 patients who presented with local or regional disease. Two-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 68.1% and 5-year DFS was 62.0% for localized stage. The 5-year DFS was similar for patients receiving adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or sequential chemoradiotherapy) and without adjuvant therapy (P > 0.05). Two-year overall survival in patients who presented with localized disease was 71.3% and 18.5% in metastatic patients (P < 0.001). In the metastatic stage, platinum/etoposide combination was the most preferred combination regimen. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line chemotherapy was 7 months (95% confidence interval: 3.5-10.5 months; standart error: 1.78). CONCLUSIONS: Although MCC is rare in Turkey, the incidence is increasing. Gender, CK20 status, tumor size, lymph node involvement, and adjuvant treatment were not associated with recurrence.

Ezrin is a prognostic biomarker in patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib.

OBJECTIVE: Sunitinib is a novel oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumor and antiangiogenic activities. This study evaluates ezrin expression in sunitinib-treated metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients and elucidates its role as a possible marker for survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expression of ezrin was measured by immunohistochemistry in 80 patients with ccRCC treated by first-line sunitinib between January 2007 and June 2012. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used for analysis of progression-free survival and overall survival (OS), and a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was employed to identify factors with an independent effect on the survival. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, liver metastasis (P = 0.018; hazard ratio [HR]: 3.707 (1.257-10.931) and overexpression of ezrin (P = 0.006; HR: 2.993 (1.373-6.523 95% confidence interval) were remained significant factors influencing OS. Overexpression of ezrin in the patients who had progressed in the first 3 months was higher than in the patients who had progressed after 3 months (P = 0.003). The median OS was longer in patients with low levels of ezrin expression (27 months) compared to patients overexpressing ezrin (12 months) (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first study in the literature showing that ezrin status is related with prognosis in patients with metastatic ccRCC.

Understanding relevant immune mechanisms in gastrointestinal oncology.

Rapid and successful drug development has resulted in multiple treatment options for gastrointestinal cancer, requiring careful decision making for individual patients. The general theme in modern immunology is that the field is moving beyond establishing the fundamental principles of immune response mechanisms to applying these propositions to understand human diseases and develop new therapies. Immunotherapy has contributed enormously to cancer treatments with a virtual explosion in novel therapeutics including checkpoint inhibitors and other recently developed immunomodulators and the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Although the majority of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are generally considered poorly immunogenic, clinical trials have revealed that some of the patients with various gastrointestinal cancers are highly responsive to immune checkpoint inhibition-based therapies. We paid special attention to the clinical relevance of immunology and emphasized how newly developed therapies work, including what their strengths and pitfalls are. This review aims to enhance the interest of practitioners in the many specialties and subspecialties that the discipline influences and to assist them in understanding this increasing complexity.

Possible Association of PER2/PER3 Variable Number Tandem Repeat Polymorphism Variants with Susceptibility and Clinical Characteristics in Pancreatic Cancer.

Objective: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a serious disease with poor outcomes, and its prevalence has been increasing steadily. The circadian rhythm (CR) is involved in multiple physiological events and maintains homeostasis. Alterations in the CR elevate the risk of developing cancer. The present case-control research was carried out to estimate the possible association between PERIOD2/PERIOD3 (PER2/PER3) gene variable number tandem repeat polymorphism (VNTR) variants and PC in the Turkish population. Materials and Methods: A total of 198 subjects (78 patients with PC and 120 healthy controls) were enrolled in this work. Genomic DNA was collected from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and genotypic analyses was performed using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. Odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated using the χ2 test. Results: The frequency of the 4R (4 repeats)/3R (3 repeats), 3R/3R genotypes, and 3R allele of PER2 VNTR in patients with PC was significantly higher than in the control group (p = 0003, p = 0.00004, respectively). PER2 VNTR 4/5 genotype was related to perineural invasion (p = 0.040). The genotype and allele distribution of PER3 VNTR variant did not show any statistical difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The PER2/PER3 VNTR 4/5-4R/3R combined genotype was increased in the patient group (p = 0.013), while 4/5-4R/4R combined genotype was increased in the control group (p = 0.0001). Conclusions: Our work has indicated that PER2 VNTR 3R allele may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of PC in Turkish patients, which may become a useful marker for predicting the development of PC. Furthermore, the PER2 VNTR genotype seems to be related to perineural invasion in PC.

The DNA damaging revolution.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is a nuclear enzyme that plays a critical role in the repair of single-strand DNA damage via the base excision repair pathway. PARP inhibitors have substantial single-agent antitumor activity by inducing synthetic lethality. They have also emerged as promising anticancer targeted therapies, especially in tumors harboring deleterious germline or somatic breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations. PARP inhibition produces single-strand DNA breaks, which may be repaired by homologous recombination, a process partially dependent on BRCA1 and BRCA2. The PARP inhibitors olaparib, veliparib, talazoparib, niraparib, and rucaparib have predominantly been studied in patients with breast or ovarian cancers associated with deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the role of PARP inhibitors alone and in combination with other therapies, including selective inhibitors against key targets involved in the DNA damage response. In this review we summarize the use of PARP inhibitors in various tumor types, as well as possible approaches for overcoming resistance to PARP inhibitors.